MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review.

Because of its lack of ionizing radiation and excellent soft-tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is being increasingly used in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in the pregnant patient. Roughly 2% of all pregnancies are ectopic. Although ectopic pregnancy is usually diagnosed on the basis of a combination of clinical, laboratory, and ultrasonographic findings, it occasionally is initially identified at MR imaging. Thus, it is imperative that the radiologist should be familiar with the variable appearance of ectopic pregnancy at MR imaging and should evaluate for ectopic pregnancy at any time when (a) a patient has positive results of a pregnancy test and (b) an intrauterine pregnancy is not definitively seen. Because of potential issues of fetal safety, a conservative approach should be used for MR imaging in pregnancy. An MR imaging protocol for the evaluation of possible appendicitis in pregnant women is detailed. Specific findings that can aid in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy are the lack of an intrauterine pregnancy, isolated hemoperitoneum, tubal masses, hematosalpinx, and interstitial masses. In the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy, consideration should be given to the more unusual forms of ectopic pregnancy, such as angular pregnancy, cornual pregnancy, and abdominal pregnancy. Potential mimics of ectopic pregnancy include placental abnormalities, ovarian neoplasms, and corpus luteum cysts.

Accuracy of cross-table lateral knee radiography for evaluation of joint effusions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the efficacy of cross-table lateral knee radiography in the diagnosis of knee effusions compared with an MRI reference standard, to evaluate reader experience in effusion assessment, and to establish a new threshold for suprapatellar pouch measurement for the diagnosis of effusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First- and third-year radiology residents and an attending musculoskeletal radiologist retrospectively assessed 108 cross-table lateral knee radiographs for qualitative grading of joint fluid and quantitative measurement of the suprapatellar pouch. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of ipsilateral knee MRI examinations performed within 1 week of radiography was performed by two attending musculoskeletal radiologists as a reference standard. RESULTS: Qualitative visual grading of cross-table lateral radiographs had a sensitivity of 90-92%, specificity of 39-54%, and accuracy of 69-76% for joint effusion. Extrapolating from previous work showing 4 mL of fluid distends the suprapatellar pouch to 4 mm on midline sagittal MRI, the corresponding measurement on cross-table lateral radiographs was predicted to be 7 mm. Using this new criterion of effusion, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with an MR midline sagittal reference standard were 76%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. Historical data for overhead lateral radiographs had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 80%, and accuracy of 79%. CONCLUSION: Qualitative visual assessment of cross-table lateral knee radiographs is highly sensitive for the detection of joint effusion. By performing quantitative evaluation with a new 7-mm criterion for suprapatellar pouch measurement, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are equivalent to that of overhead lateral radiography.

Foreign body ingestion of blister pill pack causing small bowel obstruction.

We report a case of foreign body ingestion of a blister pill pack, causing small bowel obstruction. A 76-year-old woman on multiple medications presented with 3 days of progressive abdominal distention, nausea, and vomiting. A computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated small bowel obstruction with a distinctive metallic foreign body in the distal ileum with associated wall thickening and mesenteric inflammatory changes. At exploratory laparotomy, an impacted, intact blister pill pack was removed from the distal ileum. The ingestion of blister pill packs has been associated with a range of clinical and imaging findings. To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of CT diagnosis of small bowel obstruction caused by blister pack ingestion. Early recognition of the imaging findings of an ingested blister pill pack is important to expedite appropriate management.