Clinical Outcome Comparison between CT-Guided Versus all MRI-Guided Scenarios in Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institute Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is the standard of care for patients with cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes and adverse effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients with cervical cancer treated using external beam radiotherapy followed by IGABT from 2012 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. CT-guided IGABT was compared with the three modes of MRI-guided IGABT: pre-brachytherapy (MRI Pre-BT) without applicator insertion for fusion, planning MRI with applicator in-place in at least 1 fraction (MRI ≥1Fx), and MRI in every fraction (MRI EveryFx). Patient characteristics, oncologic outcomes, and late radiation toxicity were analyzed using descriptive, survival, and correlation statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 354 patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 60 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 61.5%, 65.2%, 54.4%, and 63.7% with CT-guided, MRI PreBT, MRI ≥1Fx, and MRI EveryFx IGABT, respectively with no significant differences (p = 0.522). The 5-year local control (LC) rates were 92.1%, 87.8%, 80.7%, and 76.5% (p = 0.133), respectively, with a significant difference observed between the CT-guided and MRI ≥1Fx (p = 0.018). The grade 3-4 late gastrointestinal toxicity rates were 6% in the CT-guided, MRI ≥1Fx, and MRI EveryFx, and 8% in MRI PreBT. The grade 3-4 late genitourinary toxicity rates were 4% in the CT-guided, 2% in MRI PreBT, 1% in MRI ≥1Fx, and none in MRI EveryFx. No significant differences were observed in the oncologic and toxicity outcomes among MRI PreBT, MRI ≥1Fx, and MRI EveryFx. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided IGABT yielded an acceptable 5-year OS, LC, and toxicity profile compared with all MRI scenarios and is a potentially feasible option in resource-limited settings.

Treatment options in bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma.

Cervical cancer is the most common female cancer in the developing countries. Treatments of bulky stage IB cervical cancer have been challenged as the local control is relatively poor compared to smaller stage I disease, whether treated by radical surgery or irradiation. The treatment options are definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy or radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. The treatment decision is based on the patients' status and preferences, tumor characteristics, and experiences of clinician. This study will review and compare the treatment modalities and rationales of a combination of treatment including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma.

Hyperthermia conjunction with radiation therapy in breast cancer with chest wall recurrence: a preliminary report.

1. Hyperthermia is a very effective and valuable tool which produces a high degree of response in chest wall recurrent breast cancer, especially in cases, where curative doses of radiation could not be achieved, due to previous radiation treatment. 2. Hyperthermia once a week is sufficient to produce the enhancement of radiation neither increasing the burden to the patient nor increasing the workload to the department. 3. The effective radiation dose which causes no severe complication is 50 Gy in a small tumor and 60 Gy in a large tumor. 4. In small satellite nodules, whole chest wall irradiation should be considered to prevent recurrence in the adjacent area. 5. An air cooling system is effective and suitable for an ulcerative lesion. Further randomized study for long term local control and survival should be explored.