Protein Expression Profiles among Lichen Sclerosus Urethral Strictures-Can Urethroplasty Success be Predicted?

PURPOSE: Urethroplasty of lichen sclerosus strictures has a significantly higher failure rate than strictures due to other causes. We sought to determine predictors of urethroplasty failure in men with lichen sclerosus urethral stricture disease by evaluating protein expression profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urethral tissue was excised from patients with lichen sclerosus who were undergoing urethroplasty of urethral stricture disease at a single institution. A tissue microarray was created with cores from each sample. Immunohistochemistry was performed to compare protein expression related to inflammation, cell cycle disruption, oxidative stress, hormone receptor status and infection. Stricture recurrence was defined by the need for a subsequent unanticipated procedure for urethral stricture disease. RESULTS: We evaluated 50 men with lichen sclerosus urethral stricture disease, including 31 with successful reconstruction and 19 with recurrent stricture. Recurrent strictures expressed lower levels of several inflammatory markers and had a lower Ki-67 mitotic index and significantly higher vascular endothelial growth factor levels than nonrecurrent strictures. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study to use tissue protein expression to identify risk factors for urethroplasty failure among men with lichen sclerosus urethral stricture disease. Our findings suggest that recurrent lichen sclerosus strictures demonstrate a suppressed inflammatory response, a decreased cell turnover rate, and poor oxygenation and nutrient delivery. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of these pathways in the pathophysiology of lichen sclerosus urethral stricture disease, determine whether preoperative biopsy can predict urethroplasty success, help counsel patients and develop future treatments.

Narrative review of immediate salvage for penile prosthesis infection.

Background and Objective: Implantation of a penile prosthesis is a reliable option for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) refractory to less invasive therapies. While the frequency of penile prosthesis infections have decreased, they remain a devastating complication. Herein we discuss why immediate salvage surgery is an essential technique for the management of implant infections. We will also describe the relevant advancements to this technique. Methods: We conducted a narrative review via computer based search of PubMed for all relevant articles on penile prosthesis infection management, including guidelines, case series, reviews, and expert opinions. Search terms used included: "inflatable penile prosthesis", "IPP", "penile prosthesis", "salvage", "treatment", "delayed", "immediate". Only English peer-reviewed publications were included. Key Content and Findings: Historically, patients who presented with penile prosthesis infections were exclusively managed with complete removal of the prosthesis without replacement. Although this strategy is safe, it hastens immediate ED and corporal fibrosis, resulting in loss of penile length and increased difficulty with subsequent prosthesis replacement. Previous case series have reported successful treatment of localized penile prosthesis infections with nonsurgical treatment, but the role of conservative treatment remains limited. The current standard of immediate salvage entails removal of the infected prosthesis and washout followed by immediate replacement with a new penile prosthesis. This technique has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, thus allowing patients to resume intercourse and maintain penile length. Conclusions: Immediate salvage surgery is safe and effective, and has emerged as the preferred strategy for the management of most patients with a penile prosthesis infection.

Pediatric urothelial cancer: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Background: Urothelial cancer is a rare pediatric malignancy; previous analyses suggest lower rates of recurrence and death as compared to adults. We analyzed pediatric bladder cancer information in a national database, hypothesizing that survival would be better in children than adults. Methods: We analyzed the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) for children and adolescents (0-18 years) with urothelial bladder cancer. Rhabdomyosarcoma patients were excluded. Assessed variables included TNM staging, pathology, tumor size, surgical procedures, and post-operative re-admissions. Overall survival was defined as months since diagnosis as of last follow-up. Results: Of 140 urothelial tumors reported to NCDB between 2004-2016, 75.7% (N=106) were stage 0 at diagnosis, 6.4% (N=9) were stage I, 2.9% (N=4) were stage II and 3.6% (N=5) were stage IV, while 11.4% cases (N=16) were unknown. From available mortality data (121 patients), no patients died after definitive surgical resection. Only 1 mortality was reported at 90 days, although cause of death was reportedly unknown. Three (2.5%) patients were lost to follow-up, and most (96.7%) were alive at 90 days. Conclusions: Short-term survival outcomes among children and adolescents with urothelial bladder tumors captured in NCDB are reassuring. Future investigations focused on long-term outcomes and appropriate surveillance in this rare patient cohort are imperative to better guide management options.

Recurrent Papillary Bladder Tumors in a Boy With Lynch Syndrome.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder defined by germline mutations in one of four mismatch repair genes including PMS2, MLH2, MSH1, MSH2, or deletion in the EPCAM gene.1 The most common urologic manifestation of LS is upper tract urothelial carcinoma, which occurs in up to 20% of patients with LS.2 While data are scarce, there is growing evidence of an increased relative risk of bladder malignancy in patients with LS.3,4 Bladder tumors in children are a rare entity and the link between pediatric bladder tumors and LS has not been previously reported to our knowledge.

Management of urologic prosthetic reservoirs at the time of inguinal or pelvic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The artificial urinary sphincter and 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis each require a fluid storage component and thus have components in the inguinal and pelvic regions. Because of this, patients with urologic prosthetics sometimes present challenges during future nonprosthetic operations. Presently, there is no established guideline for device management with ensuing inguinal or pelvic surgery. AIMS: This article outlines concerns during pelvic and inguinal surgery for patients with an artificial urinary sphincter and/or inflatable penile prosthesis and proposes an algorithm for preoperative surgical planning and decision making. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on operative management of these prosthetic devices. Publications were identified by searching electronic databases. Only peer-reviewed publications available in English were considered for this review. RESULTS: We review the important considerations as well as available options for operative management of these prosthetic devices during subsequent nonprosthetic surgery and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each. Finally, we suggest a framework for helping surgeons determine which management strategy is most appropriate for their individual patients. CONCLUSION: The best management strategy will differ depending on patient values, the planned surgery, and patient-specific factors. Surgeons should understand and counsel patients on all available options and encourage informed, shared decision making to determine the best individualized approach.