Venous thromboembolism risk prediction in ambulatory cancer patients: clinical significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio.

Neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) ratios might represent a yet unrecognized risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer out-patients receiving chemotherapy. Accordingly, this study was aimed at analyzing the significance of these novel markers in the risk prediction of a first VTE episode in a population representative of a general practice cohort. To this purpose, a mono-institutional cohort study was conducted to retrospectively analyze NLR and PLR in 810 consecutive cancer out-patients with primary or relapsing solid cancer at the start of a new chemotherapy regimen. Over a median follow-up of 9.2 months, VTE occurred in 6.7% of patients. Incidental VTE was diagnosed at time of restaging in 47% of cases. Median pre-chemotherapy NLR (p = 0.015) and PLR (p = 0.040) were significantly higher in patients with intermediate risk class who developed symptomatic VTE with a twofold increased VTE risk for both inflammation-based markers (NLR: p = 0.022; PLR: p = 0.037) and a worst 1-year VTE-free survival for patients with high NLR or PLR. However, only PLR (HR = 2.4, p = 0.027) confirmed to be an independent predictor of future VTE in patients in the intermediate risk class in multivariate analysis, together with ECOG performance status (HR = 3.4, p = 0.0002) and bevacizumab use (HR = 4.7, p = 0.012). We may, thus, conclude that PLR, but to a lesser extent NLR, could represent useful clinical predictors of VTE, especially in selected categories of patients such as those in the intermediate risk class in whom the assessment of PLR could allow a better risk stratification of VTE without additional costs to the national health systems.

Sexual dysfunctions in breast cancer patients: evidence in context.

INTRODUCTION: In breast cancer patients, endocrine therapy may exert a negative impact on sexual functioning in both genders, with potentially relevant consequences concerning quality of life and treatment adherence. The availability of effective interventions to maintain and/or restore sexual health in breast cancer patients is a key issue to a research agenda. OBJECTIVES: To summarize and critically discuss the most updated and qualitatively relevant literature on the therapeutic approach to sexual impairment in breast cancer patients, with a focus on patients treated with endocrine therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed from its inception to February 2022 for observational and intervention trials including participants with sexual dysfunctions. We were particularly interested in studies of breast cancer patients with sexual dysfunctions while undergoing endocrine therapy. We developed a search strategy with the aim of maximizing the number of articles considered for screening and potential inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were selected: 3 observational and 42 intervention studies. Thirty-five studies were exclusively focused on female breast cancer populations. We could not identify studies exclusively focused on or also including male breast cancer patients. Overall, in female patients, the available armamentarium encompasses vaginal lubricants, moisturizers, estrogens, dehydroepiandrosterone, CO2 laser, ospemifene, and counseling. None of these interventions has been demonstrated to completely solve sexual dysfunctions when singularly considered. More favorable outcomes have come from the combination of different therapies. CONCLUSION: In female breast cancer, future research is oriented toward the gain of evidence on combined therapies and long-term data on safety issues on the most promising interventions. The lack of evidence on sexual disturbances in male breast cancer patients remains a major concern.

Targeting metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: mechanisms of progression and novel early therapeutic approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in clinical research have led to official approval of several new treatments for metastatic prostate cancer in the last three years: sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, radium-223 and enzalutamide. Although these agents have all been shown to improve overall survival in randomized Phase III trials, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains incurable. AREAS COVERED: First, the review summarizes the current literature on the biology of mCRPC. The emerging data are increasing our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the pathogenesis of castrate resistance and where future treatment might be headed. In the second part of the review, the authors assess the future directions in disease therapy. Indeed, novel selected therapeutic approaches, including novel agents and combinatorial therapies, are showing promising early results. EXPERT OPINION: Targeting different molecular pathways in combination with immunotherapy can be a promising direction in metastatic castration prostate cancer treatment. However, several challenges still exist including elucidating the optimal use and sequencing of these new agents. There are also challenges in both the design and the interpretation of the results from clinical trials.

Increased risk of chemotherapy-associated venous thromboembolism in elderly patients with cancer.

Data on the relationship between aging, chemotherapy, and risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial. We sought to evaluate the risk of chemotherapy-associated VTE in young to middle-aged (YMA) and elderly cancer patients and to analyze the VTE-free survival time in both groups. Patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of solid malignancy receiving any type of systemic chemotherapy, no clinical diagnosis of VTE before chemotherapy initiation, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤2 were enrolled in this study. Of the 486 consecutive patients included in the study, 380 (78%) were classified as YMA (≤70 years of age) and 106 (22%) as elderly (>70 years of age). At a median follow-up of 1 year, the incidence of VTE events was almost two-fold greater in elderly than in YMA (11% vs. 6%). Age (≤70 years vs. >70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-5.06; p=0.020), ECOG-PS (HR, 6.54; 95% CI 3.10-13.8; p<0.0001), and platinum-based chemotherapy (HR, 2.46; 95% CI 1.06-5.69; p=0.035) were independent risk factors for VTE. In the elderly subset, a trend toward an increased risk of VTE in patients receiving a platinum-based chemotherapy when compared with a non-platinum-containing regimen was observed (15% vs. 9.1%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that elderly patients had a significantly shorter VTE-free survival time compared with younger cancer patients (log-rank test=2.0; p=0.045). Our study reports an increase incidence of VTE in elderly cancer patients treated with chemotherapy compared with the younger group, suggesting that aging is one of the most important risk factors for VTE. On the basis of the results of this study, we believe that a validated predictive model including age, ECOG-PS, and type of chemotherapy (platinum- vs. non-platinum containing regimen) would enable clinicians to target thromboprophylaxis to those patients considered to be at greatest risk.