Duration of biophysical profile in periviable and very preterm low-risk pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, perinatal viability has shifted from 24 to 22 weeks of gestation at many institutions after improvements in survival in neonates delivered at the limit of viability. Monitoring these fetuses is essential because antenatal interventions with resuscitation efforts are available for patients at risk of delivery at the limit of viability. However, fetal monitoring using biophysical profiles has not been extensively studied in very preterm pregnancies, particularly in the periviable period (20 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) investigate whether the completion of biophysical profiles within 30 minutes is feasible in very preterm pregnancies, and (2) determine the average observation time required to achieve a score of 8 out of 8 in very preterm pregnancies from 20 weeks 0 days to 31 weeks 6 days. STUDY DESIGN: This study prospectively evaluated biophysical scores in singleton pregnancies undergoing routine ultrasonography at or near viability from 20 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days (periviable or group I), 24 weeks 0 days to 27 weeks 6 days (group II), and 28 weeks 0 days to 31 weeks 6 days (group III). The results and duration of biophysical profiles were compared with those of a control group (32 weeks 0 days to 35 weeks 6 days) undergoing indicated fetal surveillance. Biophysical profiles were performed for all studied pregnancies until a score of 8 out of 8 was obtained. When >1 biophysical profile was obtained during pregnancy, each was analyzed individually. Pregnancies with fetal anomalies or obstetrical/medical indications for fetal well-being surveillance were excluded. Analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS: Data were collected for 123 participants, yielding 79, 75, and 72 studies for groups I, II, and III, respectively. The control group included 42 patients, yielding 140 studies. At 30 minutes, 80% (63/79) of the studies in the periviable group had a score of 8 out of 8, as opposed to 100% (140/140) in the control group (P<.001). The mean±standard deviation time in minutes to achieve a biophysical score of 8 out of 8 was 23.3±10.1 in the periviable group, as opposed to 9.4±6.5 in controls (P<.001). Extending the study to +2 standard deviations (43.6 minutes) in the periviable group resulted in 97% (77/79) of the scans scoring 8 out of 8 in the absence of adverse outcomes. In the other groups, a biophysical score of 8 out of 8 within 30 minutes was obtained in 97% (73/75) and 100% (72/72) in groups II and III, respectively; the mean±standard deviation times were 17.1±8.4 minutes (group II) and 13.1±7.3 minutes (group III). No adverse outcomes developed during the study participation in groups I to III. CONCLUSION: Biophysical scores of 8 out of 8 can be successfully achieved in low-risk periviable pregnancies (20 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days) within an observation time longer than the standard 30-minute duration. The time required to reach a score of 8 out of 8 decreases as gestation progresses. We suggest adjusting the observation time for biophysical profile completion according to the gestational age.

Postconceptual Neonatal Dating by Transmastoid Ultrasound of Transcerebellar Diameter-Comparison to Crown Rump Length Measurement: A Proof of Concept Paper.

OBJECTIVES: Transcerebellar diameter (TCD) has been utilized prenatally as a tool to estimate gestational age (GA) when fetal growth aberrations are suspected. Traditionally, first trimester ultrasound (1TUS) has been the gold standard of dating a pregnancy in spontaneous pregnancies. We sought to determine if neonatal TCD measurement was as accurate as 1TUS in the estimation of postconceptual gestational age (PCGA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort from a registry of high-quality transmastoid views of consecutive patients from July 2019 to November 2020, delivered from 24 to 34 weeks GA, and with a 1TUS were included. The reference PCGA was the sum of the GA at delivery by 1TUS and day of life. The PCGA by TCD was calculated from Chang et al for GA by TCD. Reference and experimental values were compared by correlation, agreement within 7 days, and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Of the 154 individual patients in the registry of high-quality transmastoid views during the study period, 62 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. PCGA by 1TUS and TCD were highly correlated (r = 0.86, P < .001; κ = 47% agreement within 7 days of PCGA). The bias of PCGA by TCD was 4.6 days earlier than the PCGA by 1TUS (95% confidence interval of agreement: -29.2, 20). CONCLUSIONS: PCGA estimation by neonatal transmastoid TCD was highly correlated with that of 1TUS. It generally underestimates GA by 4.6 days. This relationship warrants further investigation to determine if this method of estimating PCGA in undated gestations is generalizable.

Outcomes in Pregnant Adolescent Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although clinical outcomes for pregnant adults have been reported, the impact of COVID-19 on adolescents is lacking. We sought to evaluate obstetric outcomes of pregnant adolescents infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and compare them with uninfected adolescent controls. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of pregnant adolescents (14-19 years) who had a positive polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 from April 2020 to December 2020 at Inova Health System Hospitals. Controls included pregnant adolescents who tested negative. The primary outcome was a composite of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction and stillbirth. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: Forty-eight pregnant adolescents who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were compared with 394 controls. Infected adolescents were more likely to be Hispanic (91.67% vs. 12.18%; risk ratio [RR] 41.85 [95% CI: 15.43-113.5]) and uninsured (50% vs. 7.87%; RR 7.04 [95% CI: 4.31-11.49]. Nearly 80% of infected adolescents remained asymptomatic, whereas one-third of symptomatic adolescents progressed to severe or critical COVID-19. The primary composite outcome was more prevalent in infected adolescents compared with noninfected controls (41.67% vs. 25.38%; adjusted RR 2.65 [95% CI: 1.19-5.93]). Maternal morbidity was more prevalent in infected adolescents (6.25% vs. 0.76%; adjusted RR 9.53 [95% CI: 3.83-23.71]). Primary and secondary maternal outcomes were more prevalent in younger adolescents and those with higher severity of COVID-19. Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection was not associated with neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant adolescents infected with SARS-CoV-2 are more likely to have adverse obstetric outcomes and maternal morbidity compared with noninfected pregnant adolescents.