RESUMO
The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics (victims' profiles, circumstances surrounding the incidents, and methods employed) of complex and complicated suicides over a 12-year period in the broader area of Athens, Greece. A retrospective analysis of 5,568 autopsy cases performed at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2022, was carried out. Out of a total sample of 5,568 autopsies, 360 suicide cases were identified, among which 14 (3.9%) were classified as complex suicides, and one case (0.3%) was identified as complicated suicide. Among the victims, 78.6% were males. The age range of the victims varied between 25 and 82 years old. The most prevalent method of complex suicide was the use of sharp objects followed by jumping from a height (42.8%). The next most common combination of methods was poisoning (21.4%) along with hanging. Prior suicidal attempts and suicide note were mentioned in 16.7% and 8.3% of the cases respectively. Overall, a total of 9 different methods were used in the above 14 cases. Only half (50.0%) of the victims had an established psychiatric diagnosis. In determining the cause of death in cases of a complex or complicated suicides, it is of utmost importance for the forensic pathologist to gather and analyze all available information provided by the police, the victim's relatives along with a thorough investigation of the scene, a detailed autopsy and a toxicological analysis.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the different types of health outcomes assessed as primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the primary care (PC) setting during the last 20 years and identify whether potential gaps exist in specific types of health care and types of intervention. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from January 2000 to September 2020 for published RCTs in PC. We recorded characteristics of eligible studies and mapped evidence by health outcome category (patient health outcomes, health services outcomes); and for each outcome category, by types of health care (preventive, acute, chronic, palliative), and by types of intervention (drug, behavioural, on structure, and on process). For RCTs assessing patient health outcomes as primary outcomes, we further mapped using the quality-of-care dimensions, that is, effectiveness, safety, and patient-centredness. RESULTS: Of the 518 eligible RCTs in PC, 357 (68.9%) evaluated a patient health outcome as the primary outcome, and 161 (31.1%) evaluated only health services outcomes as primary outcomes. Many focused on population with chronic illness (224 trials; 43.2%) and evaluated interventions on processes of health care (239 trials; 46.1%). Research gaps identified include preventive and palliative care, behavioural interventions, and safety and patient-centredness outcomes as primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our evidence map showed research gaps in certain types of health care and interventions. It also showed research gaps in assessing safety and measures to place patient at the centre of health care delivery as primary outcomes.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Preparações FarmacêuticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Food allergy (FA) in children impacts their own and their family quality of life (QoL). The association of specific FA factors with the various domains of health-related QoL (HRQL) in children is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate FA characteristics in primary school children as determinants of components of HRQL. METHODS: Children with FA were recruited from the allergy clinic of a tertiary children's hospital. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from their records, and 3 HRQL questionnaires were administered: the FA QoL Questionnaire-Child Form (FAQLQ-CF), the FA independent measure (FAIM), and the Pediatric QoL Questionnaire (PedsQL™). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to investigate the correlation between FA characteristics and the scores on the HRQL scales. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was set at p < 0.0002. RESULTS: Of 172 primary schoolchildren with FA invited to take part, 110 participated (response rate 64%), of whom 83 (75.5%) were male, aged 7.5-12.3 years (mean 10.0 ± 1.4) years. From 38 demographic and clinical characteristics, 10 were excluded on initial data analysis and 28 proceeded to bivariate analysis with the scores on FAQLQ-CF, FAIM, PedsQL™, and their subscales. Most of the 28 showed no correlation with the scores; only 4 were entered into multivariate analysis with FAQLQ-CF and PedsQL™ scores, none of which, finally showed significant association. CONCLUSION: The HRQL of children with FA did not depend on gender, age, number, and type of allergen or the characteristics of the most severe allergic reaction.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Qualidade de Vida , Alérgenos , Criança , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Although vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of preventing disease, vaccine hesitancy has been included among the ten threats of global health. Addressing low adult vaccination rates requires an adequate understanding of people's views. We explored perceived barriers to immunization among under-vaccinated adults to identify potential differences among vaccine supporters, refuters, and those who are undecided. We conducted a multi-center, mixed-methods study at 23 primary care practices in Greece. Each day, we asked three new randomly-selected adult healthcare users who attended the practice over the course of 30 consecutive working days. We used thematic content analysis to analyze their written answers to open-ended questions that addressed reasons for not getting vaccinated. Out of 1571 participants, two-thirds reported they were under-vaccinated as adults, thus accounting for three out of five of the supporters and the vast majority of the undecided and refuters. "Concerns/fears," a "perception of low susceptibility to disease due to good health status," the "absence of healthcare professional's recommendation," and "previous negative experiences" were four themes common to all three groups. Additional barriers reported by supporters and the undecided included "knowledge gaps about the necessity of adult vaccination," "negligence," and lack of "accessibility." Among refuters, additional themes identified were "mistrust in pharmaceutical companies" and "disbelief in vaccine effectiveness." In conclusion, under-vaccination is common, not only among refuters or the undecided, but also among supporters of adult vaccination. We found similarities and differences in under-vaccinated adults' perceived barriers, depending on their individual perspectives. Physicians and public health services should take into consideration the impact of the wide range of attitudes and beliefs in their effort to address the underlying barriers to vaccination compliance as they attempt to increase vaccination coverage in adults.
Assuntos
Vacinação , Vacinas , Adulto , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Research in primary care is necessary to empower its role in health systems and improve population health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this evaluation study was to assess the experiences of primary care physicians who participated as researchers in a multi-centre, mixed-methodology study on adult vaccination supported by a newly established practice-based research network. METHODS: Twenty-three physicians participated as researchers, operating in their own practices in 10 different prefectures of Greece. After the completion of the study, they were asked to reflect on their experiences in the research by providing written responses to the questions on the evaluation tool of the study. The open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Mean age of the researchers was 42.9 years old (±3.9, min 35, max 49) and 11 (47.8%) were male. Six themes emerged as beneficial for the participating researchers: (i) raised awareness of patients' needs, (ii) enhancement of clinical practice and services offered, (iii) positive impact on the doctor-patient relationship, (iv) personal satisfaction, (v) enrichment of their curriculum vitae and (vi) improvement of research skills. All researchers were interested in participating in future studies. CONCLUSION: The experience of conducting clinical research on adult vaccination in their own practices within a network was reported to be very rewarding. The benefits gained from their participation could be a valuable tool in promoting research and enhancing the quality of primary health care.
Assuntos
Médicos de Atenção Primária , Adulto , Grécia , Humanos , Masculino , Relações Médico-Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore dementia management from a primary care physician perspective. DESIGN: One-page seven-item multiple choice questionnaire; free text space for every item; final narrative question of a dementia case story. Inductive explorative grounded theory analysis. Derived results in cluster analyses. Appropriateness of dementia drugs assessed by tertiary care specialist. SETTING: Twenty-five European General Practice Research Network member countries. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and forty-five key informant primary care physician respondents of which 106 presented 155 case stories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Processes and typologies of dementia management. Proportion of case stories with drug treatment and treatment according to guidelines. RESULTS: Unburdening dementia - a basic social process - explained physicians' dementia management according to a grounded theory analysis using both qualitative and quantitative data. Unburdening starts with Recognizing the dementia burden by Burden Identification and Burden Assessment followed by Burden Relief. Drugs to relieve the dementia burden were reported for 130 of 155 patients; acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine treatment in 89 of 155 patients - 60% appropriate according to guidelines and 40% outside of guidelines. More Central and Northern primary care physicians were allowed to prescribe, and more were engaged in dementia management than Eastern and Mediterranean physicians according to cluster analyses. Physicians typically identified and assessed the dementia burden and then tried to relieve it, commonly by drug prescriptions, but also by community health and home help services, mentioned in more than half of the case stories. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physician dementia management was explained by an Unburdening process with the goal to relieve the dementia burden, mainly by drugs often prescribed outside of guideline indications. Implications: Unique data about dementia management by European primary care physicians to inform appropriate stakeholders. Key points Dementia as a syndrome of cognitive and functional decline and behavioural and psychological symptoms causes a tremendous burden on patients, their families, and society. â¢We found that a basic social process of Unburdening dementia explained dementia management according to case stories and survey comments from primary care physicians in 25 countries. â¢First, Burden Recognition by Identification and Assessment and then Burden Relief - often by drugs. â¢Prescribing physicians repeatedly broadened guideline indications for dementia drugs. The more physicians were allowed to prescribe dementia drugs, the more they were responsible for the dementia work-up. Our study provides unique data about dementia management in European primary care for the benefit of national and international stakeholders.
Assuntos
Demência , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Teoria Fundamentada , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Electronic search filters on family medicine or general practice studies have been developed and validated in previous work. However, there has been no systematic effort to specifically identify and record protocols of randomized controlled trials (RCT) protocols in primary health care (PHC). The aim of the present study was to systematically identify published RCT protocols in PHC and capture information about specific protocol characteristics that may describe this field. METHODS: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Scopus from inception to December 2014 were systematically searched. Protocols of RCTs that were published in English and were relevant to PHC were considered as eligible. Protocols referred either to a mixed population, or to an intervention including a specialized part as well as pilot or feasibility trial protocols, were excluded. Specific protocol characteristics including publication year, country, prospective registration, funding, and publication sources were extracted. RESULTS: The final database included 628 published RCT protocols (median publication year 2011; interquartile range 2009-2013). The majority of protocols were designed in the UK (n=141, 22.5%), the Netherlands (n=105, 16.7%), and USA (n=93, 14.8%). Research was mainly funded by the government (n=408, 65.0%) while 45 protocols (7.2%) included industry as the funding source. Two registries - International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry (245 (42.9%)) and ClinicalTrials.gov (209 (36.6%)) - indexed most of the protocols. Journals from several scientific fields published the articles; the field of 'Primary Health Care Medicine, General and Internal' included 69 (11.0%) articles. CONCLUSION: A compilation of published RCT protocols on PHC was feasible. The majority of protocols on PHC were published over the past 10 years, funded by the government and designed in three main countries.
Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Pesquisa Empírica , Humanos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Treated but uncontrolled hypertension is a worldwide challenge. Exploring patient perspectives in different cultures and contexts could contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of poor blood pressure (BP) control. This study aimed to investigate patients' knowledge and attitudes towards BP management in order to identify possible barriers to achieving effective control. METHODS: A mixed-methods study, using both quantitative and qualitative research methodology, was conducted by 12 general practitioners working in rural areas in five different prefectures in Greece. A 42-item, pre-tested questionnaire was completed by the hypertensive patients who visited the practices and were included among the first 20 patients for 20 consecutive working days. Included participants were patients who (a) had diagnosed hypertension and received BP-lowering medication, (b) were aged over 18 years, (c) had physical and mental ability to participate in an interview, (d) had adequate understanding of the Greek language and (e) provided signed, informed consent. The open-ended questions used to identify the patient-related barriers in hypertension control were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 613 hypertensive patients were recruited (response rate 91%); mean age was 71.5 years (SD 9.4, range 34-100) and 39.5% (242) were male. Uncontrolled BP was found in 41.3% (253), of which 67.6% (171) considered their BP controlled, 18.6% (47) uncontrolled, while 13.8% (35) were unaware of their status. Women were more likely to achieve BP control (OR 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.00). As many as 287 (46.8%) patients knew the optimal values for BP. The identified barriers in hypertension control were grouped into six themes: knowledge gaps, intolerance of adverse events, negligence, unmet individual preferences, financial barriers and overtreatment of hypertension. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the possible disconnection between their patients' perceived and actual BP control, given frequent overestimation of BP control rates and the lack of knowledge of target BP levels. They should bear in mind that covering their patients' knowledge gaps is essential in empowering their patients to get more actively involved in the management of their chronic condition. Simultaneously, physicians should aim to elicit each patient's attitudes, concerns about adverse events, individual preferences, as well as possible financial barriers and negligence, in an effort to actually see the antihypertensive treatment 'through their patients' eyes' and eliminate possible barriers in medication adherence. The provision of patient-centered care remains the gold standard for eliminating patient-related barriers and achieving higher levels of BP control.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). With advancing age, the risks of statins might outweigh the potential benefits. It is unclear which factors influence general practitioners' (GPs) advice to stop statins in oldest-old patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of a history of CVD, statin-related side effects, frailty and short life expectancy, on GPs' advice to stop statins in oldest-old patients. DESIGN: We invited GPs to participate in this case-based survey. GPs were presented with 8 case vignettes describing patients > 80 years using a statin, and asked whether they would advise stopping statin treatment. MAIN MEASURES: Cases varied in history of CVD, statin-related side effects and frailty, with and without shortened life expectancy (< 1 year) in the context of metastatic, non-curable cancer. Odds ratios adjusted for GP characteristics (ORadj) were calculated for GPs' advice to stop. KEY RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred fifty GPs from 30 countries participated (median response rate 36%). Overall, GPs advised stopping statin treatment in 46% (95%CI 45-47) of the case vignettes; with shortened life expectancy, this proportion increased to 90% (95CI% 89-90). Advice to stop was more frequent in case vignettes without CVD compared to those with CVD (ORadj 13.8, 95%CI 12.6-15.1), with side effects compared to without ORadj 1.62 (95%CI 1.5-1.7) and with frailty (ORadj 4.1, 95%CI 3.8-4.4) compared to without. Shortened life expectancy increased advice to stop (ORadj 50.7, 95%CI 45.5-56.4) and was the strongest predictor for GP advice to stop, ranging across countries from 30% (95%CI 19-42) to 98% (95% CI 96-99). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of CVD, the presence of statin-related side effects, and frailty were all independently associated with GPs' advice to stop statins in patients aged > 80 years. Overall, and within all countries, cancer-related short life expectancy was the strongest independent predictor of GPs' advice to stop statins.
Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais/tendências , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Internacionalidade , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suspensão de Tratamento/tendências , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais/normas , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Expectativa de Vida/tendências , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Suspensão de Tratamento/normasAssuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Morbidade , Fatores Sexuais , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Fatores EtáriosRESUMO
We investigated whether there is a linear relationship between levodopa (LD) dose and treatment duration, and the development of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) among patients with early untreated Parkinson's disease (PD). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LD monotherapy to any other antiparkinsonian treatment in early PD patients. Meta-regressions were conducted including as covariates the effects of LD dose, treatment duration, and age. We further proceeded in subgroup analyses based on the type of medications in the non-LD monotherapy (control) group and on whether patients in the control group received additional levodopa or not. Thirteen eligible RCTs were included, which revealed a significantly higher risk for dyskinesia in patients initially treated with LD monotherapy compared to any other treatment (OR = 2.82). None of the subsequent meta-regressions revealed any significant relationship with dose, treatment duration or age. Patients treated on LD monotherapy or MAOΙ plus LD were at a greater risk to develop LID than patients who received DA only or DA plus supplemental LD. The increased heterogeneity compromised the robustness of the results. The alleged correlation between LID and LD dose and treatment duration cannot be verified based on the data available so far. Well-designed, large-scale, long-term, RCTs on drug-naïve PD patients could allow the better comprehension of the pattern of the association between LID and LD treatment parameters.
Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Antiparkinsonianos/administração & dosagem , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Causalidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Levodopa/administração & dosagem , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de RegressãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We previously found large variations in general practitioner (GP) hypertension treatment probability in oldest-old (>80 years) between countries. We wanted to explore whether differences in country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and life expectancy could explain the differences. DESIGN: This is a survey study using case-vignettes of oldest-old patients with different comorbidities and blood pressure levels. An ecological multilevel model analysis was performed. SETTING: GP respondents from European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) countries, Brazil and New Zeeland. SUBJECTS: This study included 2543 GPs from 29 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GP treatment probability to start or not start antihypertensive treatment based on responses to case-vignettes; either low (<50% started treatment) or high (≥50% started treatment). CVD burden is defined as ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to ischemic heart disease and/or stroke and total DALYs lost per country; life expectancy at age 60 and prevalence of oldest-old per country. RESULTS: Of 1947 GPs (76%) responding to all vignettes, 787 (40%) scored high treatment probability and 1160 (60%) scored low. GPs in high CVD burden countries had higher odds of treatment probability (OR 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.00-4.57); in countries with low life expectancy at 60, CVD was associated with high treatment probability (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.25); but not in countries with high life expectancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: GPs' choice to treat/not treat hypertension in oldest-old was explained by differences in country-specific health characteristics. GPs in countries with high CVD burden and low life expectancy at age 60 were most likely to treat hypertension in oldest-old. Key Points ⢠General practitioners (GPs) are in a clinical dilemma when deciding whether (or not) to treat hypertension in the oldest-old (>80 years of age). ⢠In this study including 1947 GPs from 29 countries, we found that a high country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden (i.e. myocardial infarction and/or stroke) was associated with a higher GP treatment probability in patients aged >80 years. ⢠However, the association was modified by country-specific life expectancy at age 60. While there was a positive association for GPs in countries with a low life expectancy at age 60, there was no association in countries with a high life expectancy at age 60. ⢠These findings help explaining some of the large variation seen in the decision as to whether or not to treat hypertension in the oldest-old.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisões , Clínicos Gerais , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Expectativa de Vida , Padrões de Prática Médica , Fatores Etários , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea , Brasil/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Comparação Transcultural , Demografia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Strategies for the involvement of primary care in the management of patients with presumed or diagnosed dementia are heterogeneous across Europe. We wanted to explore attitudes of primary care physicians (PCPs) when managing dementia: (i) the most popular cognitive tests, (ii) who had the right to initiate or continue cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine treatment, and (iii) the relationship between the permissiveness of these rules/guidelines and PCP's approach in the dementia investigations and assessment. METHODS: Key informant survey. SETTING: Primary care practices across 25 European countries. SUBJECTS: Four hundred forty-five PCPs responded to a self-administered questionnaire. Two-step cluster analysis was performed using characteristics of the informants and the responses to the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two by two contingency tables with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the association between categorical variables. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to assess the association of multiple variables (age class, gender, and perceived prescription rules) with the PCPs' attitude of "trying to establish a diagnosis of dementia on their own." RESULTS: Discrepancies between rules/guidelines and attitudes to dementia management was found in many countries. There was a strong association between the authorization to prescribe dementia drugs and pursuing dementia diagnostic work-up (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% CI 2.28-5.23). CONCLUSIONS: Differing regulations about who does what in dementia management seemed to affect PCP's engagement in dementia investigations and assessment. PCPs who were allowed to prescribe dementia drugs also claimed higher engagement in dementia work-up than PCPs who were not allowed to prescribe.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Demência/epidemiologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Demência/terapia , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In oldest-old patients (>80), few trials showed efficacy of treating hypertension and they included mostly the healthiest elderly. The resulting lack of knowledge has led to inconsistent guidelines, mainly based on systolic blood pressure (SBP), cardiovascular disease (CVD) but not on frailty despite the high prevalence in oldest-old. This may lead to variation how General Practitioners (GPs) treat hypertension. Our aim was to investigate treatment variation of GPs in oldest-olds across countries and to identify the role of frailty in that decision. METHODS: Using a survey, we compared treatment decisions in cases of oldest-old varying in SBP, CVD, and frailty. GPs were asked if they would start antihypertensive treatment in each case. In 2016, we invited GPs in Europe, Brazil, Israel, and New Zealand. We compared the percentage of cases that would be treated per countries. A logistic mixed-effects model was used to derive odds ratio (OR) for frailty with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for SBP, CVD, and GP characteristics (sex, location and prevalence of oldest-old per GP office, and years of experience). The mixed-effects model was used to account for the multiple assessments per GP. RESULTS: The 29 countries yielded 2543 participating GPs: 52% were female, 51% located in a city, 71% reported a high prevalence of oldest-old in their offices, 38% and had >20 years of experience. Across countries, considerable variation was found in the decision to start antihypertensive treatment in the oldest-old ranging from 34 to 88%. In 24/29 (83%) countries, frailty was associated with GPs' decision not to start treatment even after adjustment for SBP, CVD, and GP characteristics (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.48-0.59; ORs per country 0.11-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, we found considerable variation in starting antihypertensive medication in oldest-old. The frail oldest-old had an odds ratio of 0.53 of receiving antihypertensive treatment. Future hypertension trials should also include frail patients to acquire evidence on the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in oldest-old patients with frailty, with the aim to get evidence-based data for clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacologia , Competência Clínica , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Clínicos Gerais , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Saúde Global , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Suicidal risk is often unrecognized in emergency department (ED). We aimed to assess its prevalence in patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) attending an ED and to test whether gender differences influence suicidal risk assessment, using the diagnostic accuracy properties of the Risk Assessment Suicidality Scale (RASS). METHODS: The RASS was administered to 349 patients with diabetes, COPD and rheumatic diseases visiting an ED. The MINI interview was used as the criterion standard. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal RASS cutpoint for suicidal risk separately for males and females. Somatic (PHQ-15) and depressive (PHQ-9) symptoms were also assessed and factors associated with suicidal risk across gender were determined in hierarchical regression models. RESULTS: The prevalence of suicidal risk according to the MINI was 22.9%; 16.6% of patients were at low, 5.1% at moderate, and 0.9% at high risk. At an optimal cutpoint of 270, RASS had 81.3% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity. The optimal RASS cutpoint for females (340) was double the cutpoint for males (175). Somatic symptom burden was associated with suicidal risk in both sexes but it became non-significant after depressive symptoms were taken into account; suicidal risk was also associated with history of depression in females and lower income in males. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of suicidal risk in patients with LTCs attending the ED. As the optimal RASS cutpoint for females was double the cutpoint for males, clinicians should bear in mind gender differences when assessing for suicidal risk in the ED.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/psicologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Ideação Suicida , Prevenção do Suicídio , Suicídio/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estatística como Assunto , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Irrational prescribing of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in general practice is common in Southern Europe. Recent findings from a research project funded by the European Commission (FP7), the "OTC SOCIOMED", conducted in seven European countries, indicate that physicians in countries in the Mediterranean Europe region prescribe medicines to a higher degree in comparison to physicians in other participating European countries. In light of these findings, a feasibility study has been designed to explore the acceptance of a pilot educational intervention targeting physicians in general practice in various settings in the Mediterranean Europe region. METHODS: This feasibility study utilized an educational intervention was designed using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). It took place in geographically-defined primary care areas in Cyprus, France, Greece, Malta, and Turkey. General Practitioners (GPs) were recruited in each country and randomly assigned into two study groups in each of the participating countries. The intervention included a one-day intensive training programme, a poster presentation, and regular visits of trained professionals to the workplaces of participants. Reminder messages and email messages were, also, sent to participants over a 4-week period. A pre- and post-test evaluation study design with quantitative and qualitative data was employed. The primary outcome of this feasibility pilot intervention was to reduce GPs' intention to provide medicines following the educational intervention, and its secondary outcomes included a reduction of prescribed medicines following the intervention, as well as an assessment of its practicality and acceptance by the participating GPs. RESULTS: Median intention scores in the intervention groups were reduced, following the educational intervention, in comparison to the control group. Descriptive analysis of related questions indicated a high overall acceptance and perceived practicality of the intervention programme by GPs, with median scores above 5 on a 7-point Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this intervention will estimate the parameters required to design a larger study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of such educational interventions. In addition, it could also help inform health policy makers and decision makers regarding the management of behavioural changes in the prescribing patterns of physicians in Mediterranean Europe, particularly in Southern European countries.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/educação , Medicina Geral/normas , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Medicamentos sem Prescrição , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
This paper examines potential associations of loneliness with laboratory data and specific psychosocial and behavioral attitudes. The sample collection took place in an urban Primary Health Care unit between May and July 2023, consecutively, and once exclusion criteria were implemented. Participants were aged between 40 and 75 years. Routine laboratory test results upon study initiation and six months before were used. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Loneliness Scale (Version 3), blood glucose, serum lipids, Fibrosis-4 index, and Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) were assessed through hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis. Based on full model (3rd) analysis, those who were engaged in an individual sport or activity or had contacts with more friends presented significantly lower odds for increased loneliness levels (odds ratio (OR): 0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.91], p = 0.034 and OR: 0.76 [95%CI 0.66-0.88], p < 0.001, respectively). The consumption of alcohol was associated with increased loneliness (OR: 5.55 [95%CI 1.42-21.63], p = 0.014). Elevated triglyceride levels were linked with moderate or no loneliness (OR: 0.20 [95%CI 0.05-0.83], p = 0.026), while an increased LDL/HDL atherosclerotic index was related to increased subjective loneliness (OR: 4.50 [95%CI 1.12-18.13], p = 0.035). The need for holistic approaches-involving primary care personnel-in understanding and addressing loneliness, recognizing its multifaceted nature as well as the diverse factors that contribute to this issue, is considered challenging.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The PRICOV-19 study aimed to assess the organization of primary health care (PHC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in 37 European countries and Israel; and its impact on different dimensions of quality of care. In this paper, we described measures taken by public PHC centers in Greece. Additionally, we explored potential differences between rural and non-rural settings. METHODS: The study population consisted of the 287 public PHC centers in Greece. A random sample of 100 PHC centers stratified by Health Region was created. The online questionnaire consisted of 53 items, covering six sections: general information on the PHC center, patient flow, infection prevention, information processing, communication to patients, collaboration, and collegiality. RESULTS: Seventy-eight PHC centers (78%) - 50 rural and 28 non-rural - responded to the survey. Certain measures were reported by few PHC centers. Specifically, the use of online messages about complaints that can be solved without a visit to the PHC center (21% rural; and 31% non-rural PHC centers), the use of video consultations with patients (12% rural; and 7% non-rural PHC centers), and the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) to systematically identify the list of patients with chronic conditions (5% rural; and 10% non-rural PHC centers) were scarcely reported. Very few PHC centers reported measures to support identifying and reaching out to vulnerable population, including patients that may have experienced domestic violence (8% rural; and 7% non-rural PHC centers), or financial problems (26% rural; and 7% non-rural PHC centers). Providing administrative documents to patients through postal mail (12% rural; and 21% non-rural PHC centers), or regular e-mail (11% rural; and 36% non-rural PHC centers), or through a secured server (8% rural; and 18% non-rural PHC centers) was rarely reported. Finally, providing information in multiple languages through a PHC website (12% rural PHC centers only), or an answering machine (6% rural PHC centers only), or leaflets (3% rural PHC centers only; and for leaflets specifically on COVID-19: 6% rural; and 8% non-rural PHC centers) were lacking in most PHC centers. CONCLUSION: Our study captured measures implemented by few PHC centers suggesting potential priority areas of future improvement.