Analysis of the Safety of Drug Allergy Workups in a Spanish University Hospital: Drug Characteristics, Type of Reaction, and Patients' Age at the Initial Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: The drug provocation test (DPT) is the gold standard for the drug allergy workup; however, it is not free from severe adverse reactions. Our aim was to obtain robust data that predict a reaction during or after the DPT at the first contact with the patient in the allergy outpatient clinic. METHODS: The population of this cross-sectional study comprised all patients undergoing a drug allergy workup (clinical assessment, specific IgE, or skin tests, or DPT) at University Hospital Fundacion Alcorcon in 2016. DPTs were performed until therapeutic doses were reached, and late reactions were checked. The clinical disorders assessed in our study were classified mainly as absence of allergic reactions, morbilliform rash, urticaria, anaphylaxis, and other cutaneous disorders. RESULTS: Physicians from the Allergy Unit programmed drug allergy workups in 977 patients (median age, 52 years; women, 64.54%). DPTs were not performed for 165 drugs involved in the reactions. Patients who did not undergo DPT were older than patients who did (positive or negative) (p = 0.0001). Positive DPT results were detected in 6.00% of DPTs performed, and most were for amoxicillin and metamizole (15-25% each). Multinomial logistic regression showed that positive reactions were more probable after DPT if the same clinical disorder was diagnosed at the first visit, including the episodes not considered allergic episodes (OR = 0.2, <0.01), except for anaphylaxis, which favored not performing DPTs (OR = 11, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that clinical practice in the diagnosis of drug allergy in our Allergy Department is safe, without over-diagnosis.

"Frequency of fatal and recurrent anaphylaxis due to COW'S milk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies".

Cow's milk allergy can result in anaphylactic reactions. The estimated prevalence of cow's milk allergy in developed countries ranges from 0.5% to 3% at age 1 year. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and, if possible, a meta-analysis to assess the frequency of fatal and recurrent anaphylaxis induced by cow's milk. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for studies that had assessed fatal and recurrent anaphylaxis induced by cow's milk for the population of a country or at least an administrative region. Our review included cohort, cross-sectional, and registry studies that had assessed the incidence or prevalence of recurrent anaphylaxis or the incidence of fatal anaphylaxis due to cow's milk. The pooled prevalence of recurrence (PR) for at least an episode of anaphylaxis was 26.98% (3.85-189.1). Teymourpour et al (Iran) reported the highest PR (53.10%); the two studies with the lowest PR were from France (5.2 and 0.42, respectively) (p < .01). Nine studies on fatal anaphylaxis were selected (41 deaths) and found to be highly heterogeneous (I2 = 75.9%). Levy et al and Bassagio et al reported the highest incidence rate (IR 0.15 and 0.6 deaths per million persons-year). The PR of anaphylaxis was approximately one quarter of patients with anaphylaxis due to cow's milk, while deaths from anaphylaxis caused by cow's milk were very rare, although some studies report rates as high as 15 times the lowest IR.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of fatal anaphylaxis in Spain (1998-2011): A comparison between a series from the hospital system and a national forensic series.

BACKGROUND: Reports of fatal anaphylaxis remain scarce because of the rarity of the condition and the fact that information is limited to a few countries. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate clinical and demographic characteristics and the causes of fatal anaphylaxis in Spain using two databases of cases of fatal anaphylaxis. METHODS: We analysed fatal anaphylaxis in a series from the Spanish hospital system and a series from the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences (Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses [INTCF]), which predominantly comprise extrahospital deaths. Deaths from the Spanish hospital system were retrieved from among all deaths occurring during 1998-2011 using codes related to anaphylaxis. Deaths due to anaphylaxis in the INTCF database during the same period were retrieved by 2 allergists, who identified cases in which anaphylaxis was a possible cause of death. A logistic regression model was constructed to predict the characteristics of fatal anaphylaxis in each database. RESULTS: The incidence of death by anaphylaxis in Spain using both databases was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.24-0.26) deaths per million person-years. The most frequent causes of death in the hospital system were drugs (46.1%), unknown causes (40.0%), and foods (10.4%); in the INTCF, the most common causes of death were drugs (47.2%), insect stings (30.6%), and foods (11.1%). The logistic regression model showed that fatal anaphylaxis due to unknown causes (OR 15.2, 95% CI 1.8-129.8) was more likely in the hospital database, whereas insect stings (OR 100, 95% CI 10-833.3) and previous atopic comorbidity (OR 15.2, 95% CI 6.3-33.3) were more likely in the INTCF database. CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The estimated frequency of fatal anaphylaxis in Spain was among the lowest reported. Future studies of fatal anaphylaxis should use databases from different origins in order to show the considerable heterogeneity in this type of death.

Medical and pathologic characteristics of fatal anaphylaxis: a Spanish nationwide 17-year series.

Forensic series on fatal anaphylaxis are scarce, probably because the diagnosis of anaphylaxis is often complex and the incidence is low. We report on the medicolegal, demographic and histopathological characteristics of a series of sudden deaths which were investigated for anaphylaxis at the Spanish National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences (INTCF) over a 17-year period (1998-2015). A total of 122 undetermined sudden deaths from a high percentage of Spanish regions (81.5% of the total population) were sent to the INTCF with anaphylaxis as the suspected cause of death for histological, biochemical, and medicolegal investigation. Two certified allergists confirmed that 46 of the 122 cases were fatal anaphylaxis. The results indicated a median age of 51 years (IQR = 29) and a male predominance (76%). The main causes of anaphylaxis were drugs (41%), hymenoptera stings (33%), and food (13%). A previous allergic event had been reported in both food anaphylaxis (67%) and drug anaphylaxis (53%). The deaths occurred in health care settings (37%), at home (22%), and outside the home (26.09%). Histopathology data were available for 40 individuals. The most frequent autopsy findings were angioedema of the upper airways (50%), pulmonary edema (47.5%), atheromatosis of coronary vessels (32.5%), and pulmonary congestion (27.5%). Our findings for fatal anaphylaxis indicated a predominance of men, older age (≥50 years) and death in a health care setting (one-third of cases). Previous episodes had occurred in two-thirds of cases of food-induced anaphylaxis and in half of the cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis.

Incidence of anaphylaxis in hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Only two studies have analyzed the incidence of anaphylaxis during admission to hospital. We have analyzed the incidence of anaphylaxis among hospitalized patients and determined the timing of and risk factors for episodes of anaphylaxis. METHODS: Our study was performed between 1999 and 2005. We used the definition of anaphylaxis of the NIAID-FAAN symposium. Cases of anaphylaxis were extracted from an official database of discharge diagnoses coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM), Sixth Edition. Specific and generic codes related to anaphylaxis were chosen. This strategy revealed 83.3% (95% confidence interval, CI, 47-99%) of all episodes of anaphylaxis in a pilot study. The incidence of episodes of anaphylaxis and the hazard ratios were calculated for the different variables. RESULTS: We observed a crude cumulative incidence of 1.5 episodes of anaphylaxis (95% CI, 0.9-1.9) in 5,000 admissions. The cumulative incidence according to the Standardized European Population was 1.6 cases in 5,000 admissions (95% CI, 0.8-2.3). Cox regression analysis showed that anaphylaxis occurs mainly in young people (0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99) and its incidence differs according to the clinical unit. The Vascular Surgery Unit had the highest incidence rate (hazard ratio 7.7; 95% CI, 2.1-28.6). Males had a lower risk of suffering from anaphylaxis than females (0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis is a very rare event among hospitalized patients. Female gender, young age and admission to the Vascular Surgery Unit favored the occurrence of episodes of anaphylaxis among hospitalized patients.

Relationship Between Anaphylaxis and Use of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers (BBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have been associated with an increased risk and severity of anaphylaxis. However, the evidence supporting these findings is contradictory. OBJECTIVE: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assess the influence of BBs and ACEIs on anaphylaxis. METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science for relevant observational studies. We searched for studies where the presence and severity of anaphylaxis were compared between patients taking BBs, ACEIs, both types of drug, or neither type of drug. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies met the study criteria. Of these, 15 assessed the severity and 9 the incidence of anaphylaxis. The studies brought together 22,313 anaphylaxis episodes for the severity studies and 18,101 anaphylaxis episodes for the studies of new cases of anaphylaxis. BBs and ACEIs increased the severity of anaphylaxis (BBs, odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.84; ACEIs, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12-2.16), but not the presence of new cases of anaphylaxis (BBs, OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.91-2.14; ACEIs, OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.39-4.86). It was not possible to perform an analysis adjusted for cardiovascular diseases, because only 1 study each for BBs and ACEIs, respectively, had adjusted data. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of evidence showing that the use of BBs and ACEI increases the severity of anaphylaxis is low owing to differences in the control of confounders arising from the concomitant presence of cardiovascular diseases.

Food poisoning caused by scombroids: A case-control study.

The aim of this study is to report the epidemiological characteristics of a food poisoning outbreak due to scombroid fish in a hospital. A case-control study (1:4) was conducted. Patients either symptomatic of food poisoning (cases) or asymptomatic (controls) eating at the hospital cafeteria were included. To identify the source of the outbreak, sanitary control factors were assessed. Microbiological studies and the mast cell tryptase test were performed. All cases and controls received a questionnaire enquiring about symptoms and foods consumed. The odds ratios (OR) for all risk factors and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed. In total, 20 individuals (90% female) were included in the study: four cases and 16 controls. The overall mean age was 43 years (SD: 10.2). The most frequent symptom observed was facial and neck erythaema (100%). Microbiological cultures were negative, the mast cell tryptase test was normal and breakdown of the cold chain did not occur. The most likely source of the outbreak was fried anchovies (OR: 34.7; 95% CI: 1.50-809.6; p=0.02). Methods suitable to the rapid assessment of the outbreak allowed us to establish prompt preventive measures and identify the likely aetiology.

Idiopathic anaphylaxis: a descriptive study of 81 patients in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Few European groups have published data on series of patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to report on our experience with this entity in Spain. METHODS: We conducted a two-part investigation. The first part was a descriptive cross-sectional study of 81 patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis, diagnosed between January 1990 and December 1995 in the allergy unit of the General Hospital of Albacete in Albacete, Spain. The second prong was a prospective, longitudinal study that evaluated the activity of the condition. RESULTS: Female patients constituted 68% of the study group with idiopathic anaphylaxis; the mean age of the 81 patients was 30.0 +/- 17.3 years. The number of episodes of idiopathic anaphylaxis during the year of greatest frequency varied widely (median, 2; range, 1 to 130). The duration also varied considerably, with a range of 0.03 to 300 months (median, 2 years). Most patients entered the study in remission, and 93% of these patients remained in remission throughout the followup period. Only 9% of the patients had vascular involvement. Our series of patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis had a notable prevalence of atopic diseases (48%), food allergy (20%), and episodes of anaphylaxis with an identifiable cause (15%). In addition, a high frequency (58%) of idiopathic urticaria was noted; the urticaria was acute in 62% of the affected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our series of patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis is similar to previously published series.