RESUMO
Purpose: To explore the risk factors of recurrence after second endovascular embolization of recurrent aneurysms and the characteristics of recurrent refractory aneurysms to help clinical decision-making. Materials and methods: Forty-nine patients with recurrent aneurysms who underwent repeated embolization were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the recurrent and non-recurrent group. The risk factors of recurrence, complications and follow-up results of repeated embolization, and characteristics of recurrent refractory aneurysms were analyzed. Results: Among the 49 patients with the second embolization, 5 were lost to follow-up, 9 recurred, and 35 did not. Univariate analysis showed that aneurysm size (P = 0.022), aneurysm classification (P = 0.014), and Raymond-Roy grade after the second embolization (P = 0.001) were statistically different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the Raymond-Roy grade as an independent risk factor for the recurrence of aneurysms after the second embolization (P = 0.042). The complication rate after the second embolization was 4%. There were five recurrent refractory aneurysms with an average aneurysm size of 23.17 ± 10.45 mm, including three giant aneurysms and two large aneurysms. To achieve complete or near-complete embolization of the recurrent refractory aneurysms, multiple treatment approaches were needed with multiple stents or flow diverting devices. Conclusion: Aneurysm occlusion status after the second embolization is an independent risk factor for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms. Compared with near-complete occlusion, complete occlusion can significantly reduce the risk of recurrence after second embolization. In order to achieve complete or near-complete occlusion, recurrent refractory aneurysms need multiple treatments with the use of multiple stents or flow diverting devices.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinicoradiological features and treatment outcomes of intracranial dissecting aneurysms (IDAs) in childhood. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients who were treated for spontaneous IDAs in our institute between January 2010 and December 2015. The clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, treatment modality, and outcome were studied. RESULTS: We studied 26 pediatric patients (mean age, 13.4 years; range, 4-18 years) with 31 IDAs who comprised 6.9% of all IDA patients treated during the same period. Seventeen (65.4%) patients were males, and nine (34.6%) were females. The incidence of large (≥10 mm in size) or giant aneurysms (≥25 mm in size) was 65.5%. Twenty-one (80.8%) patients underwent endovascular or surgical treatment and five (19.2%) received conservative treatment. Perioperative complications occurred in three patients, in whom two eventually recovered completely with a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 5 and one partially recovered with a GOS score 4. Overall, 25 (96.2%) patients had a favorable outcome and one (3.8%) had an unfavorable outcome at a mean follow-up of 22.8 months (range, 6-60 months). CONCLUSION: Pediatric IDAs are rare. In this series, endovascular management was a relatively safe and effective method of treatment for pediatric IDAs. However, continued follow-up is required because of the possibility of aneurysm recurrence and de novo aneurysm formation after treatment.