RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies indicated a complex association between frailty and arthritis. AIMS: To investigate the genetic causal relationship between the frailty index and the risk of common arthritis. METHODS: We performed a large-scale Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess frailty index associations with the risk of common arthritis in the UK Biobank (UKB), and the FinnGen Biobank. Summary genome-wide association statistics for frailty, as defined by the frailty index, and common arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), psoriatic arthritis (PSA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The inverse-variance weight (IVW) method served as the primary MR analysis. Heterogeneity testing and sensitivity analysis were also conducted. RESULTS: Our results denoted a genetic association between the frailty index with an increased risk of OA, the odds ratio (OR)IVW in the UKB was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.05; P = 0.007), and ORIVW was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.16-2.07; P = 0.003) in the FinnGen. For RA, the ORIVW from UKB and FinnGen were 1.03 (1.01-1.05, P = 0.006) and 4.57 (1.35-96.49; P = 0.025) respectively. For PSA, the frailty index was associated with PSA (ORIVW = 4.22 (1.21-14.67), P = 0.023) in FinnGen, not in UKB (P > 0.05). However, no association was found between frailty index and AS (P > 0.05). These results remained consistent across sensitivity assessments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a potential causal relationship that genetic predisposition to frailty index was associated with the risk of arthritis, especially RA, OA, and PSA, not but AS. Our findings enrich the existing body of knowledge on the subject matter.
Assuntos
Fragilidade , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , Humanos , Fragilidade/genética , Artrite/genética , Artrite/epidemiologia , Osteoartrite/genética , Osteoartrite/epidemiologia , Artrite Reumatoide/genética , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Artrite Psoriásica/genética , Artrite Psoriásica/epidemiologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Quality is the most important factor in satisfaction. However, the existing satisfaction index model of urban and rural resident-based basic medical insurance scheme (SIM_URRBMI) lacks the segmentation of perceived quality elements, it couldn't provide a reference for quality improvement and satisfaction promotion. This study aims to construct a revised SIM_URRBMI that can accurately and detailly measure perceived quality and provide feasible and scientific suggestions for improving the satisfaction of urban and rural residents' basic medical insurance scheme (URRBMI) in China. METHODS: Based on the theoretical framework of the American Customer Satisfaction Index, the elements of perceived quality were refined through literature review and expert consultation, and a pool of alternative measurement variables was formed. A three-stage randomized stratified cluster sampling was adopted. The main decision makers of URRBMI in the families of primary school students in 8 primary schools in Changsha were selected. Both the classic test theory and the item response theory were used for measurement variables selection. The reliability and validity of the model were tested by partial least squares (PLS)-related methods. RESULTS: A total of 1909 respondents who had URRBMI for their children were investigated. The SIM_URRBMI1.0 consists of 11 latent variables and 28 measurement variables with good reliability and validity. Among the three explanatory variables of public satisfaction, perceived quality had the largest total effect (path coefficient) (0.737). The variable with the greatest effect among the five first-order latent variables on perceived quality was the quality of the medical insurance policy (0.472). CONCLUSIONS: The SIM_URRBMI1.0 consists of 28 measurement variables and 11 latent variables. It is a reliable, valid, and standard satisfaction measurement tool for URRBMI with good prediction ability for public satisfaction. In addition, the model provides an accurate evaluation of the perceived quality, which will greatly help with performance improvement diagnosis. The most critical aspects of satisfaction improvement are optimizing the scope and proportion of reimbursement as well as setting appropriate level of deductible and capitation of URRBMI.
Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Satisfação Pessoal , Criança , China , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , População RuralRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There have been few studies on satisfaction with integrated basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents (URRBMI), and satisfaction with URRBMI is not very high because of the complexity of its policies and differences among the insured. The aim of the present study was to explore the factors that influence satisfaction with URRBMI in China and to provide scientific suggestions to the government for how to effectively manage and improve the policy. METHODS: An explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research was used. A quantitative research using a three-stage stratified cluster sampling method was used to randomly select the guardians of pupils who participated in URRBMI (n = 1335). The quantitative research was conducted to calculate the latent variables' scores and path coefficients between latent variables using SmartPLS3.0. With public trust, public satisfaction, and perceived quality as the target variables, important-performance analysis (IPA) was used to explore the important but underperforming factors, which were the key elements to improving satisfaction with URRBMI. A purposeful sampling strategy according to satisfaction level was used to obtain qualitative research subjects from among the quantitative research subjects. A qualitative research was conducted using semi-structured interviews, and the thematic analysis method was used to summarize the interview data. RESULTS: The three strongest paths were perceived quality to public satisfaction, with a total effect of 0.737 (t = 41.270, P < 0.001); perceived quality to perceived value, with a total effect of 0.676 (t = 31.964, P < 0.001); and public satisfaction to public trust, with a total effect of 0.634 (t = 31.305, P < 0.001). IPA revealed that public satisfaction and perceived quality were key factors for public trust and that perceived quality was of high importance for public satisfaction but had low performance. The policy quality was a determining factor for perceived quality. The qualitative research results showed that the most unsatisfactory aspect for the insured was the policy quality. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that improving quality is key to improving public satisfaction with and public trust in URRBMI. The government should improve the compensation level by broadening the channel of financing for the URRBMI fund, rationally formulating reimbursement standards, and broadening the scope of the drug catalog and the medical treatment projects. The government should establish a stable financing growth mechanism and effective methods of providing health education to improve public satisfaction and public trust.