RESUMO
PURPOSE: Quality of life and symptomatology in patients with malignancies admitted to comprehensive cancer centres are rarely investigated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate symptomatology and health-related quality of life of inpatients with cancer. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on two occasions 5 weeks apart in haematology and oncology departments at a comprehensive cancer centre. Assessment included demographic data, WHO performance status (PS), EORTC QLQ-C30 and pain scales of brief pain inventory. Comparisons were analysed using Wilcoxon two-sample test, rank tests and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients were analysed, mean age=59 years (SD=13.7), 42% admitted to haematological department; lung cancer was the most frequent diagnosis (15%). Low health-related quality of life and severe symptom burden, especially fatigue and appetite loss, were observed among the inpatients. In addition, role and social functions appeared to be more impaired in haematology patients than in those admitted to oncology (P=0.0372 and 0.0167, respectively). On the other hand, pain and constipation were more severely affected in oncology patients (P=0.0194 and 0.0064, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the wards of haematology and oncology had pronounced symptomatology and low quality of life. A more systematic focus on the amelioration of problems with functioning and symptoms among inpatients with malignant diseases is warranted.
Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Dor/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Danish women. Locally advanced breast cancer occurs in a relatively large proportion of all new primary breast cancer diagnoses and for unexplained reasons 20-30% of women with breast cancer wait more than eight weeks from the initial breast cancer symptom(s) before seeking medical advice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, we performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients referred to The Department of Breast Surgery, Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen in the period between 2006 and 2011, to characterize women presenting with breast cancer either larger than 5 cm or locally advanced breast cancer/inoperable breast cancer (LABC/IOBC). The aim of the study was to characterize these women concerning age, social status, co-morbidity, defined anamnestic parameters concerning breast history and delay in seeking medical advice, to explore whether common traits among these parameters could be identified which could account for the late diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 157 cases. The median age of our cohort was 67 years (range 30-98) and did not differ from all women with breast cancer, but with a high risk of severe medical co-morbidity, psychiatric co-morbidity or dementia. However, 42% did not reveal any history of a psychiatric or somatic co-morbidity did not take psychoactive drugs and had no previous benign breast disorder. They were living in their own homes, were married, did not suffer from dementia, could have a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer, but still presented with breast cancer characterized as LABC/IOBC, without any apparent reason. Among these 42%, more than half had neglected their obvious symptoms of breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Diagnóstico Tardio , Negação em Psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conscientização , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Comorbidade , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
We investigated if delayed breast implant reconstruction after breast cancer impairs prognosis. Using data from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group register, we identified all women <70 years who underwent breast reconstruction with implants after mastectomy after invasive breast cancer during 1978 to 1992, on average 2.2 years (range, 3 days-9.4 years) after mastectomy. The reconstructed women were closely matched to breast cancer patients without reconstruction on age and calendar time of diagnosis, tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and adjuvant radiation therapy. Overall, 580 reconstructed women and 1158 individually matched controls were followed-up for disease-free survival within the first 10 years and for overall survival for an average of 20.1 year (range, 12.8-27.5 years). Disease-free survival was significantly improved hazard ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.95 and overall survival was nonsignificantly improved (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.06) among the breast reconstructed women. This is likely because of differences in socioeconomic and health factors.
Assuntos
Implantes de Mama/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Dinamarca , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A biennial mammography screening programme started for all women aged 50-69 in the municipality of Copenhagen, Denmark, in April 1991. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality of the preoperative diagnostic assessment for women recalled for further examination. Quality indicators were: validity of the fine-needle aspiration cytology, rate of malignant to benign surgery, and frequency of one-step surgery for malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Database registries during the first three screening rounds from April 1991 to March 1997 were studied retrospectively, for fine-needle aspiration cytology tests where surgical biopsy was also performed. RESULTS: In the period 1991-1997, 4,111 women were recalled for clinical mammography and subsequently 1,086 women underwent surgery. The use of the triple test in the preoperative assessment increased from 50% in the first screening round to 72% in the third. Throughout the period of evaluation, the number of inadequate fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was reduced from 32% to 6%. Inadequate FNAC from malignant lesions declined from 27% to 6%. The sensitivity of FNAC increased from 67% to 90% and the accuracy from 60% to 81%. The malignant/benign ratio of surgery rose from 1.4 in the first screening round to 2.8 in the third. One-step surgery as definitive treatment was performed in 67% of malignant instances. DISCUSSION: The preoperative diagnostic assessment improved during the evaluation period. The triple test was used more often over time, the validity of FNAC and the malignant/benign ratio of surgery increased.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Dinamarca , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Service mammography has been offered biennially to women aged 50-69 years in the municipality of Copenhagen since 1991. The results were compared to breast cancer cases before initiation of screening. The comparison concerns prognostic factors and the treatment-related consequences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the Copenhagen service mammography screening were linked to data from the DBCG database. RESULTS: Before screening, 16% of breast cancer cases had a tumour size of 10 mm or less, this percentage increased to 41 in the screen-detected cases. Sixty per cent of breast cancer cases showed no evidence of metastatic spread to axillary lymph nodes before screening; this percentage increased to 78 per cent in the screen-detected cases. Forty per cent of ductal carcinomas showed a malignancy grade I before screening, compared to 53% in the screen-detected cases. Thirteen per cent were treated with breast conserving therapy before screening, as opposed to 48% in the screen-detected cases. Forty-one per cent needed postoperative adjuvant treatment before screening, compared with 21% in the screen-detected cases. DISCUSSION: A marked improvement was seen in the prognostic and treatment-related characteristics of the screen-detected breast cancer cases, as compared to breast cancer cases from the same area before screening was initiated.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , PrognósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Biennial service mammography screening for breast cancer has been offered to women aged 50-69 years in the municipality of Copenhagen since 1991. We report the results of the first three invitation rounds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from the Copenhagen service mammography screening database and other Danish registers. RESULTS: The average participation rate during the first three invitation rounds was 66%. The breast cancer detection rate was 10/1,000 screened in the first invitation round and 5/1,000 in the consecutive rounds. The probability of a false positive mammography was 6% at the prevalent screen, and this was reduced to 3% at incidence screens. Fifty-two cases of interval cancer were seen after the first invitation round. The expected number was 152, which gives a proportional interval cancer rate of 0.34. The sensitivity was 86% and the specificity 94% after the first round. DISCUSSION: The detection rate of breast cancer was high, especially in the prevalence round. The trend in the incidence of breast cancer at the subsequent rounds was similar to that before screening, which indicates that mammography screening does not lead to any greater over-diagnosis. The rate of false positive mammography was high at the initial screening round, but was acceptable at subsequent rounds, and a false positive mammography does not seem to have affected participation in subsequent rounds. The Copenhagen screening programme conforms to international quality assurance guidelines for process evaluation.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect on breast cancer mortality during the first 10 years of the mammography service screening programme that was introduced in Copenhagen in 1991. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The mammography service screening programme in Copenhagen, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: All women ever invited to mammography screening in the first 10 years of the programme. Historical, national, and historical national control groups were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was breast cancer mortality. We compared breast cancer mortality in the study group with rates in the control groups, adjusting for age, time period, and region. RESULTS: Breast cancer mortality in the screening period was reduced by 25% (relative risk 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.89) compared with what we would expect in the absence of screening. For women actually participating in screening, breast cancer mortality was reduced by 37%. CONCLUSIONS: In the Copenhagen programme, breast cancer mortality was reduced without severe negative side effects for the participants.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Mamografia/mortalidade , Programas de Rastreamento/mortalidade , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
In an overview, Swedish mammography screening trials demonstrated a 29% reduction in breast cancer mortality in women aged 50-69 and no effect on total mortality. Three Danish regions introduced mammography screening in the 1990s. The authors developed a method to evaluate the effect of mammography service screening on breast cancer mortality and validated it applying it to total mortality, where no effect was expected. Study groups and historical and national control groups were analysed using Poisson regression. Total mortality in the screening regions and periods was close to that expected in the absence of screening. A small (3%) excess risk, also seen in a non-screening area, probably results from regional differences changing over time. The effect of this is inseparable from the screening effect. The design is adequate for analysing the effect of mammography service screening on breast cancer mortality.