Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Transdermal Fentanyl and Oral Oxycodone in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Cancer Pain.

In Japan, a low-dose transdermal fentanyl (TDF; 0.5 mg) has been approved to address pain in opioid-naïve patients with cancer; however, efficacy and safety data are lacking. To determine the efficacy and safety of TDF, patients with opioid-naïve cancer pain prescribed TDF (0.5 mg/d) and oral oxycodone sustained-release formulation (OXY) 10 mg/d were extracted from electronic medical and nursing records. Overall, 40 and 101 subjects were analyzed in the TDF and OXY groups, respectively. Compared with baseline (median [minimum, maximum]) values, changes in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score on days 1, 3, and 7 post-administration were as follows: TDF (0 [-5, 4]) and OXY (-1.0 [-8, 3]); TDF (-1.5 [-6, 3]) and OXY (-2.0 [-8, 4]); and TDF (-2.0[-6, 3]) and OXY (-3.0[-8, 5]), respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups on days 1 and 3; however, the change in the NRS on day 7 was significantly higher in the OXY group than that in the TDF group. Regarding adverse events, nausea occurred in 12.5 and 13.9% of patients in the TDF and OXY groups, respectively, while 12.5% of TDF- and 10.9% of OXY-treated patients experienced somnolence, revealing similar occurrence in both groups. However, constipation was more common in the OXY group (TDF: 50.0%, OXY: 71.3%). No serious adverse events (e.g., respiratory depression) were observed in either group. Low-dose TDF (0.5 mg), available only in Japan, showed comparable efficacy and safety to OXY (10 mg/d) and can be a first choice for opioid-naïve patients with cancer pain.

A simple scoring method to predict augmented renal clearance in haematologic malignancies.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Augmented renal clearance (ARC; hyperfiltration with over 130 mL/min/1.73 m2 of creatinine clearance (CLcr )) commonly occurs in critically ill patients. Recent reports indicate that ARC also occurs in haematologic malignancies. However, the risk factors for ARC in haematologic malignancies remain unknown, and there is no established method to predict ARC in haematologic malignancies. Our objective was to explore the risk factors for ARC retrospectively and develop a scoring method to predict ARC. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted at the Sendai Medical Center (Sendai, Japan); 133 patients (April 2017-March 2019) and 41 patients (April-November 2019) with haematopoietic tumours who were administered vancomycin were enrolled in the analysis and validation cohorts, respectively. To define ARC, we calculated the vancomycin serum concentration when CLcr  = 130 mL/min/1.73 m2 using a one-compartment model. Patients with ARC were defined as those whose actual concentration of vancomycin remained lower than the calculated concentration. Using the analysis cohort, we explored risk factors of ARC and developed a scoring method to predict ARC in haematologic malignancies. The reproducibility of the scoring system was demonstrated using the validation cohort. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Through multivariate analysis, young age (P < .001), leukaemia (P = .001) and low serum creatinine (P < .001) were identified as risk factors. According to this result, we established the ARC detection method: age ≤ 50 years = 3 points, 50 years < age ≤65 years = 1 point, leukaemia = 2 points, low SCr = 2 points; patients scoring ≥ 5 points represent the ARC high-risk group. Using this scoring system, we could detect ARC with a sensitivity and specificity of 60.0% and 89.7% in the analysis cohort and 90.0% and 90.9% in the validation cohort, respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our scoring method could predict ARC in haematologic malignancies and is useful as a simple screening tool for ARC.

Effect of renal function on neutrophil decreases following eribulin administration.

BACKGROUND: Eribulin therapy has recently attracted attention from various viewpoints, including quality of life, and is considered a standard therapy for inoperable or recurrent breast cancer. Although a reduction in renal function reportedly decreases total eribulin clearance, its association with dose-limiting toxicity and the reduction of neutrophils remain unclear. AIM: This study was aimed at analyzing the association between decreased renal function prior to eribulin administration and the occurrence of neutrophil reduction and time to treatment failure in patients with breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively assessed patients with breast cancer, who underwent eribulin therapy between July 2011 and March 2018. Multivariate analysis revealed creatinine clearance <70 mL/min and serum albumin levels <3.9 mg/dL as predictive factors for neutrophil reduction. Even on increasing the relative dose intensity by these factors, no difference in time to treatment failure was observed, suggesting that treatment efficacy is potentially unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: For continuous eribulin therapy, eribulin may need to be administered to individual patients in accordance with renal function and albumin levels before treatment initiation.