Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Euro Surveill ; 22(34)2017 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857047

RESUMO

Influenza vaccination may limit the impact of influenza in the community. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in preventing hospitalisation in individuals aged ≥ 65 years in Spain. A multicentre case-control study was conducted in 20 Spanish hospitals during 2013/14 and 2014/15. Patients aged ≥ 65 years who were hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed influenza were matched with controls according to sex, age and date of hospitalisation. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated by multivariate conditional logistic regression. A total of 728 cases and 1,826 matched controls were included in the study. Overall VE was 36% (95% confidence interval (CI): 22-47). VE was 51% (95% CI: 15-71) in patients without high-risk medical conditions and 30% (95% CI: 14-44) in patients with them. VE was 39% (95% CI: 20-53) in patients aged 65-79 years and 34% (95% CI: 11-51) in patients aged ≥ 80 years, and was greater against the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype than the A(H3N2) subtype. Influenza vaccination was effective in preventing hospitalisations of elderly individuals.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Potência de Vacina , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/isolamento & purificação , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Vigilância da População , Estações do Ano , Espanha/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Res Nurs Health ; 40(5): 435-443, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805243

RESUMO

The A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus reached pandemic level in Spain in 2009, prompting a national vaccination campaign. To avoid transmission to patients, healthcare professionals' vaccination against pandemic influenza is crucial. The main objective of this study was to analyze factors associated with the failure by healthcare professionals to accept the pandemic vaccination in 2009. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of healthcare professionals in seven of Spain's autonomous regions. A questionnaire was used to collect information about personal and professional details, the respondents' flu vaccination status in the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 seasons (seasonal and pandemic vaccines), and their knowledge and attitudes. A total of 1,661 professionals completed the survey. In the 2009-2010 season, 38.2% had both the seasonal and the pandemic vaccine, 22.1% had had only the seasonal, and 4.7% only the pandemic vaccine. The strongest predictor of not receiving the pandemic vaccine was not having had seasonal vaccinations in that year or the previous year. Those who had not received the pandemic vaccine were more often female; nurses; under 45; denied contact with at-risk groups; and had negative beliefs about the vaccine effectiveness and little concern for getting the disease, being infected at work, or passing it on to patients. It would be prudent to direct preventive campaigns not only at individuals at risk of catching flu but also at health professionals with a negative view of flu vaccine, with a particular focus on nurses, who have a key role in recommending flu vaccine.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 60(8): 1009-19, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27432191

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze relationships between occupational exposure and influenza infection and hospitalization during the 2009-2010 pandemic wave and the 2010-2011 influenza seasonal epidemic in Spain. METHODS: Occupations were classified as high, medium, or low risk of influenza exposure. To assess the risk of infection, 588 outpatient cases of influenza confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) were compared with 588 outpatients without influenza symptoms. To assess the risk of hospitalization, 337 outpatient influenza cases were compared with 337 inpatient influenza cases. RESULTS: The high risk of occupational exposure group was composed only of health care workers. After adjustment for age, sex, vaccination status, and predictive variables of influenza infection, patients with a high risk of occupational exposure had an aOR of 2.14 (95%CI: 1.25-3.66) of being an outpatient influenza case and an aOR of 0.43 (95%CI: 0.20-0.95) of being an inpatient influenza case, compared with those with a low risk. CONCLUSIONS: A high risk of occupational exposure is a risk factor for influenza infection but not for hospitalization.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Fatores de Risco , Espanha
4.
Eur J Public Health ; 26(5): 882-887, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27085194

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking may facilitate influenza virus infections and their severity. The objective was to investigate the risk of hospitalization due to influenza in Spanish smokers and ex-smokers. METHODS: We carried out a multicentre, case-control study in 2011. Cases [patients ≥ 18 years hospitalized > 24 h with real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza] were selected from 29 Spanish hospitals. For each case, we selected an outpatient aged ≥ 18 years with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza matched by age (±5 years), date of hospitalization of the case (±10 days) and province of residence. We collected epidemiological variables, comorbidities and the smoking history. The risk of hospitalization due to smoking was determined by the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) using logistic regression. RESULTS: We studied 471 hospitalized cases and 476 outpatient cases. Hospitalized cases had a higher frequency of influenza risk factors compared with outpatient cases. Hospitalized cases had a higher frequency of smoking (30.9% vs. 17.1%) and being ex-smokers (29.3% vs. 25.3%). Current smoking (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.23-3.87) and being an ex-smoker (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.07-2.82) were associated with the risk of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking may increase the risk of hospitalization in smokers and ex-smokers when infected by the influenza virus. Smoking prevention could reduce hospitalizations. Influenza vaccination is recommended for smokers.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Influenza Humana/etiologia , Influenza Humana/terapia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Fam Pract ; 16: 44, 2015 Mar 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25880501

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess the contribution of physician-related factors, especially their influenza vaccine status, in the vaccination coverage of their patients. METHODS: A study of vaccination coverage was carried out in Spain in 2011-12. The dependent variable (vaccination coverage in patients aged ≥ 65 years) was obtained from regional records. Information was gathered on the vaccination of physicians through an anonymous web survey. We compared the vaccination coverage of patients with the vaccination of their physicians using the Student t test. Associations were determined using a multilevel regression model. RESULTS: The coverage in patients aged ≥ 65 years was 56.3% and was higher (57.3%) in patients whose physician had been vaccinated than in those whose physician had not (55.2%) (p = 0.008). In the multilevel regression model, vaccination of the physician was associated (p = 0.049) with vaccination of their patients after controlling for the effects of age (p = 0.046), region (p = 0.089), and opinions on the effectiveness of the vaccine (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination of physicians together with their opinions on the effectiveness of the vaccine may be a predictor of vaccination coverage in their patients. Further studies are required to confirm this.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(7): 480-90, 2015.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26232121

RESUMO

Seasonal influenza is an annual challenge for health-care systems, due to factors such as co-circulation of 2 influenza A subtypes jointly with 2 influenza B lineages; the antigenic drift of these virus, which eludes natural immunity, as well as immunity conferred by vaccination; together with influenza impact in terms of morbidity and mortality. Influenza vaccines have been available for more than 70 years and they have progressed in formulation, production and delivery route. Recommendations on vaccination are focused on those with a higher probability of severe disease, and have a progressively wider coverage, and classically based on inactivated vaccines, but with an increasing importance of attenuated live vaccines. More inactivated vaccines are becoming available, from adyuvanted and virosomal vaccines to intradermal delivery, cell-culture or quadrivalent. Overall vaccine effectiveness is about 65%, but varies depending on characteristics of vaccines, virus, population and the outcomes to be prevented, and ranges from less than 10% to almost 90%. Future challenges are formulations that confer more extensive and lasting protection, as well as increased vaccination coverage, especially in groups such as pregnant women and health-care professionals, as well as being extended to paediatrics.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Potência de Vacina , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Variação Antigênica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/classificação , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Vacinas Atenuadas , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Vacinas Virossomais , Adulto Jovem , Zoonoses
7.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(6): 1454-61, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24162551

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to investigate the main characteristics of non-vaccinated pregnant women who were hospitalised for influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 pandemic versus pregnant women hospitalised for non-influenza-related reasons in Spain, and to characterise the clinical presentation of the disease in this population to facilitate early diagnosis and future action programmes. Understanding influenza infection during pregnancy is important as pregnant women are a high-risk population for increased morbidity from influenza infection. We investigated the socio-demographic and clinical features of 51 non-vaccinated, pregnant women infected with the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in Spain (cases) and compared them to 114 controls (non-vaccinated and non-infected pregnant women) aged 15-44 years. Substantial and significant odd ratios (ORs) for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) were found for the pregnant women who were obese compared with controls (body mass index > 30) (OR 3.03; 95% confidence intervals 1.13-8.11). The more prevalent symptoms observed in pandemic influenza-infected pregnant women were high temperature, cough (82.4%), malaise (80.5%), myalgia (56.1%), and headaches (54.9%). Our results suggest that the initial symptoms and risk factors for infection of pregnant women with the influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 virus are similar to the symptoms and risk factors for seasonal influenza, which make early diagnosis difficult, and reinforces the need to identify and protect high-risk groups.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Emerg Med J ; 31(4): 301-7, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23449891

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors present at admission in adult patients hospitalised due to influenza virus infection during the 2009/10 and 2010/11 seasons--including whether infection was from pandemic or seasonal influenza A infections--that were associated with the likelihood of developing severe pneumonia with multilobar involvement and shock. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Patients hospitalised due to influenza virus infection were recruited. We collected information on sociodemographic characteristics, pre-existing medical conditions, vaccinations, toxic habits, previous medications, exposure to social environments, and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D). Severe pneumonia with multilobar involvement and/or shock (SPAS) was the primary outcome of interest. We constructed two multivariate logistic regression models to explain the likelihood of developing SPAS and to create a clinical prediction rule for developing SPAS that includes clinically relevant variables. RESULTS: Laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09, EQ-5D utility score 7 days before admission, more than one comorbidity, altered mental status, dyspnoea on arrival, days from onset of symptoms, and influenza season were associated with SPAS. In addition, not being vaccinated against seasonal influenza in the previous year, anaemia, altered mental status, fever and dyspnoea on arrival at hospital, difficulties in performing activities of daily living in the previous 7 days, and days from onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital were related to the likelihood of SPAS (area under the curve value of 0.75; Hosmer-Lemeshow p value of 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: These variables should be taken into account by physicians evaluating a patient affected by influenza as additional information to that provided by the usual risk scores.


Assuntos
Influenza Humana/complicações , Pneumonia/etiologia , Choque/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Comorbidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57(2): 167-75, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23532475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In most seasons, the influenza vaccine is effective in preventing influenza, but it is not clear whether it is equally effective in preventing mild and severe cases. We designed a case-control study to compare the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in preventing outpatient, inpatient, and severe or fatal cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza. METHODS: Hospitalized patients (n = 691) with laboratory-confirmed influenza in the 2010-2011 season recruited in 29 Spanish hospitals were individually matched by age, admission/visit date, and province with an outpatient with laboratory-confirmed influenza and an outpatient control. Severe cases were considered those patients admitted to intensive care units or who died in the hospital (n = 177). We compared the influenza vaccine status of controls and outpatient cases, inpatient cases, and severe cases using conditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounding factors. Severe and nonsevere inpatient influenza cases were compared using unconditional logistic regression. Vaccine effectiveness was (1 - odds ratio) × 100. RESULTS: Vaccine effectiveness was 75% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], .16-.39) in preventing influenza outpatient cases, 60% (AOR, 0.40; 95% CI, .25-.63) in preventing influenza-associated hospitalizations, and 89% (AOR, 0.11; 95% CI, .04-.37) in preventing severe cases. In inpatients, influenza vaccination was associated with a lower risk of severe influenza (AOR, 0.42; 95% CI, .22-.80). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination prevented influenza cases and hospitalizations and was associated with a better prognosis in inpatients with influenza. The combined effect of these 2 mechanisms would explain the high effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe cases due to influenza.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/patologia , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/patologia , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/patologia , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Gravidez , Prognóstico , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Prev Med ; 57(3): 206-11, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23732251

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) in Spain between 2008 and 2011. METHODS: We made an anonymous web survey of PHCWs in 2012. Information on attitudes towards and knowledge of influenza vaccine, and immunization in previous seasons was collected. Self-reported vaccination coverage and factors related to vaccination continuity were analysed. RESULTS: Of 5433 workers contacted, 2625 (48.3%) responded to the survey: 47.0% were general practitioners, 10.3% paediatricians and 42.7% nurses. Their reported vaccination rates from seasons 2008-2009 to 2011-2012 decreased over time: 58.4%, 57.4%, 53.2% and 49.3% (linear trend, p < 0.001). Among workers vaccinated in any previous season, 70.2% were vaccinated again in 2011-2012, compared with 5.2% among those not previously vaccinated (p < 0.001). Continuity of vaccination increased with age and with the worker or cohabitant having a major chronic condition. Vaccination was higher in workers who recognized vaccination as effective and those worried about being infected or infecting patients. CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccination coverage in PHCWs has declined, especially after the pandemic. Intensive interventions are needed to change this trend. Knowledge of vaccination should be reinforced by stressing the effectiveness of the vaccine and the risks of influenza for workers and patients.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Espanha
11.
BMC Public Health ; 13: 118, 2013 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23391376

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the 2009 influenza pandemic, a change in the type of patients most often affected by influenza was observed. The objective of this study was to assess the role of individual and social determinants in hospitalizations due to influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection. METHODS: We studied hospitalized patients (cases) and outpatients (controls) with confirmed influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect data. Variables that might be related to the hospitalization of influenza cases were compared by estimation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the variables entered into binomial logistic regression models. RESULTS: Hospitalization due to pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus infections was associated with non-Caucasian ethnicity (OR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.17 - 4.08), overcrowding (OR: 2.84, 95% CI 1.20 - 6.72), comorbidity and the lack of previous preventive information (OR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.50 - 4.83). Secondary or higher education was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36 - 0.87) CONCLUSIONS: In addition to individual factors such as comorbidity, other factors such as educational level, ethnicity or overcrowding were associated with hospitalization due to A (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus infections.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Exposição Ocupacional , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Espanha/epidemiologia
12.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 67(7): 1739-45, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22467633

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The H1N1 influenza pandemic strain has been associated with a poor prognosis in hospitalized patients. The present report evaluates the factors influencing prognosis. METHODS: A total of 813 patients hospitalized with H1N1 influenza in 36 hospitals (nationwide) in Spain were analysed. Detailed histories of variables preceding hospital admission were obtained by interview, validating data on medications and vaccine with their attending physicians. Data on treatment and complications during hospital stay were recorded. As definition of poor outcome, the endpoints of death and admission to intensive care were combined; and as a further outcome, length of stay was used. RESULTS: The mean age was 38.5 years (SD 22.8 years). There were 10 deaths and 79 admissions to intensive care (combined, 88). The use of neuraminidase inhibitors was reported by 495 patients (60.9%). The variables significantly associated with a poor outcome were diabetes (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.21-4.02), corticosteroid therapy (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = 1.39-8.20) and use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (OR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.14-6.36), while the use of neuraminidase inhibitors (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34-0.94) was protective. Neuraminidase inhibitors within the first 2 days after the influenza onset reduced hospital stay by a mean of 1.9 days (95% CI = 4.7-6.6). CONCLUSIONS: The use of neuraminidase inhibitors decreases the length of hospital stay and admission to intensive care and/or death.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Neuraminidase/antagonistas & inibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/genética , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Influenza Humana/virologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Prognóstico , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
13.
Prev Med ; 54(6): 434-9, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22548868

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing cases of influenza requiring hospitalization. METHODS: We performed a multicenter case-control study in 36 hospitals, in 2010 in Spain. Hospitalized influenza cases confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and three matched controls (two hospital and one community control) per case were selected. The use of non-pharmacological measures seven days before the onset of symptoms (frequency of hand washing, use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers and handwashing after touching contaminated surfaces) was collected. RESULTS: We studied 813 cases hospitalized for influenza and 2274 controls. The frequency of hand washing 5-10 times (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.65) and >10 times (aOR=0.59) and handwashing after contact with contaminated surfaces (aOR=0.65) were protective factors and were dose-responsive (p<0.001). Alcohol-based hand sanitizers were associated with marginal benefits (aOR=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent handwashing should be recommended to prevent influenza cases requiring hospitalization.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Administração Cutânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Desinfetantes/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/normas , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Fatores de Risco , Classe Social , Espanha
14.
Antiviral Res ; 178: 104785, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32234540

RESUMO

Seasonal influenza causes significant morbidity and mortality in people aged ≥65 years. Antiviral treatment can reduce complications and disease severity. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of antiviral treatment in patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized with confirmed influenza in preventing intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death. A retrospective cohort study was carried out in 20 hospitals from seven Spanish regions during 2013-2015 in patients aged ≥65 years. Hospitalized cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza were selected. To assess the association between antiviral treatment and ICU admission or death, the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. We included 715 hospitalized patients, of whom 640 (87.9%) received antiviral treatment, 77 (10.8%) required ICU admission and 66 (9.2%) died. In the 64-74 years age group, receipt of antiviral treatment ≤48 h (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.89), 3-4 days (aOR 0.23; 95% CI 0.05-0.92) and 5-7 days (aOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.03-0.91) after clinical symptom onset was associated with reduced mortality. Receipt of treatment >7 days after symptom onset was not associated with reduced mortality. No association of antiviral treatment with reduced mortality was observed in the >74 years age group or with the prevention of ICU admission in any age group. Antiviral treatment had a protective effect in avoiding death in patients aged 65-74 years hospitalized due to influenza when administered ≤48 h after symptom onset and when no more than 7 days had elapsed.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
J Vasc Surg ; 48(4): 953-9, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18639417

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of long-term anticoagulant treatment (enoxaparin vs coumarin) in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) as to incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and recurrent venous thromboembolism. We also analyzed the impact of thrombus regression after the anticoagulant treatment for these two outcomes. METHODS: A prospective study was designed in which 165 patients with symptomatic, unilateral, first-episode DVT were randomized to a long-term anticoagulant treatment with coumarin or enoxaparin during at least 3 months. The rate of thrombus regression was defined as the difference in Marder score after 3 months of treatment by venography. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter for 5 years. Venous disease was related to pathologic severity of PTS according to the validated scale of Villalta as rated by a physician blinded to treatment. Recurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism was documented objectively. RESULTS: The 5-year follow-up period was completed for 100 patients (enoxaparin, 56; coumarin, 44). A lesser incidence of PTS was observed in the enoxaparin group (39.3% absent, 19.6% severe) than in the coumarin group (29.5% absent, 29.5% severe), although this difference was not statistically significant. The accumulated recurrence rate was 19.3% with enoxaparin compared with 36.6% with coumarin (P = .02). Although the mean Marder score was significantly improved in both groups (49.1% for enoxaparin vs 24.0% for coumarin; P = .016), a lower reduction in thrombus size was associated with higher clinical events of recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.97; 95% CI, 1.06-3.66; P = .032). A significant inverse correlation was also found between the degree of thrombus regression at 3 months and the incidence at 5 years of PTS (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Residual venous thrombosis is an important risk factor for recurrent thromboembolism and PTS. A greater reduction in thrombus size was associated with lesser clinical events of recurrence and consequently a lesser rate of PTS. However, despite a greater recanalization with enoxaparin, the incidence of PTS was similar between both treatment groups, probably because of the small sample size. Further investigations are needed to clarify the implication of the anticoagulant treatment in the severity of PTS.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Cumarínicos/uso terapêutico , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Trombose Venosa/complicações , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 7: 187, 2007 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18021440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To ensure the highest efficiency, health services should be provided with the least possible complexity. The aim of this study is to quantify the degree of appropriateness in preoperatory hospital stays and to analyse those factors associated with a greater inappropriate use. METHODS: Historical cohort study. The histories of 440 hospitalised patients who underwent at least one surgical procedure were analysed. Data collection was carried out by doctors not involved in the services studied, following the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A bivariate and multivariate analysis of the factors associated with the appropriateness of preoperatory stays was carried out. RESULTS: The mean number of days of preoperatory stay was 5.5 (SD 5.11), of which a mean number of 2.5 days were considered to be inappropriate (SD 4.11). The overall rate of inappropriateness was 45.2% (CI 95% 43.3-47.1). The multivariate analysis showed a positive association of the inappropriateness of the preoperatory stay with weekend days, programmed admission, hospital stays longer than 7 days, medical records incorrectly or incompletely documented and the age groups of 45-65 and the >65 with respect to the <45 age group. Sex and an incorrect or incomplete nursing register did not show such an association. CONCLUSION: The inappropriate use of hospital stay during preoperatory care affects almost half the period and there are some risk determinants that could act as indicators at admission. In addition, the efficiency of care provision was found to vary greatly from the point of view of its appropriateness.


Assuntos
Cuidado Periódico , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , Idoso , Eficiência Organizacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 5(3)2017 Jul 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28714923

RESUMO

Avian influenza viruses are currently one of the main threats to human health in the world. Although there are some screening reports of antibodies against these viruses in humans from Western countries, most of these types of studies are conducted in poultry and market workers of Asian populations. The presence of antibodies against avian influenza viruses was evaluated in an elderly European population. An experimental study was conducted, including pre- and post-vaccine serum samples obtained from 174 elderly people vaccinated with seasonal influenza vaccines of 2006-2007, 2008-2009, 2009-2010, and 2010-2011 Northern Hemisphere vaccine campaigns. The presence of antibodies against A/H5N1, A/H7N3, and A/H9N2 avian influenza viruses were tested by using haemaglutination inhibition assays. Globally, heterotypic antibodies were found before vaccination in 2.9% of individuals against A/H5N1, 1.2% against A/H7N3, and 25.9% against A/H9N2. These pre-vaccination antibodies were present at titers ≥1/40 in 1.1% of individuals against A/H5N1, in 1.1% against H7N3, and in 0.6% against the A/H9N2 subtype. One 76 year-old male showed pre-vaccine antibodies (Abs) against those three avian influenza viruses, and another three individuals presented Abs against two different viruses. Seasonal influenza vaccination induced a significant number of heterotypic seroconversions against A/H5N1 (14.4%) and A/H9N2 (10.9%) viruses, but only one seroconversion was observed against the A/H7N3 subtype. After vaccination, four individuals showed Abs titers ≥1/40 against those three avian viruses, and 55 individuals against both A/H5N1 and A/H9N2. Seasonal vaccination is able to induce some weak heterotypic responses to viruses of avian origin in elderly individuals with no previous exposure to them. However, this response did not accomplish the European Medicament Agency criteria for influenza vaccine efficacy. The results of this study show that seasonal vaccines induce a broad response of heterotypic antibodies against avian influenza viruses, albeit at a low level.

18.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(7): 1891-9, 2016 07 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27064311

RESUMO

Vaccination of the elderly is an important factor in limiting the impact of pneumonia in the community. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in patients aged ≥ 65 years hospitalized for causes unrelated to pneumonia, acute respiratory disease, or influenza-like illness in Spain. We made a cross-sectional study during 2013-2014. A bivariate analysis was performed comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, taking into account sociodemographic variables and risk medical conditions. A multivariate analysis was performed using multilevel regression models. 921 patients were included; 403 (43.8%) had received the pneumococcal vaccine (394 received the polysaccharide vaccine). Visiting the general practitioner ≥ 3 times during the last year (OR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.25-2.57); having received the influenza vaccination in the 2013-14 season (OR = 2.57; 95% CI 1.72-3.84) or in any of the 3 previous seasons (OR = 11.70; 95% CI 7.42-18.45) were associated with receiving the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Pneumococcal vaccination coverage of hospitalized elderly people is low. The elderly need to be targeted about pneumococcal vaccination and activities that encourage healthcare workers to proactively propose vaccination might be useful. Educational campaigns aimed at the elderly could also help to increase vaccination coverages and reduce the burden of pneumococcal disease in the community.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Espanha
19.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0147931, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26824383

RESUMO

Vaccination of the elderly is an important factor in limiting the impact of influenza in the community. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with influenza vaccination coverage in hospitalized patients aged ≥ 65 years hospitalized due to causes unrelated to influenza in Spain. We carried out a cross-sectional study. Bivariate analysis was performed comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, taking in to account sociodemographic variables and medical risk conditions. Multivariate analysis was performed using multilevel regression models. We included 1038 patients: 602 (58%) had received the influenza vaccine in the 2013-14 season. Three or more general practitioner visits (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.19-2.18); influenza vaccination in any of the 3 previous seasons (OR = 13.57; 95% CI 9.45-19.48); and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination (OR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.38-2.80) were associated with receiving the influenza vaccine. Vaccination coverage of hospitalized elderly people is low in Spain and some predisposing characteristics influence vaccination coverage. Healthcare workers should take these characteristics into account and be encouraged to proactively propose influenza vaccination to all patients aged ≥ 65 years.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Masculino , Estado Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/imunologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Classe Social , Espanha , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Vacinação/psicologia
20.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 15(3): 425-32, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26690376

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess whether influenza vaccination reduces the risk of severe and fatal outcomes in influenza inpatients aged ≥65 years. METHODS: During the 2013-2014 influenza season persons aged ≥65 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza were selected in 19 Spanish hospitals. A severe influenza case was defined as admission to the intensive care unit, death in hospital or within 30 days after admission. Logistic regression was used to compare the influenza vaccination status between severe and non-severe influenza inpatients. RESULTS: Of 433 influenza confirmed patients, 81 (19%) were severe cases. Vaccination reduced the risk of severe illness (odds ratio: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.33-0.98). The cumulative number of influenza vaccine doses received since the 2010-2011 season was associated with a lower risk of severe influenza (odds ratio: 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.91). CONCLUSION: Adherence to seasonal influenza vaccination in the elderly may reduce the risk of severe influenza outcomes.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Influenza Humana/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/terapia , Masculino , Prognóstico , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA