Arterial dissection during peripheral vascular interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Arterial dissection (AD) is a known complication of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs), but its incidence and significance have not been well-characterized. This study examines AD in the Vascular Quality Initiative database for patients treated for peripheral arterial disease. Our hypothesis is that AD is associated with decreased patency and worse limb outcomes. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry (2016-2021) was reviewed. Patients were divided based on the presence or absence of reported AD during the procedure. Trend of incidence and management of AD was derived. The characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without AD were compared. The primary endpoint was primary patency. RESULTS: There was a total of 177,790 cases, and 3% had AD. The incidence of AD significantly increased over the study period from 2.4% to 3.6% (P = .007). Endovascular therapy was used to treat AD in 83.7% of cases, 14.5% were treated medically, and only 1.8% required open surgery. Patients with AD were significantly more likely to be female (47.4% vs 39.7%; P < .001). Patient with AD were more likely to have a history of smoking (79.7% vs 77.2%; P < .001), but were significantly less likely to be on dialysis (8.2% vs 9.3%; P < .001) compared with patients without AD. Patients with AD were more likely to have femoropopliteal disease (45.2% vs 38.0%; P < .001) and undergo treatment of more complex disease as denoted by higher mean number of lesions treated (1.95 ± 1.01 vs 1.71 ± 0.89; P < .001), longer occlusion length (8 ± 16 vs 7 ± 15 cm; P < .001), and more severe TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus grade (Grade D: 36.2% vs 29.1%; P < .001). The proportion of stenting as a treatment modality was higher in the dissection group (55.4% vs 41.1%; P < .001). After a mean follow-up of 828 days, patients with AD had significantly lower primary patency than patients without AD. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the AD group had lower primary patency (86.9% vs 91%; P < .001) and reintervention-free survival (79.5 % vs 84.1%; P < .001) at 1 year with difference in amputation-free survival. Cox proportional hazard regression confirmed the independent association of AD with primary patency and reintervention-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: AD is more common in women and is more likely to occur during treatment of the femoropopliteal segment. AD is associated with decreased primary patency and reintervention-free survival after PVI for peripheral arterial disease.

Intravascular Ultrasound Use is Associated with Improved Patency in Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) facilitates detailed visualization of endoluminal anatomy not adequately appreciated on conventional angiography. However, it is unclear if IVUS use improves clinical outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for peripheral arterial disease. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of IVUS on 1-year outcomes of PVI in the vascular quality initiative (VQI). METHODS: The VQI-PVI modules were reviewed (2016-2020). All patients with available 1-year follow-up after lower extremity PVI were included and grouped as IVUS-PVI or non-IVUS PVI based on use of IVUS. Propensity matching (1:1) was performed using demographics and comorbidities. One-year major amputation and patency rates were compared. A generalized estimating equation model was used to identify predictors of 1-year outcomes. Subgroup analysis based on Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) classification, treatment length and treatment modalities were performed using same modeling approaches. RESULTS: There were 56,633 procedures (non-IVUS PVI = 55,302 vs. IVUS-PVI = 1,331) in 44,042 patients. Propensity matching yielded a total cohort of 1,854 patients matched (1:1), with no baseline differences. Lower extremity revascularization for claudication was performed in 60.4%, while one-third (33.9%) had chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). IVUS was more commonly used for lesions >15 cm in length (46.6% vs. 43.3%) and for aortoiliac disease (31.8% vs. 27.2%). Rates of atherectomy and stenting were significantly higher with IVUS-PVI (21.1% vs. 16.8%), while balloon angioplasty was less common (13.5% vs. 24.4%). One-year patency was better with IVUS-PVI (97.7% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.004). On subgroup analysis, IVUS (odds ratio [OR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.75) was associated with improved patency in CLTI patients, TASC C or D lesions, and treatment length >15 cm. Adjunctive IVUS use during PVI did not significantly impact 1-year amputation (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.78-3.91). On multivariable regression, adjunctive use of IVUS (OR 2.46 95% CI 1.43-4.25) and aortoiliac interventions (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.09-7.75) were independent predictors of patency. Treatment modalities such as atherectomy, stenting or balloon angioplasty did not significantly impact patency at 1-year. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS during lower extremity PVI is associated with improved 1-year patency, when compared to angiography alone. Certain subgroups, such as CLTI patients, lesions>15 cm, and TASC C or D lesions might benefit from adjunctive use of IVUS.

Long-term limb salvage and functional outcomes for patients undergoing partial calcanectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Partial calcanectomy (PC) can be performed to treat chronic heel ulcers in patients with calcaneal osteomyelitis. Patients undergoing PC often have multiple comorbidities, limited mobility, and face high risk of major limb amputation. This study examined the extent of vascular diagnostic testing and interventions as well as long-term outcomes in patients undergoing PC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent PC for non-healing calcaneal ulcer over a ten-year period. Demographics, comorbidities, vascular testing, and procedural data were recorded. Additional subgroup analysis was performed according to presence or absence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Primary outcomes were major limb amputation (above or below the knee) and mortality. Secondary outcomes included successful wound healing, time to complete wound healing, re-interventions, and change in ambulatory status. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients underwent partial calcanectomies on 162 limbs. 78.3% of patients had diabetes mellitus and 47.8% were diagnosed with PAD. Ankle brachial index with pulse volume recording (ABI/PVR) was performed for 46.5% (73/157) of patients, arterial duplex in 44.6% (70/157), and 19.7% (31/157) had a computed tomography angiogram. Lower extremity revascularization was performed in 28.4% of limbs (46/162). Independent ambulatory status was reported in 40.1% prior to PC and decreased to 17.9% by the time of last recorded follow-up (p < .00001). Long-term amputation-free survival was significantly higher in patients without PAD at 7 years (78.4% vs 57.1%, p = .02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that PAD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) increased the odds of major limb amputation (OR 3.5 and 2.8, respectively), whereas ESRD and adjuvant podiatric procedures were associated with increased mortality (OR 4.8 and 4.8, respectively). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive vascular testing should be obtained in all patients undergoing PC, in order to stratify risk of amputation and identify candidates for revascularization. Over the long-term, patients undergoing PC face significant risk of prolonged wound healing, decline in ambulatory status, and major limb amputation.

Clinician perspectives regarding CYP2C19 genotype testing in patients with critical limb ischemia: A Delphi approach.

OBJECTIVES: Antiplatelet therapy is an essential element in the management of patients with arterial vascular disease. In peripheral arterial disease (PAD), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), primarily clopidogrel and aspirin, is routinely prescribed following intervention. There is sparse data regarding the need for DAPT, the appropriate duration, or the heterogeneity of treatment effects for antiplatelet regimens across patients, leading to potential uncertainty and heterogeneity around treatment practices. An example of heterogeneity of treatment effects is a patients' metabolizer status for the use of clopidogrel. The aim of the study was to (1) assess clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes toward managing patients with CYP2C19 mutations, (2) identify barriers to implementation of CYP2C19 testing and management policies, and (3) reach consensus for CYP2C19 testing and management strategies for patients with PAD who undergo peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus amongst PAD interventionalists around CYP2C19 testing. All practicing Yale New Haven Hospital PAD interventionalists with backgrounds in interventional cardiology, vascular surgery, or interventional radiology were approached by email for participation. Round 1 included the collection of baseline demographic questions, knowledge questions, and three statements for consensus. Knowledge questions were rated on a 0-10 Likert scale with the following anchors: 0 ("Not at all"), 5 ("Neutral), and 10 ("Very Much"). Participants were asked to rate the importance of the three consensus statements on a 9-point Likert scale from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 10 ("Strongly Agree"). In Round 2, participants were shown the same consensus statements, the median response of the group from the previous round, and their previous answers. Participants were instructed to revise their rating using the results from the previous round. This process was repeated for Round 3. RESULTS: Of the 28 experts invited to participate, 13 agreed (46%). Participants were predominantly male (92.3%) and white (61.5%) with representation from interventional cardiology (46.2%) and vascular surgery (53.8%). Most participants reported more than 10+ years in practice (61.5%). PAD interventionalists felt they would benefit from more education regarding CYP2C19 mutations (median score 8.0, interquartile range 5.0-8.5). They indicated some familiarity with CYP2C19 mutations (7.0, 6.0-9.5) but did not feel strongly that CYP2C19 was important to their practice (6.0, 5.5-7.5). In each round, the median responses for the three consensus statements were 5, 6, and 9, respectively. With each successive round the interquartile range narrowed indicative of evolving consensus but did not reach the prespecified interquartile range for consensus of 1 for any of the statements. CONCLUSIONS: PAD interventionalists practicing at an academic health system recognize the heterogenous response of their patients to clopidogrel therapy but are unsure when to leverage genetic testing to improve outcomes for their patients. Our study identified gaps regarding PAD interventionalists' knowledge, perceived barriers, and attitudes toward CYP2C19 testing in PAD. This information highlights the need for randomized data on genetic testing for clopidogrel responsiveness in peripheral vascular disease following intervention to help guide antiplatelet management.

Incidence and Significance of Deep Venous Reflux in Patients Treated with Saphenous Vein Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Venous ablation (VA) of the saphenous vein is the most common procedure performed for venous insufficiency. The incidence of concomitant deep venous reflux (DVR) in patients undergoing VA is unknown. Our hypothesis is that patients undergoing saphenous VA with concomitant DVR exhibit a higher clinical, etiology, anatomy, and pathophysiology (CEAP) stage and less relief after VA compared to patients without DVR. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients treated with saphenous VA at a tertiary care center from March 2012 to June 2016 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on presence or absence of DVR on initial ultrasound (US) before saphenous VA. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared. A telephone survey was conducted to assess long-term symptomatic relief, compliance with compression, and pain medication use. Subgroup analysis of patients with post-thrombotic versus primary DVR was performed. RESULTS: 362 patients underwent 497 ablations, and the incidence of DVR (>1 sec) was 20% (N = 71). Patients with DVR were significantly more likely to be male (46.4% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.021) and of Black race (21.2% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.0001) compared to patients without DVR. Patients with DVR were more likely to have a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (15.1% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.045), but there was no difference in other comorbidities. There was no significant difference in presenting symptoms, CEAP stage, or symptom severity based on numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) for pain and swelling. Clinical success of saphenous VA was comparable between the 2 groups, but patients with DVR were more likely to develop endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) II-IV (6% vs. 1%, P = 0.002). After a mean follow-up of 26 months, there was still no difference in pain or swelling scores, but patients with DVR were more likely to use compression stockings and used them more frequently. Only 11 of 71 patients with DVR had a history of DVT. Patients with post-thrombotic DVR were significantly older than patients with primary DVR (67.3 vs. 57.2, P = 0.038) and exhibited a trend toward more advanced venous disease (C4-C6: 45.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.439). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 20% of patients undergoing saphenous VA demonstrated DVR, which was more common in Black men. Presence of DVR is associated with increased risk of EHIT after saphenous VA but does not seem to impact disease severity or clinical relief after ablation. Larger studies are needed to understand outcome differences between post-thrombotic and primary DVR.

Sex differences in long-term outcomes of patients with deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Sex differences in short-term outcomes of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have been reported, but differences in long-term outcomes remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to evaluate sex differences in long-term mortality, venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality, and bleeding-related mortality in patients with DVT at a tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 2012 to 2018 of all consecutive patients diagnosed with DVT was performed. Patients were grouped by sex, and baseline characteristics and treatment modalities were compared. Long-term outcomes of recurrent VTE, bleeding, and related mortalities were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1043 (female = 521 and male = 522) patients with DVT were captured in this study period. Female patients were older (64.7 vs 61.6 years old, p = 0.01) and less likely to be obese (68.2% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.04),but had a higher average Caprini score (6.73 vs 6.35, p = 0.04). There was no difference in anatomic extent of DVT, association with PE, and severity of PE between sexes. Most patients (80.5%) were treated with anticoagulation, with no differences in choice of anticoagulant or duration of anticoagulation between females and males. Male patients were more likely to undergo catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for DVT (4.2% vs 1.7%, p = 0.02) and PE (2.7% vs 0.9%, p = 0.04). Female patients were more likely to receive systemic thrombolysis for PE (2.9% vs 1.1%, p = 0.05). After an average 2.3 years follow-up, there was significantly higher bleeding complications among females (22.2% vs 16.7%, p = 0.027). The overall mortality rate was 33.5% and not different between males and females. Females were more likely to experience VTE-related mortality compared to males (3.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.002). On regression analysis, older age (OR = 1.04 [1.03-1.06]), cancer (OR = 7.64 [5.45-10.7]), and congestive heart failure (OR = 3.84 [2.15-6.86]) were independently associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no difference in overall long-term mortality between sexes for patients presenting with DVT. However, females had increased risk of long-term bleeding and VTE-related mortality compared to males.

Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Orbital, Laser, and Excisional Atherectomy for Lower Extremity Revascularization.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to analyze the utilization pattern of atherectomy modalities and compare their outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing atherectomy in the 2010-2016 Vascular Quality Initiative Database were identified. Utilization of orbital, laser, or excisional atherectomy was obtained. Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated for isolated femoropopliteal and isolated tibial disease by different modalities were compared. RESULTS: Atherectomy use increased from 10.3% to 18.3% of all peripheral interventions (n = 122 938). Orbital atherectomy was most commonly used and increased from 59.4% in 2010 to 63.2% of all atherectomies in 2016, while laser atherectomy decreased from 19.2% to 13.1%. Atherectomy was mostly used for treatment of isolated femoropopliteal disease (51.1%), followed by combined femoropopliteal and tibial disease (25.8%) and isolated tibial disease (11.7%). In isolated femoropopliteal revascularization, excisional atherectomy was associated with higher rate of perforation (1.2%) compared with laser (0.4%) and orbital atherectomy (0.5%). The technical success of orbital atherectomy (96.7%) was lower compared with excisional atherectomy (98.7%). Concomitant stenting was significantly higher with laser atherectomy (43.0%) compared with orbital (27.2%) and excisional (26.1%) atherectomy. Nevertheless, there was no difference in 1-year primary patency, reintervention, major amputation, improvement in ambulatory status, or mortality. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated no difference in 1-year primary patency and major ipsilateral amputation among the modalities. In isolated tibial revascularization, there were no differences in perioperative outcomes among the modalities. Excisional atherectomy was associated with the highest 1-year primary patency (88.1%). After adjusting for confounders, excisional atherectomy remained associated with superior 1-year primary patency compared with orbital atherectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.18-5.68]), and excisional atherectomy remained associated with a lower rate of 1-year major ipsilateral amputation compared with laser atherectomy (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.09-0.95]). CONCLUSION: Atherectomy use has increased, driven primarily by orbital atherectomy. Despite significant variation in perioperative outcomes, there were no differences in 1-year outcomes among the different modalities when used for treating isolated femoropopliteal disease. In isolated tibial disease treatment, excisional atherectomy was associated with higher 1-year primary patency compared with orbital atherectomy and decreased major ipsilateral amputation rates compared with laser atherectomy. These differences warrant further investigation into the comparative effectiveness of atherectomy modalities in various vascular beds.

Eligibility of Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia for Deep Venous Arterialization.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) has emerged as a new modality for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and no standard option for revascularization. The proportion of patients facing major amputation who are eligible for this technology remains unknown. This study aims to provide a real-life estimate of patient eligibility for pDVA to reduce major amputations. METHODS: Electronic medical records of 100 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who underwent major amputation of 106 limbs were reviewed. Angiograms performed ≤6 months before amputation were assessed by two vascular surgeons. Disease severity was categorized using the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) and patients were classified as ideal, possible, or not candidates for pDVA. Ideal candidates had ≥1 patent tibial artery, no target in the foot, and no proximal disease. Possible candidates had ≥1 patent tibial artery with PAD, no target in the foot, and proximal disease amenable to endovascular therapy. Patients were not eligible if there was no patent tibial artery, extensive PAD, or an arterial target in the foot for bypass. RESULTS: Of 106 limbs reviewed, 35 (33%) did not undergo angiography ≤6 months before amputation because of infection (n = 14), advanced tissue loss (n = 10), failed revascularizations (n = 8), advanced limb ischemia (n = 2), and refusing revascularization (n = 1). Thus, 69 lower extremity angiograms (2 incomplete excluded) in 68 patients were analyzed. A total of 15 patients with 16 limbs (23.2%) were identified as candidates for pDVA (ideal = 7, possible = 9). There were no differences in demographics between the two groups, but candidates for pDVA were less likely to have hyperlipidemia and congestive heart failure than those who were not candidates. The pDVA candidates underwent significantly fewer interventions before major amputation compared to patients who were not candidates (1.50 ± 0.73 vs. 2.61 ± 2.57, P = 0.007). Angiographically, patients who were pDVA candidates had significantly higher Inframalleolar GLASS grades (1.81 ± 0.40 vs. 0.86 ± 0.41, P < 0.0001) but lower Femoropopliteal Glass grades (0.73 ± 1.10 vs. 2.43 ± 1.71, P < 0.0001) than patients who were not candidates. There was no significant difference in GLASS stage between these two groups (P = 0.368). After mean follow-up of 48 months, there was no difference in mortality between both groups (40% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.567). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients considered for revascularization, 23.2% had favorable angiography and 14.7% could have benefited for pDVA as a new therapeutic modality for limb salvage. 33% of major amputations were performed for clinically-deemed unsalvageable CLTI.

Reinterventions in Patients with Claudication and Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) present with claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). CLTI patients have a more advanced stage of atherosclerosis and increased comorbidities compared to claudicants, and are at an elevated risk of major amputation and mortality after lower extremity revascularization (LER). However, the frequency of reinterventions for claudication and CLTI have not been compared. Our hypothesis is that patients with CLTI undergo more frequent reinterventions to prevent major amputation. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review of consecutive patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization (LER) for PAD in 2013-2015 was performed. Patients were stratified based on indication for revascularization into claudication or CLTI. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and reinterventions were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were 826 patients undergoing LER and 44% (N = 361) had CLTI. Patients treated for CLTI were more likely to be smokers (P < 0.001), to have diabetes (P< 0.001), chronic renal insufficiency (P< 0.001), end stage renal disease (P< 0.001), and cardiac disease (P< 0.001). CLTI patients were less likely to be on optimal medical management as reflected by decreased rate of aspirin (P< 0.001), ADP receptor/P2Y12 inhibitors (P< 0.001), and statins (P< 0.001) compared to patients with claudication. Patients with CLTI had significantly higher major amputation (3.7% vs. 0.2%, P< 0.001) and mortality (1.4% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.092) at 30 days. At long-term follow up, patients with CLTI had higher rates of major amputation (15.5% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) and mortality (37.1% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with claudication. There was a significant difference in mean follow-up time between the 2 cohorts (claudication: 3.7 ± 1.5 years versus CLTI: 2.6 ± 1.8 years, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ipsilateral reintervention rate between the 2 groups (claudication: 39.6% vs. CLTI: 42.7%, P = 0.37) or the mean number of ipsilateral reinterventions (claudication: 2.0 ± 1.6 vs. CLTI: 2.0 ± 1.7). However, after adjusting for follow-up time, the mean number of reinterventions per year was significantly higher for CLTI patients compared to patients with claudication (1.4 ± 2.2 vs. .6 ± 0.7 intervention per year, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LER for CLTI undergo more frequent reinterventions over time compared to patients treated for claudication. Research on reinterventions after LER should include reporting of the frequency of reintervention adjusted for the follow up period in addition to the reintervention rate defined as the percentage of patients undergoing reintervention.

Alternative Endograft Aortoiliac Reconstruction for Iliac Branch Endoprostheses.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of complex common iliac artery (CIA) and internal iliac artery (IIA) aneurysms using iliac branch endoprostheses (IBE) has proven safe and effective. Instructions for use (IFU) require deployment of current IBE technology with the corresponding manufacturer's modular bifurcated aortic endograft. Concomitant aortoiliac occlusive disease, inadequate renal artery-iliac bifurcation length, and unfavorable aortic anatomy preclude on-label IBE deployment. This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of Alternative Endograft Aortoiliac Reconstruction (AEGAR) for branched endovascular treatment of complex iliac artery aneurysms. METHODS: In 7 consecutive patients with CIA or IIA aneurysms, computed tomography angiography (CTA) and center-line reconstruction revealed aortoiliac anatomy incompatible with the current IBE IFU due to inadequate proximal CIA landing zone (n = 7), inadequate renal artery to iliac bifurcation length (n = 2), compromised aortic anatomy (n = 3), or short infrarenal neck <15 mm (n = 1), either alone or in combination. To overcome these restrictions and facilitate IBE deployment, aortoiliac reconstruction was performed using the Endologix AFX, Endologix Ovation limbs or the Medtronic Endurant II platforms (AEGAR technique). All internal iliac artery reconstructions and external iliac artery extensions were performed using the Gore VBX or Viabahn stent grafts. Technical success was defined as successful delivery of all endograft components without migration or endoleak. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 69 years (range 52-82 years; 6 male). Four patients had bilateral CIA aneurysms and 3 patients had unilateral CIA aneurysms (mean diameter 4.3cm; range 2.2-7 cm). There were 13 IIA VBX stent grafts used for a total of 9 IIAs treated with IBE (bilateral IBE = 2 patients). The mean fluoroscopy time was 38.8 min (range 21.3-64.3 min) and the mean contrast volume was 168.5 mL (range 122-226 mL). Technical success was achieved in all patients and there were no perioperative complications. Mean hospital-stay was 2.2 days (range 1-3 days). Follow-up ranged from 82-957 days (mean = 487 days). At last follow-up, all patients were alive without cardiovascular morbidity; and CTA revealed stable or decreased aneurysm size, patent endografts, and no evidence of endoleak or migration. CONCLUSIONS: The AEGAR technique can be used to safely and effectively overcome certain aortoiliac anatomic constraints that preclude use of current IBE technology. We encourage broader use of these alternative endografts in pertinent anatomic configurations.

Comparison of Atherectomy to Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting for Isolated Femoropopliteal Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The use of atherectomy for lower extremity revascularization is increasing despite concerning reports about its long-term safety and effectiveness. This study compares the outcomes of atherectomy to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting for treatment of isolated femoropopliteal disease. METHODS: All patients undergoing endovascular treatment of isolated femoropopliteal lesions in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2009-2018) were identified. Patients with concomitant open surgery, acute limb ischemia, or iliac or tibial intervention were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 treatment groups: atherectomy with or without PTA, PTA alone, and stenting alone. Propensity matching was performed based on age, gender, race, ambulatory status, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, dialysis, prior inflow bypass and intervention, prior major ipsilateral amputation, indication, length of treated lesion, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus II classification. The perioperative and one-year outcomes of the matched groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 10,007 cases of atherectomy, 22,000 cases of PTA, and 27,579 cases of stenting of isolated femoropopliteal disease were identified. After matching, there were 6,372 procedures in atherectomy and PTA groups, respectively. Atherectomy was associated with higher likelihood of technical success (98.3% vs. 97.5%; P < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (1.8 ± 8.2 days vs. 2.7 ± 15.7 days; P < 0.001), but had increased rate of distal embolization (2% vs. 1.1%; P < 0.001) compared with PTA. At one year, atherectomy was associated with improved primary patency (84.2% vs. 82%; P = 0.047) and survival rate (91.1% vs. 90%; P = 0.044), but was also associated with a higher reintervention rate (15.7% vs 13.6%; P = 0.033) compared with PTA. There was no difference in the rates of major amputation, ambulatory status improvement, or ankle brachial index (ABI) improvement. In the second analysis, after matching, there were 6,877 procedures in the atherectomy and stenting groups, respectively. Atherectomy was associated with lower rate of dissection (3.7% vs. 8.2% <0 .001), lower rate of perforation (0.6% vs. 1.2%; P < 0.001), and a shorter length of stay (1.9 ± 8.1 vs. 2.9 ± 9.8 days; P < 0.001) than stenting. However, patients treated with atherectomy had a lower rate of technical success (98.3% vs. 99.2%; P < 0.001) and a higher rate of distal embolization (2% vs. 1.2%; P < 0.001) than stenting. At one year, atherectomy was associated with a higher rate of major ipsilateral amputation (5.3% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.046) and less improvement in ABI (0.19 ± 0.42 vs. 0.25 ± 0.4; P < 0.001) than stenting. There was no difference in rates of primary patency, survival, reintervention, and ambulatory status improvement at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Atherectomy does not seem to confer any significant additional clinical benefit compared with balloon angioplasty or stenting. Further research is needed to justify its additional cost over other endovascular modalities.

Better survival for African and Hispanic/Latino Americans after infrainguinal revascularization in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Inferior survival outcomes have historically been reported for African Americans with cardiovascular disease, and poorer outcomes have been presumed for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as well. The current study evaluates the effect of race and ethnicity on survival of patients undergoing open or endovascular interventions for lower extremity PAD. METHODS: Data of patients from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database were obtained for patients undergoing open infrainguinal (INFRA) or suprainguinal (SUPRA) bypass, peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), and amputation (AMP). Patients were further stratified as suprainguinal (SupraPVI) if any of the first three interventions listed included the aorta or iliac vessels or infrainguinal (InfraPVI) if not. The primary outcome was the patient's death (overall mortality) as recorded in the database or determined by cross-reference with the Social Security Death Index (SSDI). The secondary outcome consisted of perioperative mortality during the index hospitalization. Generalized linear modeling provided multivariate analysis, with entry of variables dependent on results of univariate analysis. RESULTS: From January 2003 through September 2015, a total of 24,241 INFRA bypass, 8028 SUPRA bypass, 48,048 InfraPVI, 21,196 SupraPVI, and 3423 AMP patients met criteria for analysis, with a median follow-up of 18 (interquartile range, 8-33) months. Combining all procedures, overall mortality was lower among African Americans than among white Americans (12.4% vs 14.2%; P < .0001) but not death in the periprocedural period (1.1% vs 1.2%; P = .26). To account for differences in length of follow-up, Cox proportional hazards analysis confirmed that the African American race was independently associated with a significantly lower occurrence of overall mortality after INFRA bypass (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.88; P < .0009), InfraPVI (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78; P < .0001), and SupraPVI (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.90; P = .0009) interventions but not after SUPRA bypass or AMP. Similarly, by Cox proportional hazards, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was also independently associated with lower overall mortality after INFRA bypass (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91; P = .0030), InfraPVI (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78; P < .0001), and SupraPVI (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89; P = .0045) but not after SUPRA bypass or AMP. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the published data for other forms of cardiovascular disease, African American patients as well as patients identified with Hispanic/Latino ethnicity with PAD included in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative undergoing INFRA revascularization for lower extremity PAD experienced better overall survival compared with white Americans.

Predicting outcomes for infrapopliteal limb-threatening ischemia using the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of open surgical or endovascular intervention for limb-threatening ischemia (LTI) involving the infrapopliteal vessels are dependent on complex anatomic, demographic, and disease factors. To assist in decision-making, we used the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) to derive a model using only preoperatively available factors to predict important outcomes for open or endovascular revascularization. METHODS: National VQI data for the infrainguinal bypass and peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) modules were reviewed in a blinded fashion for patients who underwent intervention for LTI of the infrapopliteal vessels. Primary outcomes consisted of major adverse limb event (MALE) and amputation-free survival (AFS). Generalized linear modeling was used for the multivariate analyses, with entry of variables dependent on results of univariate analysis. RESULTS: From January 2003 through August 2014 a total of 19,053 infrainguinal open bypass and 48,739 PVI procedures were identified, among which 5264 and 5252, respectively, represented infrapopliteal (tibial-peroneal-pedal) revascularization for LTI. From these, 3036 infrapopliteal open bypass patients and 1319 infrapopliteal PVI patients had sufficient follow-up data for study inclusion. For open surgery, the reduced generalized linear model revealed that American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or 5, previous major amputation, living at home, and female sex had the greatest adverse effect on MALE, and dialysis dependence, low body mass index, and lack of great saphenous vein as a conduit had the greatest negative effect on AFS. For PVI, lesion length from 10 to 15 cm, treatment of three or more arteries, and classification other than A on the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus demonstrated the largest adverse effects on MALE, and dialysis dependence, low body mass index, and congestive heart failure most negatively affected AFS. CONCLUSIONS: This study on a cross-section of patients selected for intervention in academic and community hospitals offers a "real world" glimpse of factors predictive of outcome. The VQI can be used to derive models that predict the outcomes of open surgical bypass or PVI for LTI involving the infrapopliteal vessels.

The infraclavicular approach for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is an esoteric condition that presents in young, healthy adults. Treatment includes catheter-directed thrombolysis, followed by first-rib resection for decompression of the thoracic outlet. Various techniques for first-rib resection have been described with successful outcomes. The infraclavicular approach is well-suited to treat the most medial structures that are anatomically relevant for vTOS. A narrative review was conducted to specifically examine the literature on infraclavicular exposure for vTOS. The technique for this operation is described, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. The infraclavicular approach is a reasonable choice for definitive treatment of uncomplicated vTOS.

Endovascular stenting of external iliac vein injury during anterior spine exposure.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a standard approach for the surgical management of patients with severe degenerative disease at the L4-L5 and lumbosacral (L5-S1) levels. ALIF is performed through retroperitoneal exposure but harbors a small risk of major vascular injury. In this case, we describe an emergent endovascular repair of an external iliac vein injury that occurred during ALIF with long-term follow-up. We discuss specific strategies in the decision making and technique that led to a successful outcome in this case. Endovascular stent grafting is a potential bailout option for serious iliac vein injury.

Open management of complex infrarenal aortic occlusive disease.

Open aortic reconstruction for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease is a time-honored and durable solution. Symptoms manifest as disabling claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia in patients with multilevel disease. Advanced endovascular techniques have supplanted a large volume of aortic surgery. Nonetheless, it is essential for surgeons-in-training to learn and hone their skills in open aortic surgery. Comprehensive literature review over the past 50 years was conducted on the topics of "aortic occlusive disease," "aortic bypass," and "iliofemoral bypass." Pertinent articles were selected for inclusion as references. The technical aspects of the various aortoiliac exposures are described and selected case images were chosen from the senior author's experience. This review paper details the various operative approaches to open aortoiliac revascularization with emphasis on "tips and tricks" for the learner.

Effect of inferior vena cava filter placement position on device complications.

BACKGROUND: Indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filters can cause complications, including penetration into surrounding structures, migration, and thrombosis of the vena cava. Computational fluid dynamics suggests juxtarenal placement of IVC filters decreases the risk of thrombosis; however, this has not been explored clinically. The present study examines the effect of filter placement position on long-term device complications with an emphasis on IVC thrombosis. We hypothesized that IVC filters placed further caudal to the renal veins were more likely to develop long-term thrombosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of patients receiving IVC filters at a single tertiary center between 2008 and 2016 was performed. Patients missing follow-up or procedural imaging data were excluded. The placement procedure venograms were reviewed, and the distance from the filter apex to the more inferior renal vein was measured using reported IVC filter lengths for calibration. The patients were divided into three groups according to the tip position relative to the more inferior renal vein: at or superior (group A), 1 to 20 mm inferior (group B), and >20 mm inferior (group C). The patient and procedural characteristics and outcomes were compared between the three groups. The primary end points were IVC thrombosis and device-related mortality. RESULTS: Of 1497 eligible patients, 267 (17.8%) were excluded. The most common placement position was group B (64.0%). The mean age was lowest in group C, followed by groups A and B (age, 59.5 years, 64.6 years, and 62.2 years, respectively; P = .003). No statistically significant differences were found in the distribution of sex or the measured comorbidities. Group C was the most likely to receive jugular access (group C, 71.7%; group A, 48.3%; group B, 62.4%; P < .001) and received more first-generation filters (group C, 58.5%; group A, 46.6%; group B, 52.5%; P = .045). The short-term (<30-day) and long-term (≥30-day) outcomes, including access site hematoma, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, were uncommon, with no differences between the groups. Cases of symptomatic filter penetration, migration, and fracture were rare (one, one, and three cases, respectively). Although a pattern of increasing thrombosis with more inferior placement was found, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (group A, 1.5%; group B, 1.8%; group C, 2.5%; P = .638). No cases of device-related mortality occurred. All-cause mortality after a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 2.3 years was 41.3% and did not vary significantly between the groups (P = .051). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that placement position did not predict for short- or long-term deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, IVC thrombosis, or all-cause mortality after adjustment for the baseline patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: IVC filters have low rates of short- and long-term complications, including IVC thrombosis. The placement position did not affect the occurrence of device complications in this study.

Venous outflow banding for maturation of a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula.

In the present report, we have described venous outflow banding as a technique to assist with maturation of a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) without sacrificing potential target veins for future access. A 47-year-old obese man had undergone pAVF creation between the right ulnar vessels with coil embolization of the brachial vein. Follow-up imaging demonstrated the median cubital vein briskly filling the cephalic and basilic veins. The basilic vein was banded with the patient under local anesthesia successfully. Banding of the superficial veins provides an alternative after creation of a pAVF to preserve veins that could be used as conduits for future access.

Placement and retrieval of bilateral iliac vein filters in patients with mega cava.

Temporary interruption of the inferior vena cava is the recommended treatment to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and active contraindications for therapeutic anticoagulation. In patients with mega cava (diameter >30 mm), temporary inferior vena cava filters are contraindicated. In the present report, we have described the successful placement and retrieval of bilateral iliac vein filters in two patients with VTE, mega cava, and active contraindications for therapeutic anticoagulation. At the last follow-up, both patients had recovered without recurrent VTE and had had all filters successfully retrieved without complications.