First, do no harm: the risks of overtreating children with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Although overtreatment with antiepileptic drugs contributes to the morbidity associated with epilepsy, many children still are overtreated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the withdrawal of at least one antiepileptic drug (AED) in children with refractory epilepsy using polytherapy enable a better seizure control. METHOD: This was a prospective study. Children with refractory epilepsy using at least two AEDs were included. Once the patient, or guardian, agreed to participate in the study, one or more AED were slowly tapered off. The remaining AEDs dosages could be adjusted as needed, but a new AED could not be introduced. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluated, three girls; ages ranging from 3 to 18 (mean=8.7 years). After at least one AED withdrawal, two (13.5%) patients became seizure free, seizures improved >50% in 5 (33.5%) patients, did not change in 5 (33.5%), and seizure frequency became worse in 3 (20%). Adverse events improved in 12 patients (80%). CONCLUSION: The withdrawal of at least one AED is a valuable option in the treatment of selected children with refractory epilepsy.

What about us? Siblings of children with epilepsy.

RATIONALE: It is known that epilepsy has a severe impact in the quality of life of the patients; however, it affects the lives of all family members. The psychosocial repercussions of epilepsy are often of greater significance than the seizures themselves. METHODS: This was a prospective study, conducted from January 2005 to December 2005 at the pediatric epilepsy clinic of our University Hospital. Parents were interviewed by one of the authors according to a structured questionnaire about the impact of epilepsy in the life of the siblings of children with epilepsy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven children, siblings of 78 patients with epilepsy were evaluated. From the 127 siblings of children with epilepsy, 60 were girls and 67 were boys. Ages ranged from 5 to 18 years old (mean=11.7 years). After the diagnosis of epilepsy, the siblings had only negative feelings toward the disease, mostly sadness and fear. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the impact of epilepsy in the lives of siblings of children with epilepsy is much more severe than previously suspected.

First, do no harm: the risks of overtreating children with epilepsy

BACKGROUND: Although overtreatment with antiepileptic drugs contributes to the morbidity associated with epilepsy, many children still are overtreated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the withdrawal of at least one antiepileptic drug (AED) in children with refractory epilepsy using polytherapy enable a better seizure control. METHOD: This was a prospective study. Children with refractory epilepsy using at least two AEDs were included. Once the patient, or guardian, agreed to participate in the study, one or more AED were slowly tapered off. The remaining AEDs dosages could be adjusted as needed, but a new AED could not be introduced. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluated, three girls; ages ranging from 3 to 18 (mean=8.7 years). After at least one AED withdrawal, two (13.5 percent) patients became seizure free, seizures improved >50 percent in 5 (33.5 percent) patients, did not change in 5 (33.5 percent), and seizure frequency became worse in 3 (20 percent). Adverse events improved in 12 patients (80 percent). CONCLUSION: The withdrawal of at least one AED is a valuable option in the treatment of selected children with refractory epilepsy.

INTRODUÇÃO: Apesar do tratamento excessivo com drogas antiepilépticas (DAE) contribuir para a morbidade associada à epilepsia, muitas crianças ainda são submetidas a politerapia desnecessária. OBJETIVO: Avaliar se a retirada de pelo menos uma DAE em crianças com epilepsia refratária utilizando politerapia pode proporcionar melhor controle das crises epilépticas. MÉTODOS: Este foi um estudo prospectivo. Crianças com epilepsia refratária em uso de pelo menos duas DAE foram incluídas. Após assinatura do consentimento informado, uma ou mais DAE foram lentamente retiradas. As doses das outras DAE que não foram retiradas poderiam ser ajustadas se necessário, mas uma nova DAE não pode ser introduzida. RESULTADOS: Quinze pacientes foram avaliados, três eram meninas, com idades entre 3 e 18 anos (média=8,7). Após a retirada de pelo menos uma DAE, 2 (13,5 por cento) pacientes ficaram livre de crises, as crises melhoraram em 5 (33,5 por cento), não mudaram em 5 (33,5 por cento) e a frequencia das crises pioraram em 3 (20 por cento) pacientes. Os eventos adversos melhoraram em 12 patientes (80 por cento). CONCLUSÃO: A retirada de pelo menos uma DAE é uma opção válida no tratamento de crianças com epilepsia refratária.