Primary metastatic Ewing's family tumors: results of the Italian Sarcoma Group and Scandinavian Sarcoma Group ISG/SSG IV Study including myeloablative chemotherapy and total-lung irradiation.

BACKGROUND: The Italian Sarcoma Group and the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group designed a joint study to improve the prognosis for patients with Ewing's family tumors and synchronous metastatic disease limited to the lungs, or the pleura, or a single bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was opened in 1999 and closed to the enrollment in 2008. The program consisted of intensive five-drug combination chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy as local treatment, and consolidation treatment with high-dose busulfan/melphalan plus autologous stem cell rescue and total-lung irradiation. RESULTS: During the study period, 102 consecutive patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 62 months (range 24-124). The 5-year event-free survival probability was 0.43 [standard deviation (SD) = 0.05] and the 5-year overall survival probability was 0.52 (SD = 0.052). Unfavorable prognostic factors emerging on multivariate analysis were a poor histological/radiological response at the site of the primary tumor [relative risk (RR) = 3.4], and incomplete radiological remission of lung metastases after primary chemotherapy (RR = 2.6). One toxic death and one secondary leukemia were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: This intensive approach is feasible and long-term survival is achievable in ∼50% of patients. New treatment approaches are warranted for patients responding poorly to primary chemotherapy.

Nonmetastatic Ewing family tumors: high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in poor responder patients. Results of the Italian Sarcoma Group/Scandinavian Sarcoma Group III protocol.

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) was added to conventional chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma family tumor (EFT) patients, poor responders (PRs) to induction chemotherapy in order to improve their survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≤40 years with nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) received vincristine (V), doxorubicin (A), cyclofosfamide (C), actinomycin (Ac), ifosfamide (I) and etoposide (E) (VACAc-IE regimen) as induction chemotherapy. As maintenance treatment, good responders (GR) received nine cycles of VACAc-IE regimen. PRs received three cycles of VAC-IE, mobilizing cycle with CE and HDT with Busulfan and Melphalan with stem cell support. RESULTS: Three hundred patients [median age 15 years (3-40 years)] entered the study. One patient refused local treatment, 242 (81%) underwent surgery [with radiotherapy (RT) in 80] and 57 (19%) RT alone. No toxic deaths were recorded. Overall GR were 146 (49%). Twenty-eight PR did not receive HDT. At a median follow-up of 64 months (21-116 months), 5-year overall and event-free survival (EFS) were 75% and 69%, respectively. Five-year EFS was 75% for GR, 72% for PR treated with HDT and 33% for PR who did not receive HDT. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose therapy added to the VACA-IE regimen in PR patients is feasible and effective. Selected groups of patients with ES can benefit from HDT.

Response to melphalan in up-front investigational window therapy for patients with metastatic Ewing's family tumours.

The aim of the study was to determine the activity and toxicity of melphalan as a single agent given in up-front therapy for patients with newly-diagnosed Ewing's family tumours with bone/bone marrow metastases. Nineteen patients were enrolled from 2001 to 2004. The treatment consisted of up-front therapy with melphalan (two courses of 50 mg/m2, 3 weeks apart). The overall rate of response to melphalan (complete response+partial response, according to the RECIST criteria) was 78%. Transient grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia were recorded in 97%, 81% and 28% of melphalan courses, respectively. No other relevant toxicities were recorded. Melphalan proved to be active in up-front treatment at non-myeloablative doses, and its toxicity was predictable and manageable. The schedule adopted did not interfere with any further intensive chemotherapy or myeloablative treatment in the majority of cases.

A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 microg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1-3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 x 10(6)/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 x 10(6)/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 x 10(6)/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.

Predictive factors of histologic response to primary chemotherapy in osteosarcoma of the extremity: study of 272 patients preoperatively treated with high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.

PURPOSE: In osteosarcoma of the extremity, a strong correlation between chemotherapy-induced necrosis and prognosis has been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible factors that influence histologic response to primary chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 272 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremity preoperatively treated with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX), cisplatin (CDP), and doxorubicin (ADM), the histologic response to chemotherapy was evaluated and graded as complete (no viable tumor cells) or incomplete (persistence of viable tumor cells). Several factors, such as metastatic disease to the lung at diagnosis, sex, age, site and tumor volume, histologic subtype, serum alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and methotrexate (MTX) pharmacokinetics were investigated to test their predictive significance on histologic response. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with localized disease (20.6%) and none of the 25 patients with metastatic disease at presentation had a complete histologic response (P = .006). After multivariate analysis, performed on patients with localized disease only, MTX serum peak (> or = 700 micromol/L) and histologic subtype were proven to be significant predictive factors of histologic response. A complete response was seen in 28.8% of patients with 700 micromol/L or greater MTX serum levels and in 9.9% of those patients with lower levels (P = .001). The chondroblastic subtype was less responsive (6.1% of complete response), compared with the osteoblastic (16.3%), fibroblastic (33.3%), and telangiectatic (42.3%). CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma and localized chondroblastic osteosarcoma have a reduced chemosensitivity to primary chemotherapy with MTX, CDP, and ADM. MTX serum peak significantly influences tumor necrosis. A dose adaptation of MTX is recommended to obtain a serum peak of 700 micromol/L or greater when MTX is infused in 6 hours.

High-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of relapsed osteosarcoma: an Italian sarcoma group study.

PURPOSE: To study the feasibility and activity of two courses of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in patients with osteosarcoma in metastatic relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with high-grade osteosarcoma in metastatic relapse (multiple metastases or solitary metastasis at intervals of less than 30 months) were eligible for study. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin and etoposide followed by stem-cell rescue. A second course was planned 4 to 6 weeks after the first. Surgery was performed before or after HDCT. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled onto the study. At the end of the treatment, 25 patients were in complete remission (CR), six were alive with disease progression, and one died of toxicity. At present, 14 patients are alive with a median survival time of 23 months from study entry: four are in first CR, three are in second CR, and one is in fourth CR. Six patients are alive with disease. Eighteen patients (56%) died: 17 of disease and one of toxicity. Transplantation-related mortality was 3.1%. The relapse or progression disease rate was 84.4%. The 3-year overall survival rate is 20% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate is 12%. CONCLUSION: HDCT combined with surgery is feasible and can induce CR in a large portion of patients. Two points, however, need to be considered: only patients who are chemosensitive to induction treatment can obtain CR after HDCT, and the length of remission is short, because most patients relapse. Thus novel strategies are needed to maintain the remission status or to treat patients who do not respond to induction treatment.

Disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating breast cancer: a randomized multicenter study.

PURPOSE: According to one of the most recent key scientific questions concerning the use of biomarkers in clinical trials, we investigated whether node-negative breast cancer patients, defined as high-risk cases on the basis of tumor cell proliferation, could benefit from cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-one patients with negative nodes and rapidly proliferating tumors, defined according to thymidine labeling index (TLI), were randomized to receive six cycles of CMF or no further treatment after surgery +/- radiotherapy. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 83% for patients treated with CMF compared with 72% in the control group (P: =.028). Adjuvant treatment reduced both locoregional and distant metastases. When clinical outcome was analyzed in cell kinetic subgroups characterized according to tertile criteria, compared with patients in the control arm, 5-year DFS was significantly higher after adjuvant CMF in patients with TLI values in the second (78% v 88%, respectively; P: =.037) and third tertiles (58% v 78%, respectively; P: =.024). CONCLUSION: The results from this randomized clinical study indicate that patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating tumors significantly benefit from adjuvant CMF.

Chemotherapy-induced tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in localized Ewing's sarcoma of the extremities.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the prognostic value of the proposed histopathologic method to evaluate the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy in Ewing's sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The response to chemotherapy was evaluated from the specimens of 118 Ewing's sarcoma patients, who were preoperatively treated by chemotherapy alone. Responses were graded I to III (macroscopic viable tumor, microscopic viable tumor, and no viable tumor cells, respectively). Follow-up data were available for all patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 86 months (range, 30 to 158). RESULTS: A statistically highly significant difference was observed in outcome among the three groups of patients. For patients with total necrosis (grade III response), the estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 95%, in contrast to 68% for grade II responders and 34% for grade III responders (P < .0001). This difference was also confirmed when any single group was compared with the other groups. Among the parameters tested, patient age and the size of tumor had some prognostic value. CONCLUSION: The proposed histopathologic grading, to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on the primary tumor, had the strongest correlation to clinical outcome. This method could therefore be used to identify patients with a high risk of recurrent disease. These patients could be randomized to receive alternative postoperative treatments to investigate whether more aggressive therapies will improve outcome.

A Phase I/II study of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

We designed a clinical study in which fixed doses of doxorubicin were infused by intravenous bolus 16 hours before escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, princeton, NJ) for the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer, an interval selected to allow systemic clearance of doxorubicin before administration of paclitaxel in an outpatient setting. Courses of fixed-dose doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus and paclitaxel (doses escalated from 130 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2 via dose escalation of 30 mg/m2) were repeated every 21 days, to a maximum of eight cycles. Maximum tolerated dose was reached if two or more of six patients at a given dose level were affected by the following events: absolute neutrophil count less than 500/microliter for > or = 7 days, absolute neutrophil count less than 100/microliter for > or = 3 days, insufficient hematopoietic recovery with absolute neutrophil count less than 1,500/microliter on day 21, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, any World Health Organization grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity for more than 7 days. There were 19 patients enrolled; the patients received a total of 128 treatment courses. Grade 4 neutropenia was the main side effect, occurring in 20% of courses but generally not associated with clinical events. No relevant clinical cardiac toxicity or alteration of left ventricular ejection fraction was observed. Other toxicities included complete alopecia, mild peripheral neuropathy, and mild myalgia. There was a reduction of one dose level for moderate myalgia in one patient (190 mg/m2 level). Complete alopecia was always present. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached at paclitaxel 250 mg/m2. Ultimately, the introduction of this combination in the adjuvant setting is warranted.

A phase I/II study of sequential doxorubicin and paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Based on preclinical data, we designed a phase I/II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer (either untreated or relapsed after adjuvant therapy). In the phase I study, 19 enrolled patients received bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and, after a 16-hour interval, escalating doses of paclitaxel (from 130 to 250 mg/m2 in 30-mg/ m2 increments) by 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Paclitaxel doses were increased if the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; defined by dose-limiting toxicities) had not been reached. Analysis of the 128 cycles assessable for toxicity demonstrated neutropenia (< 500/microL) in 20% of cycles with no significant clinical events. No relevant clinical cardiotoxicity was observed. Other toxicities included mild peripheral neuropathy and mild myalgia/arthralgia (In 37.5% and 30.4% of cycles, respectively). The maximum tolerated paclitaxel dose was not reached at the 250 mg/m2 dose level. In the second phase, 13 patients were treated with fixed doses of both drugs (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 220 mg/m2, the dose level immediately preceding the highest paclitaxel dose used in phase I). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 36 of the 87 cycles but was complicated by fever in only eight cycles (9%); three patients needed granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Peripheral neuropathy (grades 1 and 2 in 41.3% and 5.7% of cycles, respectively) and a myalgic syndrome (grades 1 and 2 in 24.1% and 17.2% of cycles, respectively) were observed. No significant clinical cardiotoxicity was observed in 12 of the 13 patients. One patient experienced a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 60% to 43%) at a cumulative doxorubicin dose of 400 mg/m2. Antitumor efficacy was evaluated in both phase I and phase II. Overall clinical responses included 10 complete (31.3%) and 15 partial (46.9%) responses, for an objective response rate of 78.1%. Six patients (18.8%) had stable disease. The median durations of objective and complete response were 9 and 7 months, respectively. The 78.9% objective response rate in the phase I trial (31.6% complete and 47.3% partial responses) suggests a dose response relationship: at paclitaxel dose > or = 190 mg/m2, all patients had an objective response (six complete and nine partial responses). These results confirm that doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel is active and should be tested as adjuvant treatment and in patients treated previously with anthracyclines.

The sequential administration of combined doxorubicin and paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

In phase I and II studies we administered fixed doses of doxorubicin by intravenous bolus 16 hours before escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) for the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer who had received no prior treatment or who had relapsed after adjuvant therapy. Nineteen patients were entered in the study from April 1994 to February 1995. The median age of participants was 54 years; the median disease-free interval was 328 days. Eleven patients had undergone prior adjuvant chemotherapy, seven had undergone prior hormonal therapy, and six had undergone chest radiotherapy. A total of 128 courses of fixed-dose doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus and paclitaxel (doses escalated from 130 to 250 mg/m2, through dose escalations of 30 mg/m2 if maximum tolerated dose was not reached) were repeated every 21 days for a median of seven cycles per patient. Toxicities encountered in this trial included grade 4 neutropenia (20% of courses) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (3% of courses). No grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed (World Health Organization grade I peripheral neuropathies and mild myalgias in 37.5% and 30% of courses, respectively). No cardiac toxicity was observed. Responses included six complete responses (31.6%), nine partial responses (47.2%), and three stable disease (15.8%), for an overall response rate of 78.8%. Median duration of overall and complete response was 8+ months and 7+ months, respectively. At dose levels > or = 190 mg/m2, all patients had achieved a response (six complete responses and six partial responses). A phase II trial using fixed doses of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (220 mg/m2) is ongoing. Preliminary data on 71 courses report no cardiac toxicity. Treatment with paclitaxel has been well tolerated at each dose level. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached at 250 mg/m2. No cardiac toxicity was reported. The dosing sequence of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel is a highly active regimen and needs to be tested in anthracycline patients and in an adjuvant setting.

Paclitaxel plus doxorubicin in breast cancer: an Italian experience.

Based on preclinical data, phase I/II clinical trials were performed at Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo (IOR) Operative Units (Medical Oncology Departments of Forlì, Rimini, and Ravenna, Italy) to determine the efficacy and toxicity of sequential administration of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer that either had been previously untreated or that had relapsed after adjuvant therapy. In the phase I trial, 19 patients received bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) followed after a 16-hour interval by paclitaxel (given at dose levels ranging from 130 to 250 mg/m2) by 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, for a maximum of eight cycles. Paclitaxel doses were escalated in 30-mg/m2 increments if the maximum tolerated dose had not been reached in the previous dose level. Analysis of the 128 cycles assessable for toxicity demonstrated neutropenia (<500/microL) in 26 courses (20.3%), with no significant clinical events. No relevant clinical cardiotoxicity was observed. The paclitaxel maximum tolerated dose was not reached at the 250-mg/m2 dose level (no grade 3 or 4 extramedullary toxicity). In the IOR phase II trial, 13 patients were treated with fixed doses of both drugs (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 220 mg/m2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 39 of the 95 cycles, but was complicated by fever in only eight cycles (8.4%); three cycles required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Peripheral neurotoxicity was the most common extramedullary side effect noted. Overall clinical responses in the IOR trials included 10 complete responses (31.3%) and 15 partial responses (46.9%), with an objective response rate of 78.1%. Comparison of these results with those obtained from a phase I trial using the opposite drug sequence showed comparable overall response rates, but IOR's sequence was associated with a higher complete response rate, as well as less frequent and less severe nonhematologic toxicity.

High-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation as intensification treatment in small cell lung cancer: a pilot study.

A pilot study was conducted in which 15 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with limited or extended disease were treated with high dose etoposide (600 mg/m2 daily for 3 consecutive days) followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Twelve patients underwent a double graft. All had achieved complete or partial remission with conventional induction chemotherapy (adriamycin and etoposide, plus cisplatin in five cases). After ABMT six of the 15 patients did not receive radiotherapy to the chest; all but four patients received prophylactic brain irradiation. No toxic deaths were recorded during the period of aplasia. Eleven patients relapsed and died after ABMT. The median time to death was 18 months. One other patient died at 13 months of unknown cause. At the present time three patients are alive and free of disease at 54, 51 and 47 months respectively. This pilot study shows that high dose etoposide and ABMT is well tolerated as late intensification for responsive SCLC. Definite conclusions about its precise role in therapy cannot yet be drawn.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in heavily pretreated patients with germ cell tumors: a report of 34 cases.

The aim of the study was to evaluate peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization by disease-specific chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with germ cell tumor (GCT), scheduled for high-dose chemotherapy. Thirty-four consecutive patients, 29 males and five females, with advanced GCT referred to our department for high-dose chemotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. Sixteen patients were mobilized by vinblastine 0.11 mg/kg on days 1 and 2, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 days 1-5 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 days 1-5 (VeIP). In 10 patients, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 1-5 was used instead of vinblastine (VIP), while in eight patients the mobilization was attempted by administering 7 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide. The choice of either etoposide or vinblastine was predicated upon which of these two drugs was associated with best results during premobilization chemotherapy. Cyclophosphamide was selected in patients refractory to previous cisplatin-based salvage chemotherapy. Twenty-five out of 34 patients underwent a successful PBPC collection. In 17 of them one leukapheresis procedure was sufficient to collect the target number of CD34+ cells, while in eight patients a double procedure was necessary. Altogether 33 aphereses were performed in 25 patients. In nine patients leukapheresis was not attempted. This was due to the fact that the chemotherapy failed to mobilize the target number of CD34+ cells in eight of them, treated with the VeIP mobilizing regimen, while one patient treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide rapidly progressed during therapy and for this reason leukapheresis was not undertaken. In conclusion, in heavily pretreated patients with GCT, PBPC mobilization is feasible by a further course of salvage chemotherapy. The choice of either etoposide (VIP) or vinblastine (VeIP) can be predicated upon which of these two drugs was associated with best results during premobilization chemotherapy. In our hands, VeIP seems to be less satisfactory as mobilizing treatment than VIP, possibly due to a superior number of premobilization courses of chemo therapy in some patients. Moreover, high-dose cyclophosphamide remains a good alternative for mobilizing patients refractory to salvage chemotherapy.

An Italian experience of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in germ cell tumours. Suggestions for future direction.

In this paper an Italian cooperative trial investigates the role of a high-dose regimen with carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide in germ cell tumours. Twenty-eight patients underwent one or two transplants. Seventeen with progressive disease. Nine in sensitive relapse and two with stable disease after salvage therapy. Toxicity was generally moderate: two deaths occurred at day 15 from ABMT (one from VOD and one from tumour growth). Five patients are alive and disease free at least 10 months follow-up. In highly pre-treated patients this high-dose combination seems to give an option of cure for relapsed patients. Early transplantation is suggested.

Osteosarcoma of the pelvis.

AIMS: To describe the outcomes of a large number of patients with pelvic osteosarcoma, and to define the guidelines for appropriate treatment. METHODS: We reviewed 60 consecutive patients with primary pelvic high-grade osteosarcoma. The tumour involved the whole hemipelvis in 15 cases, while the most common location was the iliac wing in 29 cases (48.3%): 25 of these adjacent to or passing the sacroiliac joint. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent surgery; there were 16 hindquarter amputations and 14 internal hemipelvectomies. All the patients who presented with metastasis died of their disease. In 18 cases wide margins were achieved, however, eight patients experienced local recurrence. Of the series, only eight patients are still alive. CONCLUSION: The use of intense chemotherapy and surgical wide margin, hardly seems to achieve local control, however, tumour necrosis was correlated with positive prognosis. When internal hemipelvectomy it is not safe enough, amputation must be considered, particularly for cases with sacrifice of the sciatic nerve roots or for older patients where a shorter surgical procedure can be less risky.

A comparison of methods of loco-regional chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy as neo-adjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity.

AIM: Our experience of pre-operative intraarterial (i.a.) vs intravenous (i.v.) infusion of cisplatinum (CDP) in a multiagent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremity is reported. METHODS: Two successive randomized studies were performed. In the first, pre-operatively, CDP i.a. vs CDP i.v. was applied in combination with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and adriamycin (ADM) within a three-drug regimen. In the second, a combination of HDMTX, ADM and IFO, within a four-drug regimen was tested. RESULTS: The rate of responses to chemotherapy (tumour necrosis > or = 90%) was significantly higher (P<0.04) for the 142 patients treated with the four-drug regimen than in the 79 patients treated with a three-drug regimen (76%vs 62%). According to the route of CDP infusion, in the three-drug regimen the rate of responses was significantly higher (P=0.004) in patients treated with i.a. CDP (77%) than in patients treated i.v. (46%); with the four-drug regimen the rate of response was not significantly different in patients treated i.a. (81%) and in patients treated i.v. (71%). No significant differences in the rates of limb salvages, local recurrence and event-free survival (EFS) were seen between the i.a. and the i.v. groups. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity, the i.a. infusion of CDP does not offer any significant advantage when this drug is used within an aggressive, multiagent, pre-operative four-drug regimen.

A sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment for patients with malignant gliomas: a phase II pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment on the basis of an earlier report by The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with histologically diagnosed malignant gliomas entered the study. Fifteen patients had glioblastoma multiforme (83%). BCNU (40 mg/sqm/die) and Cisplatin (40 mg/sqm/die) were administered concurrently for 3 days every 3-4 weeks. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy whole cranial irradiation plus a 15 Gy boost on the preoperative volume. RESULTS: Thirteen patients had measurable disease and were evaluable for response. After chemotherapy we obtained 3 CRs (complete remission) and 4 PRs (partial remission) (RR (response rate 54%). Three PRs were converted to CRs after radiotherapy, for a complete remission rate of 46% (6/13). The median duration of response was 10 months. The median survival of the entire patients population was 9 months with 33% survival rates at 1 year. Hematological toxicity grade 4 in one patient and grade 3 in two patients were the major complications due to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic regimen appears to have significant activity in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel (sequential combination) in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Based on preclinical data, we designed a phase I/II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (either untreated or relapsed after adjuvant therapy). In the phase I dose-finding study, 19 enrolled patients received bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and, after a 16-hour interval, a three-hour infusion of paclitaxel in escalating doses from 130 to 250 mg/m2, increased by 30-mg/m2 increments for each dose-level group. The first dose level group (paclitaxel 130 mg/m2) included three patients. The other dose level groups included four patients. Treatment was repeated every three weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. The paclitaxel dose was escalated to 250 mg/m2 without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. In the 128 cycles assessable for toxicity, there were no relevant clinical signs or symptoms of cardiotoxicity. This absence of significant cardiotoxicity required confirmation in a phase II trial. Since a maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel had not been reached during the first study and an increasing risk of neutropenia and peripheral neurotoxicity was feared if doses continued to escalate, a phase II confirmatory study was begun to evaluate treatment with fixed doses of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (220 mg/m2), using the same schedule and interval as in phase I. The 13 patients enrolled in phase II received a total of 95 cycles of therapy; in 10 cycles (three patients) dose reductions were necessary because of toxicity. However, no significant clinical cardiotoxicity was observed in 12 of the 13 patients. One patient experienced an asymptomatic, transient decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction at a cumulative doxorubicin dose of 400 mg/m2. Overall clinical responses included 10 complete remissions (31.3%) and 15 partial remissions (46.9%) for an objective response rate of 78.1%. At 16 months' median follow-up, the median time to progression for all patients is nine months. The high response rate obtained in the phase I/II studies and, in particular, the absence of significant cardiotoxicity require confirmation in further clinical trials. To date, two confirmatory phase II trials are ongoing in our institutions.

Influence of adriamycin dose in the outcome of patients with osteosarcoma treated with multidrug neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of two sequential studies.

The results of two sequential studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities performed at Rizzoli Institute between 1986 and 1991 in 228 patients are presented. In both studies preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), cisplatinum (CDP) and adriamycin (ADM). Postoperatively the good responder patients were treated with the same drugs used before surgery while in the poor responder patients ifosfamide was added to these three drugs. The preoperative treatment was the same in both studies while after surgery in the second protocol either the cumulative dose of ADM (270 mg/m2 instead of 360 mg/m2) or the single dose per cycle of this drug (60 mg/m2 instead of 90 mg/m2) was reduced. These changes in the last protocol were done to reduce the cardiotoxicity of ADM that was high in the first study (2 deaths and 1 heart transplantation). Since in the last protocol--in comparison with the first protocol--after surgery chemotherapy was restarted earlier and ADM was administered not as a single drug but in combination with the CDP the dose intensity of ADM was unchanged while the dose intensity of MTX, CDP and ifosfamide was higher than in the first study. The preliminary results of the 84 patients treated in the second study show a 2-year disease free survival significantly lower than that achieved in the 144 patients treated in the first study (37/51--73% vs 123/144--85%: P < 0.008). In addition, even if in the last study there were no cases of clinical cardiotoxicity due to ADM, there was a significantly higher percentage of severe myelodepression that led to two deaths for infectious complications. These results suggest that in neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma the total dose of ADM and/or the single dose per cycle of the same drug are an important determinant of outcome and that increasing the dose-intensity of less toxic but less active agents, MTX, CDP and ifosfamide, at the expense of the more active and more toxic agent, ADM, can lead to a poorer outcome without reducing toxicity.