Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 45(3): 777-83, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23001640

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess whether the haemostatic markers D-dimer, factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) are predictive of non-dipping status in treated hypertensive patients; so, as easy available laboratory data can predict non-dipping pattern and help with the selection of the patients whom circadian blood pressure should be re-examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty treated hypertensive patients with essential hypertension were included in the study. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in all patients. Daytime and nocturnal average systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were calculated. Patients were characterised as "non-dippers" on the basis of a less than 10 % decline in nocturnal blood pressure (BP); either systolic or diastolic or mean (MAP). D-dimer as marker of fibrinolytic function, FVIII activity and VWF antigen as marker of endothelial dysfunction were measured on plasma. The predictive efficiency was analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Youden index was used for the estimation of the cut-off points and the associated values for sensitivity and 1-specificity. RESULTS: Plasma levels of D-dimer, FVIII and VWF were significantly higher in non-dippers as compared with dippers, irrespective of the classification used (BP index); all P < 0.05. The ROC curves indicated a good diagnostic efficiency for D-dimer (AUC(ROC) = 0.697, 0.715 and 0.774), FVIII (AUC(ROC) = 0.714, 0.692 and 0.755) and VWF (AUC(ROC) = 0.706, 0.740 and 0.708) in distinguishing non-dipping pattern (systolic, diastolic or mean) in the study population; all P < 0.05. Among the three haemostatic markers, D-dimer presents the most satisfactory sensitivity/1-specificity for the differentiation of non-dippers, with a cut-off point >168 ng/ml (sensitivity/1-specificity for systolic BP non-dippers of 0.789/0.381, for diastolic BP non-dippers 0.923/0.444 and for MAP non-dippers 0.875/0.375). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, D-dimer has a good predictive value for non-dipping pattern and the decision for the 24-h ambulatory blood pressure re-monitoring among dippers could rely on its values.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiologia , Fator VIII/metabolismo , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Hipertensão/sangue , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Curva ROC
2.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 44(2): 523-33, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21387085

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-dipper hypertensive patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Coagulation and fibrinolysis activation factors are considered as risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the haemostatic and platelet activation markers and the non-dipping pattern in treated hypertensive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one treated hypertensive patients (53 with essential and 18 with secondary hypertension, due to chronic kidney disease-stage 4), aged 33 to 81 years (30 men), were classified as dippers and non-dippers, according to the presence or absence, respectively, of a decline of nocturnal average systolic blood pressure (BP) by more than 10% of the diurnal BP (non-dipping pattern) on 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Plasma levels of factors VIII and IX, fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, protein C, plasmin-alpha-2 antiplasmin complex, D-dimer and platelet factor 4 were measured in all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were classified as dippers and 34 as non-dippers. The percentages of patients with essential and with secondary hypertension were similar in the dippers and in the non-dippers groups (both P = 0.754). Multivariate analysis of variance showed statistically significant differences in all measured variables between dippers and non-dippers (P = 0.043). Plasma levels of factors VIII and IX, fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, protein C, plasmin-alpha-2-antiplasmin complex, and D-dimers were significantly higher in non-dippers when compared to dippers (P < 0.05 for all). In contrast, there were no significant differences in plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex (P = 0.955) and platelet factor 4 (P = 0.431) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that non-dipper treated hypertensive patients exhibit alterations in haemostasis, which may affect their cardiovascular risk.


Assuntos
Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/metabolismo , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Plaquetas/patologia , Hemostasia/fisiologia , Hipertensão/sangue , Ativação Plaquetária , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Pressão Sanguínea , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefelometria e Turbidimetria , Contagem de Plaquetas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA