Clarification of clinical features of interstitial lung disease induced by irinotecan based on postmarketing surveillance data and spontaneous reports.

Irinotecan-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) requires accurate diagnosis, followed by prompt and appropriate treatment. This study was conducted to compile information and imaging data to define the characteristics of irinotecan-induced ILD. Searches were performed on information collected for a drug reexamination application and on data from spontaneous safety reports submitted to Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited. These database searches revealed 153 cases of serious ILD that occurred in association with irinotecan therapy, and which were reported as adverse drug reactions. Computed tomographic findings obtained after the onset of ILD were categorized based on four typical patterns. A total of 66 patients (including 15 for whom a relationship between death and serious ILD could not be excluded; incidence of serious ILD: 0.74%; death rate of ILD: 0.17%) were detected during the postmarketing surveillance along with 87 patients (22 deaths) that were identified from spontaneous reports. Within 16 weeks of starting treatment, 80.7% of the patients developed ILD. A total of 61.3% of the cases treated using steroids responded to the steroid therapy. These results indicate that there is no specific clinical or imaging feature associated with ILD related to irinotecan and that the prognosis of ILD related to irinotecan was poor in patients with preexisting ILD. The relative risk calculated for the association between preexisting ILD and death was 2.25 (P=0.29). During irinotecan treatments, patients need to be carefully observed for symptoms, especially at 16 weeks after starting treatment. In addition, when patients are receiving this type of therapy, they also need to undergo chest imaging studies.

[Study on the safety and efficacy of sitafloxacin--results of the use-results survey].

Sitafloxacin (STFX, Gracevit 50 mg, fine granules 10%), a new quinolone antibacterial agent, was approved in January 2008, and the use-results survey was performed for 2 years from December 2008 to November 2010. In total, 3558 case cards were collected from 287 medical institutions and 3331 cases were subjected to a safety evaluation and 3225 were subjected to an efficacy evaluation. Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.44% (148/3331 cases). Major ADRs were diarrhea (55 cases) and hepatic function disorders (39 cases), and the incidences were 1.65% and 1.17%, respectively. Serious ADRs were observed in 5 cases (7 episodes); gastrointestinal haemorrhage, hepatic function abnormal, white blood cell count decreased, drug eruption, hypoglycemia, pneumonia, and superinfection in one case each. Efficacy rate was 92.9% (2997/3225 patients) in total with a range of 91.4 to 97.8% by type of infection such as respiratory tract and urinary tract. Eradication rate of indicated strains was 91.5% (808/883 strains) including Gram-positive bacteria at 92.3% (310/336 strains), Gram-negative bacteria at 90.7% (458/505 strains), anaerobes at 100.0% (28/28 strains) and atypical bacteria at 85.7% (12/14 strains). In conclusion, this use-results survey confirmed that STFX is a useful antibacterial agent with no serious problems in its safety profile and efficacy rates of over 90% against all infections.