The Role of Compounds Derived from Natural Supplement as Anticancer Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review.

Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is the most prominent kidney cancer derived from renal tubules and accounts for roughly 85% of all malignant kidney cancer. Every year, over 60,000 new cases are registered, and about 14,000 people die from RCC. The incidence of this has been increasing significantly in the U.S. and other countries. An increased understanding of molecular biology and the genomics of RCC has uncovered several signaling pathways involved in the progression of this cancer. Significant advances in the treatment of RCC have been reported from agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that target these pathways. These agents have become drugs of choice because they demonstrate clinical benefit and increased survival in patients with metastatic disease. However, the patients eventually relapse and develop resistance to these drugs. To improve outcomes and seek approaches for producing long-term durable remission, the search for more effective therapies and preventative strategies are warranted. Treatment of RCC using natural products is one of these strategies to reduce the incidence. However, recent studies have focused on these chemoprevention agents as anti-cancer therapies given they can inhibit tumor cell grow and lack the severe side effects common to synthetic compounds. This review elaborates on the current understanding of natural products and their mechanisms of action as anti-cancer agents. The present review will provide information for possible use of these products alone or in combination with chemotherapy for the prevention and treatment of RCC.

Docetaxel and atrasentan versus docetaxel and placebo for men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (SWOG S0421): a randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The endothelin pathway has a role in bone metastases, which are characteristic of advanced prostate cancer. Atrasentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, has shown activity in prostate cancer. We therefore assessed its effect on survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases. METHODS: In a double-blind phase 3 trial, men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, stratified for progression type (prostate-specific antigen or radiological), baseline pain, extraskeletal metastases, and bisphosphonate use, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) every 21 days, intravenously) with atrasentan (10 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 12 cycles and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who did not progress on treatment were permitted to continue atrasentan or placebo for up to 52 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00134056. FINDINGS: 498 patients were randomly assigned to the atrasentan group and 496 to the placebo group. The trial was halted early for futility in April, 2011, after a planned interim analysis. Median PFS was 9·2 months (95% CI 8·5-9·9) in the atrasentan group and 9·1 months (8·4-10·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·02, 0·89-1·16; p=0·81). Median overall survival was 17·8 months (16·4-19·8) in the atrasentan group versus 17·6 months (16·4-20·1) in the placebo group (1·04, 0·90-1·19; p=0·64). 278 (57%) of 492 patients in the atrasentan group had grade 3 and greater toxicity compared with 294 (60%) of 486 in the placebo group (p=0·22). Three deaths in the atrasentan group and seven in the placebo group were judged to be possibly or probably due to protocol treatment. INTERPRETATION: Atrasentan, when added to docetaxel, does not improve overall survival or PFS in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases; therefore, single-agent docetaxel should remain as one of the standard treatments. FUNDED: National Cancer Institute, Sanofi-Aventis, and Abbott Laboratories.

DNA Methyltransferase 1 Targeting Using Guadecitabine Inhibits Prostate Cancer Growth by an Apoptosis-Independent Pathway.

Epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation and histone modifications are implicated in repressing several tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer progression. In this study, we determined the anti-prostate cancer effect of a small molecule drug guadecitabine (gDEC) that inhibits/depletes the DNA methylation writer DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). gDEC inhibited prostate cancer cell growth and proliferation in vitro without activating the apoptotic cascade. Molecular studies confirmed DNMT1 depletion and modulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers E-cadherin and ß-catenin in several prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, 22Rv1, and MDA PCa 2b). gDEC treatment also significantly inhibited prostate tumor growth in vivo in mice (22Rv1, MDA PCa 2b, and PC-3 xenografts) without any observed toxicities. gDEC did not impact the expression of androgen receptor (AR) or AR-variant 7 (AR-V7) nor sensitize the prostate cancer cells to the anti-androgen enzalutamide in vitro. In further investigating the mechanism of cytoreduction by gDEC, a PCR array analyses of 84 chromatin modifying enzymes demonstrated upregulation of several lysine-specific methyltransferases (KMTs: KMT2A, KMT2C, KMT2E, KMT2H, KMT5A), confirmed by additional expression analyses in vitro and of harvested xenografts. Moreover, gDEC treatment increased global histone 3 lysine 4 mono-and di-methylation (H3K4me1 and H3K4me2). In sum, gDEC, in addition to directly depleting the corepressor DNMT1, upregulated KMT activating epigenetic enzymes, activating terminal epithelial program activation, and prostate cancer cell cycling exits independent of apoptosis.

Management of Metastatic Renal Clear Cell Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update.

ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. See the Appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To provide recommendations for the management of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: An Expert Panel conducted a systematic literature review to obtain evidence to guide treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The panel considered peer-reviewed reports published in English. RECOMMENDATIONS: The diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC should be made using tissue biopsy of the primary tumor or a metastatic site with the inclusion of markers and/or stains to support the diagnosis. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk criteria should be used to inform treatment. Cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to select patients with kidney-in-place and favorable- or intermediate-risk disease. For those who have already had a nephrectomy, an initial period of active surveillance may be offered if they are asymptomatic with a low burden of disease. Patients with favorable-risk disease who need systemic therapy may be offered an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); patients with intermediate or poor risk should be offered a doublet regimen (no recommendation was provided between ICIs or an ICI in combination with a VEGFR TKI). For select patients, monotherapy with either an ICI or a VEGFR TKI may be offered on the basis of comorbidities. Interleukin-2 remains an option, although selection criteria could not be identified. Recommendations are also provided for second- and subsequent-line therapy as well as the treatment of bone metastases, brain metastases, or the presence of sarcomatoid features. Participation in clinical trials is highly encouraged for patients with metastatic ccRCC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.

Diet and Health-related Quality of Life Among Men on Active Surveillance for Early-stage Prostate Cancer: The Men's Eating and Living Study (Cancer and Leukemia Group 70807 [Alliance]).

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) on active surveillance (AS) and whether it may be improved through lifestyle-focused interventions remain underdefined. OBJECTIVE: To assess longitudinal changes in HRQoL in patients who received and those who did not receive a behavioral intervention that increased vegetable intake. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A secondary analysis of participants in the Men's Eating and Living (MEAL) study (Cancer and Leukemia Group 70807 [Alliance]), a randomized trial of vegetable consumption in patients on AS, was conducted. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Prostate (FACT-P). Areas under the curves (AUCs) were used to summarize serial HRQoL. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PROs were completed in 87% (n = 387) of the intention-to-collect population. Baseline characteristics of patients completing HRQoL measures did not differ significantly from the entire study population or between groups. Baseline scores were high for all PROs and remained stable over 24 mo, with no significant differences from baseline at any time point. In adjusted analyses, there were no significant differences in summary AUC measures comparing control with intervention for the total MAX-PC score (p = 0.173); EPIC-26 domains of urinary incontinence (p = 0.210), urinary obstruction (p = 0.062), bowel health (p = 0.607), sexual health (p = 0.398), and vitality (p = 0.363); and total FACT-P scores (p = 0.471). CONCLUSIONS: Among men with localized PC on AS enrolled in a randomized trial, HRQoL was high across multiple domains at baseline, remained high during follow-up, and did not change in response to a behavioral intervention that increased vegetable intake. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with localized prostate cancer enrolled on active surveillance experience minimal cancer-associated anxiety, suffer low levels of cancer-associated symptoms, and perceive high physical and emotional well-being.

Cyr61/CCN1 signaling is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness and promotes pancreatic carcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in outlining the mechanisms involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis, precise molecular pathways and cellular lineage specification remains incompletely understood. RESULTS: We show here that Cyr61/CCN1 play a critical role in pancreatic carcinogenesis through the induction of EMT and stemness. Cyr61 mRNA and protein were detected in the early precursor lesions and their expression intensified with disease progression. Cyr61/CCN1 expression was also detected in different pancreatic cancer cell lines. The aggressive cell lines, in which the expressions of mesenchymal/stem cell molecular markers are predominant; exhibit more Cyr61/CCN1 expression. Cyr61 expression is exorbitantly higher in cancer stem/tumor initiating Panc-1-side-population (SP) cells. Upon Cyr61/CCN1 silencing, the aggressive behaviors are reduced by obliterating interlinking pathobiological events such as reversing the EMT, blocking the expression of stem-cell-like traits and inhibiting migration. In contrast, addition of Cyr61 protein in culture medium augments EMT and stemness features in relatively less aggressive BxPC3 pancreatic cancer cells. Using a xenograft model we demonstrated that cyr61/CCN1 silencing in Panc-1-SP cells reverses the stemness features and tumor initiating potency of these cells. Moreover, our results imply a miRNA-based mechanism for the regulation of aggressive behaviors of pancreatic cancer cells by Cyr61/CCN1. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the discovery of the involvement of Cyr61/CCN1 in pancreatic carcinogenesis may represent an important marker for PDAC and suggests Cyr61/CCN1 can be a potential cancer therapeutic target.

Tumor cell-derived PDGF-B potentiates mouse mesenchymal stem cells-pericytes transition and recruitment through an interaction with NRP-1.

BACKGROUND: New blood vessel formation, or angiogenic switch, is an essential event in the development of solid tumors and their metastatic growth. Tumor blood vessel formation and remodeling is a complex and multi-step processes. The differentiation and recruitment of mural cells including vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes are essential steps in tumor angiogenesis. However, the role of tumor cells in differentiation and recruitment of mural cells has not yet been fully elucidated. This study focuses on the role of human tumor cells in governing the differentiation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to pericytes and their recruitment in the tumor angiogenesis process. RESULTS: We show that C3H/10T1/2 mouse embryonic mesenchymal stem cells, under the influence of different tumor cell-derived conditioned media, differentiate into mature pericytes. These differentiated pericytes, in turn, are recruited to bind with capillary-like networks formed by endothelial cells on the matrigel under in vitro conditions and recruited to bind with blood vessels on gel-foam under in vivo conditions. The degree of recruitment of pericytes into in vitro neo-angiogenesis is tumor cell phenotype specific. Interestingly, invasive cells recruit less pericytes as compared to non-invasive cells. We identified tumor cell-secreted platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) as a crucial factor controlling the differentiation and recruitment processes through an interaction with neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) in mesenchymal stem cells. CONCLUSION: These new insights into the roles of tumor cell-secreted PDGF-B-NRP-1 signaling in MSCs-fate determination may help to develop new antiangiogenic strategies to prevent the tumor growth and metastasis and result in more effective cancer therapies.

Results of the Southwest Oncology Group phase II evaluation (study S0031) of ZD1839 for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

STUDY TYPE: Prognosis (inception cohort). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted agent ZD1839 in patients who failed one previous chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), and to correlate patterns of response with the expression of EGFR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with metastatic TCC of the urothelial tract were treated with ZD1839 500 mg oral daily. Patients were required to have a pretreatment biopsy to assess EGF expression. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 2 months, with only two patients (6.5%) surviving past 6 months with no disease progression. Thirty patients were evaluable for toxicity; there was grade 4 cerebrovascular ischaemia and an increase in creatinine level. All patients were evaluable for response, with one confirmed partial response (3%; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0-17%) in a patient with pulmonary metastases. All patients have died, and the estimated median (95% CI) survival is 3 (2-7) months. CONCLUSIONS: ZD1839 is ineffective as a second-line agent for urothelial carcinoma.

Intravenous zoledronic acid to prevent osteoporosis in a veteran population with multiple risk factors for bone loss on androgen deprivation therapy.

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer is associated with osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. Previous studies of zoledronic acid demonstrated bone loss prevention in patients initiating androgen deprivation therapy. There are limited data on patients on prolonged androgen deprivation therapy or in Veterans Affairs patients with multiple risk factors for osteoporosis. METHODS: We randomized 93 patients with M0 prostate cancer in this placebo controlled trial in the Veterans Affairs health care system. Preplanned strata included 50 patients on androgen deprivation therapy for less than 1 year (stratum 1) and 43 on androgen deprivation therapy for greater than 1 year (stratum 2). In each stratum patients were randomized to 4 mg zoledronic acid intravenously every 3 months for 4 treatments or intravenous placebo. The primary end point was the percent change in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine at 12 months. RESULTS: Age, race, body mass index and osteoporosis risk factors were similar for the 2 treatments. Most patients were former smokers, had moderate alcohol intake, were not on calcium/vitamin D supplements and were relatively sedentary at baseline. In stratum 1 spine bone mineral density increased 5.95% in the zoledronic acid arm and decreased 3.23% in the placebo arm (p = 0.0044). In stratum 2 spine bone mineral density increased 6.08% in the zoledronic acid arm and only increased 1.57% in the placebo arm (p = 0.0005). Treatment was well tolerated with minimal impact on renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid improved bone mineral density in patients with M0 prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy for 1 year or less, or greater than 1 year. This finding indicates that bisphosphonate therapy remains effective when initiated later in the course of androgen deprivation therapy and is efficacious in Veterans Affairs patients with multiple risk factors for osteoporosis.

2-Methoxyestradiol modulates beta-catenin in prostate cancer cells: a possible mediator of 2-methoxyestradiol-induced inhibition of cell growth.

2-Methoxyestradiol (2-ME(2)) is a novel anticancer agent because of its ability to potentiate apoptotic cell death and inhibit cancer cell growth and angiogenesis. The modes of action of this agent, however, have not yet been fully elucidated. In our study, we have investigated whether 2-ME2 is able to modulate beta-catenin signaling in prostate cancer cells, which is one of the major players in cell-cell adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis and carcinogenesis. We found that beta-catenin levels were significantly upregulated by 2-ME(2) in a dose-dependent manner in androgen dependent and independent prostate cancer total cellular extracts. We further show that beta-catenin levels were significantly increased in the membrane fraction, while nuclear fractions of beta-catenin were downregulated in the 2-ME(2)-treated cells. Accumulation of dephospho-beta-catenin (nondegraded form) parallel with Bcl-2 and Cyclin D1 downregulation was also achieved after 2-ME(2) treatment. Moreover, we demonstrate that the beta-catenin production by 2-ME(2) is mediated through the MEK/ERK-2 signaling pathway. Collectively, these results suggest that the cytostatic effect of 2-ME(2) may be mediated through the prevention of the translocation of beta-catenin to the nucleus parallel with an increase in cell-cell adhesion by increasing membrane beta-catenin production, eventually preventing cell migration. Moreover, dephospho-beta-catenin accumulation by 2ME(2) in the cytoplasm may contribute to the induction of apoptosis of these cells. Finally, studies testing the efficacy of 2-ME(2) in human prostate cancer are warranted to determine whether the inhibition of the expected loss of membranous beta-catenin and the upregulation of nuclear beta-catenin can prevent prostate cancer development and progression.

Southwest Oncology Group phase II study of ispinesib in androgen-independent prostate cancer previously treated with taxanes.

PURPOSE: The mitotic spindle has proven to be an effective therapeutic target in antineoplastic efforts. In this study, we sought to assess the efficacy of ispinesib, a mitotic kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor in androgen-independent prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with ispinesib 18 mg/m2 every 21 days and assessed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and measurable disease response at regular intervals. Kinesin spindle protein expression in archival tumors, population ispinesib pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic assessments of circulating lymphocytes were included. RESULTS: The study was terminated after first stage because no responses were seen in the first 21 patients. Median duration of PSA or clinical progression-free survival was 9 weeks. Plasma concentrations of ispinesib were comparable with those observed in previous phase I investigations. Immunohistochemical analysis of archival tumor specimens did not demonstrate significant KSP expression in most of the prostate cancer cases studied. Pharmacodynamic assessments of circulating lymphocytes from patients receiving ispinesib showed an absence of monopolar spindle formation, as would be expected if the drug were having its expected effects. CONCLUSION: Ispinesib was inactive in this study of patients with androgen-independent, and largely docetaxelresistant, prostate cancer. The lack of efficacy might be explained by the low expression of the drug target seen in prostate cancer, whereas not detecting monopolar spindles in circulating lymphocytes with drug treatment likely reflects the lack of dividing cells in peripheral blood.

Validation of the Association of RECIST Changes With Survival in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated on SWOG Study S0421.

BACKGROUND: Phase 2 trials evaluating new agents for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have relied on bone scan and prostate-specific antigen changes to assess activity. Given the increasing detection of measurable disease, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) changes warrant consideration to evaluate activity. We validated the association of RECIST 1.0 changes with survival in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for men with measurable disease from the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) S0421, a phase 3 trial in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel and prednisone plus placebo or atrasentan, were used. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of RECIST 1.0 outcomes within 120 days, ie, unconfirmed partial response (uPR), stable disease, and progressive disease (PD), with overall survival (OS) from day 120, adjusted for prognostic factors. RESULTS: Overall, 326 men were evaluable for landmark analysis, of whom 23 had PD, 230 stable disease, and 73 uPR. OS beyond day 120 was significantly different (P = .004) among these subgroups, with median (95% confidence interval) OS of 7.1 (3.5-8.8), 13.4 (11.4-15.6), and 16.3 (10.0-19.6) months for those with PD, stable disease, and uPR, respectively. In a multivariable model, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for patients with PD was 2.47 (1.42-4.29) compared to patients with an uPR (P = .002). CONCLUSION: The association of RECIST 1.0 changes with OS in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel was validated. Given limitations of bone scan and prostate-specific antigen alterations, improvements in objective RECIST 1.0 changes should be reported in phase 2 trials before launching phase 3 trials.

Patient-reported outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving docetaxel and Atrasentan versus docetaxel and placebo in a randomized phase III clinical trial (SWOG S0421).

Background: SWOG S0421 was a large randomized trial comparing docetaxel/prednisone plus placebo (DPP) to docetaxel/prednisone plus atrasentan over 12 cycles for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current report presents the PRO results for this trial, an important secondary endpoint. Methods: The trial specified two primary PRO endpoints. Palliation of worst pain was based on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), where a 2 point difference is defined as clinically meaningful. Improvement of functional status was based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate Cancer Trial Outcome Index (FACT-P TOI); a 5-point difference has been defined as clinically meaningful. We compared rates by arm using chi-square tests. Longitudinal analyses using linear mixed models addressed changes by arm over time. Results: Four-hundred eighty-nine patients on each arm were evaluable for PRO endpoint data. There were no differences by arm in clinically meaningful pain palliation (41.7% for DPP vs. 44.0% for DPA, p = .70) or functional status (24.2% for DPP vs. 28.7% for DPA, p = .13). Longitudinal comparisons indicated no differences over time by arm for BPI Worst Pain scores (0.13 points, p = .23). Patients on the DPA arm had improved functional status of 1.78 points on average, a statistically significant (p = .02) but not clinically meaningful difference. Conclusions: The SWOG S0421 PRO data showed little evidence of clinically meaningful differences by arm in either pain palliation or functional status.

Dose effect of soy supplementation in prostate cancer: a pilot study.

We performed a pilot study to determine the dose effect of soy supplement on serum hormonal levels, estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and androgen receptor (AR) expression in patients scheduled to undergo prostatectomy. Cohorts of 3-4 eligible patients received escalating doses of a commercial soy supplement, Flav-ein, from the time of study enrollment until prostatectomy. Serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), testosterone, and estrogen were measured at study enrollment and prior to prostatectomy. AR and ERalpha expression was evaluated in the pretreatment biopsy specimen and post-treatment prostatectomy specimen using immunohistochemical analysis. A total of 13 patients were enrolled in this pilot study and 11 patients were assessable for response. With soy supplementation, serum testosterone levels decreased in 9 of 11 patients and estrogen levels decreased in 8 of 10 patients in a dose-dependent manner. There was a variable effect on ERalpha expression with downregulation of receptor expression seen at the highest dose level. There was no effect on AR expression. In conclusion, supplementation with this commercial soy product produced a consistent decrease in serum sex hormone levels. Additional studies are needed to evaluate a potential dose effect on ERalpha expression.

Growth factors involved in prostate carcinogenesis.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer affecting men in United States and the second leading cause of death after lung cancer. The clinical course of patients after given diagnosis of prostate cancer is highly variable and the underlying reasons for such variability remain elusive. To better understand the pathophysiology of prostate cancer, there has been a push to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that mediate the development and progression of prostate cancer. Recent literature has pointed that a complex interplay between various cytokines, growth factors, and androgen receptors regulate the growth and functions of the prostate gland. Amongst the currently implicated anomalous pathways involved in prostate oncogenesis, the IGF-IGFBP axis has been demonstrated to play a very important role, although the precise molecular events regulated by IGF remain to be elucidated. The tumor promoting functions of VEGF has been defined in tumor angiogenesis and currently remains the central focus of anti-angiogenesis therapy in prostate cancer. Another key cytokine, TGF-beta has tumor-suppressor functions in normal prostate gland, but its pleiotropic functions in prostate cancer are influenced by the hormonal state of the disease. In partnership with other deregulated growth factor signaling, the TGF-beta cascade has also been implicated in the spread of prostate cancer. Lastly, members of the EGFR family, particularly the HER2 receptor, have also been recognized as crucial elements of aberrant signal transduction pathways, which induce activation of downstream signaling, involved in cellular proliferation, cell survival, and angiogenesis. The abnormal function of a number of growth factors in prostate cancer biology explains the heterogeneity of its histologic grade, mode of presentation and disease prognosis. At the same time, continued research in this field allows for the potential development of drug therapies against a diverse pool of cancer causing targets.

A phase II study of flavopiridol in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results of Southwest Oncology Group Trial 0109.

PURPOSE: Flavopiridol is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that prevents cell cycle progression and tumor growth. In initial phase I studies, encouraging responses were seen in advanced renal cell cancer (RCC). In a phase II study of flavopiridol given as a 72-h continuous infusion every 2 weeks in RCC, a response rate of 6% was seen but with considerable grade 3 or 4 asthenia, diarrhea, and thrombosis. Subsequently, an alternative 1-h bolus schedule was reported to have enhanced tolerability in a phase I trial. We therefore conducted a phase II study of this bolus regimen. METHODS: A total of 38 patients with advanced RCC were entered into this multi-institutional phase II study. Flavopiridol (50 mg/m(2) per day) was administered by bolus intravenous injection daily for three consecutive days, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Out of 34 eligible patients, one complete response and three partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 12% (95% CI 3-27%). Of the 34 patients, 14 (41%) had stable disease (SD). The probability of not failing treatment by 6 months was 21% (95% CI 9-35%). Median overall survival time was 9 months (95% CI 8-18 months). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were diarrhea (35%) and tumor pain (12%) along with anemia, dyspnea, and fatigue (9% each). CONCLUSIONS: Flavopiridol at this dose and schedule is feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile. Flavopiridol has some modest biologic activity against advanced RCC, as evidenced by its single-agent objective response and SD rates.

Impact Study: MK-0646 (Dalotuzumab), Insulin Growth Factor 1 Receptor Antibody Combined with Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in Stage IV Metastatic Non-squamous Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) regulates cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis. Adenocarcinoma and never-smokers have a higher expression of IGF-1R, which is associated with worse overall survival. Dalotuzumab-MK0646 (D) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets IGF-1R. Pemetrexed (P) has higher activity in non-squamous lung cancer (NSQL). We initiated a randomized phase II trial to test the combination of P and Cisplatin (C) ± D in NSQL. METHODS: Eligibility criteria were untreated NSQL stage IV, ECOG 0 or 1, measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and hematologic function, and no other intercurrent illness. P at 500 mg/m(2) and C at 75 mg/m(2) IV were given every 3 weeks. D was given at 10 mg/kg IV weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 3-week cycle in the experimental group. The patients had a radiographic assessment after every two cycles and were treated for a maximum of six cycles if there was a response or stable disease. The primary objective of the study was to compare the clinical response rates of PC vs. PC + D. RESULTS: From 1/2009 to 2/2011, the study accrued 26 subjects: 16 male and 10 female, with a median age of 59; 14 were treated with PC and 12 were treated with PC + D. We observed two partial responses (PR), seven stable disease (SD), three progressive disease (PD), and two not evaluable (NE) in the PC arm. In comparison, for the PC + D arm, there were three PR, four SD, four PD, and one NE. The hematologic toxicity was similar in both groups. There was higher incidence of hyperglycemia in the experimental group; four cases with grade 3 and one case with grade 4. CONCLUSION: PC + D had a similar response rate compared to PC, with a higher rate of hyperglycemia. Identification of responders using predictive markers would be key to continuing the study of D in NSQL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00799240, clinicaltrials.gov.