Twelve tips for including disability education in undergraduate medical education.

Disability is a large and growing minority population worldwide. People with disabilities continue to experience health and healthcare disparities. Despite multiple calls to action to provide disability education within undergraduate medical education as a strategy to mitigate ongoing inequities, robust disability education is not routinely provided across medical schools. This article provides twelve tips that any medical school faculty can utilize to integrate meaningful disability education within existing core medical education.

Twelve tips for medical school faculty to support students with disabilities.

As medical schools embrace diversity, it is increasingly acknowledged that medical students with disabilities must be welcome and supported in becoming physicians. Students should be able to ask for and receive reasonable accommodations to support their education. However, a practical shared approach to supporting medical students with disabilities is needed. The 12 tips in this article use sense-making theory as a framework to guide medical school faculty in supporting medical students with disabilities. The tips center on perceiving cues, creating interpretations, taking action, and communicating with students. The 12 tips can be utilized by faculty members across universities to take a proactive role in implementing support for medical students with disabilities and, in turn, nurturing an inclusive educational environment.

Medical Ethics Education for Neurology Residents: Where Do We Go from Here?

Neurologists regularly confront complex clinical scenarios that require the application of ethical principles to achieve a respectful and fair resolution. In this article, we describe the types of ethically precarious scenarios neurologists encounter, the current status of standards for ethics and communication training for neurology residents, and the present practice of ethics training in neurology residency programs. We make recommendations for optimizing bioethics training for neurology residents and suggest methods for assessing the efficacy of these training initiatives. We emphasize the current need for strengthening the practical bioethics skills of neurologists.

Creating an anti-ableist learning environment: Development of a novel disability-related microaggressions session for medical and dental students and mixed methods analysis of impact on learning and empowerment.

BACKGROUND: Disability-related microaggressions are unique among microaggressions in the assumptions they reflect and the verbal and non-verbal forms they take. They impact patients and providers alike. Yet, medical and dental students are not routinely educated about disability-related microaggressions. A medical school student-faculty team harnessed Kern's six-step curriculum design process to co-produce a novel 90-min educational intervention centered on recognizing and responding to disability-related microaggressions. The session was piloted in February 2022 as a required element of the school's mandatory professional development training for first-year medical and dental students. OBJECTIVE: This mixed-methods study examined session impact on student-reported learning pertinent to addressing and mitigating disability-related microaggressions. METHODS: Voluntary surveys were distributed to all first-year students to capture pre-/post-session self-assessment of knowledge, skills, and comfort, as well as post-session reflection on lessons learned. Quantitative data was analyzed using summary statistics, unpaired t-tests, and Mann Whitney U tests; qualitative data was analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 61 % (100/164) pre-session and 25 % (41/164) post-session. Post-session, there was significantly increased student agreement with statements addressing microaggressions knowledge, comfort teaching others, and strategies to support disability-sensitive workplaces. Post-session narrative reflections revealed learning within five themes: nature of microaggressions, identifying microaggressions, preventing microaggressions, responding to microaggressions, and medical student empowerment. Ninety-three percent of post-session respondents (38/41) agreed the session empowered them to actively contribute to anti-ableist learning environments. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot educational intervention provides a promising strategy to foster anti-ableism and advocacy among first-year medical/dental students. While limited by low response rate, small sample size, participant self-selection for survey participation, and unlinked individual pre- and post-session responses, mixed methods analysis suggests the session had a positive impact on student action-oriented knowledge and empowerment.

Preparing Preclinical Medical Students for Routine Code Status Discussions: A Mixed-Methods Study.

CONTEXT: Medical students are expected to gain competency in inquiring about patients' goals of care, per the Association of American Medical Colleges' Entrustable Professional Activities. While students may be part of teams that conduct routine code status discussions (CSDs), formal training in this skill prior to clinical clerkships is lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to address this training gap by designing a curriculum to teach preclinical medical students about routine CSDs. METHODS: We designed and conducted an interactive workshop for preclinical medical students to learn about routine CSDs and practice this skill, using Kern's Six Steps to Curriculum Design. A qualitative and quantitative pre- and postsurvey was administered. A convergent, parallel, mixed methods analysis was performed. RESULTS: Students (n = 135) named more options for code status following the workshop (presurvey 1.3 vs. postsurvey 4.3, P < 0.01). There was an increase in the proportion of students reporting that they felt "somewhat comfortable" or "extremely comfortable" conducting a CSD (presurvey 19% vs. postsurvey 64%, P < 0.01), and a decrease in those reporting that they felt "extremely uncomfortable" or "somewhat uncomfortable" (presurvey 53% vs. postsurvey 18%, P < 0.01). Thematic analysis revealed that students were concerned about knowledge gaps, communication tools, personal discomfort, and upsetting patients or family. CONCLUSION: A workshop to train medical students to conduct routine CSDs can be included as part of a preclinical medical education curriculum. Students reported that the workshop increased their confidence in conducting CSDs and demonstrated an increase in corresponding knowledge, preparing them to deliver person-centered care on their clerkships.

Embedding Interprofessional Education in Clinical Settings: Medical and Dental Student Perceptions of a Patient Interview-Storytelling Experience.

PROBLEM: Interprofessional education (IPE) is valued but difficult to deliver, given logistical and other barriers. Centering IPE around patients and grounding it in authentic practice settings are challenging within early undergraduate medical education. APPROACH: This intervention facilitated student-patient conversations to elicit patient reflections on the health care professionals who keep them healthy and care for them when they are unwell. After being introduced to the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies, first-year medical (n = 127) and dental (n = 34) students conducted a brief semistructured patient interview, using an interview card with guiding questions, during a precepted outpatient clinic session in March-May 2021. Students transcribed patients' stories and wrote their own reflections on the interview card. These reflections were used as a stimulus for a class IPE discussion. The authors employed a pragmatic qualitative research approach to explore what students learned about interprofessional collaboration from reflecting on patients' stories. OUTCOMES: Of the 161 students, 158 (98%) completed an interview card. Sixteen health professions were represented in patients' stories. The patients' stories prompted students to recognize and expand their understanding of the IPEC competencies. Students' responses reflected synthesis of the competencies into 3 themes: students value patient-centered holistic care as the goal of interprofessional collaboration; students reflect emerging professional and interprofessional identities in relating to patients, teams, and systems; and students appreciate interprofessional care is complex and challenging, requiring sustained effort and commitment. NEXT STEPS: Next steps include continuing to integrate patient voices through structured conversations across the undergraduate and graduate medical education spectrum and adapting the model to support conversations with other health professionals engaged in shared patient care. These experiences could foster ongoing deliberate reflection by students on their professional and interprofessional identity development but would require investments in student time and faculty development.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Providing Care for People With Disabilities.

Palliative care (PC) clinicians are well poised to help people with disabilities (PWD) live well in the context of serious illness. PC prioritizes person-centered care with a focus on function, autonomy, and quality of life. This approach aligns with principles of high-quality care for PWD. An understanding of the unique experiences and needs of PWD can advance the delivery of comprehensive, equitable PC for this population. In this article, we provide 10 tips to help PC clinicians develop an informed disability lens in their approach to care.

Navigating the acute to post-acute transition with patients: a first characterization of medical student knowledge gaps in rehabilitation and post-acute care.

PURPOSE: Clinical rehabilitation and post-acute care (PAC) learning experiences are not uniformly required within medical school core curricula in the United States or internationally. This study aims to characterize what medical students might know/need to know to support patients in the transition from acute hospitalization to post-acute rehabilitation settings. MATERIALS/METHODS: The medical student cohort completing required clinical rotations in a United States quaternary care hospital system was provided a voluntary survey prompting reflection on experiences discharging patients to rehabilitation/PAC and related learning needs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative grounded theory. RESULTS: Response rate was 72% (39/54). All respondents reported at least one gap in rehabilitation/PAC knowledge, falling into 8 themes: daily experience of rehabilitation/PAC; determination of eligibility/screening processes; distinctions among levels of rehabilitation/PAC; insurance coverage/equity; rehabilitation/PAC clinical practice environment; post-rehabilitation/PAC discharge support; medical capabilities within PAC settings; developing rehabilitation goals. CONCLUSIONS: Despite caring for patients discharged to post-acute rehabilitation settings, medical students lack essential knowledge about the process of rehabilitation and recovery, including patient eligibility for and service availability across PAC settings. Explicit rehabilitation/PAC education for medical students could enhance their ability to counsel and advocate for patients with disability and rehabilitation needs through care transitions.Implications for rehabilitationMedical students lack knowledge about rehabilitation and post-acute care that is important for helping patients navigate the acute to post-acute transition.Dedicated rehabilitation/post-acute care education could prepare trainees for counseling and advocating for patients during care transitions.Knowledge gaps identified in this study could inform development of curricular interventions to address medical student learning needs.

Strategies to improve the experience of patients with brain tumors in the inpatient rehabilitation setting: development of a care coordination checklist.

PURPOSE: To develop a checklist to facilitate coordination of care and communication of patients with brain tumors and assess the benefit of the checklist using a quality improvement survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rehabilitation teams are challenged to respond to the unique needs of patients with brain tumors as this population requires coordinated care across multiple disciplines with frequent communication. To improve care of this patient population in an IRF setting, we developed a novel checklist using a multidisciplinary team of clinicians. Our checklist aims to improve communication between multiple treatment teams, achieve appropriate goals during the IRF stay, involve services as needed and arrange post-discharge services for patients with brain tumors. We then used a quality improvement survey among clinicians to assess the efficacy and general opinion of the checklist. RESULTS: A total of 15 clinicians completed the survey. 66.7% felt that the checklist improved care delivery, and 66.7% felt the checklist improved communication between providers internally and with external institutions. More than half felt the checklist improved the patient experience and care delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A care coordination checklist has the potential to address the unique challenges experienced by patients with brain tumors to improve overall care for this population.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSuccessful clinical care and rehabilitation of patients with brain tumors requires the coordinated efforts of an interdisciplinary team that often spans multiple care settings.A care coordination checklist has the potential to address the unique challenges experienced by patients with brain tumors to improve overall care for this population in the inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Assessing the Impact of a Hospice and Palliative Medicine Mentored Clinical Shadowing Experience for First-Year Medical and Dental Students: A Pilot Study.

Background: All physicians encounter patients with serious illness. Medical students recognize the value of hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) and desire more knowledge and skills in this area. However, both pre-clinical and clinical HPM content are underrepresented within medical school curricula. Objectives: To conduct a pilot study examining the impact of a novel required HPM clinical experience on pre-clinical medical and dental students' learning through mixed methods evaluation of student responses. Design: Students completed a two-part electronic survey following a half-day HPM mentored clinical shadowing experience (HPM-MCSE) which included an introductory session, a faculty-mentored shadowing experience and a debriefing session. Setting/subjects: 163 first-year students at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, USA in 2022. Measurements: The survey collected demographic information and student responses to both closed-ended (Likert-scale) and open-ended prompts. Data were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics and qualitatively using constant comparative methodology. Results: 127 medical and dental students responded (78% response rate). Qualitative analysis yielded three overarching themes: acquisition of knowledge about operational dimensions of HPM, acquisition of knowledge about psychosocial dimensions of HPM, and personal impact including an awareness of discordance between expectations and lived experience of HPM practice. Of the 109 students who completed the entire survey, 67% indicated that this experience increased their interest in palliative care and 98% reported an increase in their understanding of how palliative care enhances patient care. Conclusions: Early clinical exposure to HPM for first year students stimulates multi-dimensional learning about HPM and evokes personal reflection about serious illness care.

The Healthcare Experience of Autistic Patients in Orthopaedic Surgery and Closely Related Fields: A Scoping Review.

Orthopaedic and related care has the potential to present unique obstacles for patients with a range of autism manifestations. In this review, we aim to describe and analyze the literature on autistic patients' experience within orthopaedics and closely related fields. This literature search utilized the PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. Three major concepts were built into the search terms: (1) patients on the autism spectrum; (2) patient experience; and (3) movement sciences, including orthopaedics, physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R), occupational therapy (OT), and physical therapy (PT). Our search yielded 35 topical publications, with the major topic areas addressed as follows: (1) clinical and perioperative management, (2) therapy interventions, (3) participation in exercise and social play, (4) sensory management and accommodations, (5) caregiver/parent training and involvement in care, (6) healthcare needs and barriers to care, and (7) utilization of technology. In the current literature, there are no studies that attempt to directly assess autistic patient experience with care practices and clinical environments in orthopaedics. Rigorous, direct examination of the experience of autistic patients within clinical orthopaedic settings is urgently needed to address this gap.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Language Pathology.

This article provides guidance on the integral role of physical therapy, occupational therapy (OT), and speech language pathology (SLP) in palliative care (PC), underlining the necessity for effective communication between physicians and therapists, the importance of caregiver education and support, the application of holistic treatment modalities in OT, the underutilization of resources in PC settings, the role of SLP professionals in feeding and nutrition, and the challenges in communication during the advanced stages of illness. The article draws on various studies and expert opinions to elucidate these issues, offering a valuable resource to health care professionals in ensuring high-quality patient-centered PC.

Moving Back Into the Community: Obstacles for People With an Acquired Brain Injury or Physical Disability.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate transitions from long-term institutional care to the community in people with an acquired brain injury (ABI) or a physical disability (PD). Secondary objectives were to identify barriers in each group. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study based on a person-centered plan and structured interviews to identify potential barriers. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Long-term institutional care; 2954 Medicaid participants younger than 65 interested in community living. METHODS: Analysis with SPSS 25 of 445 people with an ABI and 2509 with a PD living in long-term care between December 2008 and November 2017. The main outcome was transition to the community. Secondary measures identified specific barriers such as consumer engagement, gender, and age. RESULTS: Of the 2954 total cases, 1810 (61.3%) transitioned to the community; 57.5% of the ABI group (n = 256) and 61.9% of the PD group (n = 1554) transitioned. Although the PD group transitioned at a slightly higher rate, no significant association was found between the program (ABI or PD) and the likelihood of transitioning [χ2 (df = 1) = 3.096, P = .078]. Overall, in the ABI group, difficulties with the funding program, OR = 0.373 ± 0.238, and other individuals, OR = 0.396 ± 0.344, decreased the odds of transitioning more than other challenges, whereas lack of consumer engagement, OR = 0.659 ± 0.100, had the strongest influence on preventing transitions in the PD group. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Living in the community improves quality of life and decreases costs. No previous studies have focused on the major obstacles for 2 specific groups, those with an ABI and those with a PD. Identifying transition rates and specific barriers for different groups is an important step to developing systems that will overcome these obstacles. In addition, the equivalent transition rates between these groups highlights the benefit of increased funding and range of services for those with complex needs and support requirements.

Now Is the Time: A Primer on How to Be a Disability Education Champion in Your Medical School.

ABSTRACT: One in four noninstitutionalized adults in the United States lives with a disability. People with disabilities have frequent interactions with the medical community and the healthcare system yet experience disparities in access and outcomes. The Association of American Medical Colleges has included disability in its definition of diversity as one of the aspects of patient care that may affect health equity. However, training in the lived experience of disability is not always included in medical education. Physiatrists make excellent disability champions in medical schools, given their training and experience in the care of individuals with disabilities. Here, we describe strategies for physiatrists to increase disability education in medical schools and an overview of standards and tools (Liaison Committee on Medical Education standards; Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation standards; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health language; and the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education published by the Alliance for Disability in Health Care Education) physiatrists can use to facilitate interactions with medical school educational leadership. Specific examples are provided along with a framework to guide the development of disability champions in medical schools.

How Should Clinicians Minimize Harms and Maximize Benefits When Diagnosing and Treating Disorders Without Biomarkers?

Ethical obligations to minimize harms and maximize benefits of diagnosis and treatment of disorders without biomarkers include navigating difficult-to-measure, perhaps clinically inexplicable, symptoms. Among potential harms are public stigma, self-stigma, label avoidance, and the negative influence these stigmas have on self-esteem, quality of life, employment, and housing. Among potential benefits are patients becoming active agents in managing their illnesses, social acceptance, and access to evidence-based treatments. Ethical complexities clinicians face when trying to develop treatment plans while heeding key details from patients' narrative accounts prompt questions about how to best adhere to evidence in understudied domains of medicine.

Extending the Depth and Breadth of Physiatry Care: Five Strategies for Residents to Develop a Foundation in Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

ABSTRACT: Hospice and palliative medicine is one of seven accredited fellowship subspecialties available to graduates of physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs. Hospice and palliative medicine and physical medicine and rehabilitation share many of the same principles and practices, and physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training can be excellent preparation for hospice and palliative medicine fellowship. However, unlike the other six physical medicine and rehabilitation subspecialties, there is currently no requirement for hospice and palliative medicine training during physical medicine and rehabilitation residency. As a result, physical medicine and rehabilitation residents may encounter limited hospice and palliative medicine exposure or education, and lack explicit opportunities to develop the basic set of palliative care symptom management and communication tools that can be applied across the spectrum of physiatry care. Here, we provide five strategies that residents can use within their own programs to develop knowledge and experience in hospice and palliative medicine.

Why Disability Must Be Included in Medical School Diversification Efforts.

Individuals living with disabilities are underrepresented in the physician workforce, despite benefits of inclusion. This article describes how both ableism in admissions processes and expectations set by technical standards can perpetuate harm. The authors advocate for active attention to disability diversity and equity in medical school admissions.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) is a specialty of medicine focused on optimizing function and quality of life for individuals with physical impairments, injuries, or disabling illnesses. Given the sometimes acute nature of the loss of function and even loss of independence, there are significant palliative care (PC) needs within patients seen by PM&R. This article, written by a team of PM&R and PC specialists, aims to help the PC team better understand the world of postacute care, expand their toolkit for treating musculoskeletal and neurological symptoms, improve prognostication for patients with brain and spinal cord injuries, and decide when patients may benefit from PM&R consultation and support. There is significant overlap between the populations treated by PM&R and PC. Better integration between these specialties will help patients to maintain independence as well as advance excellent patient-centered care.