Clazakizumab for desensitization in highly sensitized patients awaiting transplantation.

Alloantibodies are a significant barrier to successful transplantation. While desensitization has emerged, efficacy is limited. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of inflammation and immune cell activation. Persistent IL-6 production increases the risk for alloantibody production. Here we report our experience with clazakizumab (anti-IL-6) for desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients (HS). From March 2018 to September 2020, 20 HS patients were enrolled in an open label pilot study to assess safety and limited efficacy of clazakizumab desensitization. Patients received PLEX, IVIg, and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly X6. If transplanted, graft function, pathology, HLA antibodies and regulatory immune cells were monitored. Transplanted patients received standard immunosuppression and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly posttransplant. Clazakizumab was well tolerated and associated with significant reductions in class I and class II antibodies allowing 18 of 20 patients to receive transplants with no DSA rebound in most. Significant increases in Treg and Breg cells were seen posttransplant. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in three patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was 58 ± 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 . Clazakizumab was generally safe and associated with significant reductions in HLA alloantibodies and high transplant rates for highly-sensitized patients. However, confirmation of efficacy for desensitization requires assessment in randomized controlled trials.

Viral-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant patients maintained on everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance with "everolimus + reduced dose tacrolimus" (Ev + Taclow ) was reported to reduce the risk of viral infections compared to "tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil" (Tac + MMF). Here we examined viremia and viral-specific T-cell (viral-Tc) responses in patients treated with Ev + Taclow versus Tac + MMF in highly-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized patients. METHODS: HLA-sensitized (HS) kidney transplant patients were monitored pre- and post-transplant for viremia (cytomegalovirus (CMV), BK, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 19 Ev + Taclow and 48 Tac + MMF patients. For CMV PCR analysis, we compared infection rates in 19 Ev + Taclow patients to 48 CMV D+/R- (#28) or CMV D-/R- (#20) Tac + MMF patients. CMV-specific cytotoxic T cell (CMV-Tc) and EBV-specific cytotoxic T cell (EBV-Tc) were evaluated by cytokine flow cytometry, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels by Luminex for selected patients in both groups. RESULTS: CMV and EBV viremia rates were similar in Ev + Taclow versus Tac + MMF patients, but BK virus (BKV) rates were significantly higher in Ev + Taclow patients. No patient in either group developed BK virus-associated allograft nephropathy (BKAN) or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). CMV-Tc and EBV-Tc decreased significantly after alemtuzumab induction but returned to pre-treatment levels 1-2 months post-transplant in most patients. de novo DSA was similar in both groups as were patient and graft survival and graft rejection. CONCLUSIONS: CMV-Tc and EBV-Tc were similar in Ev + Taclow and Tac + MMF patients. EBV and CMV viremia rates were similar over 1 year. BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Taclow patients suggesting no benefit for Ev + Taclow in enhancing viral-Tc effector functions or limiting viral infections.

Development of CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells (CMV-Tc) in pediatric renal transplant recipients with CMV viremia.

BACKGROUND: Viral infections are controlled primarily by viral-specific T cells, raising concern for adequate T-cell response to clear CMV infection in transplant recipients receiving lymphocyte-depleting agents (LDA). We examined the rates of CMV viremia and clearance, seroconversion, and CMV-specific CD8+ T cell (CMV-Tc) activity with class of induction agent received. METHODS: Retrospective review of 45 pediatric renal transplant recipients who received induction with LDA (n = 31) or non-LDA (NLDA; n = 14) received valganciclovir prophylaxis for 6 months post-transplant and CMV-PCR monitoring. CMV-Tc was measured by intracellular IFNγ flow cytometry, when possible, at baseline, 1 month after CMV viremia (>5 copies/PCR) and serially until CMV-Tc was positive (≥0.2%). RESULTS: Viremia rates at 1, 2, and 4 years post-transplant were higher in LDA vs. NLDA (46.3% vs. 7.2%, 64.2% vs. 7.2%, and 64.2% vs. 7.2%, respectively; p = .002). Viremia rates at these time points in seronegative LDA (50.3%, 71.6%, 71.6%) were significantly or near significantly higher than seronegative NLDA (9.1%, 9.1%, 9.1%; p = .004), seropositive-LDA (22.3%, 22.3%, 22.3%; p = .07), or seropositive NLDA (0%, 0%, 0%; p = .07). Eleven of 17 (64.7%) viremic subjects required valganciclovir dose reduction during the prophylaxis period for leukopenia. All viremic LDA patients developed CMV-Tc. One viremic NLDA patient did not develop CMV-Tc. No patients developed CMV disease. CONCLUSION: CMV seronegative pediatric renal transplant patients receiving LDA are more likely to have valganciclovir prophylaxis dose reduction and develop subclinical CMV viremia; however, all developed CMV-Tc. Larger prospective studies are needed to further understand the effects of induction agents on CMV-Tc and CMV-Tc's role post-transplant.

Use of Rituximab for persistent EBV DNAemia, and Its effect on donor-specific antibody development in pediatric renal transplant recipients: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent EBV DNAemia (PEBV) is associated with late-onset PTLD. The efficacy of rituximab in PEBV is not conclusive. We monitored PEBV and DSA in pediatric kidney transplant patients with or without rituximab. METHODS: 13 PEBV patients received standard treatment with immunosuppression reduction and valganciclovir, with or without IVIG; 5/13 were further treated with rituximab. RESULTS: All Rituximab-treated and 6/7 No-Rituximab patients were EBV seronegative at transplant and seroconverted post-transplant. Peak EBV PCR levels were lower in No-Rituximab than Rituximab patients and all No-Rituximab patients cleared PEBV after standard treatment. Additional 1-2 doses of rituximab reduced EBV PCR levels in all 5 Rituximab patients, 3 cleared PEBV. One No-Rituximab patient developed localized PLTD. None of Rituximab patients developed de novo DSA, while 4/8 No-Rituximab patients did: 2/4 had ABMR. 1/5 Rituximab and 5/8 No-Rituximab patients had acute rejection. There was no change in eGFR between pre-EBV DNAemia and follow-up in Rituximab patients, while reduction in No-Rituximab patients was found. There was no difference in graft and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: While early intervention with rituximab in pediatric patients with PEBV may reduce viral load and PTLD, we observed a slower development of de novo DSA, and rejection and maintenance of eGFR.

Compassionate Use of Tocilizumab for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia patients indicate that a cytokine storm may increase morbidity and mortality. Tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of cytokine storm associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Here we examined compassionate use of tocilizumab in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. METHODS: We report on a single-center study of tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. All patients had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and oxygen saturations <90% on oxygen support with most intubated. We examined clinical and laboratory parameters including oxygen and vasopressor requirements, cytokine profiles, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels pre- and post-tocilizumab treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients received one 400 mg dose of tocilizumab. Interleukin (IL)-6 was the predominant cytokine detected at tocilizumab treatment. Significant reductions in temperature and CRP were seen post-tocilizumab. However, 4 patients did not show rapid CRP declines, of whom 3 had poorer outcomes. Oxygen and vasopressor requirements diminished over the first week post-tocilizumab. Twenty-two patients required mechanical ventilation; at last follow-up, 16 were extubated. Adverse events and serious adverse events were minimal, but 2 deaths (7.4%) occurred that were felt unrelated to tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to published reports on the morbidity and mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2, tocilizumab appears to offer benefits in reducing inflammation, oxygen requirements, vasopressor support, and mortality. The rationale for tocilizumab treatment is supported by detection of IL-6 in pathogenic levels in all patients. Additional doses of tocilizumab may be needed for those showing slow declines in CRP. Proof of efficacy awaits randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

The role of novel therapeutic approaches for prevention of allosensitization and antibody-mediated rejection.

Modification of pathogenic antibodies and their effector functions in autoimmune diseases or use of B cell/plasma cell-directed anticancer therapies have illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells, plasma cells (PCs), and pathogenic antibodies and complement in alloimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation, and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines that drive dysfunctional immune responses. Current methods to reduce alloantibodies are only modestly successful. Rituximab is used for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) treatment by targeting CD20 found on B-lymphocytes. However, PCs do not express CD20, likely explaining the limited success of this approach. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis (PLEX) have limited success due to antibody rebound. Despite attempts to develop tolerable therapeutics for management of AMR, none, to date, have been universally accepted or obtained Food and Drug Administration approval. Lack of approved therapeutics often results in patients having a much shorter graft survival due to AMR. Repurposing drugs from autoimmunity and cancer immunotherapy has rapidly yielded important advancements in the care of AMR patients. Here we discuss emerging therapeutics aimed at prevention and treatment of AMR.

IgG Endopeptidase in Highly Sensitized Patients Undergoing Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies create an immunologic barrier to transplantation. Current therapies to modify donor-specific antibodies are limited and ineffective in the most highly HLA-sensitized patients. The IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (IdeS), an endopeptidase, cleaves human IgG into F(ab')2 and Fc fragments inhibiting complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, which suggests that IdeS might be useful for desensitization. We report on the combined experience of two independently performed open-label, phase 1-2 trials (conducted in Sweden and the United States) that assessed the efficacy of IdeS with regard to desensitization and transplantation of a kidney from an HLA-incompatible donor. METHODS: We administered IdeS to 25 highly HLA-sensitized patients (11 patients in Uppsala or Stockholm, Sweden, and 14 in Los Angeles) before the transplantation of a kidney from an HLA-incompatible donor. Frequent monitoring for adverse events, outcomes, donor-specific antibodies, and renal function was performed, as were renal biopsies. Immunosuppression after transplantation consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and glucocorticoids. Patients in the U.S. study also received intravenous immune globulin and rituximab after transplantation to prevent antibody rebound. RESULTS: Recipients in the U.S. study had a significantly longer cold ischemia time (the time elapsed between procurement of the organ and transplantation), a significantly higher rate of delayed graft function, and significantly higher levels of class I donor-specific antibodies than those in the Swedish study. A total of 38 serious adverse events occurred in 15 patients (5 events were adjudicated as being possibly related to IdeS). At transplantation, total IgG and HLA antibodies were eliminated. A total of 24 of 25 patients had perfusion of allografts after transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 10 patients (7 patients in the U.S. study and 3 in the Swedish study) at 2 weeks to 5 months after transplantation; all these patients had a response to treatment. One graft loss, mediated by non-HLA IgM and IgA antibodies, occurred. CONCLUSIONS: IdeS reduced or eliminated donor-specific antibodies and permitted HLA-incompatible transplantation in 24 of 25 patients. (Funded by Hansa Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02224820 , NCT02426684 , and NCT02475551 .).

Evaluation of Clazakizumab (Anti-Interleukin-6) in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts.

Introduction: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of inflammation and activation of T cells, B cells, and plasma cells. Excessive IL-6 production is linked to human diseases characterized by unregulated antibody production, including alloimmunity, where persistence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR), and graft loss are noted. Here, we report our experience investigating clazakizumab, a novel IL-6 inhibitor, in treating human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized patients with cAMR. Methods: Between February 2018 and January 2019, 10 adults with biopsy-proven cAMR were enrolled in a phase 2, single-center, open-label study. Patients received clazakizumab 25 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) monthly for 12 months, with a 6-month protocol biopsy. Primary end points included patient survival, graft survival, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and safety. Secondary end points assessed immune markers (DSAs, IgG, T-regulatory [Treg] cells). At 12 months, stable patients entered a long-term extension (LTE). Results: LTE patients received clazakizumab for >2.5 years. Mean eGFRs showed significant declines from -24 months to study initiation (0 months) (52.8 ± 14.6 to 38.11 ± 12.23 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.03). However, after initiation of clazakizumab, eGFR stabilized at (41.6 ± 14.2 and 38.1 ± 20.3 ml/min per 1.73 m2, at 12 and 24 months, respectively). Banff 2017 analysis of pre- and post-treatment biopsies showed reductions in g+ptc and C4d scores. DSA reductions were seen in most patients. Adverse events (AEs) were minimal, and 2 graft losses occurred, both in patients who discontinued clazakizumab therapy at 6 months and 12 months after study initiation. Conclusion: In this small cohort of patients with cAMR, clazakizumab treatment showed a trend toward stabilization of eGFR and reductions in DSA and graft inflammation. No significant safety issues were observed. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (IMAGINE) of clazakizumab in cAMR treatment is underway (NCT03744910).

Rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for desensitization during renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Few options for transplantation currently exist for patients highly sensitized to HLA. This exploratory, open-label, phase 1-2, single-center study examined whether intravenous immune globulin plus rituximab could reduce anti-HLA antibody levels and improve transplantation rates. METHODS: Between September 2005 and May 2007, a total of 20 highly sensitized patients (with a mean [+/-SD] T-cell panel-reactive antibody level, determined by use of the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay, of 77+/-19% or with donor-specific antibodies) were enrolled and received treatment with intravenous immune globulin and rituximab. We recorded rates of transplantation, panel-reactive antibody levels, cross-matching results at the time of transplantation, survival of patients and grafts, acute rejection episodes, serum creatinine values, adverse events and serious adverse events, and immunologic factors. RESULTS: The mean panel-reactive antibody level was 44+/-30% after the second infusion of intravenous immune globulin (P<0.001 for the comparison with the pretreatment level). At study entry, the mean time on dialysis among recipients of a transplant from a deceased donor was 144+/-89 months (range, 60 to 324). However, the time to transplantation after desensitization was 5+/-6 months (range, 2 to 18). Sixteen of the 20 patients (80%) received a transplant. At 12 months, the mean serum creatinine level was 1.5+/-1.1 mg per deciliter (133+/-97 micromol per liter), and the mean survival rates of patients and grafts were 100% and 94%, respectively. There were no infusion-related adverse events or serious adverse events during the study. Long-term monitoring for infectious complications and neurologic problems revealed no unanticipated events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the combination of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab may prove effective as a desensitization regimen for patients awaiting a transplant from either a living donor or a deceased donor. Larger and longer trials are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this approach. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00642655.)

B-cell immunotherapeutics: emerging roles in solid organ transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The introduction of B-cell-directed therapies for autoimmune diseases illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells in mediation of autoimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines. These advances clearly have implications for patients receiving solid organ transplants, especially those who are ABO incompatible, sensitized to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) pretransplant, or develop anti-HLA antibodies posttransplant. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we will review the current and evolving agents developed for B-cell depletion or modulation and discuss their potential for modification of alloimmunity in transplant recipients. We will focus on data from humans and animal models in which B cells and antibodies are targeted to reduce inflammation in transplantation. This will include a review of the immunomodulatory drug intravenous immunoglobulin, anti-CD20 (rituximab) where more clinical experience has been reported. Finally, we will discuss emerging B-cell-directed therapies which include those directed at the B-cell activating factor of the tumor necrosis family/A proliferation inducing ligand, anti-CD22, newer anti-CD20 monoclonals and antibodies to the interleukin 6 receptor (tocilizumab). SUMMARY: The primary objective of this review is to define the critical role of B cells in development of alloimmunity and how this can be modified by B-cell-directed therapies.

Development of a real-time quantitative PCR assay for detection of a stable genomic region of BK virus.

BACKGROUND: BK virus infections can have clinically significant consequences in immunocompromised individuals. Detection and monitoring of active BK virus infections in certain situations is recommended and therefore PCR assays for detection of BK virus have been developed. The performance of current BK PCR detection assays is limited by the existence of viral polymorphisms, unknown at the time of assay development, resulting in inconsistent detection of BK virus. The objective of this study was to identify a stable region of the BK viral genome for detection by PCR that would be minimally affected by polymorphisms as more sequence data for BK virus becomes available. RESULTS: Employing a combination of techniques, including amino acid and DNA sequence alignment and interspecies analysis, a conserved, stable PCR target region of the BK viral genomic region was identified within the VP2 gene. A real-time quantitative PCR assay was then developed that is specific for BK virus, has an analytical sensitivity of 15 copies/reaction (450 copies/ml) and is highly reproducible (CV ≤ 5.0%). CONCLUSION: Identifying stable PCR target regions when limited DNA sequence data is available may be possible by combining multiple analysis techniques to elucidate potential functional constraints on genomic regions. Applying this approach to the development of a real-time quantitative PCR assay for BK virus resulted in an accurate method with potential clinical applications and advantages over existing BK assays.

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG+rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP)+low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).

Imlifidase Inhibits HLA Antibody-mediated NK Cell Activation and Antibody-dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) In Vitro.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is an important pathway responsible for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Imlifidase (IdeS) cleaves human IgG into F(ab')2 and Fc fragments, potentially inhibiting ADCC. Here we examined the effect of IdeS on allo-antibody-mediated NK cell activation (Allo-CFC) and ADCC in vitro. METHODS: For Allo-CFC, normal whole blood was incubated with third-party peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pretreated with anti-HLA antibody positive (HS) or negative (NC) sera to measure IFNγ+ NK cell%. For ADCC, normal PBMCs were incubated with Farage B (FB) cells with HS or NC sera to measure 7-AAD+ lysed FB cell%. To assess the effect of IdeS on these assays, serum-treated PBMCs (Allo-CFC-1) and serum used for PBMC pretreatment (Allo-CFC-2) in Allo-CFC, and serum used for ADCC were preincubated with IdeS. Sera from IdeS-treated patients were also tested for Allo-CFC (Allo-CFC-3). RESULTS: IFNγ+ NK cell% were significantly elevated in HS versus NC sera in Allo-CFC-1 (10 ± 3% versus 2 ± 1%, P = 0.001), Allo-CFC-2 (20 ± 10% versus 4 ± 2%, P = 0.01) and 7AAD+ FB cell% (11 ± 3% versus 4 ± 2%, P = 0.02) in ADCC. These were significantly reduced by IdeS treatment. Patient sera with significantly reduced anti-HLA antibody levels at 1 day postimlifidase lost the capacity to activate NK cells in Allo-CFC-3, but those at 1-3 months postimlifidase regained the capacity. CONCLUSIONS: IdeS inhibited NK cell activation and ADCC in vitro and in treated patients. These results and reported inhibition of complement activating anti-HLA antibodies by IdeS suggest its possible role in treatment of AMR.

Interleukin-6: An Important Mediator of Allograft Injury.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine with critical innate and adaptive immunity functions. Its diverse immunological and physiological actions include direction of immune cell differentiation, initial response to invading pathogens and ischemic injury, sustained plasma cell growth, and immunoglobulin production. IL-6 transcriptional dysregulation is commonly seen in patients with autoimmune or inflammatory disorders. Emerging information suggests that IL-6 transcription is upregulated in patients with kidney and heart transplant rejection and may account for perpetuation of inflammatory responses in the allograft, leading to allograft rejection and vasculopathy. IL-6-directed therapeutics include monoclonal antibodies directed at IL-6, the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), and Janus kinase inhibitors. IL-6-mediated signaling to cell targets is unique, involving classic signaling (IL-6->IL-6R) cell membrane receptors, transsignaling (IL-6->soluble IL-6R->gp130) which activates any cell, and the recently discovered IL-6/IL-6R transpresentation in which antigen-presenting cells synthesize and express IL-6/IL-6R complexes, which are transported through the cell membrane subsequently interacting with gp130 to costimulate T cells. Currently, there are new trials in autoimmunity and heart and kidney transplantation to determine effectiveness of inhibiting IL-6/IL-6R to ameliorate chronic allograft rejection and coronary allograft vasculopathy. Therapeutic trials aimed at prevention of ischemia/reperfusion injury to allografts based on animal data should be considered.

Impact of Tocilizumab (Anti-IL-6R) Treatment on Immunoglobulins and Anti-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Patients With Chronic Antibody-mediated Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) results in the majority of renal allograft losses. Currently, there are no approved therapies. We recently reported on clinical use of tocilizumab (TCZ) for treatment of cAMR in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant patients. IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses of IgG are potent effectors of complement- and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, which are critical mediators of AMR. Here, we examined the impact of TCZ treatment for cAMR on total IgG, IgG1-4 subclasses, and anti-HLA-IgG (total and subclasses). METHODS: Archived plasma obtained pre- and post-TCZ treatment (8 mg/kg, 6×, monthly) from 12 cAMR patients who failed standard of care treatment with intravenous immune globulin + rituximab with or without plasma exchange were tested for total IgG and IgG1-4 by ELISA, anti-HLA-total IgG, IgG3 and IgG4, and donor-specific antibody by Luminex assay. Archived plasma from 14 cAMR patients treated with the standard of care were included as controls. RESULTS: Total IgG and IgG1-3 were significantly reduced post-TCZ, whereas no reduction was seen post-treatment in the control group. Of 11 patients, 8 (73%) showed reduction of anti-HLA-total IgG and IgG3 post-TCZ, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ reduced total IgG and IgG1-3 and anti-HLA-total IgG and IgG3 levels, suggesting that TCZ suppresses Ig production in B cells nonspecifically, likely through inhibition of interleukin 6-mediated signaling to B cells and plasma cells. This may be a contributing factor for the beneficial effect of TCZ on cAMR observed in this patient population.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Allosensitization and Antibody-mediated Rejection.

Modification of pathogenic antibodies for autoimmune diseases illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells, plasma cells, and pathogenic antibodies in autoimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation, and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines. Repurposing these drugs from autoimmunity and cancer immunotherapy has yielded important advancements in the care of antibody-mediated rejection patients and novel drug development aimed at HLA desensitization have recently emerged. We now stand on an important threshold that promises many advances in the care of our allosensitized patients. We hope that these initial advances will encourage basic scientist, clinical investigators, industry, National Institutes of Health, our academic societies, and the Food and Drug Administration to continue support of these important objectives. These advances clearly have implications for sensitized patients receiving solid organ transplants and antibody-mediated rejection treatment. Modification of alloimmunity and alloantibodies will also have relevance to xenotransplantation where the xenoantibodies present a formidable obstacle to advancement of this important therapy. Working together, we can advance transplant therapeutics where biologic agents are likely to play novel and important roles. Here, we discuss novel drugs emerging in this area.

Anti-CD20 antibody suppresses anti-HLA antibody formation in a HLA-A2 transgenic mouse model of sensitization.

BACKGROUND: B cell depletion by anti-CD20 antibody is used in desensitization protocols and for treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, little is known about the efficacy and the mechanism(s) of action. METHODS: A mouse model of HLA sensitization was used to study the effectiveness of anti-CD20 treatment on B cell depletion and anti-HLA antibody suppression. RESULTS: Immunization of C57BL/6 mice with skin grafts from a transgenic C57BL.Tg/HLA-A2.1 mouse resulted in robust production of anti-HLA IgM and IgG antibodies, and accelerated rejection of a secondary skin allograft (within 3 days) featured by intragraft IgG and C4d deposition. Both IgM and IgG alloantibodies are specific to HLA-A2 as well as to a panel of class I HLA, including A1, A3, A25, A26, A29, and A30. These alloantibodies were complement-dependently cytotoxic (CDC) against HLA-A2 expressing target cells. Administration of 2 doses of a mouse-anti-mouse CD20 monoclonal antibody significantly reduced the levels of anti-HLA IgG2a antibodies, suppressed serum CDC, and prolonged survival of the secondary skin allografts. Suppression of anti-HLA IgG antibodies was associated with significant depletion of B220(+)/CD5(-) B cells from the blood, the spleen and the bone marrow of the treated animals. CONCLUSION: Anti-CD20 treatment effectively depletes B220(+)/CD5(-) B cells, resulting in potent suppression of anti-HLA IgG and prolongation of skin graft survival. The data are in support for the use of anti-CD20 antibodies in highly-HLA sensitized patients undergoing desensitization and for the treatment of AMR.

Clinical significance of peripheral blood Epstein-Barr viral load monitoring using polymerase chain reaction in renal transplant recipients.

PTLD is a complication of EBV infection. We examined the efficacy of EBV-PCR monitoring to detect early replication in an attempt to prevent EBV-associated PTLD. Blood EBV levels in 156 renal transplant recipients (58 children) from three institutions over nine yr were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were asymptomatic and at high risk for PTLD were monitored for EBV infection by PCR or serology followed by PCR at the time of EBV seropositivity. More children than adults had positive EBV-PCR (12/58 vs. 2/98, p < 0.001). Adults remained asymptomatic and viremia resolved post-therapy. 3/12 EBV-PCR positive children developed PTLD (3/12 children vs. 0/2 adults, p = NS). Two out of three with PTLD were initially monitored by serology, and later by PCR. PTLD resolved post-therapy in all three patients. The remaining 9/12 EBV-PCR positive children stayed asymptomatic. None of the children and adults with negative EBV-PCR developed PTLD. EBV-PCR monitoring in high-risk renal transplant recipients, especially in children, may allow early diagnosis and intervention, and therefore may help in preventing EBV-associated PTLD.

Outcome of management strategies for BK virus replication in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Management of BKV infection is not well defined. Eighteen pediatric renal transplant patients with BKV-PCR (+) were divided into three groups; Group 1: Viruria only (6), Group 2: Viremia with stable GFR (4), Group 3: Viremia with >25% decline in GFR and BKVAN on biopsy (8). With initial BKV-PCR(+), Group 1 received no treatment; Group 2 had MMF reduced 30%; Group 3: 6/8 had CNI discontinuation, 2/8 had reduced MMF and cidofovir. BKV, GFR and histology were compared pre- and post-treatment. In Group 1 viruria decreased in all patients; GFR remained stable. Group 2 showed reduced viremia with no GFR change. Group 3 showed reduced viremia in 8/8 patients. Patients with >50% decline in GFR from baseline (6/8) showed worse histology: 2/6 lost grafts despite no BKV on follow-up biopsy. Our results show that with viruria alone no treatment is necessary; with viremia and stable GFR, reduced immunosuppression decreases viremia and maintains GFR. With viremia and reduced GFR, immunosuppression reduction with or without cidofovir decreases viremia and stabilizes GFR in most patients. Greater than 50% reduction in GFR at BKVAN diagnosis correlates with risk for graft loss. Serial monitoring of BKV viremia with early intervention may prevent BKVAN graft loss in children.

Tocilizumab (Anti-IL-6R) Suppressed TNFα Production by Human Monocytes in an In Vitro Model of Anti-HLA Antibody-Induced Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that natural killer (NK) cells activated via FcγRIIIa (CD16) interactions with anti-HLA antibodies binding to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the in vitro antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay produced IFNγ. Here we investigate if other CD16 bearing cells are responsive to alloantigen via alloantibody in the in vitro ADCC and if the ADCC-induced cytokine reactions and cytotoxicity can be modified by the anti-interleukin 6 receptor (IL-6R) monoclonal antibody, Tocilizumab (TCZ). METHODS: Whole blood from a normal individual was incubated overnight with irradiated allo-PBMCs pretreated with anti-HLA antibody positive (in vitro ADCC) or negative sera (mixed lymphocyte reaction [MLR]), with or without TCZ or control IgG. IFNγ+, TNFα+ or IL-6+ cell% in NK cells, monocytes and CD8+ T cells were enumerated by cytokine flow cytometry. ADCC using PBMCs (effector) and Farage B cells (FB, target) with anti-HLA antibody positive sera, with or without TCZ, was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: IFNγ+ and/or TNFα+ cell% in NK cells, monocytes and CD8+ T cells were elevated in the ADCC compared to the MLR condition. IL-6+ cells were significantly increased in ADCC versus MLR (10.2 ± 4.8% vs 2.7 ± 1.5%, P = 0.0003), but only in monocytes. TCZ treatment significantly reduced TNFα+ cell% in monocytes in ADCC, but had no effect on other cytokine+ cells. TCZ showed no effect on cytotoxicity in ADCC. CONCLUSIONS: IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-6 production induced by HLA antibody-mediated CD16 bearing cell activation in NK cells, monocytes, and CD8+ T cells suggests a potential role for ADCC and these inflammatory cytokines in mediation of antibody-mediated rejection. TCZ suppressed TNFα production in monocytes in the ADCC condition, suggesting a role of IL-6/IL-6R pathway in monocytes activation. Inhibition of this pathway could reduce the inflammatory cascade induced by alloantibody, although the inhibitory effect on cytotoxicity is minimal.