Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation, Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation, or a Strength-Training Exercise Program on Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults: The DO-HEALTH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The benefits of vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, and exercise in disease prevention remain unclear. Objective: To test whether vitamin D, omega-3s, and a strength-training exercise program, alone or in combination, improved 6 health outcomes among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial among 2157 adults aged 70 years or older who had no major health events in the 5 years prior to enrollment and had sufficient mobility and good cognitive status. Patients were recruited between December 2012 and November 2014, and final follow-up was in November 2017. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 3 years of intervention in 1 of the following 8 groups: 2000 IU/d of vitamin D3, 1 g/d of omega-3s, and a strength-training exercise program (n = 264); vitamin D3 and omega-3s (n = 265); vitamin D3 and exercise (n = 275); vitamin D3 alone (n = 272); omega-3s and exercise (n = 275); omega-3s alone (n = 269); exercise alone (n = 267); or placebo (n = 270). Main Outcomes and Measures: The 6 primary outcomes were change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and incidence rates (IRs) of nonvertebral fractures and infections over 3 years. Based on multiple comparisons of 6 primary end points, 99% confidence intervals are presented and P < .01 was required for statistical significance. Results: Among 2157 randomized participants (mean age, 74.9 years; 61.7% women), 1900 (88%) completed the study. Median follow-up was 2.99 years. Overall, there were no statistically significant benefits of any intervention individually or in combination for the 6 end points at 3 years. For instance, the differences in mean change in systolic BP with vitamin D vs no vitamin D and with omega-3s vs no omega-3s were both -0.8 (99% CI, -2.1 to 0.5) mm Hg, with P < .13 and P < .11, respectively; the difference in mean change in diastolic BP with omega-3s vs no omega-3s was -0.5 (99% CI, -1.2 to 0.2) mm Hg; P = .06); and the difference in mean change in IR of infections with omega-3s vs no omega-3s was -0.13 (99% CI, -0.23 to -0.03), with an IR ratio of 0.89 (99% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .02). No effects were found on the outcomes of SPPB, MoCA, and incidence of nonvertebral fractures). A total of 25 deaths were reported, with similar numbers in all treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults without major comorbidities aged 70 years or older, treatment with vitamin D3, omega-3s, or a strength-training exercise program did not result in statistically significant differences in improvement in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, nonvertebral fractures, physical performance, infection rates, or cognitive function. These findings do not support the effectiveness of these 3 interventions for these clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01745263.

Which Method of Fall Ascertainment Captures the Most Falls in Prefrail and Frail Seniors?

There is no consensus on the most reliable method of ascertaining falls among the elderly. Therefore, we investigated which method captured the most falls among prefrail and frail seniors from 2 randomized controlled trials conducted in Zurich, Switzerland: an 18-month trial (2009-2010) including 200 community-dwelling prefrail seniors with a prior fall and a 12-month trial (2005-2008) including 173 frail seniors with acute hip fracture. Both trials included the same methods of fall ascertainment: monthly active asking, daily self-report diary entries, and a call-in hotline. We compared numbers of falls reported and estimated overall and positive percent agreement between methods. Prefrail seniors reported 499 falls (fall rate = 2.5/year) and frail seniors reported 205 falls (fall rate = 1.4/year). Most falls (81% of falls in prefrail seniors and 78% in frail seniors) were reported via active asking. Among prefrail seniors, diaries captured an additional 19% of falls, while the hotline added none. Among frail seniors, the hotline added 16% of falls, while diaries added 6%. The positive percent agreement between active asking and diary entries was 100% among prefrail seniors and 88% among frail seniors. While monthly active asking captures most falls in both groups, this method alone missed 19% of falls in prefrail seniors and 22% in frail seniors. Thus, a combination of active asking and diaries for prefrail seniors and a combination of active asking and a hotline for frail seniors is warranted.

Disease activity dynamics in rheumatoid arthritis: patients' self-assessment of disease activity via WebApp.

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate patient self-assessment of RA disease activity in terms of Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores via a Web-based smartphone application (WebApp). Methods: In this prospective, multicentre study, adult RA patients were examined by a rheumatologist at baseline and after 3 months. Patients were asked to complete WebApp questionnaires weekly. The time course of patient-assessed RAPID3/4 scores and their correlations with rheumatologist-assessed DAS28, as well as Clinical and Simplified Disease Activity Indices (CDAI/SDAI), were evaluated. Results: Eighty patients were included in the analysis (median RA duration, 4.5 years; age, 57 years; 59% female). At baseline, there was a moderate to strong correlation between RAPID3 and DAS28 (r = 0.63), CDAI (r = 0.65) and SDAI (r = 0.61) scores. Similar or stronger correlations were seen at the 3-month follow-up visit (DAS28 r = 0.66, CDAI r = 0.71 and SDAI r = 0.61). Similar correlations were seen between RAPID4 and rheumatologist assessments. Correlations were not influenced by demographics or RA treatment. In the 3-month period, the RAPID3 score changed into a higher severity category than the category at baseline at least once in 47% of patients. When DAS28 scores were predicted from the RAPID3, 11% of patients had an increase of > 1 DAS28 unit during the 3-month observation period. Conclusion: Web-based patient assessments were strongly correlated with rheumatologist assessments of RA activity and showed considerable variation during follow-up. This provides a rationale for further exploration of their use as cost-effective tools to monitor RA activity between outpatient visits and to optimize tight control strategies.

A pooled analysis of vitamin D dose requirements for fracture prevention.

BACKGROUND: The results of meta-analyses examining the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and fracture reduction have been inconsistent. METHODS: We pooled participant-level data from 11 double-blind, randomized, controlled trials of oral vitamin D supplementation (daily, weekly, or every 4 months), with or without calcium, as compared with placebo or calcium alone in persons 65 years of age or older. Primary end points were the incidence of hip and any nonvertebral fractures according to Cox regression analyses, with adjustment for age group, sex, type of dwelling, and study. Our primary aim was to compare data from quartiles of actual intake of vitamin D (including each individual participant's adherence to the treatment and supplement use outside the study protocol) in the treatment groups of all trials with data from the control groups. RESULTS: We included 31,022 persons (mean age, 76 years; 91% women) with 1111 incident hip fractures and 3770 nonvertebral fractures. Participants who were randomly assigned to receive vitamin D, as compared with those assigned to control groups, had a nonsignificant 10% reduction in the risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.01) and a 7% reduction in the risk of nonvertebral fracture (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99). By quartiles of actual intake, reduction in the risk of fracture was shown only at the highest intake level (median, 800 IU daily; range, 792 to 2000), with a 30% reduction in the risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86) and a 14% reduction in the risk of any nonvertebral fracture (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96). Benefits at the highest level of vitamin D intake were fairly consistent across subgroups defined by age group, type of dwelling, baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, and additional calcium intake. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose vitamin D supplementation (≥800 IU daily) was somewhat favorable in the prevention of hip fracture and any nonvertebral fracture in persons 65 years of age or older. (Funded by the Swiss National Foundations and others.).

[Pharmacolgic osteoporosis treatment of nursing home residents]. / Medikamentöse Osteoporosetherapie bei Altersheimbewohner/-innen.

INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures in older people are common and are often associated with nursing home admission in frail people. Only few institutionalized residents with documented osteoporosis receive pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment. Studies demonstrating the benefit of osteoporosis drug therapy in this multimorbid and vulnerable population are lacking.

Effects of testosterone and vitamin D on fall risk in pre-frail hypogonadal men: a factorial design RCT.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether transdermal testosterone at a dose of 75 mg per day and/or monthly 24'000 IU Vitamin D reduces the fall risk in pre-frail hypogonadal men aged 65 and older. DESIGN: 2 × 2 factorial design randomized controlled trial, follow up of 12 months. METHODS: Hypogonadism was defined as total testosterone <11.3 nmol/L and pre-frailty as ≥1 Fried- frailty criteria and/or being at risk for falling at the time of screening. The primary outcomes were number of fallers and the rate of falls, assessed prospectively. Secondary outcomes were appendicular lean mass (ALM), sit-to-stand, gait speed, and the short physical performance test battery. Analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, fall history and the respective baseline measurement. RESULTS: We aimed to recruit 168 men and stopped at 91 due to unexpected low recruitment rate (1266 men were pre-screened). Mean age was 72.2 years, serum total testosterone was 10.8 ± 3.0 nmol/l, and 20.9% had 25(OH)D levels below 20 ng/mL. Over 12 months, 37 participants had 72 falls. Neither the odds of falling nor the rate of falls were reduced by testosterone or by vitamin D. Testosterone improved ALM compared to no testosterone (0.21 kg/m2 [0.06, 0.37]), and improved gait speed (0.11 m/s, [0.03, 0.20]) compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Transdermal testosterone did not reduce fall risk but improved ALM and gait speed in pre-frail older men. Monthly vitamin D supplementation had no benefit.

Effects of vitamin D3, omega-3 s and a simple strength training exercise program on bone health: the DO-HEALTH randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of Vitamin D, omega-3 s and exercise on aBMD in healthy older adults is limited. We examined whether vitamin D3, omega-3 s, or a simple home-based exercise program (SHEP), alone or in combination, over three years, improve lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) or total hip (TH) aBMD assessed by DXA. METHODS: aBMD was a secondary outcome in DO-HEALTH, a 3-year, multicenter, double-blind, randomized 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design trial in generally healthy older adults age ≥ 70 years. The study interventions were vitamin D3 (2000IU/d), omega-3 s (1 g/d), and SHEP (3 × 30 min/wk), applied alone or in combination in 8 treatment arms. Mixed effect models were used adjusting for age, sex, BMI, prior fall, study site and baseline level of the outcome. Main effects were assessed in the absence of an interaction between the interventions. Subgroup analyses by sex, physical activity level, dietary calcium intake, serum 25(OH)D levels, and fracture history were conducted. RESULTS: DXA scans were available for 1493 participants (mean age 75 years; 80.4% were physically active, 44% had 25(OH)D levels <20 ng/ml). At the LS and FN sites, none of the treatments showed a benefit. At the TH, vitamin D vs. no vitamin D treatment showed a significant benefit across 3 years (difference in adjusted means [AM]: 0.0035 [95% CI 0.0011, 0.0059] g/cm2). Furthermore, there was a benefit for vitamin D vs. no vitamin D treatment on LS aBMD in the male subgroup of (interaction P = 0.003; ∆AM: 0.0070 [95% CI 0.0007, 0.0132] g/cm2). CONCLUSIONS: Omega-3 and SHEP had no benefit on aBMD in healthy, active and largely vitamin D replete older adults. Our study suggests a small benefit of 2000 IU vitamin D daily on TH aBMD overall and LS aBMD among men, however, effect sizes were very modest and the clinical impact of these findings is unclear.

Vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids (omega-3 s) and strength training are simple but promising strategies to improve bone health, however, their effect in healthy older adults over a period of three years was unclear. In this study, we examined whether daily vitamin D supplementation (2000 IU/d), daily omega-3 s supplementation (1 g/d) or a simple strength training program performed three times per week, either applied alone (e.g., only vitamin D supplements) or in combination (e.g., vitamin D and omega-3 s supplements) could improve bone density at the spine, hip or femoral neck. We included 1493 healthy older adults from Switzerland, Germany, France and Portugal who were at least 70 years of age and who had not experienced any major health events in the five years before study start. Taking omega-3 s supplements showed no benefit for bone density. Similarly, the simple strength exercise program showed no benefit. In contrast, participants receiving daily vitamin D supplements experienced a benefit at the hip. However, it should be noted that the effect across three years was very small.

Association Between Multimorbidity and Rate of Falls: A 3-Year 5-Country Prospective Study in Generally Healthy and Active Community-Dwelling Adults Aged ≥70 Years.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the baseline number of chronic diseases and multimorbidity with regard to the incidence of all and injurious falls over 3 years among European community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: Observational analysis of DO-HEALTH, a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter trial with 7 European centers: Zurich, Basel, Geneva (Switzerland), Berlin (Germany), Innsbruck (Austria), Toulouse (France), and Coimbra (Portugal), including 2157 community-dwelling adults aged 70 years and older without any major health events in the 5 years prior to enrollment, sufficient mobility, and good cognitive status. METHODS: The main outcomes were the number of all falls and injurious falls experienced over 3 years. The number of chronic diseases and multimorbidity, defined as the presence of 3 or more chronic diseases at baseline, were assessed with the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire by Sangha et al. RESULTS: Among the 2155 participants included in the analyses (mean age: 74.9 years, 62% were women, 52% were physically active more than 3 times a week), 569 (26.4%) had multimorbidity at baseline. Overall, each 1-unit increase in the baseline number of chronic diseases was linearly associated with a 7% increased incidence rate of all falls [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.12, P < .001] and a 6% increased incidence rate of injurious falls (aIRR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, P = .003). Baseline multimorbidity was associated with a 21% increased incidence rate of all falls (aIRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.37, P = .002) and a 17% increased incidence rate of injurious falls (aIRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.32, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Baseline number of prevalent chronic diseases and multimorbidity in generally healthy and active community-dwelling older adults were associated with increased incidence rates of all and injurious falls over 3 years. These findings support that multimorbidity may need consideration as a risk factor for falls, even in generally healthy and active older adults.

[Strategies of early rehabilitation in acute care of patients with vertebral fractures]. / Konzepte der Frührehabilitation und Sekundär-Prävention bei Osteoporotischen Wirbelfrakturen.

Due to the aging population the number of vertebral fractures will increase in the next years. In the acute care setting the pain treatment of patients with acute vertebral fractures is highly important. Part of the acute pain treatment is the early rehabilitative intervention of the treating team consisting of physicians, nurses and physiotherapists. In the acute care setting mostly rheumatologists, orthopaedic surgeons and physical therapy physicians are the treating physicians. Individual physiotherapy and patient communication and instruction are most important in this acute care setting. Special techniques of mobilisation and positioning are instructed. The guidelines of pain therapy in elderly geriatric patients have to be observed. In the last decade opioid therapy is one of the cornerstones of pharmacotherapy. For posture training and stabilization individual corselets have to be adapted. The aim is to stabilize the vertebral column and to avoid further anterior or posterior compression of the vertebral body. In the secondary prevention novel therapy programs are discussed.