Scheduled methadone reduces overall opioid requirements after pediatric posterior spinal fusion: A single center retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Posterior spinal fusion to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is associated with significant postoperative pain. Different modalities have been reported as part of a multimodal analgesic plan. Intravenous methadone acts as a mu-opioid agonist and N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist and has been shown to have opioid-sparing effects. Our multimodal approach has included hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with and without preincisional methadone, and recently postoperative methadone without a PCA. AIMS: We hypothesized that a protocol including scheduled postoperative methadone doses would reduce opioid usage compared to PCA-based strategy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between 2015 and 2020 was performed. There were three patient groups: Group PCA received a hydromorphone PCA without methadone; Group PCA + Methadone received preincisional methadone and a hydromorphone PCA; Group Methadone received preincisional methadone, scheduled postoperative methadone, and no PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid use over 72 h. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, sedation scores, and length of stay. RESULTS: Group PCA (n = 26) consumed 0.33 mg/kg (95% CI [0.28, 0.38]) total hydromorphone equivalents, Group PCA + methadone (n = 39) 0.30 mg/kg (95% CI [0.25, 0.36]) total hydromorphone equivalents, and Group methadone (n = 22) 0.18 mg/kg (95% CI [0.15, 0.21]) total hydromorphone equivalents (p = .00096). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: A protocol with intraoperative and scheduled postoperative methadone doses resulted in a 45% reduction in opioid usage compared to a PCA-based protocol with similar analgesia after pediatric posterior spinal fusion.

Inter- and intra-observer repeatability of aortic annulus measurements on screening CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): Implications for appropriate device sizing.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate intra- and inter-observer repeatability of aortic annulus CT measurements for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by readers with different levels of experience and evaluate the impact of different multi-reader paradigms to improve prosthesis sizing. METHODS: 82 TAVR screening CTAs were evaluated twice by three raters with six (R1 = radiologist), three (R2 = 3D-laboratory technician) or zero (R3 = medical student) years of experience. Results were translated into hypothetical TAVR size recommendations. Intra- and inter-observer repeatability between single readers and three different multi-reader paradigms ([A]: two readers, [B]: three readers, or [C]: two readers + an optional third reader) were evaluated. RESULTS: Intra-observer variability did not differ significantly (range: 50.1-67.8mm2). However, we found significant differences in mean inter-observer variance (p = 0.001). Multi-reader paradigms led to significantly increased precision (lower variability) for scenarios [B] and [C] (p = 0.03, p < 0.05). Compared to single readers, all multi-reader strategies clearly lowered the rate of discrepant device size categorization between repeated measurements (22-26% to 5-10%). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic annulus CT measurements for TAVR are highly reproducible. Multi-reader strategies provide higher precision than evaluations from single readers with different levels of experience and could effectively be implemented with two readers and an optional third reader (Paradigm C) in a clinical setting.