Singapore tuberculosis (TB) clinical management guidelines 2024: A modified Delphi adaptation of international guidelines for drug-susceptible TB infection and pulmonary disease.

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains endemic in Singapore. Singapore's clinical practice guidelines for the management of tuberculosis were first published in 2016. Since then, there have been major new advances in the clinical management of TB, ranging from diagnostics to new drugs and treatment regimens. The National TB Programme convened a multidisciplinary panel to update guidelines for the clinical management of drug-susceptible TB infection and disease in Singapore, contextualising current evidence for local practice. Method: Following the ADAPTE framework, the panel systematically reviewed, scored and synthesised English-language national and international TB clinical guidelines published from 2016, adapting recommendations for a prioritised list of clinical decisions. For questions related to more recent advances, an additional primary literature review was conducted via a targeted search approach. A 2-round modified Delphi process was implemented to achieve consensus for each recommendation, with a final round of edits after consultation with external stakeholders. Results: Recommendations for 25 clinical questions spanning screening, diagnosis, selection of drug regimen, monitoring and follow-up of TB infection and disease were formulated. The availability of results from recent clinical trials led to the inclusion of shorter treatment regimens for TB infection and disease, as well as consensus positions on the role of newer technologies, such as computer-aided detection-artificial intelligence products for radiological screening of TB disease, next-generation sequencing for drug-susceptibility testing, and video observation of treatment. Conclusion: The panel updated recommendations on the management of drug-susceptible TB infection and disease in Singapore.

Comparison of Vancomycin Trough-Based and 24-Hour Area Under the Curve Over Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC/MIC)-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin 24-hour area under the curve over minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) monitoring has been recommended over trough-based monitoring in pediatric patients. This study compared the proportion of target attainment between vancomycin AUC/MIC and trough-based methods, and identified risk factors for subtherapeutic initial extrapolated targets. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH), Singapore. Patients aged 1 month to 18 years with stable renal function who received intravenous vancomycin between January 2014 and October 2017, with at least 2 vancomycin serum concentrations obtained after the first dose of vancomycin, were included. Using a pharmacokinetic software, namely Adult and Pediatric Kinetics (APK), initial extrapolated steady-state troughs and 24-hour AUC were determined by using a one-compartmental model. Statistical tests included Wilcoxon rank sum test, McNemar test, logistic regression, and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: Of the 82 pediatric patients included, a significantly larger proportion of patients achieved therapeutic targets when the AUC/MIC-based method (24, 29.3%) was used than with the trough-based method (9, 11.0%; p < 0.01). Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or with age <13 years had an increased risk of obtaining subtherapeutic targets. However, empiric vancomycin doses of 60 mg/kg/day would be sufficient to achieve serum therapeutic targets, using the AUC/MIC-based method. CONCLUSION: The AUC/MIC-based vancomycin monitoring may be preferred because a larger proportion of patients could achieve initial therapeutic targets. Future prospective studies with larger sample size will be required to determine the optimal vancomycin strategy for pediatric patients.

Burden of antibiotic resistance in infections among very-low-birthweight infants in Singapore.

Introduction: Recent reports have described the increasing predominance of Gram-negative organisms among invasive bacterial infections affecting preterm infants. This changing pattern of infections is concerning due to the spread of antibiotic resistance among Gram-negatives. Method: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study involving very-low-birthweight (VLBW) (<1500 grams) infants born <32 weeks gestation, with culture-proven infections (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) in the neonatal intensive care unit from 1 January 2005 to 31 October 2017. Results: A total of 278 out of 2431 (11.4%) VLBW infants born <32 weeks gestation developed 334 infections, i.e. 52 (15.6%) early-onset infections (EOIs) and 282 (84.4%) late-onset infections (LOIs). The overall incidence decreased from 247 to 68 infections per 1000 infants over the study period, corresponding to reductions in LOI (211 to 62 infections per 1000 infants). A total of 378 bacteria were isolated, i.e. Gram-negatives accounted for 70.9% (45 of 59 [76.3%] EOI; 223 of 319 [69.9%] LOI). Specific resistant organisms were noted, i.e. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (8 of 21 S. aureus infections [38.1%]); Cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella (18 of 62 isolates [29.0%]) and multidrug-resistant [MDR] Acinetobacter (10 of 27 isolates [37.0%]). MDR organisms accounted for 85 of 195 (43.6%) Gram-negative infections from the bloodstream and CSF. Based on laboratory susceptibility testing, only 63.5% and 49.3% of infecting bacteria isolated in blood were susceptible to empiric antibiotic regimens used for suspected EOI and LOI, respectively. Conclusion: Gram-negative bacteria are the predominant causative organisms for EOI and LOI and are frequently MDR. Understanding the pattern of antimicrobial resistance is important in providing appropriate empiric coverage for neonatal infections.

Remdesivir therapy for severe pediatric COVID-19 in Singapore: A single-center retrospective observational cohort study.

Background and Aims: There is a paucity of information on remdesivir (RDV) use in severe pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to explore the effectiveness of RDV as the cumulative proportion of pediatric COVID-19 patients deescalated from Day 5 of high dependency or intensive care unit (HD/ICU). Methods: All children ≤18 years admitted to Singapore's largest pediatric hospital from January 1, 2020 to March 18, 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were included if they were positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, required oxygen, and HD/ICU care. The characteristics and outcomes of those who received RDV or not (no-RDV) were compared. Results: We reviewed 15 children with a median age of 2.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.8-11.0), of which 7 (46.7%) received RDV. There was no difference in cumulative proportion of children deescalated from Day 5 of HD/ICU care in the RDV versus the no-RDV group (5/7, 70% vs. 7/8, 87.5%, p = 0.57). The RDV versus no-RDV group had higher disease severity, that is, WHO Ordinal Scale scores (median 6, IQR: 5-7 vs. 5, IQR: 4-5, p = 0.03), higher procalcitonin levels (ug/L) (median 4.31, IQR: 0.8-24.2 vs. 0.12, IQR: 0.09-0.26, p = 0.02), and longer HD/ICU care days (median 5, IQR: 4-9, vs. 1, IQR: 1-4, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in hospitalization days. There were no adverse events directly attributable to RDV. None died from COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Our observational analysis was unable to detect any clear benefit of RDV in terms of reducing duration in HD/ICU. RDV was well-tolerated in children with severe COVID-19.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales incidence in the South-East Asia region: an observational study.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an initial increase in the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from clinical cultures in South-East Asia hospitals, which was unsustained as the pandemic progressed. Conversely, there was a decrease in CRE incidence from surveillance cultures and overall combined incidence. Further studies are needed for future pandemic preparedness.