The state of diabetes care and obstacles to better care in Aceh, Indonesia: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Cardio-metabolic diseases are a major cause of death worldwide, including in Indonesia, where diabetes is one of the most critical diseases for the health system to manage. METHODS: We describe the characteristics, levels of control, health behavior, and diabetes-related complications of diabetes patients in Aceh, Indonesia. We use baseline data and blood testing from a randomized-controlled trial. We conducted semi-structured interviews with eight health providers from Posbindu and Prolanis programs that target diabetes and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We also conducted three focus group discussions with 24 diabetes patients about their experiences of living with diabetes and the existing support programs. RESULTS: The blood tests revealed average HbA1c levels indicative of poor glycemic control in 75.8 percent of patients and only 20.3 percent were free from any symptoms. Our qualitative findings suggest that patients are diagnosed after diabetes-related symptoms manifest, and that they find it hard to comply with treatment recommendations and lifestyle advice. The existing programs related to NCDs are not tailored to their needs. CONCLUSION: We identify the need to improve diabetes screening to enable earlier treatment and achieve better control of the disease. Among diagnosed patients, there are widespread beliefs about diabetes medication and alternative forms of treatment that need to be addressed in a respectful dialogue between healthcare professionals and patients. Current diabetes screening, treatment and management programs should be revised to meet the needs of the affected population and to better respond to the increasing burden of this disease.

Mothers' experiences of quality of care and potential benefits of implementing the WHO safe childbirth checklist: a case study of Aceh Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to mitigate missed opportunities to provide high-quality care, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) to support health providers perform essential tasks. Our qualitative study is a baseline assessment of quality of care (QoC) perceived by mothers who gave birth at health facilities aiming to highlight areas where implementing the SCC can potentially improve the QoC as well as areas that are not part of the SCC yet require improvement. METHODS: Assessing the overall experience of care, our qualitative study focuses on 8 out of 29 items in the checklist that are related to the personal interactions between healthcare provider and mothers. Using a set of semi-structured questions, we interviewed 26 new mothers who gave institutional births in Aceh province in Indonesia. RESULTS: Our findings revealed some gaps where implementing the SCC can potentially improve safety and QoC. They include communicating danger signs at critical points during birth and after discharge, encouraging breastfeeding, and providing mothers with information on family planning. Moreover, taking a qualitative approach allowed us to identify additional aspects such as need for clarity at the point of admission, maintaining dignity, and protecting mothers' rights in the decision-making process to be also essential for better QoC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the need to actively listen to and engage with the experiences of women in the adaptation and implementation of the checklist. While our findings indicate that implementing the SCC has the potential to improve the quality of maternal care and overall birth experience, a more holistic understanding of the lived experiences of women and the dynamics of their interactions with health facilities, care providers, and their birth companions can complement the implementation of the checklist.

Improving post-traumatic growth of disaster survivors: An integrative literature review.

BACKGROUND: The psychological aspect is one of the important aspects of the affected disaster survivors. The change in the disaster management paradigm is one reason for the need to change interventions that previously only focused on handling posttraumatic distress syndrome into interventions to increase post-traumatic growth to prevent post-disaster psychological disorders. This review aims to synthesise recent research to develop further explanations regarding potential strategies to improve the post-traumatic growth of disaster survivors. METHOD: This is an integrative review of previous studies. Articles were identified via SCOPUS, EMBASE, JSTOR, PROQUEST, MEDLINE and grey literature (Google Scholar). All subject-relevant literature from 2000 to 2022 was identified. This review included quantitative and qualitative studies and literature reviews, with criteria: all types of interventions used to improve the post-traumatic growth of disaster survivors and potential influencing factors that may affect the implementation as well as other relevant outcomes. RESULT: From 400 initial search studies, 27 studies (24 quantitative. one qualitative, and two mixed methods) were eligible to be included in the review. Some factors promoting post-traumatic growth included religious coping, culture, social support, the severity of the trauma, coping strategies, education level and work satisfaction. CONCLUSION: By systematically exploring the factors that foster post-traumatic growth of disaster survival, this integrative review will give fundamental information to develop an intervention that prevents or minimises the psychological impacts of a disaster towards survivors.