Gene network interaction analysis to elucidate the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in the Clostridiumdifficile.

Antimicrobial resistance has caused chaos worldwide due to the depiction of multidrug-resistant (MDR) infective microorganisms. A thorough examination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and associated resistant mechanisms is vital to solving this problem. Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is an opportunistic nosocomial bacterial strain that has acquired exogenous AMR genes that confer resistance to antimicrobials such as erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, rifampicin, moxifloxacin, fluoroquinolones, vancomycin, and others. A network of interactions, including 20 AMR genes, was created and analyzed. In functional enrichment analysis, Cellular components (CC), Molecular Functions (MF), and Biological Processes (BP) were discovered to have substantial involvement. Mutations in the rpl genes, which encode ribosomal proteins, confer resistance in Gram-positive bacteria. Full erythromycin and azithromycin cross-resistance can be conferred if more than one of the abovementioned genes is present. In the enriched BP, rps genes related to transcriptional regulation and biosynthesis were found. The genes belong to the rpoB gene family, which has previously been related to rifampicin resistance. The genes rpoB, gyrA, gyrB, rpoS, rpl genes, rps genes, and Van genes are thought to be the hub genes implicated in resistance in C. difficile. As a result, new medications could be developed using these genes. Overall, our observations provide a thorough understanding of C. difficile AMR mechanisms.

Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Based on Clinicoradiological Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. However, of all Laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 1-13% requires conversion to an open for various reasons. Thus, for surgeons it would be helpful to establish criteria that would predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conversion preoperatively. But there is no clear consensus among the laparoscopic surgeons regarding the parameters predicting the difficult dissection and conversion to open cholecystectomy. AIM: To assess the clinical and radiological parameters for predicting the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its conversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted from October 2010 to October 2014. Total of 180 patients meeting the inclusion criteria undergoing LC were included in the study. Four parameters were assessed to predict the difficult LC. These parameters were: 1) Gallbladder wall thickness; 2) Pericholecystic fluid collection; 3) Number of attacks; 4) Total leucocyte count. The statistical analysis was done using Z-test. RESULTS: Out of 180 patients included in this study 126 (70%) were easy, 44 (24.44%) were difficult and 3 (5.56%) patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy. The overall conversion rate was 5.6%. The TLC>11000, more than 2 previous attacks of cholecystitis, GB wall thickness of >3mm and Pericholecystic collection were all statistically significant for predicting the difficult LC and its conversion. CONCLUSION: The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conversion to open surgery can be predicted preoperatively based on number of previous attacks of cholecystitis, WBC count, Gall bladder wall thickness and Pericholecystic collection.