Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 35(3): 469-482, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388650

RESUMO

Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and postoperative complications have not been evaluated have not been compared to standard LPV in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Thirty-nine patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were enrolled in this study. In the study group (SG) optimal PEEP was determined by a decremental titration procedure and defined as the PEEP value resulting the highest static pulmonary compliance. In the control group (CG) PEEP was set to 6 cmH2O. Primary endpoints were intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange parameters. Secondary outcomes were perioperative procalcitonin kinetics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Optimal PEEP levels (median = 10, range: 8-14 cmH2O), PaO2/FiO2 (451.24 ± 121.78 mmHg vs. 404.15 ± 115.87 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static pulmonary compliance (52.54 ± 13.59 ml cmH2O-1 vs. 45.22 ± 9.13 ml cmH2O-1, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while driving pressure (8.26 ± 1.74 cmH2O vs. 9.73 ± 4.02 cmH2O, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower in the SG as compared to the CG. No significant intergroup differences were found in procalcitonin kinetics (P = 0.076). Composite outcome results indicated a non-significant reduction of postoperative complications in the SG. Intraoperative PEEP-optimization resulted in significant improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics as compared to standard LPV. Whether these have any effect on short and long term outcomes require further investigations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02931409.


Assuntos
Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Mecânica Respiratória , Humanos , Pulmão , Respiração Artificial , Fenômenos Fisiológicos Respiratórios
2.
Trials ; 18(1): 375, 2017 08 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28800778

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation during major abdominal surgery commonly develop pulmonary atelectasis and/or hyperdistention of the lungs. Recent studies show benefits of lung-protective mechanical ventilation with the use of low tidal volumes, a moderate level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment maneuvers during general anesthesia, even in patients with healthy lungs. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of intraoperative lung-protective mechanical ventilation, using individualized PEEP values, on postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response. METHODS/DESIGN: A total number of 40 patients with bladder cancer undergoing open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (ileal conduit or orthotopic bladder substitute) will be enrolled and randomized into a study (SG) and a control group (CG). Standard lung-protective ventilation with a PEEP of 6 cmH2O will be applied in the CG and an optimal PEEP value determined during a static pulmonary compliance (Cstat)-directed PEEP titration procedure will be used in the SG. Low tidal volumes (6 mL/Kg ideal bodyweight) and a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5 will be applied in both groups. After surgery both groups will receive standard postoperative management. Primary endpoints are postoperative pulmonary complications and serum procalcitonin kinetics during and after surgery until the third postoperative day. Secondary and tertiary endpoints will be: organ dysfunction as monitored by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, in-hospital stay, 28-day and in-hospital mortality. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the possible benefits or disadvantages of an individualized lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy during open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion regarding postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02931409 . Registered on 5 October 2016.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Inflamação/prevenção & controle , Atelectasia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária , Biomarcadores/sangue , Calcitonina/sangue , Protocolos Clínicos , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hungria , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/etiologia , Inflamação/mortalidade , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Complacência Pulmonar , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia , Atelectasia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Atelectasia Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos , Derivação Urinária/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA