Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Forensic Sci ; 65(4): 1072-1084, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134501

RESUMO

The reporting of a likelihood ratio (LR) calculated from probabilistic genotyping software has become more popular since 2015 and has allowed for the use of more complex mixtures at court. The meaning of "inconclusive" LRs and how to communicate the significance of low LRs at court is now important. We present a method here using the distribution of LRs obtained from nondonors. The nondonor distribution is useful for examining calibration and discrimination for profiles that have produced LRs less than about 104 . In this paper, a range of mixed DNA profiles of varying quantity were constructed and the LR distribution considering the minor contributor for a number of nondonors was compared to the expectation given a calibrated system. It is demonstrated that conditioning genotypes should be used where reasonable given the background information to decrease the rate of nondonor LRs above 1. In all 17 cases examined, the LR for the minor donor was higher than the nondonor LRs, and in 12 of the 17 cases, the 99.9 percentile of the nondonor distribution was lower when appropriate conditioning information was used. The output of the tool is a graph that can show the position of the LR for the person of interest set against the nondonor LR distribution. This may assist communication between scientists and the court.


Assuntos
Impressões Digitais de DNA/métodos , DNA/genética , Funções Verossimilhança , Comunicação , Impressões Digitais de DNA/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Genética Forense/legislação & jurisprudência , Genética Forense/métodos , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Repetições de Microssatélites
2.
Forensic Sci Int Genet ; 35: 50-56, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29660688

RESUMO

Modern probabilistic genotyping (PG) software is capable of modeling stutter as part of the profile weighting statistic. This allows for peaks in stutter positions to be considered as allelic or stutter or both. However, prior to running any sample through a PG calculator, the examiner must first interpret the sample, considering such things as artifacts and number of contributors (NOC or N). Stutter can play a major role both during the assignment of the number of contributors, and the assessment of inclusion and exclusion. If stutter peaks are not filtered when they should be, it can lead to the assignment of an additional contributor, causing N contributors to be assigned as N + 1. If peaks in the stutter position of a major contributor are filtered using a threshold that is too high, true alleles of minor contributors can be lost. Until now, the software used to view the electropherogram stutter filters are based on a locus specific model. Combined stutter peaks occur when a peak could be the result of both back stutter (stutter one repeat shorter than the allele) and forward stutter (stutter one repeat unit larger than the allele). This can challenge existing filters. We present here a novel stutter filter model in the ArmedXpert™ software package that uses a linear model based on allele for back stutter and applies an additive filter for combined stutter. We term this the allele specific stutter model (AM). We compared AM with a traditional model based on locus specific stutter filters (termed LM). This improved stutter model has the benefit of: Instances of over filtering were reduced 78% from 101 for a traditional model (LM) to 22 for the allele specific model (AM) when scored against each other. Instances of under filtering were reduced 80% from 85 (LM) to 17 (AM) when scored against ground truth mixtures.


Assuntos
Alelos , DNA/genética , Genética Forense/métodos , Software , Impressões Digitais de DNA , Eletroforese , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Repetições de Microssatélites , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
3.
Forensic Sci Int Genet ; 12: 69-76, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24905335

RESUMO

The original CODIS database based on 13 core STR loci has been overwhelmingly successful for matching suspects with evidence. Yet there remain situations that argue for inclusion of more loci and increased discrimination. The PowerPlex(®) Fusion System allows simultaneous amplification of the following loci: Amelogenin, D3S1358, D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, D13S317, Penta E, D16S539, D18S51, D2S1338, CSF1PO, Penta D, TH01, vWA, D21S11, D7S820, D5S818, TPOX, DYS391, D8S1179, D12S391, D19S433, FGA, and D22S1045. The comprehensive list of loci amplified by the system generates a profile compatible with databases based on either the expanded CODIS or European Standard Set (ESS) requirements. Developmental validation testing followed SWGDAM guidelines and demonstrated the quality and robustness of the PowerPlex(®) Fusion System across a number of variables. Consistent and high-quality results were compiled using data from 12 separate forensic and research laboratories. The results verify that the PowerPlex(®) Fusion System is a robust and reliable STR-typing multiplex suitable for human identification.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Genéticas , Genética Forense , Humanos , Repetições de Microssatélites
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA