Human papilloma virus vaccination in males: A pharmacovigilance study on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

AIMS: Human papilloma virus (HPV) is 1 of the most common sexually transmitted infection responsible for different types of cancer: cervical, penile, vulvar, anal and oropharyngeal. It can affect both males and females. Our aim was to enrich the knowledge on the safety profiles of HPV vaccines in the male population. METHODS: We reviewed all the reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) present in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System from 1 January 2006 to 30 September 2018. Statistical data mining was performed using the reporting odds ratio with 95% confidence interval in order to detect disproportionality in reporting. RESULTS: A total of 5493 reports of AEFI were retrieved. The events most reported and that proportionally occurred more frequently with HPV vaccines than with others in males were: syncope (n = 701, reporting odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval [1.41-5.76p), loss of consciousness (n = 425, 2.79 [1.36-5.72]) and fall (n = 272, 3.54 [2.00-6.26]). CONCLUSION: Most of the AEFIs were already reported in premarketing clinical trials and acknowledged for the corresponding vaccines. A disproportionate reporting was found for some of these events including syncope. The HPV vaccines are generally well tolerated in males, although limitations own of spontaneous reporting should be considered.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants and alopecia: The valuable support of postmarketing data.

Little is known about the administration of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the occurrence of alopecia. Our aim was to analyse the reports of alopecia following DOAC administration received until 2 May 2018 from VigiBase, the World Health Organization database. A descriptive analysis of age, sex, seriousness and dechallenge/rechallenge outcome was carried out. For each report, the time-to-onset was evaluated and the causality was assessed by using Naranjo algorithm. Overall, 1316 reports were retrieved, most concerning rivaroxaban (58.8%); 80% of the reports were related to females, in particular to those aged ≥65 years (23.1%). The median value of the time-to-onset was 28 days, with an interquartile range of 63 days. In 54.3% of the reports the causality was assessed as possible. In conclusion, a possible association could exist between DOACs administration and alopecia, but further observational studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Drug-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: a pharmacovigilance study on World Health Organization's database.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) occurs in several clinical conditions, including drug therapy. We aim to investigate the association between the administration of several drug classes and the onset of DIC by using the reports of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) collected in Vigibase, the World Health Organization (WHO) database of ADR. METHODS: We collected reports of drug-related DIC from 1968 to September 2015, classified in Vigibase according to the MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) term "Disseminated intravascular coagulation". A disproportionality analysis using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI95%) was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 4653 reports of drug-associated DIC were retrieved and the 75.9% of them was serious according to WHO seriousness criteria. DIC was significantly (ROR > 1, lower limit of CI95% > 1) associated with 88 drugs, mainly antineoplastic agents, antithrombotic agents and antibacterials for systemic use. Among of the most frequently reported individual drugs we found dabigatran (94 reports) ROR = 1.34 (CI95% 1.08-1.67), oxaliplatin and bevacizumab both with 75 reports and ROR = 1.77 (1.38-2.27) and 2.02 (1.57-2.61), respectively. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of drugs, widely used in the clinical practice, may be associated with the potential occurrence of DIC. For many of these drugs, the ADR is not acknowledged in the corresponding Summary of Product Characteristics. The high number of drugs involved underlines the importance of evaluate this condition such as an ADR that might occur during drug therapy.

Antibacterial prescription in Italian preschool children: analysis of 7 years of data from the Emilia-Romagna region reimbursement database.

OBJECTIVES: To describe antibacterial prescribing patterns in outpatients aged 0-5 years from 2007 to 2013 in the Emilia-Romagna region, assessing sex- and age-specific consumption over time. METHODS: All children aged 0-5 years resident in the Emilia-Romagna region who received at least one prescription of a systemic antibacterial in the period 2007-13 were enrolled. The prescriptions of systemic antibacterials to children were collected from the regional prescription database. Data were stratified by year, sex and age, and analysed in terms of periodic prevalence and of annual prescription rate per 1000 person-years. RESULTS: The prevalence of children receiving at least one prescription per year varied from 68.0% in 2007 to 59.0% in 2013, while the average prevalence of children receiving five or more prescriptions per year was 6.96%. The annual prescription rate varied from 1621.26 in 2007 to 1372.27 in 2013. Penicillins + ß-lactamase inhibitors accounted for 35.3% of total prescriptions, followed by extended-spectrum penicillins (28.6%), macrolides (17.0%) and third-generation cephalosporins (13.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendations, a significant overprescription of antibacterials to children still exists, showing no satisfactory improvements over the years. In contrast to Northern European countries, adherence to evidence-based guidelines was poor, with frequent prescribing of broad-spectrum agents for the treatment of mostly viral childhood infectious disease.

Safety profile of human papilloma virus vaccines: an analysis of the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System from 2007 to 2017.

AIMS: Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the cause of different types of carcinoma. Despite the remarkable effectiveness of the HPV vaccines, there have been many complaints about their risk-benefit profile due to adverse events following immunization (AEFI). The purpose of this study is to analyse the safety profile of the HPV vaccine basing on real-life data derived from reports of suspected AEFIs collected in the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and assess if the searches on Google overlap with spontaneous reporting. METHODS: We collected all the reports in VAERS between January 2007 to December 2017 related to the HPV vaccines. A disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval was performed. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, 55 356 reports of AEFI related to HPV vaccines were retrieved in VAERS, corresponding to 224 863 vaccine-event pairs. The highest number of reports was related to Gardasil (n = 42 244). The two events more frequently reported and statistically significant for HPV vaccines were dizziness (n = 6259; ROR = 2.60; 95% confidence interval 2.53-2.66) and syncope (n = 6004; ROR = 6.28; 95% confidence interval 6.12-6.44). The trends of spontaneous reporting and Google searches overlap. CONCLUSION: The AEFI analysis showed that the events most frequently reported were non-serious and listed in the corresponding summary of product characteristics. Potential safety signals arose regarding less frequent AEFIs that would deserve further investigation. It is extremely important to disseminate correct and evidence-based scientific information.

Cardiovascular safety of macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics: An analysis of the WHO database of adverse drug reactions.

INTRODUCTION: The cardiovascular safety profile of macrolides and fluoroquinolones has been widely discussed. The aim of the present study is to provide the contribution of real-world data onto the ongoing discussion about cardiovascular toxicity of both macrolides and fluoroquinolones. METHODS: Reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were retrieved from VigiBase. Macrolides and fluoroquinolones were compared with amoxicillin by using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality. Macrolides were then compared with fluoroquinolones. RESULTS: Overall, 6810 reports of ADRs were retrieved: 62% of them were serious and 35% concerned female. Macrolides were more frequently associated with "atrial fibrillation" (ROR = 1.26, CI 1.02-1.57) and "ventricular fibrillation" ROR = 2.60, CI 1.92-3.54) than fluoroquinolones. Antimicrobials more frequently reported for "cardiac disorder" were azithromycin (375 reports) and clarithromycin (302) for macrolides and levofloxacin (470) and moxifloxacin (391) for fluoroquinolones. CONCLUSION: Our data highlighted that macrolides and fluoroquinolones may influence cardiac rhythm and suggest caution in the prescribing of these drugs to patients with hidden cardiovascular risk factors. Although these ADRs seem to be not common, they have a notable impact in clinical practice because of the huge number of the exposed subjects.

Comparative risk/benefit profile of biosimilar and originator erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs): data from an Italian observational study in nephrology.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) vs originator, based on data from clinical practice in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We collected data of the patients with diagnosis of CKD on conservative treatment from nine Italian structures. Patients were enrolled applying different exclusion criteria, and various individual parameters were registered at the beginning for descriptive analysis. Patients were treated with epoetin alfa, beta, and darbepoetin as originator and epoetin zeta as biosimilar. Hemoglobin levels have been analyzed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: At baseline, 47 patients were in the biosimilar group and 57 in the originator; the basal level of hemoglobin was similar between the groups (mean Hb 9.4 and 9.3 g/dL, respectively). Median age, weight, and comorbidities were almost comparable. After 3 months, 44 patients remained in the biosimilar group and 48 in the originator; hemoglobin increase was significantly greater in patients treated with biosimilar [absolute increase 1.6 vs 1.0 g/dL, p < 0.001]. After 6 and 12 months, number of patients fall furthermore. Hemoglobin levels increased more in the biosimilar group after 6 months (2.1 vs 1.1 g/dL, p < 0.001) and 12 months (2.0 vs 1.0 g/dL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Biosimilar ESAs have similar risk/benefit profile compared to originators. Our data are in agreement with relevant scientific literature and, on the other hand, they are in contrast with common thought that considers biosimilar less efficacious and less safe than originators.

Safety profile of the direct oral anticoagulants: an analysis of the WHO database of adverse drug reactions.

AIM: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and a more promising safety profile. Unanswered safety aspects remain to be addressed and available evidence on the risk associated with these drugs are conflicting. In order to contribute to the debate on their safety profile, we conducted a comparative analysis of the reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with DOACs in VigiBase. METHODS: Study based on reports of suspected ADRs held in VigiBase as at December 2014, in which a DOAC or warfarin were administered in patients with nonvalvular AF and listed as suspected/interacting drugs. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to classify ADRs. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results with P ≤ 0.05 were statistically significant. RESULTS: We retrieved 32 972 reports. We identified 204 ADRs with a ROR >1 (P ≤ 0.05) and we focused on 105 reactions. Positive ROR emerged for DOACs and gastrointestinal haemorrhage compared with warfarin [(1.6 (1.47-1.75)], but no disproportionality with cerebral haemorrhage was found [0.31 (0.28-0.34)]. We identified other potential signals that have not been associated with DOACs previously. CONCLUSIONS: As well as premarketing authorization clinical trial studies, we found a reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage, but an increased risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage in patients treated with DOACs compared to warfarin. We provide new data and we highlight several differences between the three novel oral anticoagulants, in the rate and type of ADRs occurred.

Safety profile of H1-antihistamines in pediatrics: an analysis based on data from VigiBase.

PURPOSE: H1-antihistamines are commonly used in infants and children for the relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a variety of conditions. Little is known about their safety profile in these patients. We performed a comparative analysis of the safety profiles of H1-antihistamines using data from the WHO database (VigiBase). METHODS: We selected adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on H1-antihistamines in children (0-16 years) up to June 2014 from VigiBase. ADRs were codified according to MedDRA terminology. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence for drug-reaction pairs were calculated. RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 8918 reports related to antihistamines, corresponding to 19503 drug reaction pairs for 68 different drugs. Most of reports involved children aged 2 to 6 years (32%) and 6 to 12 years (34%). Most reported drugs were cetirizine (1608 reports, corresponding to 18%), loratadine (16%), and diphenhydramine (10%). ADRs were classified as serious in 23% of cases, and 400 cases had a fatal outcome. We found a significant associations for several drug-reaction pairs such as levocetirizine and epilepsy (ROR, 6.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-28.53) and chlorphenamine and toxic epidermal necrolysis (ROR, 7.29; 95% CI, 2.39-22.2). CONCLUSIONS: H1-antihistamines are among the most used drugs in pediatrics, also in an off-label manner. Our data highlights associations with serious and unexpected ADRs. Educative intervention to clinicians and parents are needed to help doctors to make proper choices on the drug treatment and for the early detection of ADRs to maximize the benefits and reduce the risk of ADRs in these patients.

Risk of acute and serious liver injury associated to nimesulide and other NSAIDs: data from drug-induced liver injury case-control study in Italy.

AIM: Drug-induced liver injury is one of the most serious adverse drug reactions and the most frequent reason for restriction of indications or withdrawal of drugs. Some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were withdrawn from the market because of serious hepatotoxicity. We estimated the risk of acute and serious liver injury associated with the use of nimesulide and other NSAIDs, with a prevalence of use greater than or equal to 5%. METHODS: This is a multicentre case-control study carried out in nine Italian hospitals from October 2010 to January 2014. Cases were adults, with a diagnosis of acute liver injury. Controls presented acute clinical disorders not related to chronic conditions, not involving the liver. Adjusted odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated initially with a bivariate and then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We included 179 cases matched to 1770 controls. Adjusted OR for acute serious liver injury associated with all NSAIDs was 1.69, 95% CI 1.21-2.37. Thirty cases were exposed to nimesulide (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.28-3.47); the risk increased according to the length of exposure (OR > 30 days: 12.55, 95% CI 1.73-90.88) and to higher doses (OR 10.69, 95% CI 4.02-28.44). Risk of hepatotoxicity was increased also for ibuprofen, used both at recommended dosages (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.13-3.26) and at higher doses (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.11-12.46) and for ketoprofen ≥ 150 mg (OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.33-10.00). CONCLUSION: Among all NSAIDs, nimesulide is associated with the higher risk, ibuprofen and high doses of ketoprofen are also associated with a modestly increased risk of hepatotoxicity.

Ibuprofen-associated hypothermia in children: analysis of the Italian spontaneous reporting database.

PURPOSE: An analysis of Italian spontaneous adverse drug reactions (ADR) reporting database highlighted a potential association between hypothermia and ibuprofen in children. Hypothermia is defined as a core body temperature of 35 °C (95 °F). Ibuprofen is the most prescribed NSAID for the treatment of fever and moderate pain in children. We aimed to analyze the cases of ibuprofen-associated hypothermia retrieved in the Italian database in order to contribute to the discussion on this potential association. METHODS: We extracted all suspected cases of ibuprofen-associated hypothermia from the Italian spontaneous reporting database and from VigiBase up to December 2015. We considered the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) as a measure of disproportionality for the Italian cases and the information component (IC) for the reports from VigiBase. We performed a case-by-case analysis to exclude duplicates. RESULTS: Nineteen cases of hypothermia associated with ibuprofen use were retrieved from the Italian spontaneous reporting database (PRR 19.8, CI 95 %, 12.0-32.9). The reports concerned ten females and nine males with an average age of 2.5 years. Up to 31 December 2015, 168 cases of hypothermia associated with ibuprofen were reported to VigiBase, with an IC of 2.05 (IC025, 1.82). Among these, 126 cases involved children (49 % males) with an average age of 4.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of this ADR is unknown so far, the widespread use of this drug recommends the need for further studies to better characterize this possible association. Clinicians and pharmacists but also parents should be aware that this risk is theoretical as not yet been confirmed.

Acute renal failure in patients treated with dronedarone or amiodarone: a large population-based cohort study in Italy.

PURPOSE: Causes of ARF are numerous including drugs. In 2012, spontaneous reporting showed a possible association between dronedarone and ARF. To further investigate such association, a retrospective cohort study on health-service claim databases was performed taking amiodarone as comparison. METHODS: All patients receiving new prescription of amiodarone or dronedarone between September 2010 and December 2012 were selected. Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs), with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), for dronedarone versus amiodarone were performed. HRs were calculated: (i) for the entire cohort; (ii) for matched cohorts using propensity score; (iii) and high-dimensional propensity score. RESULTS: New users without previous episodes of ARF were 56,739 and 1761 on dronedarone and 54,978 on amiodarone. After 1:1 matching for propensity score, new users with dronedarone and amiodarone were 1467 and 1467, respectively. The cumulative incidence rate of ARF was 1.6 % (95 % CI 0.7-3.6 %) among dronedarone group and 2.3 % (1.0-5.1 %) among amiodarone group (p from log rank test = 0.4884). The unadjusted HR of ARF was 0.34 (0.18-0.64) in dronedarone new users compared to amiodarone; in propensity score matched cohort, it was 0.75 (0.26-2.16), and in high-dimensional propensity score, it was 0.83 (0.25-2.73). CONCLUSIONS: This large community-based study did not confirm the signal of an increased nephrotoxicity from dronedarone compared to amiodarone. Nevertheless, given the increasing number of reports collected from pharmacovigilance databases worldwide on this association, it is advisable for clinicians and patients to be aware of the possible kidney damage due to dronedarone in order to improve clinical outcomes with early intervention.

Off-label use of nicardipine as tocolytic and acute pulmonary oedema: a post-marketing analysis of adverse drug reaction reports in EudraVigilance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a signal of acute pulmonary oedema (APO) due to nicardipine used off-label as tocolytic in pregnant women. METHODS: All the suspected cases of APO recorded in EudraVigilance database up to 31/01/2013 and associated with nicardipine containing medicinal products were retrieved. The Proportional Reporting Ratio was considered as measure of disproportionality. Individual cases evaluation was conducted. RESULTS: Thirty-four spontaneous cases regarding pregnancy women who experienced APO following nicardipine treatment as tocolytic were collected. The detected proportional reporting ratio was 50.96 (95% confidence interval lower bound equal to 36.75). The analysis focused on 10 serious cases. Most women, aged between 27 and 39 years, were treated with intravenous nicardipine. The most of the suspected adverse reactions occurred between 24 and 96 hours. CONCLUSIONS: A potentially causal association between APO and off-label use of nicardipine as tocolytic has been detected during a periodic signal detection activity. The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee confirmed our findings, recommending an update of the summary of the product characteristics for medicines containing nicardipine for both intravenous and oral formulations. Then European Medicines Agency reaffirmed that nicardipine use in other indications is no longer recommended.

Oral bisphosphonates do not increase the risk of severe upper gastrointestinal complications: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the effect of oral bisphosphonates (BPs) on risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC) are conflicting. We conducted a large population-based study from a network of Italian healthcare utilization databases aimed to assess the UGIC risk associated with use of BPs in the setting of secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: A nested case-control study was carried out within a cohort of 68,970 patients aged 45 years or older, who have been hospitalized for osteoporotic fracture from 2003 until 2005. Cases were the 804 patients who experienced hospitalization for UGIC until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) associated with current and past use of BPs (i.e. for drug dispensation within 30 days and over 31 days prior the outcome onset, respectively) after adjusting for several covariates. RESULTS: Compared with patients who did not use BPs, current and past users had OR (and 95% confidence interval) of 0.86 (0.60 to 1.22) and 1.07 (0.80 to 1.44) respectively. There was no difference in the ORs estimated according with BPs type (alendronate or risedronate) and regimen (daily or weekly), nor with co-therapies and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Further evidence that BPs dispensed for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures are not associated with increased risk of severe gastrointestinal complications is supplied from this study. Further research is required to clarify the role BPs and other drugs of co-medication in inducing UGIC.

Effectiveness of oral bisphosphonates for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evidence from the AIFA-BEST observational study.

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of the bone, whose incidence increases progressively with aging. The main consequences of osteoporosis are fragility fractures, which have considerable medical, social, and economic implications. Adequate treatment of osteoporosis must be considered as a compelling public health intervention. Bisphosphonates (BPs) represent the most significant advance in this field in the past decade, and they are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. However, evidence for their effectiveness is limited to secondary prevention, whereas their effect in primary prevention is uncertain and needs further investigation. METHODS: Using administrative data collected in the "Biphosphonates Efficacy-Safety Tradeoff" (BEST) study, a nested case-control study was conducted by including 56,058 participants, aged 55 years who were started on oral BPs from 2003 to 2005. Cases were the 1,710 participants who were hospitalized for osteoporotic fractures until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio of fracture associated with categories of treatment duration. RESULTS: Compared with participants assuming BPs for less than 1 year, those who remained on therapy for at least 2 years had a 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7 to 33%) fracture risk reduction. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that BPs, dispensed for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures after at least 2 years of treatment.

User-only design to assess drug effectiveness in clinical practice: application to bisphosphonates and secondary prevention of fractures.

PURPOSE: Different strategies applicable to control for confounding by indication in observational studies were compared in a large population-based study regarding the effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) for secondary prevention of fractures. METHODS: The cohort was drawn from healthcare utilization databases of 13 Italian territorial units. Patients aged 55 years or more who were hospitalized for fracture during 2003-2005 entered into the cohort. A nested case-control design was used to compare BPs use in cohort members who did (cases) and who did not experience (controls) a new fracture until 2007 (outcome). Three designs were employed: conventional-matching (D1 ), propensity score-matching (D2 ), and user-only (D3 ) designs. They differed for (i) cohort composition, restricted to patients who received BPs straight after cohort entry (D3 ); (ii) using propensity score for case-control matching (D2 ); and (iii) compared groups of BPs users versus no users (D1 and D2 ) and long-term versus short-term users (D3 ). RESULTS: Bisphosphonate users had odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.20 (1.01 to 1.44) and 0.95 (0.74 to 1.24) by applying D1 and D2 designs, respectively. Statistical evidence that long-term BPs use protects the outcome onset with respect to short-term use was observed for user-only design (D3 ) being the corresponding odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.64 (0.44 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: User-only design yielded closer results to those seen in RCTs. This approach is one possible strategy to account for confounding by indication.

Underreporting in pharmacovigilance: an intervention for Italian GPs (Emilia-Romagna region).

PURPOSE: Underreporting is a major limitation of spontaneous reporting systems for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Several interventions to increase the ADR reporting rate have been proposed, but their efficacy remains poorly investigated. METHODS: This was a questionnaire study aimed at assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of general practitioners (GPs) regarding ADR reporting and at evaluating whether a monthly e-mail-based newsletter on drug safety could affect the rate and the quality of the ADR reports submitted by these GPs. Three local health authorities (LHAs) of the Emilia-Romagna region were chosen on the basis of their ADR reporting rate during the period preceding the study: Rimini (high), Ferrara (average), and Piacenza (low reporting rate). All GPs (n = 737) associated with these three LHAs were recruited. The pooled number of ADR reports sent by GPs in the remaining seven LHAs of the region was used as controls. The study covered a period of 3 years and was divided into: (1) identification of the reasons leading to underreporting through a questionnaire (Phase I); (2) the intervention, i.e., sending a newsletter for a 10-month period (Phase II); (3) evaluation of the intervention outcomes during the 10 months following the period in which the newsletter had been received (Phase III). RESULTS: Among GPs involved, 22.8 % returned the questionnaire. Over 94 % of the respondents considered the spontaneous reporting of suspected ADRs to be part of their professional obligations, but only 6.5 % had submitted at least one report in the previous 6 months. Following the completion of Phase II, the overall number of reports coming from the LHAs subjected to the intervention rose by 49.2 % compared to 2009, while the number of reports coming from the control LHAs increased by 8.8 %. Rimini and Piacenza showed a 200 % increase in the number of ADR reports submitted by GPs, while the number of ADR reported submitted by the control group decreased by 25.5 %. In 2011, the number of overall ADRs reports from the LHAs subjected to the intervention decreased by 6.8 %; this decrease reached 50.0 % of the GPs. Control HLAs showed an overall decline of 4.3 %, while the total number of ADRs from GPs increased by 63.3 %. Ferrara was excluded from the analysis due to confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The periodic e-mail update on the safety of drugs represents an effective and inexpensive way to raise the awareness of GPs on the importance of spontaneous ADR reporting. Since the outcome of the intervention seemed to disappear after the intervention was stopped, there appears to be a need to adopt a policy of regular updates and educational strategies for health professionals.

Pattern of triptan use and cardiovascular coprescription: a pharmacoepidemiological study in Italy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the incidence, prevalence, and patterns of triptan use with a special focus on patients who also received cardiovascular drugs, considered as a deviation from appropriate triptan use. METHODS: We collected data on prescriptions reimbursed in between 2006 and 2008 in an Italian region. Patients receiving at least one prescription of triptans from January to December 2007 were divided in two populations: new users (without triptan prescriptions in 2006), and already in treatment. All patients were followed for 12 months in terms of both triptan use and cardiovascular coprescriptions. RESULTS: One-year prevalence of triptan use was 0.8%, whereas the incidence was 0.4%. New users accounted for 47.5% of total users (34,915). The percentages of very frequent users (>120 and >180 dosage unit per year) were about double among those already in treatment (26.6% and 15.3%, respectively) and new users (1% and 0.3%; p < 0.01). Patients starting with the lowest dose of tablet formulation were more likely to interrupt therapy after their first prescription (p < 0.01). Many users aged >65 received concomitant cardiovascular therapies: 36.6% among new users and 64.3% for already in treatment (p < 0.01). In both groups, about 5% of elderly patients received coprescriptions, suggesting a high deviation from appropriate triptan use. CONCLUSIONS: A higher percentage of very frequent users was detected in patients already in treatment compared with new users. Moreover, the percentage of nonnegligible triptan recipients were in age groups for which the drug is not recommended by the product label (≤18 years and >65) and who had cardiovascular coprescriptions suggestive of vasoconstrictive risk.

Cardiovascular events in statin recipients: impact of adherence to treatment in a 3-year record linkage study.

PURPOSE: In the general population, lack of adherence to statin therapy remains a widespread phenomenon and an important matter of concern both in terms of cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit profile. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of cardiovascular events in Italian statin recipients, focussing on the relationship between degree of adherence to therapy and occurrence of events in a 3-year follow-up. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of all patients from Emilia Romagna (4,027,275 inhabitants) who received statin prescriptions in January-February 2005 and who were followed for up to 36 months for cardiovascular hospital admission (i.e. coronary disease, cerebrovascular accidents, peripheral arthropathy), adherence to statin treatment (proportion of days covered: ≥ 80%) and use of other cardiovascular drugs. The relationship between adherence and cardiovascular events was analysed by multivariate logistic regression; age, sex, other cardiovascular drugs and previous events were covariates of the model. RESULTS: Patients non-adherent to a statin regimen over the 3-year period (76% of the cohort) had higher odds of events, irrespective of risk factors, by more than 40% when compared with adherent patients. Odds of events were in particular: strongly non-adherent, adjOR=1.19 (CI95% 1.15-1.23), slightly non-adherent, adjOR =1.25 (1.21-1.30), highly variable in the amount of statins received, adjOR=1.69 (1.62-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the key role of adherence to statins in cardiovascular prevention at any level of risk. Appropriateness of statin use needs not only careful selection of patients to be treated, but also cooperation between patient and physician to ensure continued drug use whenever treatment is appropriate.

Evaluation of the safety profile of rotavirus vaccines: a pharmacovigilance analysis on American and European data.

Rotaviruses (RVs) are the most common cause of severe diarrheal disease. To date two rotavirus oral vaccines are licensed: Rotarix and Rotateq. Our aim was to contribute to the post-marketing evaluation of these vaccines safety profile. We collected all RV vaccines-related reports of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) in US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and VigiBase between January 2007 and December 2017. A disproportionality analysis using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) was performed. A total of 17,750 reports in VAERS and 6,358 in VigiBase were retrieved. In VAERS, 86.2% of the reports concerned RotaTeq, whereas in VigiBase 67.7% of them involved Rotarix. Across the databases, diarrhea (1,672 events in VAERS, 1,961 in VigiBase) and vomiting (1,746 in VAERS, 1,508 in VigiBase) were the most reported AEFIs. Noteworthy, the RV vaccines-intussusception pair showed a ROR greater than 20 in both databases. Some new potential safety signals emerged such as fontanelle bulging, hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode, livedo reticularis, and opisthotonus. Overall, our data show that most of the reported AEFIs are listed in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPCs). However, there remains the need to investigate the potential safety signals arose from this analysis, in order to complete the description of the AEFIs.