Acetate differentially regulates IgA reactivity to commensal bacteria.

The balance between bacterial colonization and its containment in the intestine is indispensable for the symbiotic relationship between humans and their bacteria. One component to maintain homeostasis at the mucosal surfaces is immunoglobulin A (IgA), the most abundant immunoglobulin in mammals1,2. Several studies have revealed important characteristics of poly-reactive IgA3,4, which is produced naturally without commensal bacteria. Considering the dynamic changes within the gut environment, however, it remains uncertain how the commensal-reactive IgA pool is shaped and how such IgA affects the microbial community. Here we show that acetate-one of the major gut microbial metabolites-not only increases the production of IgA in the colon, but also alters the capacity of the IgA pool to bind to specific microorganisms including Enterobacterales. Induction of commensal-reactive IgA and changes in the IgA repertoire by acetate were observed in mice monocolonized with Escherichia coli, which belongs to Enterobacterales, but not with the major commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, which suggests that acetate directs selective IgA binding to certain microorganisms. Mechanistically, acetate orchestrated the interactions between epithelial and immune cells, induced microbially stimulated CD4 T cells to support T-cell-dependent IgA production and, as a consequence, altered the localization of these bacteria within the colon. Collectively, we identified a role for gut microbial metabolites in the regulation of differential IgA production to maintain mucosal homeostasis.

Characteristics of factors contributing to follow-up for suspected delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Delayed bleeding (DB) is a major adverse event associated with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) that sometimes causes difficulties in making decisions regarding endoscopic hemostasis. This study identified the factors that contribute to follow-up without endoscopic hemostasis when DB is suspected after colorectal ESD. METHODS: In total, 583 patients (603 tumors) who underwent ESD or hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors at Chiba University Hospital between June 2009 and January 2022 were retrospectively registered. Of these, 141 cases (141 tumors) with DB, and hematochezia or hemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dL after colorectal ESD, were analyzed. The DB group was divided into the Hemostasis group (H group; endoscopic hemostasis performed) and no-Hemostasis group (no-H group; no endoscopy performed, or endoscopy performed but no hemostasis performed after hematochezia or hemoglobin decrease). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the factors contributing to follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with 31 tumors were categorized into the H group, and 110 patients with 110 tumors were in the no-H group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that date from ESD to first hematochezia ≤Day 3 (odds ratio, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-14.33; P = .010) and bleeding duration ≤1 day (odds ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-8.34; P = .009) contributed to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of DB after colorectal ESD, a bleeding duration ≤1 day or date from ESD to first hematochezia ≤Day 3 may contribute to follow-up observation without endoscopic hemostasis.

Utility of prophylactic clipping after colorectal cold snare polypectomy in patients on oral antithrombotic agents.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is no consensus on the effectiveness of prophylactic clipping after colonic cold snare polypectomy (CSP). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of prophylactic clipping in preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after colorectal CSP in patients on antithrombotic agents. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited consecutive patients on antithrombotic agents who underwent colorectal CSP in Chiba University Hospital. The DB rate was compared between patients with and without prophylactic clipping. RESULTS: The study included 133 patients (422 polyps) requiring prophylactic clipping and 85 patients (282 polyps) not requiring prophylactic clipping. There were no significant differences in DB and hematochezia rates between the groups. By weighted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio of hematochezia was 0.557 (95% confidence interval, 0.225-1.378; P = .205) in patients without clipping compared to those with clipping. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic clipping may not be necessary to prevent DB after colorectal CSP in patients on antithrombotic agents.

Intensive triamcinolone acetonide injection regimen can highly prevent stricture after extensive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the utility of intensive triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections after extensive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: This retrospective study included 27 lesions in 27 consecutive patients who underwent ESD (ulcers encompassing ≥3/4 of the esophageal circumference) and received TA injections without oral steroid administration. Groups A and B included patients undergoing ESD with and without complete circumferential resection, respectively. All patients received TA injections (100 mg/session) immediately after ESD. In Group A, weekly based TA injections were performed until near-complete ulcer epithelialization. In Group B, patients did not receive additional injections or received weekly or biweekly TA injections. The primary outcome was stricture rate, and the secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients requiring endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) and the number of TA injections. RESULTS: Group A included 7 lesions, and Group B included 20 lesions. The median (range) tumor lengths were 40 (30-90) and 45 (30-110) mm in Groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, the median circumferential resection diameter was 40 (20-80) mm. The stricture rate and the proportion of patients requiring EBD were 0 (0%) in Group A and 1 (5.0%) in Group B. The number of TA injection sessions was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (8 [5-25] vs 1.5 [1-3]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive weekly or biweekly based TA injections might aid in preventing post-ESD stricture and the need for EBD in patients undergoing extensive resection involving the entire esophageal circumference.

A prediction model of abnormal acid reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The measurement of esophageal acid exposure time (AET) using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) tests is the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, this catheter-based 24-h test can cause considerable patient discomfort. Our aim is to identify factors affecting AET and to develop a scoring model for predicting AET abnormalities before conducting the MII-pH test. METHODS: Of the 366 patients who underwent MII-pH test at two facilities in Japan and Vietnam, 255 patients who also had esophagogastroduodenoscopy and high-resolution manometry were included in this study. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using risk factors for AET > 6% identified from a derivation cohort (n = 109). A scoring system predicting AET > 6% was then constructed and externally validated with a separate cohort (n = 146). RESULTS: Three variables were derived from the prediction model: male gender, Hill grades III-IV, and weak mean distal contractile integrals. Based on these scores, patients were classified into low (0 point), intermediate (1-3 points), and high (4 points) risk groups. The probabilities of having an AET > 6% were 6%, 34%, and 100% for these groups, respectively. A score of < 1 excluded patients with abnormal AET, with a negative predictive value of 93.8% in the derivation cohort and 80.0% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We derived and externally validated a prediction model for abnormal AET. This system could assist in guiding the appropriate treatment strategies for GERD.

Differences Between Patients with Heartburn Refractory to Vonoprazan and Those Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, demonstrates more potent acid inhibition than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vonoprazan in patients with unproven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by comparing patients with vonoprazan-refractory heartburn with those with PPI-refractory heartburn. METHODS: This study included 104 consecutive patients with vonoprazan- or PPI-refractory heartburn (52 patients each), no erosive esophagitis on endoscopy and who underwent combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) testing with vonoprazan/PPI discontinuation. Patients' backgrounds, symptom scores from four questionnaires, MII-pH results and high-resolution manometry results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The vonoprazan group demonstrated significantly higher GERD symptoms and scores of abdominal pain and diarrhea on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. MII-pH results revealed that the vonoprazan group demonstrated 40.4%, 17.3%, and 42.3% and the PPIs group exhibited 26.9%, 17.3%, and 55.8% of abnormal acid reflux [true non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)], reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn, respectively. The vonoprazan group demonstrated higher true NERD rates but with no significant difference (p = 0.307). Among the vonoprazan group, eight patients with true NERD underwent another MII-pH test on vonoprazan, and all cases demonstrated normal acid exposure times (0.0% [0.0-0.3]). CONCLUSION: Patients with unproven GERD with vonoprazan-refractory heartburn demonstrated more symptoms, including not only GERD symptoms but also functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, than those with PPI-refractory heartburn.

Two onset types of achalasia and the long-term course to diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the incidence of achalasia has been increasing, but its cause remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the initial symptoms and the course of symptoms and to find new insights into the cause and course of the disease. METHODS: Altogether, 136 patients diagnosed with achalasia by high-resolution manometry (HRM) were enrolled. Questionnaires and chart reviews were conducted to investigate the initial symptoms, time from onset to diagnosis, and comorbidities, as well as the relationship between HRM results, time to diagnosis, and symptom severity. RESULTS: In total, 67 of 136 patients responded to the questionnaire. The median ages of onset and diagnosis were 42 and 58 years, respectively. The median time from onset to diagnosis was 78.6 months, with 25 cases (37.3%) taking > 10 years to be diagnosed. The symptom onset was gradual and sudden in 52 (77.6%) and 11 (16.4%) patients, respectively. Of the 11 patients with acute onset, three (27.3%) developed anhidrosis at the same time. There was no correlation between the time from onset to diagnosis and esophageal dilatation, resting LES pressure, or mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). No correlation was also found between the degree of symptoms and resting LES pressure or IRP. CONCLUSION: Esophageal achalasia can have acute or insidious onsets. This finding may help to elucidate the cause of achalasia.

Clinical effects and emerging issues of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from Japanese real-world practice.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of atezolizumab has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, its long-term efficacy and association with adverse events in real-world practice are unknown. This study was designed to shed light on these issues. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, data were collected from patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in seven institutions in Japan. The authors focused on the efficacy and adverse events related to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were enrolled in this study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the first-line treatment group was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-9.9), whereas the median PFS for the second- or later-line treatment group was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.7), which was significantly worse than that of the first-line treatment group (p = .005). Twenty-seven patients had interrupted bevacizumab treatment. Proteinuria accounted for the largest proportion of bevacizumab treatment interruptions. The cumulative incidence rate of bevacizumab interruption due to anti-VEGF-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus than in those without (p = .026). The landmark analysis showed that patients experienced bevacizumab interruption by 24 weeks from treatment initiation had poorer PFS than those who did not (p = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The PFS of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment mostly replicates that of a global phase 3 trial. Interrupted bevacizumab treatment was more common in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus, which may be associated with worsening long-term PFS. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been the standard front line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. With the growing incidence of fatty liver due to metabolic syndrome as a background liver disease for hepatocellular carcinoma, the rate of comorbid hypertension and diabetes mellitus has been increasing accordingly. The present study demonstrated the cumulative incidence rate of bevacizumab interruption due to anti-VEGF-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus. The landmark analysis clarified that interruption of bevacizumab might be a risk of impaired efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over the long term in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Long-term course of gastric submucosal tumors: growth speed and size-increasing factors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) are treated or monitored according to GI stromal tumor guidelines, but the adequacy of the guidelines has not been thoroughly examined. We investigated the long-term course of gastric SMTs to determine the validity of guideline-based follow-up methods and the factors contributing to their size increase. METHODS: This study included gastric SMTs diagnosed as GI mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs) by using EUS and followed up with EUS. The percentage and speed of GIMT enlargement and factors associated with the enlargement were investigated by using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: From January 1994 to May 2022, a total of 925 gastric SMTs were evaluated with EGD, and 231 SMTs were diagnosed as GIMTs. Of the 231 GIMTs, 145 were examined by EUS more than twice and were followed up for >6 months. The mean ± standard deviation follow-up period was 5.20 ± 4.04 years (range, 0.5-17.3 years), with 39 (26.9%) of 145 GIMTs increasing in size with a mean doubling time of 3.60 ± 3.37 years. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing tumor growth revealed that irregular extraluminal borders were an increasing factor (hazard ratio, 3.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.52), initial tumor size ≤9.5 mm (hazard ratio, .23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.77) was a nonincreasing factor, and GIMTs with calcification (n = 13) did not increase in size. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor growth in gastric GIMTs <9.5 mm in diameter and/or with calcification is rare. Follow-up intervals for these lesions could be extended.

Carcinogenic potential in regenerated mucosa after endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about genetic mutations in the regenerated mucosa (RM) after endoscopic resection (ER) of esophageal carcinoma. Thus, this study investigates the status of genetic variation in RM after ER of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: The study cohort included 19 patients with ESCC. We used an esophageal carcinoma panel to identify target sequences for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), background mucosa (BM), and RM after ER of ESCC. We used OncoKB to check whether each mutation was a putative driver. RESULTS: We identified 77 mutations of 32 genes in SCC, 133 mutations of 34 genes in BM, and 100 mutations of 29 genes in RM. Putative driver mutations were identified in 20 mutations in 14 cases in SCC, 16 mutations in 10 cases in BM, and 7 mutations in 11 cases in RM. The rate of putative driver mutations to total mutations was significantly lower in RM (26% in SCC vs 12% in BM vs 7% in RM, P = 0.009). Additionally, the rate of cases with TP53 putative driver mutations was significantly lower in RM (63% in SCC vs 37% in BM vs 16% in RM, P = 0.011). The percentage of putative driver mutations and the percentage of cases with a putative driver of TP53 were significantly lower in RM. CONCLUSION: Esophageal RM after ER of ESCC could have a lower risk of carcinogenesis.

Clinical Features Focusing on Extraintestinal Manifestations in Japanese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Far East 1000.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) can develop extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) during the disease course, which sometimes impact their quality of life. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the prevalence and types of EIMs using a hospital-based IBD cohort in Japan. METHODS: A patient cohort with IBD was established in 2019, as participated by 15 hospitals in Chiba Prefecture of Japan. Using this cohort, the prevalence and types of EIMs, which are defined based on previous reports and the Japanese guidelines, were investigated. RESULTS: This cohort enrolled 728 patients, including 542 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 186 Crohn's disease (CD). Of these patients with IBD, 10.0% were identified with one or more EIMs (57 (10.5%) with UC and 16 (8.6%) with CD). Arthropathy and arthritis were the most common EIM in 23 (4.2%) patients with UC, followed by primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (2.6%). Arthropathy and arthritis were also the most common in patients with CD, but no cases of PSC were observed. EIMs were more frequently observed in patients with IBD treated by specialists than in those treated by non-specialists (12.7% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.011). The incidence of EIMs in patients with IBD was not significantly different over time. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and types of EIMs in our hospital-based cohort in Japan did not significantly differ from those reported in previous or Western studies. However, the incidence might be underestimated due to the limited ability of non-IBD specialists to discover and describe EIMs in patients with IBD.

Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of 21-30 mm colonic polyps. METHOD: We conducted a single-center RCT. Patients diagnosed with suspected colorectal intramucosal carcinoma (21-30 mm and adaptable for both UEMR and ESD) were randomly assigned to the UEMR and ESD groups at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. We independently performed one-sample tests against the set threshold for each treatment. The significance level was set at p = 0.224. RESULT: Eleven polyps each in the UEMR and ESD groups, respectively, were analyzed. The R0 resection rate (%) was 36 (95% confidence interval 11-69) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.002). The p-value against the set threshold for UEMR was 0.743, whereas that for ESD was < 0.001 (one-sample binomial test). The en bloc resection rates (%) were 82 (48-97) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively; however, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.167). The mean treatment time (min) was significantly shorter in the UEMR group (8 ± 6) than in the ESD group (48 ± 29) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: ESD could achieve a high R0 resection rate, while the en bloc resection rate was comparable between the two treatment techniques with less burden on patients undergoing UEMR for 21-30-mm colorectal polyps. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial as jRCT1030210015 and jRCT1030210177.

Appropriate selection of endoscopic resection for superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas in association with recurrence.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The appropriate selection of endoscopic resection for relatively small superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNADAs) considering recurrence is not completely clarified. Therefore, this study investigated endoscopic resection utility (EMR, underwater EMR [UEMR], and cap-assisted EMR [EMRC]) for SNADAs from the viewpoint of recurrence and short-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with sporadic SNADAs who underwent EMR, UEMR, and EMRC at Chiba University Hospital between May 2004 and March 2020 and were observed for ≥12 months after endoscopic resection (EMR, 34 patients, 36 lesions; UEMR, 54 patients, 55 lesions; and EMRC, 45 patients, 48 lesions). Outcomes were evaluated using weighted logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression analysis was weighted using propensity scores. RESULTS: EMRC showed significantly higher en-bloc and R0 resection rates than EMR. All techniques were equally safe. Only 1 case each of intraoperative perforation and postoperative perforation (in 2 different patients) occurred, which were associated with EMRC. UEMR resulted in higher R0 resection and lower postbleeding rates than EMR. Moreover, patients who underwent UEMR showed no perforation. Median observation period per lesion after endoscopic resection was 84 months (range, 16-199) for patients who underwent EMR, 25 months (range, 12-60) for patients who underwent UEMR, and 63 months (range, 12-180) for patients who underwent EMRC. No significant difference was observed between EMR versus UEMR and between EMR versus EMRC in terms of recurrence (odds ratio, .20 [95% confidence interval, .01-2.86; P = .24] and .78 [95% confidence interval, .09-6.84; P = .82], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence risk was not different for EMR, UEMR, and EMRC. Therefore, UEMR, a simple and safe procedure, could be the first choice for relatively small SNADAs. With larger prospective studies, UEMR data may turn out to be more robust, corroborating it as the endoscopic modality of choice for certain SNADAs.

Utility of underwater EMR for nonpolypoid superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤20 mm.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The application of underwater EMR (UEMR) for nonpolypoid superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) has not been comprehensively assessed. Therefore, the current study aimed to validate the efficacy of UEMR versus conventional EMR and cap-assisted EMR (EMRC) for SNADETs measuring ≤20 mm. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with sporadic nonpolypoid SNADETs measuring ≤20 mm undergoing EMR, EMRC, or UEMR at Chiba University Hospital between May 2004 and October 2020 (EMR, 21 patients and 23 SNADETs; UEMR, 60 patients and 61 SNADETs; EMRC, 45 patients and 48 SNADETs). A weighted logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of RX/1 and piecemeal resection. The recurrence rate of lesions observed ≥12 months after resection was assessed. RESULTS: Both UEMR and EMRC had a significantly higher R0 resection rate than EMR. UEMR had significantly lower multiple resection and postbleeding rates than EMR. Only 1 patient (2.1%) who underwent EMRC experienced intraoperative and postoperative perforation. EMR was involved in RX/1 and piecemeal resection. The recurrence rates of EMR, UEMR, and EMRC were 4.3%, 2.0%, and 6.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UEMR had significantly higher R0 resection and lower postbleeding rates than EMR. Moreover, it was safer than EMRC and was associated with a lower incidence of recurrences. The significant results of the retrospective analysis suggest a randomized controlled study with adequate numbers needs to be conducted to confirm the superior efficacy of UEMR before it is recommended for primary treatment option for SNADETs measuring ≤20 mm.

Long-term outcomes of cold snare polypectomy for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The effectiveness of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) regarding long-term outcomes is not fully clarified. This study aimed to investigate long-term outcomes of CSP for SNADETs. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with sporadic SNADETs and treated with CSP at Chiba University Hospital between March 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Long-term outcomes, short-term outcomes, and adverse events were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 35 patients with 46 lesions were included. The en-bloc resection rate was 97.8%. Thirty-seven lesions (80.4%) were diagnosed as adenomatous. The R0 resection rate for adenomatous lesions was 70.3%. Follow-up investigations more than 12 months after CSP were completed for 35 adenomatous lesions (94.6%). The median observation period after CSP was 48 months. One patient whose observation period was only 3 months died from chronic heart failure with cardiac sarcoidosis 6 months after CSP. No patient died from SNADETs. The relapse-free survival rate at 12 months after CSP was 97.1%. One recurrence (2.7%) was observed 12 months after CSP. We removed the recurrence lesion with CSP and cold forceps polypectomy. No new recurrence occurred within the observation period. No perforation or post-operative bleeding occurred for CSP. CONCLUSIONS: Cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small SNADETs is a safe and useful procedure with a high en-bloc resection rate and long-term local control capability.

Anti-TNFα antibody versus non-anti-TNFα molecular agents for ulcerative colitis patients who failed initial anti-TNFα therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α antibody (ATA) and biologics/molecular targeted agents with other mechanisms (non-ATA) are currently available for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the knowledge about optimal drug selection after the initial treatment with ATA failure is lacking. This study assessed whether the response to the initial ATA could be a basis for selecting subsequent agents in UC patients. METHODS: Ulcerative colitis patients treated with ATA or non-ATA as the subsequent biologic after the failure of initial ATA were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy at 14 weeks was examined according to the response to initial ATA. RESULTS: Of 163 patients treated with the first ATA, the efficacy of subsequent ATA and non-ATA was evaluated in 63 and 36, respectively. Remission and response to subsequent-line therapy, regardless of ATA or non-ATA, were lower in patients with primary nonresponse (PNR) to initial ATA than in patients with efficacy to initial ATA (33.3% vs 69.2%, P < 0.01). In patients with PNR to initial ATA, the remission rate with subsequent ATA was significantly lower than with subsequent non-ATA (4.3% vs 26.3%, P = 0.04). In patients who showed efficacy to initial ATA, the remission rate with subsequent ATA was also lower than that with subsequent non-ATA (30.6% vs 56.3%, P = 0.08). PNR with initial ATA was the predictor of PNR to subsequent ATA (odds ratio: 5.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-21.7). CONCLUSION: Non-ATA may be suitable in UC patients as the subsequent biologics regardless of the outcome of the first ATA.