The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

Sleep Apnea Physiological Burdens and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by frequent reductions in ventilation, leading to oxygen desaturations and/or arousals. Objectives: In this study, association of hypoxic burden with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) was examined and compared with that of "ventilatory burden" and "arousal burden." Finally, we assessed the extent to which the ventilatory burden, visceral obesity, and lung function explain variations in hypoxic burden. Methods: Hypoxic, ventilatory, and arousal burdens were measured from baseline polysomnograms in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) studies. Ventilatory burden was defined as event-specific area under ventilation signal (mean normalized, area under the mean), and arousal burden was defined as the normalized cumulative duration of all arousals. The adjusted hazard ratios for incident CVD and mortality were calculated. Exploratory analyses quantified contributions to hypoxic burden of ventilatory burden, baseline oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry, visceral obesity, and spirometry parameters. Measurements and Main Results: Hypoxic and ventilatory burdens were significantly associated with incident CVD (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] per 1 SD increase in hypoxic burden: MESA, 1.45 [1.14, 1.84]; MrOS, 1.13 [1.02, 1.26]; ventilatory burden: MESA, 1.38 [1.11, 1.72]; MrOS, 1.12 [1.01, 1.25]), whereas arousal burden was not. Similar associations with mortality were also observed. Finally, 78% of variation in hypoxic burden was explained by ventilatory burden, whereas other factors explained only <2% of variation. Conclusions: Hypoxic and ventilatory burden predicted CVD morbidity and mortality in two population-based studies. Hypoxic burden is minimally affected by measures of adiposity and captures the risk attributable to ventilatory burden of obstructive sleep apnea rather than a tendency to desaturate.

Ventilatory Drive Withdrawal Rather Than Reduced Genioglossus Compensation as a Mechanism of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in REM Sleep.

Rationale: REM sleep is associated with reduced ventilation and greater obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity than non-REM (nREM) sleep for reasons that have not been fully elucidated. Objectives: Here, we use direct physiological measurements to determine whether the pharyngeal compromise in REM sleep OSA is most consistent with 1) withdrawal of neural ventilatory drive or 2) deficits in pharyngeal pathophysiology per se (i.e., increased collapsibility and decreased muscle responsiveness). Methods: Sixty-three participants with OSA completed sleep studies with gold standard measurements of ventilatory "drive" (calibrated intraesophageal diaphragm EMG), ventilation (oronasal "ventilation"), and genioglossus EMG activity. Drive withdrawal was assessed by examining these measurements at nadir drive (first decile of drive within a stage). Pharyngeal physiology was assessed by examining collapsibility (lowered ventilation at eupneic drive) and responsiveness (ventilation-drive slope). Mixed-model analysis compared REM sleep with nREM sleep; sensitivity analysis examined phasic REM sleep. Measurements and Main Results: REM sleep (⩾10 min) was obtained in 25 patients. Compared with drive in nREM sleep, drive in REM sleep dipped to markedly lower nadir values (first decile, estimate [95% confidence interval], -21.8% [-31.2% to -12.4%] of eupnea; P < 0.0001), with an accompanying reduction in ventilation (-25.8% [-31.8% to -19.8%] of eupnea; P < 0.0001). However, there was no effect of REM sleep on collapsibility (ventilation at eupneic drive), baseline genioglossus EMG activity, or responsiveness. REM sleep was associated with increased OSA severity (+10.1 [1.8 to 19.8] events/h), but this association was not present after adjusting for nadir drive (+4.3 [-4.2 to 14.6] events/h). Drive withdrawal was exacerbated in phasic REM sleep. Conclusions: In patients with OSA, the pharyngeal compromise characteristic of REM sleep appears to be predominantly explained by ventilatory drive withdrawal rather than by preferential decrements in muscle activity or responsiveness. Preventing drive withdrawal may be the leading target for REM sleep OSA.

Neural ventilatory drive decline as a predominant mechanism of obstructive sleep apnoea events.

BACKGROUND: In the classic model of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), respiratory events occur with sleep-related dilator muscle hypotonia, precipitating increased neural ventilatory 'drive'. By contrast, a drive-dependent model has been proposed, whereby falling drive promotes dilator muscle hypotonia to precipitate respiratory events. Here we determine the extent to which the classic versus drive-dependent models of OSA are best supported by direct physiological measurements. METHODS: In 50 OSA patients (5-91 events/hour), we recorded ventilation ('flow', oronasal mask and pneumotach) and ventilatory drive (calibrated intraoesophageal diaphragm electromyography, EMG) overnight. Flow and drive during events were ensemble averaged; patients were classified as drive dependent if flow fell/rose simultaneously with drive. Overnight effects of lower drive on flow, genioglossus muscle activity (EMGgg) and event risk were quantified (mixed models). RESULTS: On average, ventilatory drive fell (rather than rose) during events (-20 (-42 to 3)%baseline, median (IQR)) and was strongly correlated with flow (R=0.78 (0.24 to 0.94)). Most patients (30/50, 60%) were classified as exhibiting drive-dependent event pathophysiology. Lower drive during sleep was associated with lower flow (-17 (-20 to -14)%/drive) and EMGgg (-3.5 (-3.8 to -3.3)%max/drive) and greater event risk (OR: 2.2 (1.8 to 2.5) per drive reduction of 100%eupnoea); associations were concentrated in patients with drive-dependent OSA (ie, flow: -37 (-40 to -34)%/drive, OR: 6.8 (5.3 to 8.7)). Oesophageal pressure-without tidal volume correction-falsely suggested rising drive during events (classic model). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the prevailing view, patients with OSA predominantly exhibit drive-dependent event pathophysiology, whereby flow is lowest at nadir drive, and lower drive raises event risk. Preventing ventilatory drive decline is therefore considered a target for OSA intervention.

Atomoxetine and fesoterodine combination improves obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients with milder upper airway collapsibility.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The combination of the noradrenergic atomoxetine plus the anti-muscarinic oxybutynin acutely increased genioglossus activity and reduced obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity. However, oxybutynin has shorter half-life than atomoxetine and side effects that might discourage long-term usage. Accordingly, we aimed to test the combination of atomoxetine and fesoterodine (Ato-Feso), a newer anti-muscarinic with extended release formulation, on OSA severity and endotypes. METHODS: Twelve subjects with OSA underwent a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial comparing one night of atomoxetine plus fesoterodine (80-4 mg) to placebo. Parameters of OSA severity (e.g., apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI], nadir oxygen desaturation and hypoxic burden) were calculated from two clinical, in-lab polysomnographic studies. OSA endotypes (including collapsibility per VMIN and arousal threshold) were derived from validated algorithms. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, Ato-Feso did not reduce the AHI (34.2 ± 19.1 vs. 30.1 ± 28.2 events/h, p = 0.493), but reduced the apnoea index (12.9 [28.8] vs. 1.8 [9.1] events/h, median [interquartile range], p = 0.027) and increased nadir desaturation (76.8 [8.0] vs. 82.2 [8.8] %, p = 0.003); a non-significant trend for improved hypoxic burden was observed (52.4 [50.5] vs. 29.7 [78.9] %min/h, p = 0.093). Ato-Feso lowered collapsibility (raised VMIN ; 43.7 [29.8-55.7] vs. 56.8 [43.8-69.8] %VEUPNOEA , mean [CI], p = 0.002), but reduced the arousal threshold (129.3 [120.1-138.6] vs. 116.7 [107.5-126] %VEUPNOEA , p = 0.038). In post hoc analysis, 6/6 patients with milder collapsibility (VMIN > 43%) exhibited OSA resolution (drop in AHI > 50% and residual AHI < 10 events/h) and improved hypoxaemia. CONCLUSION: While inefficacious in unselected patients, Ato-Feso administered for one night suppressed OSA in patients with milder collapsibility. Ato-Feso may hold some promise as an alternative OSA treatment in certain subgroups of individuals.

The Sleep Apnea-Specific Pulse-Rate Response Predicts Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality.

Rationale: Randomized controlled trials have been unable to detect a cardiovascular benefit of continuous positive airway pressure in unselected patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesize that deleterious cardiovascular outcomes are concentrated in a subgroup of patients with a heightened pulse-rate response to apneas and hypopneas (ΔHR). Methods: We measured the ΔHR in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) (N = 1,395) and the SHHS (Sleep Heart Health Study) (N = 4,575). MESA data were used to determine the functional form of the association between the ΔHR and subclinical cardiovascular biomarkers, whereas primary analyses tested the association of the ΔHR with nonfatal or fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in longitudinal data from the SHHS. Measurements and Main Results: In the MESA, U-shaped relationships were observed between subclinical CVD biomarkers (coronary artery calcium, NT-proBNP [N-terminal prohormone BNP], and Framingham risk score) and the ΔHR; notably, a high ΔHR (upper quartile) was associated with elevated biomarker scores compared with a midrange ΔHR (25th-75th centiles). In the SHHS, individuals with a high ΔHR compared with a midrange ΔHR were at increased risk of nonfatal or fatal CVD and all-cause mortality (nonfatal adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)], 1.60 [1.28-2.00]; fatal adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.68 [1.22-2.30]; all-cause adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.29 [1.07-1.55]). The risk associated with a high ΔHR was particularly high in those with a substantial hypoxic burden (nonfatal, 1.93 [1.36-2.73]; fatal, 3.50 [2.15-5.71]; all-cause, 1.84 [1.40-2.40]) and was exclusively observed in nonsleepy individuals. Conclusions: Individuals with OSA who demonstrate an elevated ΔHR are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study identifies a prognostic biomarker for OSA that appears useful for risk stratification and patient selection for future clinical trials.

Upper airway muscles: influence on obstructive sleep apnoea pathophysiology and pharmacological and technical treatment options.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent with numerous deleterious effects on neurocognitive and cardiovascular health. It is characterized by collapse of the upper airway during sleep, due to the decrease in both basal and compensatory UA muscle activities. However, the leading treatment, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. This review presents latest works focusing on novel interventions targeting upper airway muscles to alleviate OSA severity. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last years, researchers have focused on the development of alternative treatment strategies targeting UA muscle activation, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. SUMMARY: Among the nonpharmacological treatments, hypoglossal nerve stimulation aims to increase upper airway muscle phasic activity during sleep through electrical stimulation, while myofunctional therapy improves the activity and coordination of upper airway dilator muscles.Regarding OSA pharmacotherapy, recent findings strongly suggest that selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as atomoxetine and reboxetine, when administered with antimuscarinics such as oxybutynin, can alleviate OSA in most patients increasing pharyngeal dilator muscles activity during sleep. New combinations of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and antimuscarinics have further been explored with variable success and animal models showed that leptin, thyrothropin releasing hormone analogues and gene therapy hold potential for the future of OSA pharmacotherapy.

Addition of zolpidem to combination therapy with atomoxetine-oxybutynin increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold in obstructive sleep apnoea: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atomoxetine combined with oxybutynin (Ato-Oxy) has recently been shown to reduce obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity by >60%. However, Ato-Oxy also modestly reduced the respiratory arousal threshold, which may decrease sleep quality/efficiency. We sought to investigate the additional effect of zolpidem with Ato-Oxy on sleep efficiency (primary outcome), the arousal threshold, OSA severity, other standard polysomnography (PSG) parameters, next-day sleepiness and alertness (secondary outcomes). METHODS: Twelve participants with OSA received 10 mg zolpidem plus Ato-Oxy (80-5 mg, respectively) or Ato-Oxy plus placebo prior to overnight in-laboratory PSG according to a double-blind, randomized, crossover design (1-week washout). Participants were fitted with an epiglottic catheter, a nasal mask and pneumotachograph to quantify arousal threshold and airflow. Next-day sleepiness and alertness were assessed via the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and a driving simulation task. RESULTS: The addition of zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9% ± 13% (80.9% ± 16.9% vs. 88.2% ± 8.2%, p = 0.037) and the respiratory arousal threshold by 17% ± 18% (-26.6 ± 14.5 vs. -33.8 ± 20.3 cm H2 O, p = 0.004) versus Ato-Oxy + placebo. Zolpidem did not systematically change OSA severity. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and zolpidem did not worsen next-day sleepiness. However, median steering deviation during the driving simulator task increased following the zolpidem combination. CONCLUSION: Zolpidem improves sleep efficiency via an increase in the respiratory arousal threshold to counteract potential wake-promoting properties of atomoxetine in OSA. These changes occur without altering the rate of respiratory events or overnight hypoxaemia. However, while the addition of zolpidem does not increase next-day perceived sleepiness, caution is warranted given the potential impact on next-morning objective alertness.

Impact of cold and flu medication on obstructive sleep apnoea and its underlying traits: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Animal studies indicate that alpha-1 adrenergic receptor agonists and antimuscarinic agents improve genioglossus muscle activity during sleep and may be candidates for the pharmacological treatment of OSA. On the other hand, noradrenergic stimulants may be wake-promoting or cause insomnia symptoms if taken before bedtime, and the addition of a medication with sedative properties, such as an antihistaminic, may reduce these side effects. In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of the combination of an alpha-1 adrenergic agonist (pseudoephedrine) and an antihistaminic-antimuscarinic (diphenhydramine) on OSA severity (AHI), genioglossus responsiveness and other endotypic traits (Vpassive , muscle compensation, LG and arousal threshold). METHODS: Ten OSA patients performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial comparing one night of pseudoephedrine 120 mg plus diphenhydramine 50 mg (DAW1033D) to placebo administered prior to sleep. The AHI, genioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative oesophageal pressure and the endotypic traits were measured via PSG. RESULTS: The participants' median (interquartile range) age was 50 (46-53) years and body mass index (BMI) was 34.3 (30.6-39.2) kg/m2 . The drug combination had no effect on AHI (21.6 (9.1-49.8) on placebo vs 37.9 (5.1-55.4) events/h on DAW1033D, P > 0.5) or genioglossus responsiveness (6.0 (2.6-9.2) on placebo vs 4.0 (3.5-7.3) %/cm H2 O). Amongst the phenotypic traits, only Vpassive was improved by 29 (3-55) % eupnoea, P = 0.03 (mean (95% CI)). CONCLUSION: The combination of pseudoephedrine and diphenhydramine did not improve OSA severity or genioglossus responsiveness but induced a small improvement in upper airway collapsibility, possibly due to the decongestant effect of the medications. The results of this study do not support the use of these medications for OSA treatment.

The Combination of Atomoxetine and Oxybutynin Greatly Reduces Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity. A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-Blind Crossover Trial.

Rationale: There is currently no effective pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Recent investigations indicate that drugs with noradrenergic and antimuscarinic effects improve genioglossus muscle activity and upper airway patency during sleep. Objectives: We aimed to determine the effects of the combination of a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (atomoxetine) and an antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) on OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]; primary outcome) and genioglossus responsiveness (secondary outcome) in people with OSA. Methods: A total of 20 people completed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial comparing 1 night of 80 mg atomoxetine plus 5 mg oxybutynin (ato-oxy) to placebo administered before sleep. The AHI and genioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative esophageal pressure swings were measured via in-laboratory polysomnography. In a subgroup of nine patients, the AHI was also measured when the drugs were administered separately. Measurements and Main Results: The participants' median (interquartile range) age was 53 (46-58) years and body mass index was 34.8 (30.0-40.2) kg/m2. ato-oxy lowered AHI by 63% (34-86%), from 28.5 (10.9-51.6) events/h to 7.5 (2.4-18.6) events/h (P < 0.001). Of the 15/20 patients with OSA on placebo (AHI > 10 events/hr), AHI was lowered by 74% (62-88%) (P < 0.001) and all 15 patients exhibited a ≥50% reduction. Genioglossus responsiveness increased approximately threefold, from 2.2 (1.1-4.7)%/cm H2O on placebo to 6.3 (3.0 to 18.3)%/cm H2O on ato-oxy (P < 0.001). Neither atomoxetine nor oxybutynin reduced the AHI when administered separately. Conclusions: A combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents administered orally before bedtime on 1 night greatly reduced OSA severity. These findings open new possibilities for the pharmacologic treatment of OSA. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02908529).

The hypoxic burden of sleep apnoea predicts cardiovascular disease-related mortality: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study and the Sleep Heart Health Study.

AIMS: Apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), the universal clinical metric of sleep apnoea severity, poorly predicts the adverse outcomes of sleep apnoea, potentially because the AHI, a frequency measure, does not adequately capture disease burden. Therefore, we sought to evaluate whether quantifying the severity of sleep apnoea by the 'hypoxic burden' would predict mortality among adults aged 40 and older. METHODS AND RESULTS: The samples were derived from two cohort studies: The Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men (MrOS), which included 2743 men, age 76.3 ± 5.5 years; and the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS), which included 5111 middle-aged and older adults (52.8% women), age: 63.7 ± 10.9 years. The outcomes were all-cause and Cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality. The hypoxic burden was determined by measuring the respiratory event-associated area under the desaturation curve from pre-event baseline. Cox models were used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios for hypoxic burden. Unlike the AHI, the hypoxic burden strongly predicted CVD mortality and all-cause mortality (only in MrOS). Individuals in the MrOS study with hypoxic burden in the highest two quintiles had hazard ratios of 1.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.62] and 2.73 (95% CI 1.71-4.36), respectively. Similarly, the group in the SHHS with hypoxic burden in the highest quintile had a hazard ratio of 1.96 (95% CI 1.11-3.43). CONCLUSION: The 'hypoxic burden', an easily derived signal from overnight sleep study, predicts CVD mortality across populations. The findings suggest that not only the frequency but the depth and duration of sleep related upper airway obstructions, are important disease characterizing features.

Structure and severity of pharyngeal obstruction determine oral appliance efficacy in sleep apnoea.

KEY POINTS: •Some patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) respond well to oral appliance therapy, whereas others do not for reasons that are unclear. •In the present study, we used gold-standard measurements to demonstrate that patients with a posteriorly-located tongue (natural sleep endoscopy) exhibit a preferential improvement in collapsibility (lowered critical closing pressure) with oral appliances. •We also show that patients with both posteriorly-located tongue and less severe collapsibility (predicted responder phenotype) exhibit greater improvements in severity of obstructive sleep apnoea (i.e. reduction in event frequency by 83%, in contrast to 48% in predicted non-responders). •The present study suggests that the structure and severity of pharyngeal obstruction determine the phenotype of sleep apnoea patients who benefit maximally from oral appliance efficacy. ABSTRACT: A major limitation to the administration of oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is that therapeutic responses remain unpredictable. In the present study, we tested the hypotheses that oral appliance therapy (i) reduces pharyngeal collapsibility preferentially in patients with posteriorly-located tongue and (ii) is most efficacious (reduction in apnoea-hypopnea index; AHI) in patients with a posteriorly-located tongue and less-severe baseline pharyngeal collapsibility. Twenty-five OSA patients underwent upper airway endoscopy during natural sleep to assess tongue position (type I: vallecula entirely visible; type II: vallecula obscured; type III: vallecula and glottis obscured), as well as obstruction as a result of other pharyngeal structures (e.g. epiglottis). Additional sleep studies with and without oral appliance were performed to measure collapsibility (critical closing pressure; Pcrit) and assess treatment efficacy. Overall, oral appliance therapy reduced Pcrit by 3.9 ± 2.4 cmH2 O (mean ± SD) and AHI by 69 ± 19%. Therapy lowered Pcrit by an additional 2.7 ± 0.9 cmH2 O in patients with posteriorly-located tongue (types II and III) compared to those without (type I) (P < 0.008). Posteriorly-located tongue (p = 0.03) and lower collapsibility (p = 0.04) at baseline were significant determinants of (greater-than-average) treatment efficacy. Predicted responders (type II and III and Pcrit < 1 cmH2 O) exhibited a greater reduction in the AHI (83 ± 9 vs. 48 ± 8% baseline, P < 0.001) and a lower treatment AHI (9 ± 6 vs. 32 ± 15 events h-1 , P < 0.001) than predicted non-responders. The site and severity of pharyngeal collapse combine to determine oral appliance efficacy. Specifically, patients with a posteriorly-located tongue plus less-severe collapsibility are the strongest candidates for oral appliance therapy.

Quantifying the magnitude of pharyngeal obstruction during sleep using airflow shape.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive quantification of the severity of pharyngeal airflow obstruction would enable recognition of obstructive versus central manifestation of sleep apnoea, and identification of symptomatic individuals with severe airflow obstruction despite a low apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). Here we provide a novel method that uses simple airflow-versus-time ("shape") features from individual breaths on an overnight sleep study to automatically and non-invasively quantify the severity of airflow obstruction without oesophageal catheterisation. METHODS: 41 individuals with suspected/diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea (AHI range 0-91 events·h-1) underwent overnight polysomnography with gold-standard measures of airflow (oronasal pneumotach: "flow") and ventilatory drive (calibrated intraoesophageal diaphragm electromyogram: "drive"). Obstruction severity was defined as a continuous variable (flow:drive ratio). Multivariable regression used airflow shape features (inspiratory/expiratory timing, flatness, scooping, fluttering) to estimate flow:drive ratio in 136 264 breaths (performance based on leave-one-patient-out cross-validation). Analysis was repeated using simultaneous nasal pressure recordings in a subset (n=17). RESULTS: Gold-standard obstruction severity (flow:drive ratio) varied widely across individuals independently of AHI. A multivariable model (25 features) estimated obstruction severity breath-by-breath (R2=0.58 versus gold-standard, p<0.00001; mean absolute error 22%) and the median obstruction severity across individual patients (R2=0.69, p<0.00001; error 10%). Similar performance was achieved using nasal pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of pharyngeal obstruction can be quantified non-invasively using readily available airflow shape information. Our work overcomes a major hurdle necessary for the recognition and phenotyping of patients with obstructive sleep disordered breathing.

Phenotyping Pharyngeal Pathophysiology using Polysomnography in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

RATIONALE: Therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could be administered on the basis of a patient's own phenotypic causes ("traits") if a clinically applicable approach were available. OBJECTIVES: Here we aimed to provide a means to quantify two key contributors to OSA-pharyngeal collapsibility and compensatory muscle responsiveness-that is applicable to diagnostic polysomnography. METHODS: Based on physiological definitions, pharyngeal collapsibility determines the ventilation at normal (eupneic) ventilatory drive during sleep, and pharyngeal compensation determines the rise in ventilation accompanying a rising ventilatory drive. Thus, measuring ventilation and ventilatory drive (e.g., during spontaneous cyclic events) should reveal a patient's phenotypic traits without specialized intervention. We demonstrate this concept in patients with OSA (N = 29), using a novel automated noninvasive method to estimate ventilatory drive (polysomnographic method) and using "gold standard" ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm EMG) for comparison. Specialized physiological measurements using continuous positive airway pressure manipulation were employed for further comparison. The validity of nasal pressure as a ventilation surrogate was also tested (N = 11). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Polysomnography-derived collapsibility and compensation estimates correlated favorably with those quantified using gold standard ventilatory drive (R = 0.83, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.76, P < 0.0001; respectively) and using continuous positive airway pressure manipulation (R = 0.67, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.64, P < 0.001; respectively). Polysomnographic estimates effectively stratified patients into high versus low subgroups (accuracy, 69-86% vs. ventilatory drive measures; P < 0.05). Traits were near-identical using nasal pressure versus pneumotach (N = 11, R ≥ 0.98, both traits; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypes of pharyngeal dysfunction in OSA are evident from spontaneous changes in ventilation and ventilatory drive during sleep, enabling noninvasive phenotyping in the clinic. Our approach may facilitate precision therapeutic interventions for OSA.

Neural memory of the genioglossus muscle during sleep is stage-dependent in healthy subjects and obstructive sleep apnoea patients.

KEY POINTS: In most patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), there is a spontaneous resolution of the breathing disorders during slow wave sleep (SWS) for yet unknown reasons related to non-anatomical factors. Some recently identified forms of neural memory specific of upper airway muscles may play a role in this phenomenon. In the present study, we show for the first time that a form of memory of the genioglossus (tongue) muscle is greatly enhanced during SWS compared to non-rapid eye movement stage 2 sleep. The present study represents a step forward in understanding the mechanisms responsible for the spontaneous development of stable breathing during SWS in OSA patients and may help the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies for this disease. ABSTRACT: Several studies have shown that obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) improves during slow wave sleep (SWS) for reasons that remain unclear. Recent studies have identified forms of neural memory such as short-term potentiation or after-discharge that can occur in response to upper airway obstruction. Neural memory may play a role in the development of stable breathing during SWS by increasing upper airway muscles activity in this sleep stage. We hypothesize that the after-discharge of the genioglossus muscle following upper airway obstruction is enhanced during SWS compared to non-rapid eye movement stage 2 (N2). During sleep, we performed five-breath drops in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP-drop) to simulate obstructive events and reflexively activate the genioglossus. Immediately afterwards, CPAP was returned to an optimal level. Once the post-drop ventilation returned to eupnoea, the genioglossus after-discharge was measured as the time it took for genioglossus activity to return to baseline levels. In total, 171 CPAP-drops were analysed from a group of 16 healthy subjects and 19 OSA patients. A mixed-model analysis showed that after-discharge duration during SWS was 208% (95% confidence interval = 112% to 387%, P = 0.022) greater than during N2 after adjusting for covariates (ventilatory drive, CPAP levels). There was also a non-significant trend for a -35% reduction in after-discharge duration following an arousal vs. no-arousal from sleep (95% confidence interval = -59.5% to 5%, P = 0.08). Genioglossus after-discharge is two-fold greater in SWS vs. N2, which could partly explain the breathing stabilization described in OSA patients during this sleep stage.

Breath-holding as a means to estimate the loop gain contribution to obstructive sleep apnoea.

KEY POINTS: A hypersensitive ventilatory control system or elevated "loop gain" during sleep is a primary phenotypic trait causing obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Despite the multitude of methods available to assess the anatomical contributions to OSA during wakefulness in the clinical setting (e.g. neck circumference, pharyngometry, Mallampati score), it is currently not possible to recognize elevated loop gain in patients in this context. Loop gain during sleep can now be recognized using simplified testing during wakefulness, specifically in the form of a reduced maximal breath-hold duration, or a larger ventilatory response to voluntary 20-second breath-holds. We consider that easy breath-holding manoeuvres will enable daytime recognition of a high loop gain in OSA for more personalized intervention. ABSTRACT: Increased "loop gain" of the ventilatory control system promotes obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in some patients and offers an avenue for more personalized treatment, yet diagnostic tools for directly measuring loop gain in the clinical setting are lacking. Here we test the hypothesis that elevated loop gain during sleep can be recognized using voluntary breath-hold manoeuvres during wakefulness. Twenty individuals (10 OSA, 10 controls) participated in a single overnight study with voluntary breath-holding manoeuvres performed during wakefulness. We assessed (1) maximal breath-hold duration, and (2) the ventilatory response to 20 s breath-holds. For comparison, gold standard loop gain values were obtained during non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep using the ventilatory response to 20 s pulses of hypoxic-hypercapnic gas (6% CO2 -14% O2 , mimicking apnoea). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used to maintain airway patency during sleep. Additional measurements included gold standard loop gain measurement during wakefulness and steady-state loop gain measurement during sleep using CPAP dial-ups. Higher loop gain during sleep was associated with (1) a shorter maximal breath-hold duration (r2  = 0.49, P < 0.001), and (2) a larger ventilatory response to 20 s breath-holds during wakefulness (second breath; r2  = 0.50, P < 0.001); together these factors combine to predict high loop gain (receiver operating characteristic area-under-curve: 92%). Gold standard loop gain values were remarkably similar during wake and non-REM sleep. The results show that elevated loop gain during sleep can be identified using simple breath-holding manoeuvres performed during wakefulness. This may have implications for personalizing OSA treatment.

Palatal prolapse as a signature of expiratory flow limitation and inspiratory palatal collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

In some individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), the palate prolapses into the velopharynx during expiration, limiting airflow through the nose or shunting it out of the mouth. We hypothesised that this phenomenon causes expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and is associated with inspiratory "isolated" palatal collapse. We also wanted to provide a robust noninvasive means to identify this mechanism of obstruction.Using natural sleep endoscopy, 1211 breaths from 22 OSA patients were scored as having or not having palatal prolapse. The patient-level site of collapse (tongue-related, isolated palate, pharyngeal lateral walls and epiglottis) was also characterised. EFL was quantified using expiratory resistance at maximal epiglottic pressure. A noninvasive EFL index (EFLI) was developed to detect the presence of palatal prolapse and EFL using the flow signal alone. In addition, the validity of using nasal pressure was assessed.A cut-off value of EFLI >0.8 detected the presence of palatal prolapse and EFL with an accuracy of >95% and 82%, respectively. The proportion of breaths with palatal prolapse predicted isolated inspiratory palatal collapse with 90% accuracy.This study demonstrates that expiratory palatal prolapse can be quantified noninvasively, is associated with EFL and predicts the presence of inspiratory isolated palatal collapse.

Identifying obstructive sleep apnoea patients responsive to supplemental oxygen therapy.

A possible precision-medicine approach to treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) involves targeting ventilatory instability (elevated loop gain) using supplemental inspired oxygen in selected patients. Here we test whether elevated loop gain and three key endophenotypic traits (collapsibility, compensation and arousability), quantified using clinical polysomnography, can predict the effect of supplemental oxygen on OSA severity.36 patients (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) >20 events·h-1) completed two overnight polysomnographic studies (single-blinded randomised-controlled crossover) on supplemental oxygen (40% inspired) versus sham (air). OSA traits were quantified from the air-night polysomnography. Responders were defined by a ≥50% reduction in AHI (supine non-rapid eye movement). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and self-reported sleep quality.Nine of 36 patients (25%) responded to supplemental oxygen (ΔAHI=72±5%). Elevated loop gain was not a significant univariate predictor of responder/non-responder status (primary analysis). In post hoc analysis, a logistic regression model based on elevated loop gain and other traits (better collapsibility and compensation; cross-validated) had 83% accuracy (89% before cross-validation); predicted responders exhibited an improvement in OSA severity (ΔAHI 59±6% versus 12±7% in predicted non-responders, p=0.0001) plus lowered morning blood pressure and "better" self-reported sleep.Patients whose OSA responds to supplemental oxygen can be identified by measuring their endophenotypic traits using diagnostic polysomnography.

Predicting epiglottic collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is characterised by pharyngeal obstruction occurring at different sites. Endoscopic studies reveal that epiglottic collapse renders patients at higher risk of failed oral appliance therapy or accentuated collapse on continuous positive airway pressure. Diagnosing epiglottic collapse currently requires invasive studies (imaging and endoscopy). As an alternative, we propose that epiglottic collapse can be detected from the distinct airflow patterns it produces during sleep.23 OSA patients underwent natural sleep endoscopy. 1232 breaths were scored as epiglottic/nonepiglottic collapse. Several flow characteristics were determined from the flow signal (recorded simultaneously with endoscopy) and used to build a predictive model to distinguish epiglottic from nonepiglottic collapse. Additionally, 10 OSA patients were studied to validate the pneumotachograph flow features using nasal pressure signals.Epiglottic collapse was characterised by a rapid fall(s) in the inspiratory flow, more variable inspiratory and expiratory flow and reduced tidal volume. The cross-validated accuracy was 84%. Predictive features obtained from pneumotachograph flow and nasal pressure were strongly correlated.This study demonstrates that epiglottic collapse can be identified from the airflow signal measured during a sleep study. This method may enable clinicians to use clinically collected data to characterise underlying physiology and improve treatment decisions.

Desipramine Increases Genioglossus Activity and Reduces Upper Airway Collapsibility during Non-REM Sleep in Healthy Subjects.

RATIONALE: Obstructive sleep apnea is a state-dependent disease. One of the key factors that triggers upper airway collapse is decreased pharyngeal dilator muscle activity during sleep. To date, there have not been effective methods to reverse pharyngeal hypotonia pharmacologically in sleeping humans. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that administration of desipramine 200 mg prevents the state-related reduction in genioglossus activity that occurs during sleep and thereby decreases pharyngeal collapsibility. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial with 10 healthy participants. Participants received active treatment or placebo in randomized order 2 hours before sleep in the physiology laboratory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Genioglossus activity during wakefulness and sleep, genioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative epiglottic pressure, and upper airway collapsibility during passive and active conditions were compared between on- and off-drug states. Desipramine abolished the normal reduction of genioglossus activity from wakefulness to non-REM sleep that occurred on the placebo night. Specifically, tonic (median, 96% [86-120] vs. 75% [50-92] wakefulness; P = 0.01) but not phasic genioglossus activity was higher with desipramine compared with placebo. Upper airway collapsibility was also reduced with desipramine compared with placebo (-10.0 cm H2O [-15.2 to -5.8] vs. -8.1 cm H2O [-10.4 to -6.3]; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Desipramine reduces the state-related drop in tonic genioglossus muscle activity that occurs from wakefulness to non-REM sleep and reduces airway collapsibility. These data provide a rationale for a new pharmacologic therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02428478).