Effects of acute sleep deprivation on H reflex and V wave.

The impact of sleep deprivation on muscular strength and power remains poorly understood. We aimed to determine the acute effects of 24 hr of sleep deprivation on H-reflex and V-wave excitability. Fourteen healthy young adults (eight men, six women) were included. Participants visited the laboratory on two different occasions, without and with 24 hr of sleep deprivation. In each session, participants were tested for maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the plantar flexors and dorsiflexors, soleus H- and M-recruitment curves, and evoked V wave, as well as tibialis anterior/soleus electromyographic co-activation. Twenty-four hours of sleep deprivation did not affect either plantarflexion MVC or soleus electromyographic normalized amplitude (p > .05). Moreover, H-reflex and V-wave peak-to-peak normalized amplitude did not change with sleep deprivation (p > .05). Conversely, we obtained a significant increase in antagonist/agonist level of co-activation during MVC post-sleep deprivation (6.2 ± 5.2%, p < .01). In conclusion, we found that H-reflex and V-wave responses are well preserved after 24 hr of sleep deprivation, revealing that descending neural drive and/or modulation in Ia afferent input remains largely unaffected under these circumstances. Yet, sleep deprivation affects motor control by exacerbating the magnitude of antagonist/agonist co-activation during forceful muscle contractions and this is novel.

Running economy in recreational male and female runners with similar levels of cardiovascular fitness.

This study explored differences in running economy between well-conditioned young male and female (tested within the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycle) participants, matched for age and percent difference between predicted and actual maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o2max). Twenty-five recreational runners (13 men and 12 women), aged 19-27 yr, performed graded treadmill exercise to assess V̇o2max. Participants also performed three bouts of submaximal continuous treadmill running at 8, 10, and 12 km/h. Sex comparisons revealed lower maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and V̇o2max in women relative to men (P < 0.05). However, the percent difference from predicted V̇o2max was similar between men and women (men: 149.6 ± 18.7%, women: 150.8 ± 16.4%; P > 0.05). Absolute running economy (mL·kg-0.75·km-1) improved in transition between treadmill speeds, and this occurred similarly in both sexes. Despite this, women showed overall lower oxygen cost of running than men during treadmill locomotion at predetermined absolute and relative intensities (P < 0.05). Finally, in a small subset of participants (n = 6, 3 male and 3 female participants) with similar MAS (16 km/h), men still exhibited higher V̇o2max and gross oxygen cost of running than women (difference of ~6%, statistics not computed). The present results indicate that, in men and women with similar percent of predicted V̇o2max, running economy follows a sexually dimorphic pattern throughout a broad spectrum of treadmill speeds. Ultimately, from a motor performance perspective, our data strongly suggest that lower V̇o2max values in female recreational runners are partially compensated by lower gross oxygen cost of locomotion during submaximal running.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our data demonstrate that, compared with that seen in men with similar percent difference from predicted maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o2max), scaled gross oxygen cost of running (in absolute and relative terms) is lower in women throughout a broad spectrum of treadmill speeds. Importantly, these findings were obtained after controlling for the effects of the menstrual cycle on running economy, and this is novel.