Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Experience in 95 patients. / Factores pronósticos de los tumores neuroendocrinos de páncreas resecados. Experiencia en 95 pacientes.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in patients with resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNT). METHODS: Medical records of 95 patients with resected PNT were retrospectively reviewed. The variables studied were: age, sex, form of presentation (sporadic/familial tumors), functionality, type of tumor, localization, type of surgery, tumor size, multifocal tumors and recurrent rate. The new WHO classification (2010) was used. RESULTS: There were 45 men and 50 women. Mean age was 46.8 years. Regarding the mode of presentation, it was sporadic in 66 patients (69.8%) and 29 cases were familial neuroendocrine tumors (30.2%) in association with MEN 1 syndrome. The 59% of patients suffered from non-functional tumors and 41% were functional: 20 insulinoma, 16 gastrinoma, and 3 glucagonoma. Distal pancreatectomy was the most common surgical procedure, followed by tumor enucleation in 19 patients. According to the WHO classification, 59 patients had a PNT G1, 24 PNT G2 and 12 with a poorly-differentiated carcinoma, respectively. The 5-year survival in well-differentiated tumors was 100%, regardless of the functionality. Sporadic PNT are more commonly unifocal (P<0.001), associating liver metastasis. Survival and recurrence rates after a mean follow-up of 85.3 months were 65.8 and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, WHO classification was an independent prognostic factor in PNT survival.

Groove pancreatitis vs. pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A review of 8 cases. / Pancreatitis del surco versus adenocarcinoma de páncreas: a propósito de 8 casos.

INTRODUCTION: Groove pancreatitis (PS) is an uncommon clinical situation and radiologically it can mimic carcinoma of the periampullary area. The aim of this paper is to study a series of 8 patients who underwent surgery with preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic head mass and subsequent pathological diagnosis of PS. METHODS: In our series, 6 were men and 2 women, with an average age of 51,9 years. Before surgery, all patients had epigastric abdominal pain requiring analgesia at high doses. The preoperative analytical CEA and Ca 19.9 were normal in all patients. Imaging studies showed intrapancreatic solid lesions in 6 of the 8 patients, and in the remaining 2 one papillary mass of 5 and 6cm, respectively, that caused stenosis in the duodenal luz. EUS neoplastic cells were negative in all patients. RESULTS: The immediate postoperative evolution was satisfactory, there are no complications. In our series, no patients have died. The long-term follow-up, in 7 of the 8 patients, has been excellent with disappearance of abdominal pain and improvement of nutritional status. The remaining patient had frequent recurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis, and at 60 months, presented a pseudocyst that has required a Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy. CONCLUSIONS: PS must be included in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, which may include carcinoma of the periampullary area and other causes of chronic pancreatitis.

[HELLP syndrome with severe liver dysfunction: a presentation of three cases]. / Síndrome de HELLP con disfunción hepática severa: presentación de cuatro casos.

UNLABELLED: HELLP syndrome (HS) occurs in 0.5-0.9% of pregnant women. According to the Tennessee criteria, it is characterised by haemolytic anaemia, thrombopenia and multi-organ dysfunction. The purpose of this article is to present the cases of four pregnant women diagnosed with HS with severe liver involvement. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We present the cases of 4 pregnant women of 24, 27, 28 and 36 weeks gestation, respectively. Pregnancy was terminated by urgent Caesarean section in all 4 cases. The first case required a right hepatectomy, with a good post-operative outcome; the second patient developed fulminant liver failure, dying due to multi-organ failure while waiting for a liver transplant. The third patient progressed satisfactorily with conservative medical treatment. The fourth patient required two livers transplants, being discharged from hospital three months later. CONCLUSIONS: When faced with the clinical suspicion of a HS it is essential to rule out a liver haematoma, since the treatment of choice depends on its clinical-radiological severity. If there is a rupture of the haematoma, urgent surgery is essential and, in the case of severe liver failure, a liver transplant is indicated.

[Changes in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of hepatic trauma. A retrospective study comparing 2 series of cases in different (1997-1984 vs. 2001-2008)]. / Cambios en el manejo diagnóstico-terapéutico del traumatismo hepático. Estudio retrospectivo comparando 2 series de casos en periodos diferentes (1997-1984 vs. 2001-2008).

INTRODUCTION: We present a series of 146 cases of hepatic trauma (HT) treated in our hospital over a period of 8 yearsm (2001-2008), and comparing it with a previous series of 92 cases (1977-1984). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The mean age in the current series was 28.6 years and the majority were male. The closed traumas were mainly penetrating, with the most frequent cause being road traffic accidents. RESULTS: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification was used to evaluate the grade of the hepatic injury. Associated abdominal and /or extra-abdominal injuries were seen in 79.5% of the patients, with the most frequent being chest trauma, compared to bone fractures in the previous series. The most common associated intra-abdominal injury was the spleen in both series. The most used diagnostic technique in the current series was abdominal CT. Simple peritoneal puncture and lavage (PLP) were the most used examinations used in the previous series. Non-surgical treatment (NST) was given in 98 cases and the surgery was indicated in the remaining 48. In the previous series, 97.8% of patients were operated on. In the current series, on the 15 patients with severe liver injuries, 5 right hepatectomies, 2 segmentectomies and 6 packing compressions were performed, with the remaining two dying during surgery due to hepatic avulsion. The overall mortality was 3.4%, being 1% in the NST group and 8.3% in the surgical patients. In the previous series, the overall mortality was 29.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The key factor for using NST is to control haemodynamic stability, leaving surgical treatment for haemodynamically unstable patients.

[Giant lipomas or retroperitoneal liposarcomas? Controversies in their diagnosis and treatment]. / ¿Lipoma gigante o liposarcoma retroperitoneal? Controversias en su diagnóstico y tratamiento.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal lipomas are extremely rare tumors that must be differentiated from well-differentiated liposarcomas (WD-LPS). OBJECTIVES: To summarize the evidence about giant retroperitoneal lipomas or liposarcomas; and to elaborate recommendations for their management. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search from January 1985 to December 2019 and a review of our own cases was performed. RESULTS: Our series comprises four patients, two females and two males. The diagnosis was incidental in two cases. The medium size was 26 cm, being two cases located exclusively in the retroperitoneum, one in the inguinal region and one in the buttock via pelvic space. All cases were surgically removed being confirmed the initial diagnosis of retroperitoneal lipomas in two cases, as the rest two cases were classified as WD_LPS after MDM2/CDK4 genetic analysis. The review of the available literature plus our own cases revealed 30 cases, of which 58% were woman. Only two cases were asymptomatic. The main symptom was abdominal mass (53%) followed by abdominal pain (40,6%). The median size of the lesions was 24,9 cm with a median weight of 4.576,3 g. All cases were surgically removed, being necessary to remove contiguous organs in only four cases (12,5%). CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal lipoma is a rare tumor which must be differentiated from WD-LPS. This is a very difficult task, being necessary to determinate MDM2 status (by FISH or MLPA), present in liposarcoma but not in lipomas, for its correct diagnosis. The treatment must be based on a complete surgical resection with negative margins.