Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 47(12): 1716-1723, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625980

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine perceptions of nurses and physicians in regard to ethical decision-making climate in the ICU and to test the hypothesis that the worse the ethical decision-making climate, the greater the discordance between nurses' and physicians' rating of ethical decision-making climate with physicians hypothesized to rate the climate better than the nurses. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A total of 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the United States. SUBJECTS: ICU physicians and nurses. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians were measured in April-May 2014, using a 35-items self-assessment questionnaire that evaluated seven factors (empowering leadership by physicians, interdisciplinary reflection, not avoiding end-of-life decisions, mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making, active decision-making by physicians, and ethical awareness). A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians participated (response rate of 63%). Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorized according to four ethical decision-making climates: good, average with nurses' involvement at end-of-life, average without nurses' involvement at end-of-life, and poor. Overall, physicians rated ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses (p < 0.001 for all seven factors). Physicians had more positive perceptions of ethical decision-making climate than nurses in all 13 participating countries and in each individual participating ICU. Compared to ICUs with good or average ethical decision-making climates, ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the greatest discordance between physicians and nurses. Although nurse/physician differences were found in all seven factors of ethical decision-making climate measurement, the factors with greatest discordance were regarding physician leadership, interdisciplinary reflection, and not avoiding end-of-life decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians consistently perceived ICU ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses. ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the largest discrepancies.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/ética , Cuidados Críticos/ética , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/ética , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Autorrelato , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Estados Unidos
2.
J Interprof Care ; 30(3): 301-8, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27152533

RESUMO

This article describes a study that evaluated the quality of teamwork in a surgical intensive care unit and assessed whether teamwork could be improved significantly through a tailor-made intervention. The quality of teamwork prior to and after the intervention was assessed using the Interprofessional Practice and Education Quality Scales (IPEQS) using the PROSE online diagnostics and documenting system, which assesses three domains of teamwork: organisational factors, care processes, and team members' attitudes and beliefs. Furthermore, team members evaluated strengths and weaknesses of the teamwork through open-ended questions. Information gathered by means of the open questions was used to design a tailor-made 12-week intervention consisting of (1) optimising the existing weekly interdisciplinary meetings with collaborative decision-making and clear communication of goal-oriented actions, including the psychosocial aspects of care; and (2) organising and supporting the effective exchange of information over time between all professions involved. It was found that the intervention had a significant impact on organisational factors and care processes related to interprofessional teamwork for the total group and within all subgroups, despite baseline differences between the subgroups in interprofessional teamwork. In conclusion, teamwork, and more particularly the organisational aspects of interprofessional collaboration and processes of care, can be improved by a tailor-made intervention that takes into account the professional needs of healthcare workers.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Processos Grupais , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Relações Interprofissionais , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comunicação , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 46(1): 46-56, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690968

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Apart from organizational issues, quality of inter-professional collaboration during ethical decision-making may affect the intention to leave one's job. To determine whether ethical climate is associated with the intention to leave after adjustment for country, ICU and clinicians characteristics. METHODS: Perceptions of the ethical climate among clinicians working in 68 adult ICUs in 12 European countries and the US were measured using a self-assessment questionnaire, together with job characteristics and intent to leave as a sub-analysis of the Dispropricus study. The validated ethical decision-making climate questionnaire included seven factors: not avoiding decision-making at end-of-life (EOL), mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, open interdisciplinary reflection, ethical awareness, self-reflective physician leadership, active decision-making at end-of-life by physicians, and involvement of nurses in EOL. Hierarchical mixed effect models were used to assess associations between these factors, and the intent to leave in clinicians within ICUs, within the different countries. RESULTS: Of 3610 nurses and 1137 physicians providing ICU bedside care, 63.1% and 62.9% participated, respectively. Of 2992 participating clinicians, 782 (26.1%) had intent to leave, of which 27% nurses, 24% junior and 22.7% senior physicians. After adjustment for country, ICU and clinicians characteristics, mutual respect OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.66- 0.90), open interdisciplinary reflection (OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.62-0.86]) and not avoiding EOL decisions (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.77-0.98]) were all associated with a lower intent to leave. CONCLUSION: This is the first large multicenter study showing an independent association between clinicians' intent to leave and the quality of the ethical climate in the ICU. Interventions to reduce intent to leave may be most effective when they focus on improving mutual respect, interdisciplinary reflection and active decision-making at EOL.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/ética , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Intenção , Cultura Organizacional , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cuidados Críticos/psicologia , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Ética Médica , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/ética , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
4.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 27(10): 781-789, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29475979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Literature depicts differences in ethical decision-making (EDM) between countries and intensive care units (ICU). OBJECTIVES: To better conceptualise EDM climate in the ICU and to validate a tool to assess EDM climates. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi method, we built a theoretical framework and a self-assessment instrument consisting of 35 statements. This Ethical Decision-Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) was developed to capture three EDM domains in healthcare: interdisciplinary collaboration and communication; leadership by physicians; and ethical environment. This instrument was subsequently validated among clinicians working in 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the USA. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the structure of the EDM climate as perceived by clinicians. Measurement invariance was tested to make sure that variables used in the analysis were comparable constructs across different groups. RESULTS: Of 3610 nurses and 1137 physicians providing ICU bedside care, 2275 (63.1%) and 717 (62.9%) participated respectively. Statistical analyses revealed that a shortened 32-item version of the EDMCQ scale provides a factorial valid measurement of seven facets of the extent to which clinicians perceive an EDM climate: self-reflective and empowering leadership by physicians; practice and culture of open interdisciplinary reflection; culture of not avoiding end-of-life decisions; culture of mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team; active involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making; active decision-making by physicians; and practice and culture of ethical awareness. Measurement invariance of the EDMCQ across occupational groups was shown, reflecting that nurses and physicians interpret the EDMCQ items in a similar manner. CONCLUSIONS: The 32-item version of the EDMCQ might enrich the EDM climate measurement, clinicians' behaviour and the performance of healthcare organisations. This instrument offers opportunities to develop tailored ICU team interventions.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões/ética , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Cultura Organizacional , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Modelos Teóricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA