The course of fatigue after acute spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and course of fatigue following acute spinal cord injury (SCI) during rehabilitation and after discharge. SETTING: Tertiary spinal cord rehabilitation facility. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with traumatic SCI were assessed after admission to rehabilitation and followed until 6-months post discharge into the community. Fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (MFIS-SCI) at admission, discharge and 6 months after discharge. Clinically significant fatigue was defined as FSS scores ⩾4 or MFIS-SCI scores ⩾24.5. RESULTS: The mean (s.d.) age of our mainly male (78.8%) sample was 46.3 (17.8) years of age. Half had cervical and 61.6% had complete injuries. Mean (s.d.) FSS scores were 3.7 (1.6) at baseline, 3.4 (1.5) at discharge and 3.7 (1.7) post discharge. Mean (s.d.) MFIS-SCI scores were 24.4 (16.1) at baseline, 23.4 (16.3) at discharge and 27.8 (17.5) post discharge. Fatigue on the FSS was present in 51.9% at baseline, 38.3% at discharge and 48.1% post discharge. Fatigue on the MFIS-SCI was present in 44.2% at baseline, 44.7% at discharge and 51.9% post discharge. There was no relationship between fatigue and injury level or completeness. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue is common in SCI patients admitted to rehabilitation. Fatigue remained stable during rehabilitation and after discharge into the community. Clinicians should consider early screening for fatigue and interventions to reduce the consequences of fatigue in people with SCI. SPONSORSHIP: The British Columbia Medical Services Foundation funded our study.

An evaluation of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury: input from the international community.

STUDY DESIGN: Interactive workshops with a presurvey-postsurvey. OBJECTIVES: To describe a series of workshops held at international meetings to inform the spinal cord injury (SCI) community about the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) and to obtain feedback on both the workshop and the ISAFSCI assessment. SETTING: Three international conferences of SCI practitioners in Toronto, Las Vegas and Vancouver held between 2012 and 2013. METHODS: The workshops included an overview of the ISAFSCI, sharing experiences using it in clinical practice and interactive cases illustrating how to complete the scoring. A presurvey-postsurvey was administered to obtain feedback on the workshops and the ISAFSCI assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen participants completed the workshop surveys and 96% (109/114) completed both presurvey and postsurvey. Prior to the workshop, 41% (47/114) of those who had completed the survey reported assessing autonomic function in their practice, and of those, 53% (25/47) reported using the ISAFSCI. After the workshop, 74% (84/114) of participants reported that the case studies were helpful, and 57% (65/114) reported that they wanted to start or continue to use the ISAFSCI in their clinical practice. Suggestions for improving the ISAFSCI included providing further areas to consider when performing the assessment, addressing ambiguity of terms and reporting foreseeable implementation challenges. CONCLUSION: Results from this workshop suggest that more work is needed to inform the SCI community on the ISAFSCI assessment and to further clarify its language. Results from this study will inform future revisions to the ISAFSCI.

The relationship between fatigue and participation in spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional national survey. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between fatigue and community participation frequency and provide an adjusted model of the relationship including important covariates. SETTING: Canada; Community. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry Community Survey. We used multi-variable regression analyses with hierarchical backward elimination, including variable specification, interaction assessment and confounding assessment. Variables with statistically significant correlation with the primary-dependent variable (participation) were included for modeling. RESULTS: The crude model of association between fatigue and participation accounted for 7.2% of the variance in participation scores. The full model with all a priori selected variables accounted for 25.1% of variance in participation scores. The adjusted model, including the identified confounders (pain, depressive mood, comorbidities and level of injury), accounted for 21.1% of variance in participation scores. Depressive mood variables had the highest standardized beta coefficients, reflecting the largest contribution to this model. CONCLUSION: Fatigue has a statistically significant negative association with participation for individuals with spinal cord injury, when controlling for pain, depressive mood, comorbidities and level of injury. Multifaceted clinical interventions and research addressing fatigue, pain and depressive symptoms are warranted.

Medication use is associated with fatigue in a sample of community-living individuals who have a spinal cord injury: a chart review.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between medications known to cause fatigue in spinal cord injury (SCI) and fatigue severity and to describe the pattern of prescription of these medications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Medical charts of 136 individuals admitted to the GF Strong Outpatient SCI Program between December 2004 and May 2007 were reviewed. Data collected included information on medications, clinical and demographic characteristics and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) scores. Multiple linear regression techniques were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of the subjects had clinically relevant fatigue. As a group, the subjects were taking 147 different medications; 41/147 medications were identified as causing fatigue. The two most commonly prescribed categories of medications were antispasticity medications (75 subjects) and analgesic medications (61 subjects). Although several variables were found to contribute to the FSS scores including the use of fatigue-causing medications, the presence of pain (7.6% of variance) and the use of fatigue-causing analgesics (4.2% of variance) explained the most variance in the scores. CONCLUSION: Fatigue is prevalent in outpatients with SCI. Fatigue-causing medications contribute to a higher FSS score. Clinicians treating persons with SCI should be aware that fatigue is a common and significant problem. Clinicians should be aware that fatigue may be exacerbated by the use of medication and should enquire about the effects of medication on fatigue when assessing and prescribing new medications.

Use of prolonged standing for individuals with spinal cord injuries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prolonged standing in people with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) has the potential to affect a number of health-related areas such as reflex activity, joint range of motion, or well-being. The purpose of this study was to document the patterns of use of prolonged standing and their perceived effects in subjects with SCIs. SUBJECTS: The subjects were 152 adults with SCIs (103 male, 49 female; mean age=34 years, SD=8, range=18-55) who returned mailed survey questionnaires. METHODS: A 17-item self-report survey questionnaire was sent to the 463 members of a provincial spinal cord support organization. RESULTS: Survey responses for 26 of the 152 respondents were eliminated from the analysis because they had minimal effects from their injuries and did not need prolonged standing as an extra activity. Of the 126 remaining respondents, 38 respondents (30%) reported that they engaged in prolonged standing for an average of 40 minutes per session, 3 to 4 times a week, as a method to improve or maintain their health. The perceived benefits included improvements in several health-related areas such as well-being, circulation, skin integrity, reflex activity, bowel and bladder function, digestion, sleep, pain, and fatigue. The most common reason that prevented the respondents from standing was the cost of equipment to enable standing. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Considering the many reported benefits of standing, this activity may be useful for people with SCI. This study identified a number of body systems and functions that may need to be investigated if clinical trials of prolonged standing in people with SCI are undertaken.

Measurement properties of the CESD scale among individuals with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common after spinal cord injury (SCI), yet it can be difficult and costly to diagnose. Screening tools such as the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD) can assist with case identification; however, insufficient knowledge of their measurement properties exists to use them in the SCI population. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability and validity of the CESD-20 and the CESD-10. SETTING: Tertiary care centre in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: A 2-week retest study of 47 individuals with traumatic SCI. Subjects >or=19, who had their SCI for >or=1 year and had American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale ranking of A or B. Short Form-36 (SF-36) subscales and a visual analogue scale for fatigue (VAS-F) were used to assess validity using Pearson's correlations coefficients. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. Normative data are presented based on key demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 and 0.86 and retest reliability was ICC=0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.93) and ICC=0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.92) for the CESD-20 and CESD-10, respectively. Minimal bias was evident based on the Bland-Altman plots. The strongest correlations were with outcomes representing mental health (r=-0.71), vitality (r=-0.60) and the VAS-F (r=0.57). The weakest correlation was with the physical function score of the SF-36 (r=-0.37). CONCLUSION: The CESD-20 and CESD-10 are quick and easy to use. This study provides evidence in support of the reliability and validity.

Orthostatic hypotension in the first month following acute spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. OBJECTIVES: To determine prevalence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) during the acute rehabilitation period. SETTING: Quaternary care spinal unit, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with acute SCI stratified by neurological level (cervical, 55 (62%); upper thoracic, 12 (13%); lower thoracic, 22 (25%)), and graded by American Spinal Injury Association standards. Non-invasive measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were made at baseline and 3 min following an orthostatic challenge test administered during the first month after SCI. RESULTS: Patients with cervical or upper thoracic motor complete SCI more frequently experienced OH (P<0.01). OH persisted during the first month following SCI in 74% of cervical and only 20% of upper thoracic motor complete SCI patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with cervical and upper thoracic motor complete SCI are more likely to experience persistent OH than those with lower level or motor incomplete SCI during the first month of rehabilitation.

Clinical correlates of fatigue in spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of fatigue in an outpatient spinal cord injury population and to examine the clinical variables contributing to that fatigue. SETTING: GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Medical charts of 76 individuals admitted to the GF Strong Outpatient SCI Program between December 2004 and December 2005 were reviewed. Data collected included information on clinical characteristics, demographics and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) scores. Multivariable analysis was completed to determine the independent association between these variables and fatigue severity. RESULTS: A total of 57% (95% confidence interval (CI)=45-67%) of the sample were found to have fatigue severe enough to interfere with function. People that were admitted for medical reasons; had pain, spasticity, incomplete injuries, and/or were on more that one medication with a known side effect of fatigue had significantly higher FSS scores. Multivariable analysis indicated incomplete injury was the only statistically significant predictor of a higher FSS scores; pain approached significance (P=0.07, CI=-0.09, 2.06). Together these variables account for 18% of the variance in FSS scores in this sample. CONCLUSION: Fatigue among individuals with spinal cord injury who are seeking outpatient rehabilitation is very common. The severity of fatigue was greater for individuals with incomplete lesions. Pain was also a potentially important covariate of fatigue. Further research is required to determine what else contributes to fatigue severity beyond these clinical variables as only minimal variance was accounted for in our model.

Cross-cultural differences in preference for recovery of mobility among spinal cord injury rehabilitation professionals.

STUDY DESIGN: Direct observation of a constrained consensus-building process in three culturally independent five-person panels of rehabilitation professionals from the US, Italy and Canada. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate cultural differences in belief among rehabilitation professionals about the relative importance of alternative functional goals during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Spinal Cord Injury Units in Philadelphia-USA, Rome-Italy and Vancouver-Canada. METHODS: Each of the three panels came to independent consensus about recovery priorities in SCI utilizing the features resource trade-off game. The procedure involves trading imagined levels of independence (resources) across different functional items (features) assuming different stages of recovery. RESULTS: Sphincter management was of primary importance to all three groups. The Italian and Canadian rehabilitation professionals, however, showed preference for walking over wheelchair mobility at lower stages of assumed recovery, whereas the US professionals set wheelchair independence at a higher priority than walking. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest cross-cultural recovery priority differences among SCI rehabilitation professionals. These dissimilarities in preference may reflect disparities in values, cultural expectations and health care policies.