Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 11(6): 431-8, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14686828

RESUMO

Determination of the severity of injury to the soft tissues is an important component of patient assessment and affects management of closed fractures. The response of soft tissue to blunt injury involves microvascular and inflammatory processes that produce localized tissue hypoxia and acidosis. Incisions placed through such compromised tissue can lead to wound breakdown and deep infection. Therefore, recognizing the signs of soft-tissue injury is the foundation for successful management of closed fractures. Many treatment options, including splinting, cryotherapy, compression, and delayed surgery, help limit further soft-tissue injury and facilitate its rapid recovery before surgical intervention. Emerging surgical techniques based on improved management have resulted in decreased rates of soft-tissue complications.


Assuntos
Fraturas Fechadas/complicações , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/etiologia , Humanos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/fisiopatologia , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/terapia
2.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; (429): 188-92, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15577486

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for contemporary revision hip surgery in a consecutive series of patients. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiographs of 439 revision hip surgeries done between 1996 and 2003. Fifty-five percent of the surgeries were for aseptic loosening, 14% were for instability, 13% were for osteolysis around a well-fixed implant, 7% were for infection, 5% were for periprosthetic fracture, 3% were for conversion of a hemiarthroplasty, 1% was for psoas impingement, 1% was for loose recalled implants, and 1% was for implant fracture. As expected, aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision surgery. Instability was a common reason for early revision whereas revision for osteolysis around a well-fixed implant was a more common reason for late revision.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Falha de Prótese , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA