Multicenter harmonization study for PD-L1 IHC testing in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Various programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed and used in clinical trials in association with different drugs. In order to harmonize and make PD-L1 testing in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) widely available, we conducted a multicenter study comparing PD-L1 standardized assays and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). Methods: IHC with five anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (28-8, 22C3, E1L3N, SP142 and SP263) was performed concomitantly on 41 NSCLC surgical specimens in 7 centers using Dako Autostainer Link 48 (3 centers), Leica Bond (2 centers) or Ventana BenchMark Ultra (2 centers) platforms. For each matching platform, 22C3, 28-8 and SP263 assays were performed. For nonmatching platforms and other antibodies, LDTs were developed in each center. A total of 35 stainings were performed for each case across different platforms and antibodies. PD-L1 staining was assessed in tumor cells and immune cells by seven trained thoracic pathologists. For statistical analysis, 1%, 50% and 1%, 5%, 10% expression thresholds were used for tumor cells and immune cells, respectively. Results: 28-8, 22C3 and SP263 assays were highly concordant for tumor cells staining across the five Dako or Ventana platforms. Among 27 LDTs developed in 7 centers on Dako, Ventana and Leica platforms, 14 (51.8%) demonstrated similar concordance when compared with reference assays for tumor cell staining. Clone SP263 achieved the highest concordance rate across all platforms. Lower concordance was observed for immune cells staining when using a four categories scale. Conclusion: 28-8, 22C3 and SP263 assays had close analytical performance for tumor cell staining across seven centers. Some LDTs on Dako, Ventana and Leica platforms achieved similar concordance, but caution is warranted for their validation. These LDTs will be further validated in order to provide recommendations for the use of assays and LDT for PD-L1 testing in NSCLC.

Fibrous tumours of the ovary: aetiologies and MRI features.

The ovaries can be affected by a vast variety of tumours, which may be benign or malignant, solid or cystic. Although ultrasonography is often the first examination performed in the evaluation of gynaecological conditions, magnetic resonance imaging is nowadays the most accurate imaging technique in the characterization of ovarian masses. Once the ovarian origin of a pelvic mass has been determined, the detection of any fibrous component within the lesion significantly reduces the spectrum of aetiologies that should be considered. Fibrotic tissue usually displays marked low-signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences at MRI, and enhancement is mostly moderate after intravenous administration of gadolinium chelates. This review aims to provide the main diagnoses to consider at MRI whenever an ovarian tumour, both purely solid or solid and cystic, contains a fibrous component, even if minimally abundant. The corresponding key imaging features are provided.

Compliance to genomic test recommendations to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in the case of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, in real-life settings.

BACKGROUND: Genomic tests are a useful tool for adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in the case of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer with intermediate prognostic factors. Real-life data on the use of tests can help identify the target population for testing. METHODS: French multicentric study (8 centers) including patients, all candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy for HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. We describe the percentage of tests performed outside recommendations, according to the year of testing. We calculated a ratio defined as the number of tests required to avoid chemotherapy for one patient, and according to patient and cancer characteristics. We then performed a cost-saving analysis using medical cost data over a period of 1 year from diagnosis, calculated from a previous study. Finally, we calculated the threshold of the ratio (number of tests required to avoid chemotherapy for one patient) below which the use of genomic tests was cost-saving. RESULTS: A total of 2331 patients underwent a Prosigna test. The ratio (performed test/avoided chemotherapy) was 2.8 [95% CI: 2.7-2.9] in the whole population. In the group following recommendations for test indication, the ratio was 2.3 [95% CI: 2.2-2.4]. In the case of non-abidance by recommendations, the ratio was 3 [95% CI: 2.8-3.2]. Chemotherapy was avoided in 841 patients (36%) following the results of the Prosigna test. The direct medical costs saved over 1 year of care were 3,878,798€ and 1,718,472€ in the group of patients following test recommendations. We calculated that the ratio (performed test/avoided chemotherapy) needed to be under 6.9 for testing to prove cost-saving. CONCLUSION: The use of genomic testing proved cost-saving in this large multicentric real-life analysis, even in certain cases when the test was performed outside recommendations.