Interventions to improve vitamin D status in at-risk ethnic groups during pregnancy and early childhood: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature with the primary aim of identifying behavioural interventions to improve vitamin D stores in children from at-risk ethnic groups. DESIGN: Review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017080932. Health Behaviour Model and Behaviour Change Wheel framework constructs used to underpin evaluation of interventions. Methodological quality evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias, Cochrane ROBINS-I and NHLBI tools. SETTING: Databases Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL with secondary search of Google Scholar. No country limits set. Papers between January 1990 and February 2018, published in English included. Anticipating study heterogeneity, outcome measures not pre-specified and identified from individual full papers. Updated literature search November 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Patient or population including pregnant women, newborns and children aged under 18 years, from Asian or African ethnic groups. RESULTS: Of 10 690 articles screened, 298 underwent full-text review, with 24 ultimately included for data extraction. All identified studies conducted a vitamin D pharmacological supplementation intervention, with two also incorporating a behavioural intervention strategy. No study explicitly defined a primary aim of evaluating a behavioural intervention, undertaken to study its effect on vitamin D supplement uptake. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to address the paucity of data in ethnic at-risk children on how behavioural interventions ideally developed and co-produced with the community under study, affect and help improve vitamin D uptake, within the antenatal and pregnancy phase as well as during childhood.

Action research: a valuable research technique for service delivery development.

The evaluation of healthcare practice and service delivery is fraught with difficulties. Service development and/or delivery occurs within socially dynamic settings which are in a continual state of change. Service development also often involves large elements of improvisation. The action research approach is useful for health service research, as it supports collaboration between researchers and practitioners, and not only allows but makes explicit that the action researcher has both roles within the setting being studied. This paper discusses action research methodology and offers insight into principles that favor its use for service delivery development. This includes consideration of the interactive variables within studies of health care systems and the importance of evaluating relationships between stakeholders to understand how these factors or variables, which cannot be controlled for, are responsible for successful development of the service. Action research facilitates change and helps bridge the theory-practice gap. With the current dynamic changes within both the pharmacy profession and national health services, researchers may find the action research technique of value when considering new roles and innovative ways of engaging in collaborative, multi-disciplinary working to improve delivery of patient care.

Development of the specialist menopause pharmacist (SMP) role within a research framework.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential contribution of a new healthcare practice model, the specialist menopause pharmacist (SMP) role. METHOD: Post pilot, the SMP's remit was proposed as combining clinical practice (service delivery) and research studies, with emphasis on strengthening liaison between the secondary and primary care sectors. Action research, a qualitative research technique, was selected to document role development in the first year. Here the pharmacist-researcher's focus was a local situation where the effects of a particular change, involving people who were part of the situation, were assessed. The change factor was the introduction of the pharmacist to the multi-disciplinary specialist team. The pharmacist-researcher did not attempt to hold anything constant but observed the changes occurring in a systematic manner. Analysis of on-going collaborative professional activity generated the hypothesis that the role was of use in enhancing patient care. Using triangulation and focusing on the descriptive phrase 'of use', it was then possible to study SMP implemented 'actions' that would be accepted as being 'useful' SMP functions. The aim was to test for reliability and obtain data with greater range and accuracy. The three studies undertaken included a controlled, questionnaire study asking for patients' views on the pharmacist service, auditing health professionals usage of the pharmacist operated telephone help-line, and assessing the impact of structured on-site training on community pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall impact and achievements over 3 years, against a background where the SMP role continued to develop during the study. RESULTS: Action research methodology engendered reflective practice, enabling the SMP to be both the service delivery provider (the intervention) and the researcher. This pharmacist practice model is accepted both by patients and health professional colleagues. The remit combines clinical practice with on-going research studies. In the UK setting, the SMP can undertake numerous liaison activities between secondary and primary care sectors to facilitate enhanced delivery of menopause patient care. CONCLUSION: Using an action research approach, and combining qualitative and quantitative methods to complement data collection, it was possible to assess the specialist pharmacist role in depth.