Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in Patients with Coronavirus Disease: A Multicenter Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: RCVS (Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstrictive Syndrome) is a condition associated with vasoactive agents that alter endothelial function. There is growing evidence that endothelial inflammation contributes to cerebrovascular disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In our study, we describe the clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of RCVS in a multicenter case series of patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective case series. We collected clinical characteristics, imaging, and outcomes of patients with RCVS and COVID-19 identified at each participating site. RESULTS: Ten patients were identified, 7 women, ages 21 - 62 years. Risk factors included use of vasoconstrictive agents in 7 and history of migraine in 2. Presenting symptoms included thunderclap headache in 5 patients with recurrent headaches in 4. Eight were hypertensive on arrival to the hospital. Symptoms of COVID-19 included fever in 2, respiratory symptoms in 8, and gastrointestinal symptoms in 1. One patient did not have systemic COVID-19 symptoms. MRI showed subarachnoid hemorrhage in 3 cases, intraparenchymal hemorrhage in 2, acute ischemic stroke in 4, FLAIR hyperintensities in 2, and no abnormalities in 1 case. Neurovascular imaging showed focal segment irregularity and narrowing concerning for vasospasm of the left MCA in 4 cases and diffuse, multifocal narrowing of the intracranial vasculature in 6 cases. Outcomes varied, with 2 deaths, 2 remaining in the ICU, and 6 surviving to discharge with modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0 (n=3), 2 (n=2), and 3 (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that patients with COVID-19 may be at risk for RCVS, particularly in the setting of additional risk factors such as exposure to vasoactive agents. There was variability in the symptoms and severity of COVID-19, clinical characteristics, abnormalities on imaging, and mRS scores. However, a larger study is needed to validate a causal relationship between RCVS and COVID-19.

Recent update on basic mechanisms of spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-shattering neurological condition that affects between 250,000 and 500,000 individuals each year with an estimated two to three million people worldwide living with an SCI-related disability. The incidence in the USA and Canada is more than that in other countries with motor vehicle accidents being the most common cause, while violence being most common in the developing nations. Its incidence is two- to fivefold higher in males, with a peak in younger adults. Apart from the economic burden associated with medical care costs, SCI predominantly affects a younger adult population. Therefore, the psychological impact of adaptation of an average healthy individual as a paraplegic or quadriplegic with bladder, bowel, or sexual dysfunction in their early life can be devastating. People with SCI are two to five times more likely to die prematurely, with worse survival rates in low- and middle-income countries. This devastating disorder has a complex and multifaceted mechanism. Recently, a lot of research has been published on the restoration of locomotor activity and the therapeutic strategies. Therefore, it is imperative for the treating physicians to understand the complex underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of SCI.

Site Experience and Outcomes in the Trevo Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRACK) Multicenter Registry.

Background and Purpose- It remains unclear how experience influences outcomes after the advent of stent retriever technology. We studied the relationship between site experience and outcomes in the Trevo Acute Ischemic Stroke multicenter registry. Methods- The 24 sites that enrolled patients in the Trevo Acute Ischemic Stroke registry were trichotomized into low-volume (<2 cases/month), medium-volume (2-4 cases/month), and high-volume centers (>4 cases/month). Baseline features, imaging, and clinical outcomes were compared across the 3 volume strata. A multivariable analysis was performed to assess whether outcomes were influenced by site volumes. Results- A total of 624 patients were included and distributed as low- (n=188 patients, 30.1%), medium- (n=175, 28.1%), and high-volume (n=261, 41.8%) centers. There were no significant differences in terms of age (mean, 66±16 versus 67±14 versus 65±15; P=0.2), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (mean, 17.6±6.5 versus 16.8±6.5 versus 17.6±6.9; P=0.43), or occlusion site across the 3 groups. Median (interquartile range) times from stroke onset to groin puncture were 266 (181.8-442.5), 239 (175-389), and 336.5 (221.3-466.5) minutes in low-, medium-, and high-volume centers, respectively (P=0.004). Higher efficiency and better outcomes were seen in higher volume sites as demonstrated by shorter procedural times (median, 97 versus 67 versus 69 minutes; P<0.001), higher balloon guide catheter use (40% versus 36% versus 59%; P≤0.0001), and higher rates of good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS], ≤2; 39% versus 50% versus 53.4%; P=0.02). There were no appreciable differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or 90-day mortality. After adjustments in the multivariable analysis, there were significantly higher chances of achieving a good outcome in high- versus low-volume (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.03-2.7; P=0.04) and medium- versus low-volume (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P=0.03) centers, but there were no significant differences between high- and medium-volume centers (P=0.86). Conclusions- Stroke center volumes significantly influence efficiency and outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy.

Impact of Balloon Guide Catheter Use on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in the STRATIS Stroke Thrombectomy Registry.

Background and Purpose- Mechanical thrombectomy has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, the impact of balloon guide catheter (BGC) use is not well established. Methods- STRATIS (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke) was a prospective, multicenter study of patients with large vessel occlusion treated with the Solitaire stent retriever as first-line therapy. In this study, an independent core laboratory, blinded to the clinical outcomes, reviewed all procedures and angiographic data to classify procedural technique, target clot location, recanalization after each pass, and determine the number of stent retriever passes. The primary clinical end point was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, 0-2) at 3 months as determined on-site, and the angiographic end point was first-pass effect (FPE) success rate from a single device attempt (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, ≥2c) as determined by a core laboratory. Achieving modified FPE (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, ≥2b) was also assessed. Comparisons of clinical outcomes were made between groups and adjusted for baseline and procedural characteristics. All participating centers received institutional review board approval from their respective institutions. Results- Adjunctive technique groups included BGC (n=445), distal access catheter (n=238), and conventional guide catheter (n=62). The BGC group had a higher rate of FPE following first pass (212/443 [48%]) versus conventional guide catheter (16/62 [26%]; P=0.001) and distal access catheter (83/235 [35%]; P=0.002). Similarly, the BGC group had a higher rate of modified FPE (294/443 [66%]) versus conventional guide catheter (26/62 [42%]; P<0.001) and distal access catheter (129/234 [55%]; P=0.003). The BGC group achieved the highest rate of functional independence (253/415 [61%]) versus conventional guide catheter (23/55 [42%]; P=0.007) and distal access catheter (113/218 [52%]; P=0.027). Final revascularization and mortality rates did not differ across the groups. Conclusions- BGC use was an independent predictor of FPE, modified FPE, and functional independence, suggesting that its routine use may improve the rates of early revascularization success and good clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02239640.

A case-control study of stroke risk factors and outcomes in African American stroke patients with and without crack-cocaine abuse.

BACKGROUND: Stroke in crack-cocaine abusers is increasingly recognized. We aimed to identify significant differences in stroke risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes between hospitalized stroke patients with and without crack-cocaine abuse. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that compared stroke patients with crack-cocaine abuse (cases) to stroke patients without crack-cocaine (controls). RESULTS: We identified 93 crack-cocaine cases and 93 controls admitted between January 2004 and May 2006 to one teaching hospital. There were significant differences between crack-cocaine cases and controls in age (48.7 years vs. 55 years) (P = 0.0001), male gender (65.6% vs. 40.9%) (odds ratios, OR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.22-2.21), arterial hypertension (61.1% vs. 83.9%) (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.60), hypercholesterolemia (18.7% vs. 68.5%) (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.05-0.21), diabetes (20.9% vs. 41.9%) (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70), cigarette smoking (70.6% vs. 29%) (OR = 5.86, 95% CI 3.07-11.20), ischemic stroke (61.3% vs. 79.6%) (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.78), and intracerebral hemorrhage (33.3% vs. 17.2%) (OR = 3.03, 95% CI 1.53-6.00). Also, there were significant differences in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (3.3 vs. 7) (P < 0.0001), and MRS scores (1.8 vs. 2.5) (P = 0.0022) at hospital discharge. Using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, we found that crack-cocaine abusers had 2.28 higher odds of having a favorable functional outcome (MRS score ≤ 2) at hospital discharge, after adjusting for stroke risk factors and characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that crack-cocaine abusers with stroke had fewer traditional risk factors, and more favorable functional outcome as compared to non-crack-cocaine abusers.

Vertebral artery stenting for the treatment of bow hunter's syndrome: report of 4 cases.

Bow hunter's syndrome (BHS) is a rare condition resulting from vertebrobasilar insufficiency secondary to mechanical occlusion or stenosis of the vertebral artery (VA) due to head rotation. Traditionally, surgical intervention with C1-C2 fusion or VA decompression was the mainstay of therapy. Endovascular intervention was rarely performed to treat BHS. We reviewed the neurointerventional database from July 2005 to October 2010 to identify all cases of BHS treated with VA stenting. Here we report clinical, technical, and outcome data for 4 patients with BHS who were treated with VA stenting. In all 4 of these patients, stenting was performed in the V2 segment (C2-C6) of the VA without significant technical difficulties. All patients reported symptomatic relief, and only minor or no residual stenosis was detected by dynamic digital subtraction angiography. Our findings indicate that VA stenting for the treatment of BHS is feasible, safe, and clinically effective. Endovascular techniques might offer an alternative, minimally invasive therapy for the treatment of BHS.

Neurocritical care of a reperfused brain.

Cerebral hyperperfusion and reperfusion injuries are not infrequently encountered following in reperfusion of ischemic or hypoperfused brain. Mechanism of injury could be related to tissue plasminogen activator toxicity, oxidative stress, and hyperperfusion due to impaired cerebral autoregulation in already maximally dilated cerebral vasculature and compromised cerebral hemodynamic reserve. Reperfusion injury can present as headaches and seizures in mild forms and as subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and encephalopathy in its most severe manifestation. Prevention and identifying those at risk of hyperperfusion syndromes are the best strategy. Active treatment includes basic neurocritical care with reduction of blood pressure to a reperfused brain and timely neuroprotection and cerebral edema control measures are the mainstay of its management approach.

Gliomas: survival differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties.

BACKGROUND: For gliomas, metropolitan status has not been heavily explored in the context of short-term mortality or long-term observed survival. Larger populations are associated with proximity to academic universities/high-volume hospitals. METHODS: The SEER-18 registry was queried for patients with gliomas. The patients were further classified into two population groups based on rural-urban continuum codes: metropolitan or non-metropolitan. Demographics and clinical factors were compared between both groups. For observed survival, univariate and multivariate analyses occurred with Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The non-metropolitan group constituted approximately 10.8% of all patients. Age at diagnosis of glioma was older for the non-metropolitan group compared to metropolitan group (51.60 years vs. 49.06 years). Relative to the metropolitan group, the non-metropolitan group exhibited a larger proportion of Caucasian, married, grade I and IV gliomas, no surgery, no GTR (for those who had surgery), and temporal/parietal/occipital locations. Other covariates (sex, tumor size, laterality, and radiation status) did not exhibit significant differences in proportions. From analysis of observed survival, independent predictors include population group, as well as age, gender, marital status, tumor location, tumor grade, laterality, GTR, and receipt of radiation. Short-term mortality was 11.68% and 13.04% for Metropolitan and non-metropolitan groups, respectively. Median survival was 15 months and 12 months for Metropolitan and non-metropolitan groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: About one-tenth of gliomas are treated at non-metropolitan sites. Key differences exist among patient/glioma characteristics based on metropolitan status. Overall, metropolitan status appears to influence short-term mortality and long-term observed survival for gliomas.

Causes of death in glioblastoma: insights from the SEER database.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GB) and its variants portend a poor prognosis. The predominant cause of death (COD) is related to the cancer diagnosis, but a significant subset is related to other causes. As GB is a systemic disease requiring systemic treatment, focus regarding all COD provides a comprehensive illustration of the disease. METHODS: The SEER-18 was queried for patients with cranial GB and its variants. Age, gender, race, marital status, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and follow-up data were acquired. The patients were classified into group A (death attributed to this cancer diagnosis) or group B (death attributed to causes other than this cancer diagnosis). RESULTS: From 1973 to 2013, 36,632 deaths (94%) constituted group A, and 2,324 deaths (5.9%) constituted group B. The latter significantly exhibited lower proportions of age <60, Caucasians, married status, frontal/brain stem/ventricle tumor locations, and receipt of radiation. From logistic regression, age >60, male gender, race, not married, tumor location, and no radiation were significant independent predictors for group B. The top known CODs in group B are diseases of heart, pneumonia and influenza, cerebrovascular diseases, accidents and adverse effects, and infections. CONCLUSIONS: CODs not attributed to GB remains a significant subset of all CODs. Many of these, particularly diseases of heart, are frequent comorbidities. Moreover, infection-related CODs after GB diagnosis appear more salient compared to CODs in the general population. Consideration of these CODs, and vigilant treatment aimed at these CODs, may improve overall care for GB patients.

Modern operative nuances for the management of eloquent high-grade gliomas.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG), the rate of tumor recurrence is high and survival rate for the patient is low. Gross total resection has shown increased survival but the location of the tumor in the eloquent brain poses significant risk of morbidity. In this report, we focus on modern surgical nuances for resection of tumors located in the eloquent brain. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Research of the literature was conducted using the following search terms: surgical resection of gliomas, high-grade gliomas, and the role of vascular encasement - from 1986-2018. An institutional experience from the first author of this paper was also reviewed for selection of our illustrative cases. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Gross total resection remains the mainstay of therapy for high-grade gliomas. The resection of the peritumoral FLAIR, when possible, has been associated with increased survival but also has the potential to cause increased morbidity. In the eloquent brain, the resection of the tumor itself is possible if attention is given to the interface of the tumor and brain, or if a safe pseudo-interface is created by the surgeon. Tumor-seeding to the ventricular system needs to be avoided. Devascularization, dissection away from the brain, and retractorless brain surgery are key to successful surgical outcomes. Management of the venous and arterial invasion/encasement are also outlined in this report. Technical aspects are discussed with corresponding videos. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade gliomas involving eloquent brain areas require a tailored treatment plan. While the medical treatment is undergoing quick evolution, gross total resection still remains one of the key milestones of treatment for improved survival. Surgical techniques play key role. We propose that encasement and/or the invasion of arteries and veins, should be considered equally as important as the eloquent brain when contemplating the resection of gliomas.

Downward migration of carotid stent on 8 months follow-up imaging: possible stent "watermelon- seeding" effect.

BACKGROUND: One method used to treat atherosclerotic carotid disease is carotid artery stenting (CAS). A rarely encountered limitation of this technique is stent migration. Here, we present a rare case of carotid stent downward migration found on follow-up imaging 8 months post operation. METHOD/RESULT: A 70-year-old man presented with aphasia and right-sided weakness secondary to high-grade (99%) proximal left internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis that was treated with CAS. Stent apposition distally was achieved as well as proximally at the carotid bulb without crossing the bifurcation and without going distally beyond the ICA angulation to avoid kinking. Eight months follow-up computerized axial angiogram showed downward migration of the stent into the common carotid with restenosis distal to the stent. A 6-8 × 40 mm stent was deployed and the stenosed area restented with good results to overlap with the older stent and landed distal to the ICA angulation. CONCLUSION: Interventionalists should be aware of the rare possibility of migrating downward "watermelon-seeding" of carotid stents. This report may generate the hypothesis that the stent watermelon-seeding effect may be related to proximal placement of a short stent below the ICA angulation and at the carotid bulb in severely stenotic lesion.

Dissecting aneurysms of posterior cerebral artery: clinical presentation, angiographic findings, treatment, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: The dissecting posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms are very rare. These aneurysms pose significant treatment challenge and need careful evaluation to formulate an optimal treatment plan in case of ruptured or un-ruptured presentations. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected data. RESULTS: Seven patients with dissecting aneurysms of the PCA were identified. Six out of seven presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and one with ischemic stroke. Three out of seven were treated with endovascular coil embolization without sacrifice of the parent artery and the rest had parent artery occlusion (PAO) with coil embolization. None of the patients developed new neurological deficits post-procedure. Aneurysm re-occurred in two patients that were treated without PAO. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of the dissecting PCA aneurysm is safe and feasible. It can be performed with or without PAO. Recurrence is more common without PAO and close follow-up is warranted.

Endovascular therapy for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis.

Recent reports have emerged suggesting that multiple sclerosis (MS) may be due to abnormal venous outflow from the central nervous system, termed chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI). These reports have generated strong interest and controversy over the prospect of a treatable cause of this chronic debilitating disease. This review aims to describe the proposed association between CCSVI and MS, summarize the current data, and discuss the role of endovascular therapy and the need for rigorous randomized clinical trials to evaluate this association and treatment.

Safety and feasibility of simultaneous ipsilateral proximal carotid artery stenting and cerebral aneurysm coiling.

Coexistence of cerebral aneurysm and carotid artery disease may be encountered in clinical practice. Theoretical increase in aneurysmal blood flow may increase risk of rupture if carotid artery disease is treated first. If aneurysm coiling is performed first, stroke risk may increase while repeatedly crossing the diseased artery. It is controversial which disease to treat first, and whether it is safe to treat both simultaneously via endovascular procedures. We document the safety and feasibility of such an approach. Review of collected neurointerventional database at our institution was performed for patients who underwent both carotid artery stenting (CAS) and aneurysm coil embolization (ACE) simultaneously. All patients underwent carotid stenting followed by aneurysm coiling in the same setting. Demographic, clinical data, and outcome measures including success rate and periprocedural complications were collected. Five hundred and ninety aneurysms coiling were screened for patients who underwent combined CAS and ACE. Ten patients were identified. Mean age was 67.7 years (range 51-89). The success rate for stenting and coiling was 100% with no immediate complications. The coiling procedure time was extended by an average of 45 min for performing both procedures jointly. No stroke, TIAs, or aneurysmal rebleeding was found on their most recent follow up. Our case series demonstrates that it is safe and feasible to perform CAS and ACE simultaneously as one procedure which may avoid unwanted risk of treating either disease at two separate time sessions.