RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Lifestyle interventions are recommended as the first-line treatment to control metabolic syndrome components and improve cardiometabolic risk factors. However, studies directly comparing the cardiometabolic effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) vs. the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) accompanied by salt restriction are currently lacking. Thus, with the present secondary analyses of a randomized trial, we aimed to assess the cardiometabolic effects of a 3-month intensive dietary intervention implementing salt restriction alone or on top of the DASH and MedDiet compared to no/minimal intervention in never drug-treated adults with high normal blood pressure (BP) or grade 1 hypertension. METHODS: We randomly assigned individuals to the control group (CG, n = 60), salt restriction group (SRG, n = 60), DASH diet with salt restriction group (DDG, n = 60), or MedDiet with salt restriction group (MDG, n = 60). RESULTS: According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the DDG and the MDG had lower odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) of metabolic syndrome [0.29 (0.12, 0.72), and 0.15 (0.06, 0.41), respectively] compared to the CG. Moreover, the MDG had lower odds of metabolic syndrome compared to the SRG and lower odds of elevated BP levels than the DDG and the SRG. Moreover, total and LDL-cholesterol, fasting glucose, HbA1c, and systolic/diastolic BP were reduced in all three intervention groups compared to the CG. CONCLUSION: On a background of salt restriction, the MedDiet was superior in BP reduction, but the DASH and MedDiet reduced the prevalence of metabolic syndrome to the same extent.
RESUMO
Background: Despite advances in the treatment of oncology patients, therapy-related side effects may lead to premature morbidity. Inflammatory activation that has been linked to cardiovascular disease is crucial for the pathogenesis of both Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the vascular effects of chemotherapy in patients with HL and NHL by positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG PET/CT) and to investigate interactions with systemic inflammation as assessed by circulating inflammatory markers. Methods: Between July 2015 and July 2019, 65 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 17.78 years) with confirmed diagnosis of either HL (n = 33) or NHL (n = 32) were prospectively studied. PET/CT imaging was performed at baseline, at an interim phase, and after first-line treatment. Aortic FDG uptake was assessed by measuring global aortic target-to-background ratio (GLA-TBR). Serum biomarkers interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1b were measured at each phase. Results: Patients with HL demonstrated significant reduction in aortic TBR after first-line treatment (median GLA-TBR baseline: 1.98, median GLA-TBR third scan: 1.75, median difference = -0.20, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.33, P = 0.006), which remained significant after adjustment for confounders (adj. R2 of model = 0.53). In contrast, patients with NHL did not demonstrate a significant aortic inflammation response (P = 0.306). Furthermore, patients with HL demonstrated a significant reduction in IL-6 (P = 0.048) and IL-1b (P = 0.045), whereas patients with NHL did not demonstrate significant reduction in IL-6 (P = 0.085) and IL-1b levels (P = 0.476). Conclusions: Aortic inflammation, as assessed by 18-FDG PET/CT, is reduced in HL patients after first-line treatment but not in NHL patients. These findings imply that different pathophysiological pathways and different therapies might affect the arterial bed in different ways for patients with lymphoma.