Correlation between the morphological features of the biceps groove and injuries to the biceps pulley and the long head tendon of the biceps.

PURPOSE: The morphometric features of the biceps groove were measured to investigate their correlation with the injury of the pulley and the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). METHODS: A total of 126 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery had their morphological features of bicipital groove evaluated on a 3D reconstruction model of the humeral head. The groove width, groove depth, opening angle, medial wall angle, and inclination angle of the bicipital groove were measured for each patient. During the surgery, the type of injury to the biceps pulley and the degree of long head of biceps tendon injury were assessed. The correlations of these injury assessments with bicipital groove measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: The average groove width was(12.3 ± 2.1) mm. The average groove depth was(4.9 ± 1.4) mm. The average groove inclination angle was 26.3° ± 8.1°. The average opening angle was 89.8° ± 18.4°. The average medial groove wall angle was 40.6° ± 7.9°.Sixty six patients had injury of the biceps pulley structure, and their Martetschläger classifications were as follows: type I injury in 12 patients, type II injury in 18 patients, and type III injury in 36 patients. The Lafosse grades of Lesions of LHBT were as follows: 72 cases were grade 0 injury, 30 cases were grade I injury, and 24 cases were grade II injury. We found no significant correlation between the opening width, depth, inclination angle, opening angle, and medial wall angle of the morphological features of bicipital groove and injuries of the pulley and the LHBT. The correlation between pulley structure injury and lesions of LHBT was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Lesions of LHBT show strong correlation with pulley injuries.This study does not find a correlation between the injury of the pulley or the LHBT and bicipital groove morphology.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients remains a controversial topic. This study investigates the mid-term outcomes of ARCR in RA patients and identifies the factors influencing clinical efficacy. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled RA patients with small or medium rotator cuff tears (RCTs) between February 2014 and February 2019. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant-Murley scores were collected at each follow-up time. Ultimately, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray were employed to assess rotator cuff integrity and progression of shoulder bone destruction, respectively. Statistical methods used two-way repeated-measures ANOVA or generalized estimation equations. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were identified and divided into ARCR (n = 75) and conservative treatment (n = 82) groups. ARCR group continued to be divided into small tear (n = 35) and medium tear (n = 40) groups. At the final, all scores were better in ARCR group than in the conservative treatment group (p < 0.05). A radiographic evaluation of the final follow-up demonstrated that the progression rate in ARCR group (18.67%) was significantly lower than that of the conservative treatment group (39.02%, p < 0.05). In the comparison of the small tear and medium tear groups, all scores increased significantly after surgery (p < 0.05), and the final follow-up scores were better than preoperative scores (p < 0.05) but worse than those of the 6-month postoperative follow-up (p < 0.05). Comparison between the two groups revealed that all scores of the small tear group were significantly better than those of the medium tear group at 6-month postoperative follow-up (p < 0.05). Although the scores of small tear group remained better than those of the medium group at the final postoperative follow-up, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Radiographic assessment of the final follow-up demonstrated that the progression rate in the small tear group (8.57%) was significantly lower than that in the medium group (27.50%, p < 0.05), and the retear rate of small tear group (14.29%) was significantly lower than that of the medium tear group (35.00%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ARCR could effectively improve the quality of life for RA patients with small or medium RCTs, at least in the medium term. Despite the progression of joint destruction in some patients, postoperative retear rates were comparable to those in the general population. ARCR is more likely to benefit RA patients than conservative treatment.