Effectiveness of Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in managing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by non-physicians.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The role of supraglottic devices in airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of intubation through the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) when used by prehospital emergency nurses in the setting of OHCA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational trial during 12 years by the Fire Department and prehospital emergency service of the health district of Strasbourg, France. The primary outcome was the success rate of ventilation after intubation through the ILMA, while the secondary outcomes were the success rate of ventilation after insertion of the ILMA and complications related to ILMA placement and intubation. Factors associated with successful intubation were also studied. RESULTS: During the study period, 1464 ILMA placements were attempted by emergency nurses during OHCA. Ventilation was possible in 1250 patients (85.38%) after ILMA placement and in 1078 patients (73.63%) after intubation. Regurgitation of gastric contents occurred in 237 (16.18%) patients, mostly during basic life support. Two factors were predictive of a successful tracheal intubation: the performance of the Chandy maneuver OR = 2.91 (CI: 2.07-3.97) and the number of attempts at intubation OR = 1.95 (CI: 1.43-2.61). Conversely, the number of attempts at ILMA insertion was predictive of an intubation failure OR = 0.11 (CI: 0.07-0.17). CONCLUSION: The success rate of intubation through the ILMA was high. After ILMA placement, ventilation was possible in 1250 patients (85.38%) and in 1078 patients (73.63%) after intubation.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors sent for emergency angiography: a clinical score for predicting acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health issue. Emergency coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention might improve survival, especially when cardiac arrest is caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, identifying patients with AMI after OHCA remains challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and ECG criteria in OHCA that may help to identify better the patients with AMI. METHODS: Consecutive OHCA patients who underwent emergency coronary angiography in our centre between 2009 and 2013 were included in this retrospective single-centre observational study. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients with complete datasets were included. Significant coronary artery disease was found in 71% of the patients, and 43% presented with AMI. The independent predictors of AMI were ST elevation in any lead including aVR (odds ratio (OR) 18.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6-49.38), chest pain before cardiac arrest (OR 4.05; 95% CI 1.55-10.54) and an initial shockable rhythm (OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.34-6.45). An additive score that included these three predictors yielded a sensitivity and a specificity for detecting AMI of 93% and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that fewer than half of patients with OHCA undergoing emergency coronary angiography present with AMI. The identification of OHCA patients with AMI might be improved by a simple score using post-resuscitation ECG and simple clinical criteria.

Intubating laryngeal mask airway placement by non-physician healthcare providers in management out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a case series.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The role of supralaryngeal devices in airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) remains controversial. The aim of this prospective observational trial was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) when used by trained prehospital emergency nurses in the setting of OHCA. METHODS: After approval from the Research Ethics Board, prehospital emergency nurses trained in placement of ILMA (Fastrach™, LMA Vitaid, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) followed a formal protocol for airway control during OHCA. The primary outcome was the success rate of ILMA placement, while secondary outcomes were success rate of tracheal intubation through the ILMA, and the incidence of regurgitation of gastric contents. RESULTS: During the study period, 302 ILMA placements were attempted by emergency nurses during OHCA resuscitation. After ILMA placement, but before attempt for intubation, ventilation was possible in 290 patients (96%). Obstruction or major leaks were observed in 12 patients (4%). Tracheal tube insertion through the ILMA was attempted in 265 patients, and was performed in 254 (95.8%). This allowed for proper lung ventilation through the tracheal tube in 242 cases whereas 12 tubes were esophageal or proved obstructed. Regurgitation of gastric contents occurred in 43 (14.2%) patients; in 23 cases before arrival of the first aid team, in 18 cases before ILMA placement, and in 2 cases after the ILMA placement. CONCLUSION: The use of ILMA for airway management by trained emergency nurses during OHCA resuscitation is feasible and allows for effective airway management. The success rate of tracheal tube placement through the ILMA was high. In addition, the incidence of regurgitation was lower when using the ILMA than that previous historical reports with face-mask ventilation.