The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively calculate the incidence of postoperative sacroiliac joint-related pain (SIJP) and investigate the association between spinopelvic parameters and postoperative SIJP after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. We defined postoperative SIJP as unilateral buttock pain according to fulfillment of the following criteria within 3 months of the surgery: a sacroiliac joint (SIJ) score higher than 4/9 postoperatively; positive response to analgesic periarticular SIJ injection with fluoroscopy; no other complications related to the surgery. The patients were divided into the SIJP group and non-SIJP group. We compared the background information and analyzed the differences in spinopelvic parameters in both groups. Additionally, receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to evaluate the cutoff values of spinopelvic parameters. RESULTS: Of the 281 patients enrolled, 265 were included and eight developed postoperative SIJP (3.0%). There were no significant differences in the background information between groups. Preoperative and postoperative radiological evaluations revealed that the pelvic incidence (PI) in the SIJP group was significantly higher than that in the non-SIJP group, and there were no significant differences in lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and PI minus LL. For preoperative PI, the area under the curve, cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.73739, 59, 62.5%, and 81.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative SIJP after lumbar spine surgery was 3.0%. Higher PI values were associated with a higher risk of postoperative SIJP. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Disability due to knee pain and somatising tendency in Japanese adults.

BACKGROUND: Knee pain is common and related to knee osteoarthritis. However, there is a discrepancy between knee pain and radiographic osteoarthritis. In the general population, knee pain is associated with psychological and cognitive factors, which would be one explanation for the discrepancy. Limited evidence demonstrates that somatization is associated with knee pain. This study examined the association between disability due to knee pain and a high somatising tendency. METHODS: Japanese adults (aged 20-64 years) who had experienced knee pain in the past four weeks were included in this study (n = 14,695, 50% women). Data were extracted from a large internet survey. Somatising tendency was assessed using the Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8). Disability due to knee pain was categorized into three levels: 1) knee pain without difficulty with activities of daily living (ADL), 2) knee pain with ADL difficulty but without requiring sick leave, and 3) knee pain requiring sick leave. The association between ≥ high somatising tendency (SSS-8 score ≥ 12) as well as very high somatising tendency (SSS-8 score ≥ 16) and disability due to knee pain was examined using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, depressive symptoms, education level, regular exercise, chronicity of knee pain (≥3 months), osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. RESULTS: Greater disability due to knee pain was associated with a higher odds ratio for ≥ high somatising tendency (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.36 [2.10-2.66] in group 2 vs. group 1, aOR = 3.23 [2.66-3.92] in group 3 vs. group 1). Stronger associations were found for a very high somatising tendency (aOR = 2.80 [2.42-3.23] in group 2 vs. group 1, aOR = 4.51 [3.64-5.58] in group 3 vs. group 1). CONCLUSIONS: Somatization may play a role in disability due to knee pain in the general adult population with knee pain, similar to the role of somatization in low back pain.

Factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Microendoscopic foraminotomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, using outcome measurement scores such as the neck disability index (NDI) and numerical rating scale (NRS). However, the scores for spine surgery do not always reflect the true subjective satisfaction of the patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: The subjects consisted of consecutive patients who underwent microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The NDI, the NRS score for the neck, upper back, and arm, and the EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Postoperative subjective satisfaction was also assessed as a direct evaluation of satisfaction, and willingness to undergo the same operation if needed was assessed as an indirect evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 52.9 ± 11.8 years; 19.0% were female and 81.0% were male. The operation time for one level was 57.7 min and the estimated blood loss was minimal in most cases. All NDI, NRS, and EQ-5D scores improved significantly postoperatively. Univariate analyses revealed that the factors related to subjective satisfaction were younger age, non-smoking status, high preoperative NDI score, and low postoperative NRS score for the arm. Factors related to the willingness to undergo the same operation if needed were high preoperative NDI scores, high preoperative NRS scores for the arm, and low preoperative EQ-5D scores. CONCLUSIONS: Factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy include younger age, non-smoking status, high preoperative NDI score, high preoperative NRS score for the arm, low preoperative EQ-5D score, and a low postoperative NRS score for the arm.

A comparative study of three conservative treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: lumbar spinal stenosis with acupuncture and physical therapy study (LAP study).

BACKGROUND: Although the efficiency of conservative management for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been examined, different conservative management approaches have not been compared. We have performed the first comparative trial of three types of conservative management (medication with acetaminophen, exercise, and acupuncture) in Japanese patients with LSS. METHODS: Patients with L5 root radiculopathy associated with LSS who visited our hospital for surgical treatment were enrolled between December 2011 and January 2014. In this open-label study, patients were assigned to three treatment groups (medication, exercise, acupuncture) according to the visit time. The primary outcomes were Zurich claudication questionnaire (ZCQ) scores before and after 4 weeks of treatment. Least square mean analysis was used to assess the following dependent variables in the treatment groups: changes in symptom severity and physical function scores of the ZCQ and the ZCQ score of patient's satisfaction after treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-eight, 40, and 41 patients were allocated to the medication, exercise, and acupuncture groups, respectively. No patient underwent surgical treatment during the study period. The symptom severity scores of the ZCQ improved significantly after treatment in the medication (p = 0.048), exercise (p = 0.003), and acupuncture (p = 0.04) groups. The physical function score improved significantly in the acupuncture group (p = 0.045) but not in the medication (p = 0.20) and exercise (p = 0.29) groups. The mean reduction in the ZCQ score for physical function was significantly greater for acupuncture than for exercise. The mean ZCQ score for treatment satisfaction was significantly greater for acupuncture than for medication. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture was significantly more effective than physical exercise according to the physical function score of the ZCQ and than medication according to the satisfaction score. The present study provides new important information that will aid decision making in LSS treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ( UMIN000006957 ).

A population approach to analyze the effectiveness of a back extension exercise "One Stretch" in patients with low back pain: A replication study.

BACKGROUND: We examined the effectiveness of an intervention using a standing back extension exercise called "One Stretch", based on the McKenzie method, in improving or preventing low back pain and disability in Japanese care workers. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized controlled trial in Japan. Care workers in the intervention group received an exercise manual and a 30-minute seminar on low back pain and were encouraged to exercise in groups, while care workers in a control group were given only the manual. All care workers answered questionnaires at baseline and after one year on the subjective improvement in low back pain, whether they had had a medical consultation for low back pain, and the exercise compliance. Low back pain with disability was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Participants included 89 workers in the intervention group and 78 in the control group. Background characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared to the control group, a greater number of care workers in the intervention group showed improvements in low back pain or prevented it, did not have a medical consultation for low back pain, and exercised regularly. Furthermore, significantly fewer care workers in the intervention group suffered from low back pain with disability by the end of the study period than in the control group. CONCLUSION: The population approach about the exercise "One Stretch" led to better compliance with the exercise, and was effective for improving or preventing low back pain and in decreasing the likelihood of having a medical consultation for low back pain.

Anterior screw fixation for an odontoid fracture using an Acutrak 4/5 screw: a case report.

The direct anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures by a single cancellous screw, especially for osteoporotic vertebrae, has a potential risk of leading to insufficient stability and implant failures. We experienced good results following surgery using a single Acutrak 4/5 screw to obtain sufficient stability for an odontoid fracture in a patient with osteopenia. The screw is a cannulated self-tapping headless screw and has a tapered profile and full threads with variable pitches, and it can yield sufficient compression force as the screw is inserted. The preoperative severe neck pain of the patient was diminished immediately after the surgery. The patient achieved bone union in a short time and had a good clinical result for at least 3 years. Some biomechanical studies showed that the compression force of Acutrak standard screws was stronger than that of both 4.0-mm cancellous screws inserted with the lag screw technique and Herbert screws, and other studies showed that the compression force of Acutrak 4/5 screws was equivalent to that of 4.5-mm cortical screws. However, there has been no clinical report of surgery using an Acutrak 4/5 screw for odontoid fractures. This is the first clinical report of fixation by an Acutrak 4/5 screw.

Tips and Complications of Two-step Open Procedure for Ethanol Sclerosis Therapy for a Venous Hemangioma of the Thoracic Spine: A Case Report.

Introduction: Venous hemangiomas of the thoracic spine are rare tumors that are diagnose based on radiological findings. Ethanol sclerosis therapy through the percutaneous or open approaches has been reported to be useful treatment options. Therefore, radiological examination and the treatment procedure can be performed together. As pathological diagnosis of the tumor is important, a strategy that comprises biopsy followed by definitive treatment is ideal. The tips and complications of the two-step open procedure for ethanol sclerosis therapy have not been discussed in detail. This is the first report of this kind in the literature, especially about the tips and complications. Case Report: A 51-year-old woman presented with pain in the upper part of her back. Radiological examination revealed a hypervascular tumor at the second thoracic vertebra. We first performed an open biopsy along with decompression and fixation surgery, because the patient developed a walking disability with motor weakness in her right leg. The tumor was pathologically diagnosed as a venous hemangioma. Therefore, we performed ethanol sclerosis therapy using the open approach as a curative technique for the tumor 17 days after the initial surgery. A total of 10 mL of a mixture of 100% ethanol and a lipid-soluble contrast medium - which improve visibility - was injected intermittently and slowly. This was followed by the injection of 3 mL of a water-soluble contrast medium to confirm sclerosis. Immediately after the last procedure, the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials in all bilateral lower extremity muscles disappeared simultaneously. The patient incomplete paralysis of the lower extremity and transient dysuria postoperatively; however, she could walk without assistance after 5 months. Conclusion: This case highlights the following: First, the two-step procedure of open biopsy followed by ethanol injection using the open approach allowed accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Second, additional injection of a water-soluble contrast medium to confirm sclerosis after ethanol injection can cause paralysis. Third, a mixture of ethanol and a lipid-soluble contrast medium effective improves visibility to identify expansions. These experiences will be useful for following ethanol sclerosis therapy for a venous hemangioma of the thoracic spine.

Ethanol Sclerosis Therapy for Aggressive Vertebral Hemangioma of the Spine: A Narrative Review.

Vertebral hemangiomas of the spine are rare benign tumors. They occur primarily in the thoracic region and are often asymptomatic and found incidentally on radiological examination; however, some are symptomatic, aggressive, and gradually increase in size. Various therapeutic approaches have been proposed for their management. This study aimed to review the therapeutic management, focusing on ethanol sclerosis therapy. The PubMed database was searched from inception to January 2023 using the keywords "hemangioma", "spine OR vertebra", and "ethanol". Twenty studies were retrieved, including two letters. The first report of spinal therapy was published in 1994. Ethanol sclerosis therapy is effective in treating vertebral hemangiomas. It is performed independently or in combination with other techniques, such as vertebroplasty using cement and surgery. The therapy is performed under local or general anesthesia with fluoroscopic or computed tomography guidance. A total of 10-15 mL of ethanol is slowly injected via unilateral or bilateral pedicles. Complications of the therapy include hypotension and arrhythmia during the procedure, paralysis immediately after the procedure, and delayed compression fractures. This review could enable the refinement of knowledge regarding ethanol sclerosis therapy, which is a treatment option that could be adopted.

The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

PURPOSE: The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most common scoring systems used for patients with low back pain (LBP). Although the normative score of the ODI was reported to be 10.19 in a review article, no study has calculated the normative score after adjusting the value based on the age distribution. In addition, none of the previous studies has estimated the cut-off value which separates LBP with disability from LBP without disability. The purpose of this study was to estimate the normative score by adjusting the data for age distribution in Japan, and to determine the cut-off value which separates LBP with disability from LBP without disability. METHODS: We conducted an internet survey on LBP using the Japanese version of the ODQ. A total of 1,200 respondents, composed of 100 males and 100 females in each age group (from the 20s to 70s), participated in this study. We also asked them to provide information about their backgrounds. We estimated the normative score after correcting for the age distribution of Japan. We also estimated the ODI of those with or without disability, the factors associated with the ODI, and the cut-off value which separates LBP with disability from LBP without disability. RESULTS: The participants' backgrounds were similar to the national survey. The normative score of the ODI was estimated at 8.73. The ODI of the LBP with disability group was 22.07. Those with sciatica and obese subjects showed higher ODI than those without. The optimal cut-off value was estimated to be 12. CONCLUSIONS: We defined the normative score and the cut-off value of the ODI.

Normative score and cut-off value of the Neck Disability Index.

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common health problem that restricts activities of daily living. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was developed to assess disability in patients with neck pain. The normative score and the cut-off value are mandatory to assess an individual patient or a certain patient group for clinically important neck pain with disability, by distinguishing it from nonsignificant pain. The objective of the present study was to determine the normative score and the cut-off value of the NDI. METHODS: A total of 1,200 participants who registered with an internet research company were interviewed on the website about their episodes of neck pain during the previous 4 weeks, and completed the online NDI questionnaire. If the participants reported neck pain, they were also asked about the disability in activity of daily living it caused, and the presence of associated symptoms in upper limbs. Disability was defined according to the consensus study on the standardization of back pain definitions. The normative score was determined by calculating the mean in the participants, and the cut-off value was determined by the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of neck pain was 37.8 %. Demographic data of the participants also indicated that they were representative of the normal population in Japan. The mean score was 6.98, and the median was 2. The NDI score was higher in middle age, and at its peak in the 50s age group (50-59 years of age). The female mean was significantly higher. The NDI score was higher in those with upper limb symptoms. We have determined the cut-off value of the NDI to detect neck pain associated with disability to be 15. CONCLUSIONS: The normative score and the cut-off value of the NDI were determined. Our cut-off value is potentially useful in evaluating the therapeutic effectiveness of various interventions for neck pain.

Relationship Between Sacroiliac Joint-related Pain and Spinopelvic Mobility.

STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between sacroiliac joint-related pain (SIJ-RP) and spinopelvic mobility. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No specific radiological findings are available for the diagnosis of SIJ-RP. A previous study reported that a higher pelvic incidence and sacral slope (SS) values were significantly associated with sacroiliac joint pain. The concept of spinopelvic mobility, which is evaluated by the differences between SS in the standing and sitting positions, has been the focus of hip and spine surgeries in recent years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SIJ-RP group comprised patients diagnosed with SIJ-RP based on physical findings and their response to analgesic injections. No other lumbar or hip joint diseases were observed. The non-SIJ-RP group comprised patients with lower back pain for reasons other than SIJ-RP. Radiographs of the lateral view of the pelvis in the standing and sitting positions were evaluated for all patients. We compared and analyzed the backgrounds, SS in the two positions, and difference in SS between the two positions in both groups. RESULTS: In total, 245 patients were included in the study, with 49 and 196 patients in the SIJ-RP and non-SIJ-RP groups, respectively. More female patients experienced SIJ-RP than male patients ( P =0.0361). There were significant differences between the groups for SS in standing ( P =0.0076), sitting ( P =0.0005), and those with a difference between sitting and standing of <5° ( P =0.0278) in the univariate analyses. Logistic regression analyses, after adjustment for age and sex, revealed significant differences between the groups with an SS difference <5° ( P =0.0088; 95% confidence interval, 1.280-5.519), with an odds ratio of 2.7. CONCLUSION: On evaluating spinopelvic mobility, we found that SIJ-RP was related to hypomobility of the sacrum, which could indicate the hypermobility of the sacroiliac joint.

Characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters of patients with sacroiliac joint pain.

To evaluate the characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters on radiography in patients with sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP). Two hundred fifty patients were included and divided into the SIJP group (those diagnosed with SIJP based on physical findings and response to analgesic periarticular injections; n = 53) and the non-SIJP group (those with low back pain [LBP] because of other reasons; n = 197). We compared their demographic characteristics and spinopelvic parameters using radiography. All differences found in the patients' demographic characteristics and spinopelvic parameters were analyzed. More female participants experienced SIJP than male participants (P = 0.0179). Univariate analyses revealed significant differences in pelvic incidence (PI) (P = 0.0122), sacral slope (SS) (P = 0.0034), and lumbar lordosis (LL) (P = 0.0078) between the groups. The detection powers for PI, SS, and LL were 0.71, 0.84, and 0.66, respectively. Logistic regression analyses, after adjustment for age and sex, revealed significant differences in PI (P = 0.0308) and SS (P = 0.0153) between the groups, with odds ratios of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively. More female participants experienced SIJP than male participants. Higher PI and SS values were related to SIJP among LBP patients.

The Impact of Cefazolin Shortage on Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery in Japan.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agents on surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the use of alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agents might have a negative effect on SSI prevention, their association with SSI risk in spine surgery remains unclear. METHODS: We used the registry data of consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery from April 2017 to January 2020 in four institutions participating in the University of Tokyo Spine Group. Before March 2019, all institutions used cefazolin for antimicrobial prophylaxis. After March 2019, the institutions used broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents as an alternative due to a cefazolin shortage in Japan. RESULTS: Among the 3841 enrolled patients (2289 males), 2024 received cefazolin and 1117 received alternative agents. The risk of reoperation for deep SSI within 30 days of spine surgery was significantly higher in the alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agent group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.35; P = 0.014). In subgroup analyses, the SSI risk was significantly higher in the thoracolumbar surgery group (aOR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06-3.73; P = 0.03). A nonsignificant consistent trend was found in all other subgroups: posterior decompression (aOR 1.91; 95% CI, 0.86-4.21; P = 0.11); posterior fixation (aOR 2.05; 95% CI, 0.99-4.24; P = 0.05); and cervical spine surgery (aOR 2.30; 95% CI, 0.82-6.46; P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agents increased the risk of reoperation for SSI after spine surgery compared with cefazolin. Our study supports the current practice of using first-generation cephalosporins as first-line antimicrobial prophylaxis agents in spine surgery as recommended in multiple guidelines.Level of Evidence: 3.

Degree of satisfaction following full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy.

BACKGROUND: Foraminotomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR). Foraminotomy has been performed by an open approach or minimally invasive approach using a microscope or endoscope. A review of the literature has revealed that both the open and minimally invasive approach provide good clinical results. Since the introduction of full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) followed by microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy, we adopted FECF in 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR. METHODS: A total of 109 consecutive patients underwent FECF for CR. All operations were performed at Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) score for the arm was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the time of discharge from the hospital. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and the 3 months after the operation. RESULTS: In total 109 patients, the mean age was 51.3 years; 22.9% were female and 77.1% were male. The cervical level most frequently operated on was C6/7, followed by C5/6. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The mean operation time was 61.7 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 0 to 10 mg in all cases. One patient exhibited temporary postoperative muscle weakness, although he recovered within 1 year. There was one case of dural tear, and no cases of nerve root injury or surgical site infection. There was one case of reoperation by microendoscopic surgery in 3 months due to insufficient improvement. Preoperative NRS scores for the arm was 4.6 and it improved significantly postoperatively to 2.1 for the entire study group. The mean satisfaction score at discharge was 7.5. The mean score at 3 months after the operations was 7.4. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR was high 3 months after the operation.

Association between somatic symptom burden and health-related quality of life in people with chronic low back pain.

Depression is a relevant risk factor for low back pain and is associated with the outcomes of low back pain. Depression also often overlaps with somatisation. As previous studies have suggested that somatisation or a higher somatic symptom burden has a role in the outcomes of low back pain, the aim of the present cross-sectional study was to examine whether somatic symptom burden was associated with health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic low back pain independent of depression. We analyzed internet survey data on physical and mental health in Japanese adults aged 20-64 years with chronic low back pain (n = 3,100). Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Somatic symptom burden and depression were assessed using the Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), respectively. SSS-8 score was categorized as no to minimal (0-3), low (4-7), medium (8-11), high (12-15), and very high (16-32). The association between SSS-8 and EQ-5D was examined using linear regression models, adjusting for depression and other covariates, including age, sex, BMI, smoking, marital status, education, exercise, employment, and the number of comorbid diseases. A higher somatic symptom burden was significantly associated with a lower health-related quality of life independent of depression and the number of comorbid diseases (regression coefficient = 0.040 for SSS-8 high vs. very high and 0.218 for non to minimal vs. very high, p trend <0.0001). In conclusion, somatic symptom burden might be important for the health-related quality of life of individuals with chronic low back pain.

Validation study of a diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain.

BACKGROUND: There are no specific radiological findings for the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint-related pain. A diagnostic scoring system had been developed in 2017. The score comprised the sum of scores of six items. The score ranged from 0 to 9 points, and the cutoff was calculated as 4. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sacroiliac joint-related pain group (n=31) comprised patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint-related pain based on patient history, physical findings, and responses to analgesic periarticular injection. In addition, it was confirmed that they had no other lumbar or hip joint diseases. The non-sacroiliac joint-related pain group (n=123) comprised patients with low back pain due to a reason other than sacroiliac joint-related pain. We evaluated scores for all subjects. We analyzed the differences in each item between both groups and performed receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis to evaluate the score validity. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. There were significant differences for the following four of six items: one-finger test results (P<0.0001), pain while sitting on a chair (P=0.0141), sacroiliac joint shear test results (P<0.0001), and tenderness of the posterosuperior iliac spine (P<0.0001). The cut-off value was 5 points, the area under the curve was 0.80239, sensitivity was 77.4%, and specificity was 76.4%. CONCLUSION: The score demonstrated moderate validity for diagnosing sacroiliac joint-related pain.

Evidence-based Care Bundles for Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Spinal Instrumentation Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study, using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of evidence-based care bundles for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) in spinal instrumentation surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: About half of all SSIs are preventable via evidence-based methods. For successful SSI prevention, the bacterial load must be minimized, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) protection must be maximized. However, it is difficult to cover all of these requirements by single preventative method. METHODS: We screened consecutive patients scheduled for spinal instrumentation surgeries at a single tertiary referral hospital for high surgical, SSI, and MRSA colonization risks. Evidence-based care bundles were implemented for high-risk patients and included 1) additional vancomycin prophylaxis, 2) diluted povidone-iodine irrigation, and 3) nasal and body decontamination. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative features, and SSIs reported to the Japanese Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system were prospectively obtained in the same method by the same assessor and were used for the analyses. The results were compared before and after the application of the bundle. RESULTS: There were 1042 spinal instrumentation surgeries (741 before and 301 after care bundles) performed from November 2010 to December 2015. Of 301 surgeries, 57 cases (18.9%) received care bundles. There were no significant differences in patient backgrounds before and after the intervention. The SSI rate decreased significantly from 3.8% to 0.7% (P < 0.01) after the intervention, with an overall 82% relative risk reduction. A significant protective effect was observed in the multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.77, P = 0.02). There were no MRSA-related SSIs among those that received care bundles, even though MRSA was the predominant pathogen in the study population. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based care bundles, applied in selected high-risk spinal instrumentation cases, minimized bacterial load, maximized MRSA protection, and significantly reduced SSI rates without topical vancomycin powder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The associations between magnetic resonance imaging findings and low back pain: A 10-year longitudinal analysis.

PURPOSE: To conduct a 10-year longitudinal analysis of the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and low back pain (LBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-one volunteers with a history of LBP, but without current LBP were recruited between 2005 and 2006. Participants' baseline demographics and MRI findings were recorded. All volunteers were invited for a follow-up MRI in 2016; of these, 49 volunteers (53.8%) participated in the follow-up. We enquired whether they had LBP history during the 10 years between the baseline and follow-up examinations. Sagittal T1 and T2-weighted MRI were used to assess the intervertebral space from T12/L1 to L5/S1. We evaluated the presence of disc degeneration by Pfirrmann's grading system, disc bulging, high intensity zone (HIZ), spondylolisthesis, and any type of Modic changes in the follow-up MRIs. We compared the follow-up MRI findings with the baseline findings; the progress of each finding over the 10 years were also compared between the groups with (n = 36) and without (n = 13) LBP. RESULTS: Average age of the study participants at follow-up was 44.8 years; 25 were female and 24 were male. Average age, sex, body mass index, and smoking habits of those who did and did not participate in the follow-up study, as well as the demographic characteristics of those who did and did not have LBP history during the 10 years, were not significantly different. Compared with the group without LBP history, the group that had LBP history during the 10 years did not have a significantly increased prevalence of disc degeneration, disc bulging, and HIZ in the follow-up and baseline MRIs. Spondylolisthesis and any type of Modic changes were also not associated with LBP history during the 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up MRI findings consistent with Pfirrmann grading ≥4, disc bulging, HIZ, spondylolisthesis, and any type of Modic changes were not associated with LBP history during the 10 years between the baseline and follow-up study. The progresses of these findings were also not associated with the LBP history. In addition, baseline MRI findings were not associated with LBP history during the 10 years; therefore, our data suggest that baseline MRI findings cannot predict future LBP.

The relationship between findings on magnetic resonance imaging and previous history of low back pain.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and previous low back pain (LBP) in participants without current LBP. Current LBP was defined as LBP during the past month. Previous LBP was defined as a history of medical consultation for LBP. Ninety-one participants without current LBP were included. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI was used to assess the intervertebral space from T12/L1 to L5/S1. These images were classified into five grades based on the Pfirrmann grading system. Furthermore, we evaluated the presence of disk bulging, high-intensity zone, and spondylolisthesis. We compared the MRI findings between groups with (27 participants) and without (64 participants) previous LBP without current LBP. Intraobserver and interobserver kappa values were evaluated. Participants had an average age of 34.9 years; 47 were female and 44 were male; and their average body mass index was 21.8 kg/m2. Compared to the group of participants without previous LBP, the group of participants with previous LBP had a significantly higher incidence of disk degeneration such as a Pfirrmann grade ≥3, disk bulging, and high-intensity zone in the analyses adjusted by age and sex. There were no significant differences in spondylolisthesis between the groups. An odds ratio of >10 was only found for Pfirrmann grade ≥3, ie, a Pfirrmann grade ≥3 was strongly associated with a history of previous LBP in participants without current LBP.

Estimated risk for chronic pain determined using the generic STarT Back 5-item screening tool.

OBJECTIVE: The generic STarT Back 5-item screening tool (STarT-G) is used to manage chronic pain in the lower back and elsewhere. This study evaluated the validity of the Japanese version of this generic screening tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Japanese participants between the ages of 20 and 64 years completed online surveys regarding pain. Survey reliability was assessed with internal consistency, as calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate concurrent validity between the STarT-G score and standard reference questionnaires. Associations between STarT-G scores and the presence of a disability due to chronic pain (DCP) were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Analyses ultimately included data obtained from 52,842 Japanese participants (54.4% male) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 47.7 (9.4) years. Approximately 1.5% of participants had DCP, and the mean STarT-G score was 1.2 (1.4). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.71, indicating an acceptable reliability. The STarT-G score moderately correlated with the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) score (Spearman's correlation coefficient: r = 0.34). When the STarT-G threshold was set at 4, the sensitivity and specificity of the DCP predictive model were 65.8% and 82.4%, respectively, and the area under the ROC was 0.808. CONCLUSION: The STarT-G was internally consistent and was able to distinguish between subjects with and without a DCP. Therefore, the STarT-G can reliably be used in the Japanese population to identify patients with DCP.