Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 129, 2018 03 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29540160

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infection by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Colonization by S. aureus increases the risk of infection. Little is known about decolonization strategies for S. aureus beyond antibiotics, however probiotics represent a promising alternative. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 in reducing carriage of S. aureus at multiple body sites. METHODS: One hundred thirteen subjects, positive for S. aureus carriage, were recruited from the William S. Middleton Memorial Medical Center, Madison, WI, USA, and randomized by initial site of colonization, either gastrointestinal (GI) or extra-GI, to 4-weeks of oral L. rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, or placebo. Nasal, oropharyngeal, and axillary/groin swabs were obtained, and serial blood and fecal samples were collected. Differences in prevalence of S. aureus carriage at the end of the 4-weeks of treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The probiotic and placebo groups were similar in age, gender, and health history at baseline. S. aureus colonization within the stool samples of the extra-GI group was 15% lower in the probiotic than placebo group at the endpoint of the trial. Those in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group had 73% reduced odds (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.98) of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus presence, and 83% reduced odds (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.73) of any S. aureus presence in the stool sample at endpoint. CONCLUSION: Use of daily oral L. rhamnosus HN001 reduced odds of carriage of S. aureus in the GI tract, however it did not eradicate S. aureus from other body sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01321606 . Registered March 21, 2011.


Assuntos
Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Veteranos
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(11): 3177-3180, 2017 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961980

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of hospital-acquired infections, responsible for >450000 infections annually in the USA. Probiotics provide a promising, well-tolerated adjunct therapy to standard C. difficile infection (CDI) treatment regimens, but there is a paucity of data regarding their effectiveness for the treatment of an initial CDI. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of 33 participants from February 2013 to February 2015 to determine the feasibility and health outcomes of adjunct probiotic use in patients with an initial mild to moderate CDI. METHODS: The intervention was a 28 day, once-daily course of a four-strain oral probiotic capsule containing Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc-37, Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 and B. lactis Bl-04. The control placebo was identical in taste and appearance. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: trial registration number = NCT01680874. RESULTS: Probiotic adjunct therapy was associated with a significant improvement in diarrhoea outcomes. The primary duration of diarrhoea outcome (0.0 versus 1.0 days; P = 0.039) and two exploratory outcomes, total diarrhoea days (3.5 versus 12.0 days; P = 0.005) and rate of diarrhoea (0.1 versus 0.3 days of diarrhoea/stool diary days submitted; P = 0.009), all decreased in participants with probiotic use compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in the rate of CDI recurrence or functional improvement over time between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics are a promising adjunct therapy for treatment of an initial CDI and should be further explored in a larger randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bifidobacterium animalis/fisiologia , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Terapia Combinada , Diarreia/microbiologia , Diarreia/terapia , Método Duplo-Cego , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactobacillus/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto
3.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 52: 39-45, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836508

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an organism of great public health importance, causing 20,000 deaths annually. Decolonization of patients with S. aureus may prevent infections, yet current options are limited to antimicrobials that promote antibiotic resistance and can cause adverse side effects. Probiotics have potential to reduce colonization of pathogenic bacteria, representing a promising alternative for S. aureus decolonization, but thus far lack rigorous evaluation. METHODS: Potential subjects were recruited from inpatient and outpatient settings within a VA medical center and screened for S. aureus gastrointestinal (GI) or extra-GI colonization using swabs at multiple body sites. Positive, eligible, consenting participants were stratified by colonization site and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 4-weeks of daily placebo or Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 probiotic treatment. Blood and stool samples, and treatment adherence reports were collected from each subject throughout the study, along with a final set of swabs at study completion to detect S. aureus carriage. The outcomes of this study are GI or extra-GI carriage by S. aureus at the end of 4weeks of therapy, change in phagocytic activity of polymorphonuclear cells from pre-intervention to post-intervention, and symptomatic S. aureus infection at any site during the study period. CONCLUSION: 114 participants have been recruited for this study. Analysis of outcomes is underway. This is the first clinical trial to examine the efficacy of L. rhamnosus HN001 for decolonization of S. aureus, and investigates the mechanism by which L. rhamnosus HN001 mediates its effect on S. aureus colonization. ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier NCT01321606.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(10): 1154-1156, 2017 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28964347

RESUMO

The prevalence of Clostridium difficile spores was assessed in 48 observations of infected inpatients. Participants were randomized to hand hygiene with either alcohol-based handrub or soap and water. C difficile was recovered in 14.6% of pre-hand hygiene observations. It was still present on 5 of these 7 participants after hand hygiene (3/3 using alcohol-based handrub; 2/4 using soap and water).


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Desinfecção/métodos , Higiene das Mãos/métodos , Mãos/microbiologia , Esporos Bacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(9): 1047-9, 2016 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067517

RESUMO

A prospective study was conducted to identify risk factors for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, including co-colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile infection in patients admitted to the intensive care unit in 2 Veterans Affairs facilities. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile infection co-colonization were significant risk factors for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization. Further studies are needed to identify measures for preventing co-colonization of these major organisms in veterans.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Veteranos
6.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 11: 15, 2016 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27113448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking increases hospitalization and healthcare-associated infection. Our primary aim of this pilot, randomized-controlled trial was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a tobacco cessation intervention compared with usual care in inpatients. S. aureus carriage, healthcare-associated infections and infections post discharge were exploratory outcomes. METHODS: Current inpatient smokers from a university hospital facility were randomized to usual care or a face to face tobacco cessation counseling session where patients' tobacco use and strategies for quitting were discussed. Patient engagement, satisfaction and withdrawal symptoms were measured at 1 week and 12 weeks post discharge. Nasal swabs were collected at enrollment and discharge and assessed for S. aureus colonization. P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact and t-tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: For the study's primary outcome, participants reported the intervention as being generally acceptable and reported high overall levels of satisfaction, with a Likert scale score of at least 4/5 for all measures of satisfaction. No subjects utilized free tobacco cessation services after discharge. 83 % of the intervention group and 93 % of the control group smoked at least one cigarette after discharge. Secondary outcomes with regard to infections showed that, at discharge, 12 % of the intervention group (n = 17) and 18 % of the control group (n = 22) tested positive for S. aureus. After 3 months, 9 % of the intervention group developed infection, 41 % visited an emergency room, and 24 % were readmitted within 3 months post-discharge, compared to 27, 32 and 36 % of the control group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With regards to the primary aim of this study, there were overall high levels of satisfaction with the intervention, indicating good feasibility and acceptance among patients. However, more intensive interventions in hospitalized patients and impact on healthcare-associated infections and post-discharge infections should be explored.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do Paciente , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nariz/microbiologia , Projetos Piloto , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias , Wisconsin
7.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 44: 26-32, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is a pathogen of rapidly increasing public health importance. An estimated quarter of a million Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) occur in the United States annually, at a resultant cost of 14,000 deaths and 1 billion dollars. Clostridium difficile related deaths have risen 400% over the last decade, and current standard antibiotic treatments are only 75 to 85% successful. Besides increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance and side effects, these treatments are very expensive. The most vulnerable population for Clostridium difficile is older adults, who make up approximately half of the cases, but account for 90% of the related deaths. Probiotics may have potential as adjunctive therapeutic agents for CDIs, however, current data is limited. METHODS: This pilot study is a single-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase two clinical trial. The trial primarily evaluates the effect of four weeks of probiotic therapy in addition to standard of care on Clostridium difficile diarrhea duration and recurrence. Secondary outcomes include effect on fecal cytokines, fecal lactoferrin, and Clostridium difficile toxin density in stool, as well as patient functional status. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will determine the feasibility and effect size to conduct larger randomized controlled trials of probiotic interventions in patients with CDI, to determine the impact of probiotics on the symptoms of CDI. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01680874.

8.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(11): 1226-8, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25444269

RESUMO

Screening for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) has not been universally implemented within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). A prospective study was conducted to identify the admission prevalence rate of VRE in patients admitted to the intensive care unit in 2 VA facilities. Significant regional differences were found between the 2 facilities. Further studies are needed to account for regional differences in VRE admission prevalence, to optimize infection control interventions.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Estado Terminal , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Veteranos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Geografia , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA