Challenges and visions for managing pain-related insomnia in primary care using the hybrid CBT approach: a small-scale qualitative interview study with GPs, nurses, and practice managers.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain and insomnia have a complex, bidirectional relationship - addressing sleep complaints alongside pain may be key to alleviating patient-reported distress and disability. Healthcare professionals have consistently reported wanting to offer psychologically informed chronic pain management at the primary care level. Research in secondary care has demonstrated good treatment efficacy of hybrid CBT for chronic pain and insomnia. However, primary care is typically the main point of treatment entry, hence may be better situated to offer treatments using a multidisciplinary approach. In this study, primary care service providers' perception of feasibility for tackling pain-related insomnia in primary care was explored. METHODS: The data corpus originates from a feasibility trial exploring hybrid CBT for chronic pain and insomnia delivered in primary care. This formed three in-depth group interviews with primary care staff (n = 9) from different primary care centres from the same NHS locale. All interviews were conducted on-site using a semi-structured approach. Verbal data was recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic analysis process. RESULTS: Eight themes were identified - 1) Discrepant conceptualisations of the chronic pain-insomnia relationship and clinical application, 2) Mismatch between patients' needs and available treatment offerings, 3) Awareness of psychological complexities, 4) Identified treatment gap for pain-related insomnia, 5) Lack of funding and existing infrastructure for new service development, 6) General shortage of psychological services for complex health conditions, 7) Multidisciplinary team provision with pain specialist input, and 8) Accessibility through primary care. These mapped onto four domains - Current understanding and practice, Perceived facilitators, Perceived barriers, Ideal scenarios for a new treatment service - which reflected the focus of our investigation. Taken together these provide key context for understanding challenges faced by health care professionals in considering and developing a new clinical service. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care service providers from one locale advocate better, multidisciplinary treatment provision for chronic pain and insomnia. Findings suggest that situating this in primary care could be a feasible option, but this requires systemic support and specialist input as well as definitive trials for success.

Behavioural interventions for people living with adult-onset primary dystonia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Primary dystonia is a chronic neurological movement disorder that causes abnormal muscle movements. Pain and emotional distress may accompany these physical symptoms. Behavioural interventions are used to help people with long term conditions improve their quality of life. Little is known about behavioural interventions applied to Dystonia. We report a systematic review of studies reporting current evidence of behavioural interventions for people with primary dystonia. METHODS: We did systematic searches of Medline, PsycINFO, AHMED and CINAHL. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using a risk of bias tool. Any disagreements were resolved by liaising with an independent rater. Physiological outcomes such as dystonia severity and psychological outcomes such as sleep and depression were selected on the basis that primary dystonia causes motor and non-motor symptoms. No time limit was placed on the searches. A narrative synthesis of the results is presented. RESULTS: Of 1798 titles and abstracts screened, 14 full articles were retrieved and inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Of these a final nine were eligible for the review (N = 73). Only two were Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs). Using the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) dystonia classification, that was published after this work started, all of the included studies were of idiopathic adult onset focal dystonia without associated features. These included: blepharospasm (eye dystonia) (N = 1), cervical dystonia (neck dystonia) (N = 2), writer's cramp (hand dystonia) (N = 3) and the yips (N = 3). No studies reported on dystonia that affects two or more body regions. Studies reported good adherence and response rates to treatment. Physiological and psychological improvements were noted in all studies at weekly, monthly and yearly follow-ups. Caution should be taken when interpreting the results because of the scarcity of RCTs identified, use of small sample sizes, and inappropriate statistical methods. CONCLUSION: We identified few studies; mainly of poor methodological quality that all studied a focal dystonia. It is not possible to draw firm conclusions. Nevertheless, the data suggests that a combined behavioural therapy approach including relaxation practice for people with idiopathic adult onset focal dystonia merits further investigation.

Combined cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness programme for people living with dystonia: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: To design and test the delivery of an intervention targeting the non-motor symptoms of dystonia and pilot key health and well-being questionnaires in this population. DESIGN: A proof-of-concept study to test the delivery, acceptability, relevance, structure and content for a 3-day group residential programme for the management of dystonia. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a single botulinum toxin clinic. The intervention was delivered in the community. PARTICIPANTS: 14 participants consented to take part (2 withdrew prior to the starting of intervention). The average age was 60 years (range 44-77), 8 of whom were female. After drop-out, 9 participants completed the 3-day programme. INTERVENTION: A 3-day group residential programme. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Process evaluation and interviews were carried out before and after the intervention to explore participant's views and expectations, as well as experiences of the intervention. Select questionnaires were completed at baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Although participants were not sure what to expect from the programme, they found it informative and for many this together with being in a group with other people with dystonia legitimised their condition. Mindfulness was accepted and adopted as a coping strategy. This was reflected in the 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully delivered a 3-day residential programme to help those living with dystonia manage their condition. Further improvements are suggested. The quantitative outcome measures were acceptable to this group of patients with dystonia.