Traumatic middle meningeal arteriovenous fistulas (MMAVFs): an exploratory systematic review.

This study aims to systematically review case reports and case series in order to compare the postoperative course of conservative, endovascular and surgical treatments for traumatic dural arteriovenous fistulas predominantly supplied by the middle meningeal artery (MMAVFs), which usually occur following head trauma or iatrogenic causes. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until June 23rd, 2024. Three cohorts were defined based on the treatment modality employed. The primary outcomes were the rates of overall obliteration and postoperative complications, with all-cause mortlality considered as secondary outcome. A total of 61 studies encompassing 78 pooled MMAVFs were included in the qualitative analysis. The predominant demographic consisted of males (53.9%) with a median age of 50.5 (IQR: 33.5-67.5) years. The main etiologies for fistula formation were head trauma (75.6%), cranial neurosurgical procedures (11.5%) and endovascular embolization (8.97%). Venous drainage patterns were categorized as follows based on anatomical confluence: Class I (16.7%), II (14.1%), III (12.8%), IV (14.1%), V (7.7%), and VI (3.9%). Regarding treatment efficacy, the overall obliteration rate was 89.74%, achieved through endovascular (95.83%), surgical (64.29%) or conservative (93.75%) approaches. In terms of safety, the overall postoperative complication rate was 6.49% with an all-cause mortality rate of 8.97%, predominantly observed in the surgical group (35.71%). Our systematic review highlights the challenging management of traumatic MMAVFs, frequently associated with head injuries. Endovascular therapy has emerged as the predominant treatment modality, demonstrating markedly higher rates of fistula obliteration, reduced all-cause mortality, and fewer postoperative complications.

Hearing preservation and quality of life in small to medium sized vestibular schwannomas after a wait and scan approach or stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) encompasses a choice between conservative "wait-and-scan" (WAS) approach, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or open microsurgical resection. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management approach for small to medium sized VS. This study aims to compared outcomes related to hearing in patients with small and medium sized VS who underwent initial treatment with WAS versus SRS. METHODS: A systematic review of the available literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane up December 08, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model to calculate mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR). A leave-one-out analysis was conducted. The risk of bias was assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (RoB-2). Ultimately, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE assessment. The primary outcomes were serviceable hearing, and pure-tone average (PTA). The secondary outcome was the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale (PANQOL) total score. RESULTS: Nine studies were eligible for inclusion, comprising a total of 1,275 patients. Among these, 674 (52.86%) underwent WAS, while 601 patients (47.14%) received SRS. Follow-up duration ranged from two to eight years. The meta-analysis indicated that WAS had a better outcome for serviceable hearing (0.47; 95% CI: 0.32 - 0.68; p < 0.001), as well as for postoperative functional measures including PTA score (MD 13.48; 95% CI 3.83 - 23.13; p < 0.01), and PANQOL total score (MD 3.83; 95% CI 0.42 - 7.25; p = 0.03). The overall certainty of evidence ranged from "very low" to "moderate". CONCLUSIONS: Treating small to medium sized VS with WAS increases the likelihood of preserving serviceable hearing and optimized PANQOL overall postoperative score compared to SRS. Nevertheless, the limited availability of literature and the methodological weakness observed in existing studies outline the need for higher-quality studies.

Two-stage radiosurgery for large brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors. In several cases, they present as large masses, which are related to a worse prognosis and more complex therapeutic alternatives. Staged radiosurgery is reported to achieve local control with minimal radiation-related adverse events in BMs. However, no methodological consensus has been achieved in its use for large brain metastases (LBMs; > 2 cm). Therefore, the authors aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of 2-stage Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for LBMs, in order to optimize patients' postoperative course. METHODS: A systematic review of available literature was run in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (OvidSP), and Google Scholar for works published up to December 14, 2022. Nonrandomized clinical trials, case series, and cohort studies were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Pooled mean difference and rates estimates were calculated by a random-effects model meta-analysis. The degree of heterogeneity was expressed using the I2 statistic. A subgroup analysis was performed. Ultimately, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria (cohorts, case series, and nonrandomized clinical trials), including 958 patients. A total pooled mean volume reduction of 6.27 cm3 (95% CI 5.67-6.88 cm3) and 54.36% (95% CI 39.92%-68.79%) after 2-stage GKRS was reported. Pooled rates of complete response (44.63%; 95% CI 26.50%-64.31%), neurological mortality (16.19%; 95% CI 7.68%-30.98%), and all-cause mortality (47.92%; 95% CI 28.04%-68.49%) were calculated. Overall certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage GKRS is an effective and safe approach for the treatment of LBMs. Nevertheless, the lack of available literature and the weak methodological approaches used determine a low to very low certainty of evidence and cannot provide robust evidence to recommend this intervention. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct higher-quality primary studies.

Endovascular Treatment and Microsurgical Clipping for the Management of Paraclinoid Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of microsurgical clipping versus endovascular treatment (EVT) for paraclinoid aneurysms. METHODS: A systematic search for studies including patients with paraclinoid aneurysms treated with a microsurgical or endovascular technique was conducted in 6 databases from inception to February 2022. Efficacy outcomes included complete angiographic occlusion at last follow-up, favorable functional outcome, and recurrence of the aneurysm. For safety, we assessed a composite of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 95 studies including 6711 patients, 3029 in the surgical group and 3682 in the EVT group were found. Pooled rates of complete occlusion were 94% (95% CI 91%-96%; I2 = 0%) in the surgical group and 69% (95% CI 63%-74%; I2 = 79%) in the EVT group, respectively. The favorable functional outcome rate was 86% (95% CI 76%-92%; I2 = 72%) with surgical treatment and 95% (95% CI 92%-97%; I2 = 61%) with EVT. The rate of aneurysm recurrence with surgical treatment was 1% (95% CI 0%-4%; I2 = 0%) and 12% (95% CI 9%-16%; I2 = 57%) with EVT. The composite safety outcome rate in the surgical group was 24% (95% CI 18%-30%; I2 = 90%) and 10% (95% CI 8%-13%; I2 = 71%) in the EVT group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that microsurgical clipping seems to have a higher efficacy than EVT in terms of angiographic occlusion and aneurysm recurrence; however, EVT seems to be safer in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Considering the heterogeneity and low-level evidence of the data available, further prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.