RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In minimally invasive esophagectomy, a circular stapled anastomosis is common, but no evidence exists investigating the role of the specific localization of the anastomosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an esophagogastrostomy on the anterior or posterior wall of the gastric conduit on the postoperative outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All oncologic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis procedures, performed between 2017 and 2022, were included in this study. The cohort was divided in two groups: a) intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy on the anterior gastric wall of the conduit (ANT, n = 285, 65%) and b) on the posterior gastric wall (POST, n = 154, 35%). Clinicopathological parameters and short-term outcomes were compared between both groups by retrieving data from the prospective database. RESULTS: Overall, 439 patients were included, baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, there was a higher proportion of squamous cell carcinoma in ANT (22.8% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.043). A higher rate of robotic-assisted procedures was observed in ANT (71.2% vs. 49.4%). Anastomotic leakage rate was similar in both groups (ANT 10.4% vs. POST 9.8%, P = 0.851). Overall complication rate and Clavien-Dindo > 3 complication rates were higher in POST compared to ANT: 53.2% vs. 40% (P = 0.008) and 36.9% vs. 25.7% (P = 0.014), respectively. The rate of delayed gastric emptying (20.1% vs. 7.4%, P < 0.001) and nosocomial pneumonia (22.1% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.05) was significantly higher in POST. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic circular stapled anastomosis may benefit from esophagogastrostomy on the anterior wall of the gastric conduit, in terms of lower rate of delayed gastric emptying.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Gastroparesia , Humanos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Gastroparesia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
Trauma-related esophageal injuries (TEIs) are a rare but highly lethal condition. The presentation of TEIs is very diverse depending on the location and mechanism of injury (blunt vs. penetrating), as well as the presence or absence of concurrent injuries. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to delineate the clinical features impacting TEI management. A systematic review of the Medline, Embase, and web of science databases was undertaken for studies reporting on patients with TEIs. A random effects model was employed in the meta-analysis of aggregated data. Eleven studies, incorporating 4605 patients, were included, with a pooled mortality rate of 19% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-25%). Penetrating injuries were 34% more likely to occur (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89, P = 0.01), predominantly in the neck compartment. Surgery was employed in 53% of cases (95% CI 32-73%), with 68% of patients having associated injuries (95% CI 43-94%). In terms of choice of surgical repair technique, primary suture repair was most frequently reported, irrespective of injury location. Postoperative drainage was employed in 27% of the cases and was more common following repair of thoracic esophageal injuries. The estimated dependence on mechanical ventilation was 5.91 days (95% CI 5.1-6.72 days), while the length of stay in the intensive care unit averaged 7.89 days (95% CI 7.14-8.65 days). TEIs are uncommon injuries in trauma patients, associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. Open suture repair of ensuing esophageal defects is by large the most employed approach, while stenting may be indicated in carefully selected cases.
Assuntos
Esôfago , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Humanos , Esôfago/lesões , Esôfago/cirurgia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Drenagem/métodos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Técnicas de Sutura , Idoso , AdolescenteRESUMO
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) represents an established approach for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of our technique for performing the intrathoracic anastomosis during RAMIE.All the procedures were performed by the same surgeon using the same technique for performing the intrathoracic anastomosis. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG); the primary outcome was the evaluation of the feasibility and safety of our technique. From 2016 to 2021, 204 patients underwent Ivor Lewis RAMIE at our Center. Two patients (0.9%) were converted during the thoracic phase. The anastomosis was completed in all the other patients forming complete anastomotic rings. The median duration for the robotic-assisted thoracoscopic phase was 224 minutes. Twenty-two of the RAMIE-Ivor Lewis patients had an anastomotic leakage (10.3%). The overall 90-day postoperative mortality was 1.9%. The procedure resulted to be feasible and safe in our cohort of patients.
Assuntos
Boehmeria , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodosRESUMO
Modern Multimodal Concepts for Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Abstract. In case of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma, the clear recommendation for multimodal therapy has been established in the guidelines. This also applies to systemic therapy in the palliative, metastatic situation. Against the background of increasing experience with multimodal concepts and a parallel trend towards more and more personalized tumor therapy, therapy options that go beyond this are increasingly being used. The most recent chapter here is the successful use of antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the adjuvant, additive or palliative setting. Salvage concepts and the salvage operation are also used. These are efficient options to be able to react surgically from a situation of clinical remission and close observation in case of tumor recurrence. The limited radical surgical procedures with reconstruction according to "Merendino" and the "double tract procedure" with limited resection of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach via abdominal approach are options for high-risk patients or very elderly patients. They show great advantages with regard to the operational stress and - especially the "double tract procedure" - with regard to the quality of life. The oligometastatic situation is also the subject of ongoing studies. Under strict clinical observation, it may make sense not to exclude patients with very limited metastases from a curative concept. Numerous cases of long-term survival encourage this. In the palliative setting, in addition to classic chemotherapy and best supportive care, immunotherapy is also playing an increasingly important role, and here, too, a conversion to a curative concept is possible if the response is good. Palliative esophageal resections in the case of disseminated metastases, infiltration of vertebral bodies, aorta or trachea or main bronchi must be strictly avoided and must unfortunately be described as incurable.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMO
The full robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is an upcoming approach in the treatment of esophageal and junctional cancer. Potential benefits are seen in angulated precise maneuvers in the abdominal part as well as in the thoracic part, but due to the novelty of this approach the optimal setting of the trocars, the instruments and the operating setting is still under debate. Hereafter, we present a technical description of the 'Mainz technique' of the abdominal part of RAMIE carried out as Ivor Lewis procedure. Postoperative complication rate and duration of the abdominal part of 100 consecutive patients from University Medical Center in Mainz are illustrated. In addition, the abdominal phase of the full RAMIE is discussed in general.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Abdome , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Esôfago , Humanos , Complicações Pós-OperatóriasRESUMO
Background/purpose: Irreproducibility and missing translatability are major drawbacks in experimental animal studies. Hand-sewn anastomoses in oesophageal surgery are usually continuous, whereas those in experimental oesophageal surgery are widely performed using the simple interrupted technique. It has been implicated to be inferior in tolerating anastomotic tension, which we aimed to test in rats due to their importance as an animal model in oesophageal surgery.Methods: We determined linear breaking strengths for the native oesophagus (n = 10), the simple interrupted suture anastomosis (n = 11), and the simple stitch (n = 9) in 8-week old Sprague-Dawley rats. Experiments were powered to a margin of error of 10% around the results of exploratory investigations. The comparison of anastomotic resilience between native organ and simple interrupted suture anastomosis was a priori powered to 99%.Results: Native oesophagi sustained traction forces of 4.25 N (95% CI: 4.03-4.58 N), but the simple interrupted suture anastomosis had only 38.6% (Δ= -2.78 N, 95% CI: -2.46 to -3.11 N, p < .0001) of the resilience of native oesophagi.Conclusions: Oesophageal division and re-anastomosis markedly decreases resilience to traction forces compared to the native organ. This effect is even more pronounced in rats compared to other species and might impair transferability of results.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica , Esôfago/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Suturas , Animais , Feminino , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resistência à TraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The anatomic variations of the visceral arteries are not uncommon. The liver arterial blood supply shows 50% variability between humans, with the most common anatomy being one hepatic artery arising from the celiac trunk and one pancreatico-duodenal arcade between the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery. Occlusion of one artery are mostly asymptomatic but may become clinically relevant when surgery of the liver, bile duct or the pancreas is required. If these pathologies are not reversible, an oncologic pancreatic head resection cannot be performed. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 64-year-old Caucasian female patient with a locally advanced, resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with complete atherosclerotic occlusion of the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery. This vascular anomaly was missed on the preoperative imaging and became known postoperatively. A collateral circulation from a hypertrophic inferior mesenteric artery to the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery compensated the blood supply to the visceral organs. The postoperative course was complicated by an elevation of the transaminases AST/ALT, which normalized under conservative treatment with alprostadil (prostavasin™) and anticoagulation, since angiographic recanalization failed. The patient recovered fully and was discharged at the 14th postoperative day. Two years later, she required endovascular repair of an aortic rupture during which the inferior mesenteric artery was preserved. CONCLUSION: This case underlines the natural potential of the human body to adapt to chronic arterial malperfusion by creating a collateral circulation and supports the need for adequate preoperative imaging, including a proper arterial phase before upper abdominal surgery.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Artéria Celíaca , Feminino , Artéria Hepática/cirurgia , Humanos , Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Pâncreas/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Esophagogastric and colorectal anastomoses are vulnerable to leakage. Extended knowledge of growth factors and their receptors is needed to understand anatomic healing. METHODS: The expression pattern of vascular growth factor receptor (VEGFR1-3), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFRα/ß) and keratinocyte growth factor receptor (KGFR) were analyzed by semiquantitative-PCR in the rat intestinal tract and in esophagogastric anastomosis 5d after surgery. RESULTS: VEGFR1, VEGFR2, EGFR, KGFR and PDGFRα expression was observed throughout the intestinal tract including esophagus, stomach, small bowl and colon. VEGFR3 was not found in gastric samples and PDGFRß expression was not detected in the small bowl. Semiquantitative analyses of the VEGFR1, PDGFRα and EGFR expression in esophagogastric anastomotic tissues revealed a 2-fold upregulation of the VEGFR1 in gastric samples, while no change was observed in the esophageal anastomotic side. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed a distinct expression pattern of the investigated growth factor receptors in rat intestinal tract. Showing higher expression levels of growth factor receptors at the gastric anastomotic tissue at the fifth postoperative day suggests a different contribution of the gastric and the esophageal side to the anastomotic healing.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento/genética , Regulação para Cima , Receptor 1 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/genética , Cicatrização/genética , Análise de Variância , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Animais , Biópsia por Agulha , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Imuno-Histoquímica , Análise Multivariada , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos BN , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Cicatrização/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many centers use the Pringle's maneuver during liver resections. Since this maneuver might impair healing of bowel anastomoses, we evaluated its influence on the healing of colonic anastomosis in rats. METHODS: Male Wistar rats underwent median laparotomy and sigmoid resection with end-to-end anastomosis under inhalation anesthesia. Thereafter, rats received a 25 minutes Pringle's maneuver (PM, group 1) or were kept under anesthesia for the same period of time (group 2). The anastomotic bursting pressure (BP) was measured on postoperative days (POD) 3, 6 and 9. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was used for histopathological evaluation of the anastomosis. The Mann-Whitney U and χ2 -tests were used, p<0.05 values were considered significant. RESULTS: All animals (n=48) lost body weight (BW) until POD3 (95.2% vs. 85.7%, p=0.003), and BW remained lower after PM (106.2% vs. 92.8%, p=0.001). The anastomotic BP was lower in group 1 compared to group 2 on POD 3 (116mmHg vs. 176.28mmHg, p=0.001), POD 6 (182.8mmHg vs. 213mmHg, p=0.029) and POD 9 (197.2mmHg vs. 251.7mmHg, p=0.009), and mortality was higher in group 1 (1 vs. 7, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Pringle's maneuver increases anastomotic complications in rats. Therefore, a Pringle's maneuver should be avoided during simultaneous liver and colorectal surgery.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/patologia , Animais , Colectomia/métodos , Colo Sigmoide/patologia , Masculino , Ratos Wistar , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Redução de Peso , CicatrizaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The textbook outcome (TBO), a multidimensional indicator that reflects an optimal perioperative course, has emerged as a significant prognostic variable in surgical oncology. Our study aimed to assess the occurrence and determinants of TBO following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for cancer. METHODS: A total of 945 patients who had undergone MIE at two high-volume centers between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the independent predictors of TBO. The potential selection bias associated with choosing between different MIE techniques-namely, robotic esophagectomy (RE) and video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE)-was addressed by applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: TBO was realized in 46.6% of cases (n = 440), correlating with markedly better overall and disease-free survival. Multivariable analysis showed that treatment with RE (odds ratio (OR) = 1.527; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.149-2.028) was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving TBO, whereas a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 2 or higher showed an opposite association (CCI2: OR = 0.687, 95% CI = 0.483-0.977; CCI ≥ 3: OR = 0.604, 95% CI = 0.399-0.915). The advantage of RE in attaining a higher rate of TBO, compared to VATE, remained statistically significant after applying IPTW, with rates of 53.3% for RE and 42.2% for VATE. Notably, RE contributed to a greater probability of thorough lymph node dissection, resection with negative margins, and the avoidance of major complications. CONCLUSION: TBO was realized in 46.6% of the patients who underwent MIE for cancer. Patients with a lower CCI and those who received RE were more likely to achieve TBO.
RESUMO
Objective: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery typically necessitates the use of multiple ports. The new single-port robotic system (da Vinci SP system) platform is designed to perform uniportal surgery. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the da Vinci SP system when used for anatomical lung resection. Methods: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage I lung cancer requiring anatomical lung resections were considered eligible for this trial. The primary outcome measure was the rate of conversion, whereas the secondary objective focused on assessing the incidence of perioperative complications. Results: The study included 35 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 48-74 years). Of these, 30 underwent lobectomy and 5 received segmentectomy. All surgeries were successfully performed using a subcostal approach, except for 1 patient, who required a thoracotomy conversion due to bleeding (conversion rate: 2.9%). The median docking time was 2 minutes (range, 1-8 minutes). For the 34 patients who completed uniportal surgery, the median total operating time was 194 minutes (range, 63-405 minutes), whereas the console time was 153 minutes (range, 93-267 minutes). The median number of harvested nodes was 13 (range, 5-37), while the median number of nodal stations was 6 (rang, 4-8). There were no in-hospital fatalities, and the median postoperative stay was 3 days (range, 2-12 days). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the da Vinci SP system for anatomical lung resection through a subcostal approach. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier: NCT05535712.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on minimally invasive mediastinal surgery using a trans-subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic approach. Despite its potential advantages, the widespread adoption of this method has been hindered by the intricate surgical maneuvers required within the confined retrosternal space. Robotic surgery offers the potential to overcome the limitations inherent in the thoracoscopic technique. METHODS: This was a clinical trial (NCT05455840) to evaluate the feasibility and safety of utilizing the da Vinci® SP system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for trans-subxiphoid single-port surgery in patients with anterior mediastinal disease. The primary endpoints encompassed conversion rates and the secondary endpoints included the occurrence of perioperative complications. RESULTS: Between August 2022 and April 2023, a total of 15 patients (7 men and 8 women; median age = 56 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 49 to 65 years) underwent trans-subxiphoid robotic surgery using da Vinci SP platform for maximal thymectomy (n = 2) or removal of anterior mediastinal masses (n = 13). All surgical procedures were carried out with success, with no need for conversion to open surgery or the creation of additional ports. The median docking time was 2 min (IQR: 1 to 4 min), while the console time had a median of 152 min (IQR: 95 to 191 min). There were no postoperative complications and patients experienced a median postoperative hospital stay of 2 days with no unplanned 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that trans-subxiphoid single-port robotic surgery employing the da Vinci SP system in patients with anterior mediastinal disease is clinically viable with acceptable safety and short-term outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The previously published ROBOT trial demonstrated that robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is associated with a lower percentage of postoperative complications compared to open esophagectomy (OTE) for patients with esophageal cancer. The implications of these results on healthcare costs are important given the increased attention for cost-reduction in healthcare. Therefore the aim of this study was to report the hospital costs of RAMIE compared to OTE as treatment for esophageal cancer. METHODS: The ROBOT trial randomized 112 patients with esophageal cancer between RAMIE and OTE through January 2012 and August 2016 in a single tertiary care academic centre in the Netherlands. The primary outcome of the current study was hospital costs from the day of esophagectomy until 90 days after discharge based on Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing methodology. Secondary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per complication prevented and risk factors for increased hospital costs. RESULTS: Of the 112 included patients, 109 patients underwent an esophagectomy, of whom 54 RAMIE and 55 OTE. The mean total hospital costs were comparable between RAMIE 40211 and OTE 39495 (mean difference -715; bias-corrected and accelerated confidence interval -14831 to 14783, p = 0.932). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20.000 to 25.000 (i.e. estimated additional costs to the hospital to treat patients with a complication) RAMIE had a probability 62%-70% of being cost effective to prevent postoperative complications. In multivariable regression analysis, major postoperative complications were the main driver of hospital costs after esophagectomy (31839, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In this randomized trial RAMIE resulted in fewer postoperative complications compared to OTE without increasing total hospital costs.
RESUMO
Introduction: Several studies reported the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy over the conventional open approach, particularly in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The literature regarding the elderly population is however scarce and it is still not clear whether elderly patients may benefit from a minimally invasive approach as the general population. We sought to evaluate whether thoracoscopic/ laparoscopic (MIE) or fully robotic (RAMIE) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy significantly reduces postoperative morbidity in the elderly population. Methods: We analyzed data of patients who underwent open esophagectomy or MIE/RAMIE at Mainz University Hospital and at Padova University Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Elderly patients were defined as those ≥ 75 years old. Clinical characteristics and the postoperative outcomes were compared between elderly patients who underwent open esophagectomy or MIE/RAMIE. A 1-to-1 matched comparison was also performed. Patients < 75 years old were evaluated as a control group. Results: Among elderly patients MIE/RAMIE were associated with a lower overall morbidity (39.7% vs. 62.7%, p=0.005), less pulmonary complications (32.8 vs. 56.9%, p=0.003) and a shorter hospital stay (13 vs. 18 days, p=0.03). Comparable findings were obtained after matching. Similarly, among < 75 years-old patients, a reduced morbidity (31.2% vs. 43.5%, p=0.01) and less pulmonary complications (22% vs. 36%, p=0.001) were detected in the minimally invasive group. Discussion: Minimally invasive esophagectomy improves the postoperative course of elderly patients reducing the overall incidence of postoperative complications, particularly of pulmonary complications.
RESUMO
Esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) are rare heterogenous clinical entities. The surgical resection can be performed in different surgical approaches. However, the robotic surgical strategy is poorly documented in the treatment of SMTs. We present our series of operated esophageal SMTs approached via robotic-assisted surgery. Six patients with symptomatic esophageal submucosal tumors underwent robotic surgery within a 3-year period. The performed procedures were robotic-assisted enucleation, robotic esophagectomy (RAMIE) and reverse hybrid robotic esophagectomy. Patients' clinical data, intra/postoperative outcomes, and histopathological features were retrieved from the institution's prospective database. Five of six patients were scheduled for upfront surgery: four underwent robotic enucleation (three leiomyoma and one suspected GIST) and one underwent reverse hybrid robotic esophagectomy (suspected GIST). One patient, diagnosed with GIST, was treated with neoadjuvant Imatinib therapy, before undergoing a RAMIE. No major intra-operative complications were recorded. Median length of stay was 7 days (6-50), with a longer post-operative course in patients who underwent esophagectomy. Clavien-Dindo > 3a complications occurred in two patients, aspiration pneumonia and delayed gastric emptying. The final histopathological and immuno-histochemical diagnosis were leiomyoma, well-differentiated GIST, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and Schwannoma. Robotic-assisted surgery seems to be a promising option for surgical treatment strategies of benign or borderline esophageal submucosal tumors.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Leiomioma , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Leiomioma/patologia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Long-gap esophageal atresia represents a distinct entity among the esophageal atresia spectrum. In many patients, achieving a reasonable anastomosis depends on some millimeters of tissue. We aimed to determine what effect the suturing technique would have on esophageal ex vivo elongation as it may determine the strength of a primary anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an analysis of porcine esophagi from animals for slaughter (100-120 days old with a weight of 100-120 kg), we determined esophageal length gain of simple continuous and simple interrupted suture anastomoses subjected to linear traction until linear breaking strength was reached. Statistical power of 80% was ensured based on an a priori power analysis using five specimens per group in a separate exploratory experiment. RESULTS: The simple continuous suture anastomosis in 15 porcine esophagi ( = 4.47 cm, 95% confidence interval: 4.08-4.74 cm) outperformed the simple interrupted suture anastomosis in another 15 esophagi ( = 3.03 cm, 95% confidence interval: 2.59-3.43 cm) in length gain (Δ = 1.44 cm, 95% confidence interval: 0.87-2.01 cm, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Simple continuous anastomoses achieved higher length gain compared with simple interrupted suture anastomoses. This effect warrants an experimental assessment in vivo to assess its potential merits for clinical applicability.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Esôfago/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura/normas , Animais , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Humanos , Suínos , Resistência à TraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis is gaining popularity as a treatment for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes for RAMIE procedures using the da Vinci Xi robotic system 4-arm technique. METHODS: Data of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma undergoing modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively collected. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using an identical intrathoracic anastomotic reconstruction technique with the same perioperative management. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) definitions. RESULTS: Mean duration was 416 min (±80); 70% of patients had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery. Pulmonary complications were observed in 17% of patients. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 8% of patients. Median ICU stay was 1 day and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 11 days. The 30-day mortality was 1%; 90-day mortality was 3%. A R0 resection was reached in 92% of patients with a median number of 29 dissected lymph nodes. All patients had at least 7 months of follow-up with a median follow-up of 17 months. Median overall survival was not reached yet. CONCLUSION: RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis) for esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer was technically feasible and safe. Postoperative complications and short-term oncologic results were comparable to the highest international standards nowadays.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Laparoscopia , Robótica , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The surgical treatment of gastric cancer has arrived at a turning point towards the routine application of minimally invasive techniques. After the first results of prospective randomized trials from Asia confirmed the surgical and oncological safety, the latest results of international trials provided evidence for minimally invasive gastrectomy of advanced gastric cancer in a multimodal setting. A new addition in the field of minimally invasive procedures is robotic-assisted surgical techniques, which have already been implemented for these indications in many centers in Germany. The technical advantages that are applicable in the robotics setting in comparison to laparoscopy lead to a rapid dissemination of the procedure but still need to be evaluated in controlled trials. Further developments for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer are found in the field of intraoperative imaging procedures. In this field various technologies are available, such as fluorescence imaging using a near-infrared camera, which requires the use of a fluorescent agent or the hyperspectral camera system, which does not require the application of a fluorophore and merges pictures from visible and non-visible wavelengths to a functional image. It is to be expected that in the future various technological advancements can make a valuable contribution to the surgical treatment of gastric cancer in the clinical routine, especially if they support and facilitate the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias Gástricas , Gastrectomia , Alemanha , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy, postoperative complications rates have decreased. Daily laboratory tests are used to screen patients for postoperative complications. The course of inflammatory indicators after esophagectomy after different surgical approaches has not been described yet. The aim of the study was to describe the postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte levels after different surgical approaches for esophagectomy and relate it to postoperative complications. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 217 consecutive patients underwent thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Blood tests to assess CRP and leukocytes were performed daily in all patients. Differences between treatment groups were analyzed with a linear mixed model. All postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective database. Prognostic factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The study evaluated 4 different esophagectomy techniques: open (n = 57), hybrid (n = 53), totally minimally invasive (n = 52), and robot-assisted minimally invasive (n = 55). The increase of inflammatory indicators was significantly higher after open esophagectomy on the first 2 postoperative days compared with the 3 minimally invasive procedures (P < .001). Postoperative CRP values exceeding 200 mg/L on the second postoperative day and open esophagectomy were independently associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Open esophagectomy results in significantly higher CRP and leukocyte values compared with hybrid, minimally invasive, and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Open esophagectomy and a CRP increase on the second postoperative day above 200 mg/L are independent positive predictors for postoperative complications in multivariate analysis.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangue , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Traction procedures are useful to preserve the child's own esophagus in long-gap forms of esophageal atresia. To date, it remains unclear what suture size or position of the traction sutures is optimal to account for differences in anatomy and to reduce the risk of traction sutures being torn out of the esophageal tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Explanted porcine esophagi (from swine aged 100-120 days and weighing 100-120 kg) were divided at the carinal level. Traction sutures were either placed circumferentially or only in the dorsal wall and the breaking strength-circumferential disruption of the muscular layer-was measured. Suture size (USP 4-0 vs. 5-0) was also evaluated in a similar way. RESULTS: Neither traction suture position did not influence breaking strengths between circumferentially placed traction sutures or those exclusively placed in the dorsal esophageal wall (Δ = 0.47 N, 95% confidence interval: -2.83 to 3.76 N, p = 0.771, n = 11 per group) nor differing suture sizes of USP 4-0 and USP 5-0 (Δ = 1.46 N, 95% confidence interval: -3.2 to 0.28 N, p = 0.0946, n = 9 per group) affected breaking strengths. CONCLUSION: Suture size and suture positioning do not affect mechanical stability in Foker's procedure and therefore can be adapted as needed according to patient's anatomy and size.