RESUMO
Sarcopenia is a syndrome defined by generalized and progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. Besides affecting elderly population, it is actually common among inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) patients. We performed a systematic literature review with a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) on sarcopenia in IRD. A systematic search has been performed on Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of science. Studies characteristics were collected. Assessment tools were body composition (total lean mass (TLM) and percentage, appendicular skeletal mass (ASM), fat-free mass and index (FFM and FFMI), skeletal mass index (SMI) and segmental lean mass (SLM)), and muscle strength and physical performance tests. Treatment effect defined the difference in change from baseline to the end of follow-up treatment was divided by the pooled SD of the difference. Twenty-two studies on 778 patients receiving bDMARDs/tsDMARDs and 157 controls were reviewed. They investigated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (N = 14), spondyloarthritis (SpA) (N = 6), psoriatic arthritis (N = 1), and both RA and SpA (N = 1). tsDMARDs were used in one study with no effect on sarcopenia. Ten studies demonstrated that bDMARDs increased significantly muscle measures in 347 patients (44.6%) with a significant increase in TLM (6/15 studies; 57.4%), FFMI (4/6 studies; 59.9%), ASM (2/5 studies; 17.6%), SMI (2/5 studies; 18.1%), and SLM (2/2 studies; 3.6%). bDMARDs showed also a positive effect on handgrip strength in 1/3 of studies (45.2%) and on physical performance in 1/2 of studies (61%). In 1/5 of comparative studies, IRD patients on bDMARDs showed significantly higher increase of TLM in comparison to controls naïve bDMARDs. Regarding diagnosis, positive effect of bDMARDs was seen in 67.4% in SpA versus 49.3% in RA, with a significant increase of TLM, ASM and FFMI in 59.4%, 100%, and 65.2% in SpA versus 54.9%, 24.1%, and 54.8% in RA, respectively. Meta-analysis assessed the effect of bDMARD on TLM in 10 studies. There was no statistically significant difference [SMD - 0.10 (95% Confidence Interval - 0.26 - 0.06; tau2 = 0). Heterogeneity across studies was null, and the 95% confidence interval (index of precision) was equal to the 95% predictive interval. The first systematic literature review showed that bDMARDs have a significant improve effect in nearly half of RA and SpA patients on muscle mass and muscle strength, assessed separately. However, the meta-analysis concluded that bDMARDs have no significant effect on TLM.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Psoriásica , Artrite Reumatoide , Produtos Biológicos , Febre Reumática , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Idoso , Sarcopenia/complicações , Sarcopenia/tratamento farmacológico , Força da Mão , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Febre Reumática/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Vaccine hesitancy is considered one of the greatest threats to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination programs. Lack of trust in vaccine benefits, along with concerns about side effects of the newly developed COVID-19 vaccine, might significantly contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The objective of this study was to determine the level of vaccine hesitancy among communities in particular their belief in vaccination benefits and perceived risks of new vaccines. An online cross-sectional study was conducted in 10 countries in Asia, Africa, and South America from February to May 2021. Seven items from the WHO SAGE Vaccine Hesitancy Scale were used to measure a construct of belief in vaccination benefit, and one item measured perceived riskiness of new vaccines. A logistic regression was used to determine which sociodemographic factors were associated with both vaccine hesitancy constructs. A total of 1,832 respondents were included in the final analysis of which 36.2% (range 5.6-52.2%) and 77.6% (range 38.3-91.2%) of them were classified as vaccine hesitant in terms of beliefs in vaccination benefits and concerns about new vaccines, respectively. Respondents from Pakistan had the highest vaccine hesitancy while those from Chile had the lowest. Being females, Muslim, having a non-healthcare-related job and not receiving a flu vaccination during the past 12 months were associated with poor beliefs of vaccination benefits. Those who were living in rural areas, Muslim, and those who did not received a flu vaccination during the past 12 months had relatively higher beliefs that new vaccines are riskier. High prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in some countries during the COVID-19 pandemic might hamper COVID-19 vaccination programs worldwide. Programs should be developed to promote vaccination in those sociodemographic groups with relatively high vaccine hesitancy.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , África , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Paquistão , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , América do Sul/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Hesitação VacinalRESUMO
Background: Risk perceptions of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are considered important as they impact community health behaviors. The aim of this study was to determine the perceived risk of infection and death due to COVID-19 and to assess the factors associated with such risk perceptions among community members in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Africa, Asia, and South America. Methods: An online cross-sectional study was conducted in 10 LMICs in Africa, Asia, and South America from February to May 2021. A questionnaire was utilized to assess the perceived risk of infection and death from COVID-19 and its plausible determinants. A logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with such risk perceptions. Results: A total of 1,646 responses were included in the analysis of the perceived risk of becoming infected and dying from COVID-19. Our data suggested that 36.4% of participants had a high perceived risk of COVID-19 infection, while only 22.4% had a perceived risk of dying from COVID-19. Being a woman, working in healthcare-related sectors, contracting pulmonary disease, knowing people in the immediate social environment who are or have been infected with COVID-19, as well as seeing or reading about individuals infected with COVID-19 on social media or TV were all associated with a higher perceived risk of becoming infected with COVID-19. In addition, being a woman, elderly, having heart disease and pulmonary disease, knowing people in the immediate social environment who are or have been infected with COVID-19, and seeing or reading about individuals infected with COVID-19 on social media or TV had a higher perceived risk of dying from COVID-19. Conclusions: The perceived risk of infection and death due to COVID-19 are relatively low among respondents; this suggests the need to conduct health campaigns to disseminate knowledge and information on the ongoing pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Humanos , Pandemias , PobrezaRESUMO
Vaccine hesitancy is considered as one of the greatest challenges to control the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A related challenge is the unwillingness of the general public to pay for vaccination. The objective of this study was to determine willingness-to-pay (WTP) for COVID-19 vaccine among individuals from ten low- middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Africa, and South America. Data were collected using an online questionnaire distributed during February - May 2021 in ten LMICs (Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, Egypt, India, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan, and Tunisia). The major response variable of in this study was WTP for a COVID-19 vaccine. The assessment of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was based on items adopted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) vaccine hesitancy scale constructs. In this study, 1337 respondents included in the final analysis where the highest number of respondents was from India, while the lowest number was from Egypt. A total of 88.9% (1188/1337) respondents were willing to pay for the COVID-19 vaccination, and 11.1% (149/1337) were not. The average WTP for COVID-19 vaccination was 87.9 US dollars ($), (range: $5-$200). The multivariate model analysis showed that the country, monthly household income, having a history of respiratory disease, the agreement that routine vaccines recommended by health workers are beneficial and having received the flu vaccination within the previous 12 months were strongly associated with the WTP. Based on the country of origin, the highest mean WTP for COVID-19 vaccine was reported in Chile, while the lowest mean WTP for the vaccine was seen among the respondents from Sudan. The availability of free COVID-19 vaccination services appears as a top priority in the LMICs for successful control of the ongoing pandemic. This is particularly important for individuals of a lower socio- economic status. The effects of complacency regarding COVID-19 extends beyond vaccine hesitancy to involve less willingness to pay for COVID-19 vaccine and a lower value of WTP for the vaccine.
RESUMO
Systemic diseases should be always considered when managing unexplained intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction related to systemic lupus erythematosus is often responsive to corticosteroid therapy when promptly treated.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Management of acetabular fracture in the elderly patients is becoming an increasingly topic of debate. Data from different parts of the world specified particularities of their patients. AIM: To describe patterns of these fractures in the Tunisian patients aged > 60, which can contribute to management and preventive plans. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review from 1997 to 2016 treated at the Charles Nicolle university hospital. Information regarding demographics, co morbidities, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), types and levels of injury, treatment type, and mortality were collected. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 68,6 years (range 60-94 years). The male to female ratio was 3:85.Main causes were motor vehicle accident. Most of our patients were in good health. The associated lesions were very frequent and present in 64.7% of cases with a clear predominance of cranio-fascial trauma, with a median of the ISS score at 11. According to the Judet and Letournel classification, 18 elementary fractures and 16 complex fractures were reported with predominance of the anterior column-posterior hemitransverse fracture pattern. Posterior wall fracture in the elderly is often associated with comminution and / or marginal impaction and / or posterior dislocation of the hip. Fractures of the anterior segment are often associated with hip protrusion and / or quadrilateral plate involvement and / or the superomedial roof impaction or "Gull sign". CONCLUSION: As our population continues to age, traumatic acetabular fractures will become more prevalent. Appropriate screening strategies, treatment and prevention plans will need to be developed to improve outcomes in this devastating injury.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Acetábulo/lesões , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Placas Ósseas , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency worldwide and its resulting anemia appears as a public health problem. Iron deficiency anemia is rather a symptom than a disease in itself, and the identification of its etiology is of paramount importance. AIM: to study the clinical and etiological features of iron deficiency anemia in an Internal Medicine department. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study between 2001 and 2015 at an internal medicine department including patients presenting with iron deficiency anemia and having at least one etiological investigation. RESULTS: The average age was 45.6 16,3 years. Three main mechanisms of iron deficiency anemia were noted: repeated blood loss (94.4%), digestive malabsorption of iron (17.8%) and lack of dietary iron intake (6.6%). The digestive origin dominated the etiologies of iron deficiency anemia with a leading frequency of gastritis (32.2%). An underlying cancer was discovered in six cases. The average duration of follow-up was 9.1 months. An unfavorable outcome (persistence or recurrence of iron deficiency anemia) was associated with an absence or insufficiency of etiological treatment (p << 10-3) and with a duration of iron treatment inferior to 4 months (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: In case of iron deficiency anemia, the prognosis depends on the quality of the etiological investigation. It can allow the discovery of an underlying cancer. The management of iron deficiency anemia relies on a well-led iron supplementation and an optimal treatment of the incriminated cause.