Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Background: The safety and efficacy of DAPT in elderly patients with ACS is not well characterized. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review to identify clinical studies that reported safety and efficacy outcomes after DAPT for ACS in elderly patients. The primary outcomes of primary efficacy endpoint rates and bleeding event rates were reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval. No prior ethical approval was required since all data are public. Results: Our search yielded 660 potential studies. We included 8 studies reporting on 29,217 patients. There was a higher risk of bleeding event rates in elderly patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor when compared to clopidogrel with a risk ratio of 1.17 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.27, p < 0.05). There was no difference in primary efficacy endpoint rates between elderly patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor when compared to clopidogrel with a risk ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.07, p=0.17). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel is associated with a higher risk of bleeding events in elderly patients with ACS. There was no difference in the primary efficacy endpoints between the two treatment groups.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 induced hypoxia: Single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated pneumonia represent a clinical and scientific challenge. The role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in such a crisis remains unclear. METHODS: We examined COVID-19 patients who were supported for acute respiratory failure by both conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) and ECMO at a tertiary care institution in Washington DC. The study period extended from March 23 to April 29. We identified 59 patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation. Of those, 13 patients required ECMO. RESULTS: Nine out of 13 ECMO (69.2%) patients were decannulated from ECMO. All-cause ICU mortality was comparable between both ECMO and MV groups (6 patients [46.15%] vs. 22 patients [47.82 %], p = 0.92). ECMO non-survivors vs survivors had elevated D-dimer (9.740 mcg/ml [4.84-20.00] vs. 3.800 mcg/ml [2.19-9.11], p = 0.05), LDH (1158 ± 344.5 units/L vs. 575.9 ± 124.0 units/L, p = 0.001), and troponin (0.4315 ± 0.465 ng/ml vs. 0.034 ± 0.043 ng/ml, p = 0.04). Time on MV as expected was significantly longer in ECMO groups (563.3 hours [422.1-613.9] vs. 247.9 hours [101.8-479] in MV group, p = 0.0009) as well as ICU length of stay 576.2 hours [457.5-652.8] in ECMO group vs. 322.2 hours [120.6-569.3] in MV group, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: ECMO is a supportive intervention for COVID-19 associated pneumonia that could be considered if the optimum mechanical ventilation is deemed ineffective. Biomarkers such as D-dimer, LDH, and troponin could help with discerning the clinical prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Discretionary Atherectomy in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) usually have concomitant calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring atherectomy to improve lesion compliance and odds of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a paucity of data regarding PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2016 through 2019 using ICD-10 codes to identify individuals with AS who underwent PCI with or without atherectomy (Orbital Atherectomy [OA], Rotational or Laser Atherectomy [non-OA]). Temporal trends, safety, outcomes, costs, and correlates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were assessed using discharge weighted data. RESULTS: Hospitalizations of 45,420 AS patients undergoing PCI with or without atherectomy were identified and of those, 88.6 %, 2.3 %, and 9.1 % were treated with PCI-only, OA, or non-OA, respectively. There was an increase in PCIs (8855 to 10,885), atherectomy [OA (165 to 300) and non-OA (795 to 1255)], and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use (625 to 1000). The median cost of admission was higher in the atherectomy cohorts ($34,340.77 in OA, $32,306.2 in non-OA) as compared to the PCI-only cohort ($23,683.98). Patients tend to have decreased odds of MACE with IVUS guided atherectomy and PCI. CONCLUSIONS: This large database revealed a significant increase in PCI with or without atherectomy in AS patients from 2016 to 2019. Considering the complex comorbidities of AS patients, the overall complication rates were well distributed among the different cohorts, suggesting that IVUS guided PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS is feasible and safe.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair: An Analysis From the National Inpatient Sample.

Background: Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation carry an elevated surgical risk resulting in increasing adoption of less invasive transcatheter therapies such as transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR); however, data are limited. This study aimed to describe patient characteristics and predictors of poor outcomes among those undergoing TTVR. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was queried (2016-2019) to identify all patients undergoing TTVR (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code 02UJ3JZ) alone or in combination with mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) (code 02UG3JZ). The primary aim was to define clinical characteristics, time trends, in-hospital outcomes, and predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality (mortality). The secondary outcomes included predictors of increased hospitalization costs and length of stay (greater than the 75th percentile). Results: We identified 925 patients who underwent TTVR (460 [49.7%] who underwent TTVR alone and 465 [50.3%] who underwent TTVR in combination with MTEER). There was a 6.5-fold increase in TTVR adoption (P < .001). Patients were older (78 ± 10 years), female (63.2%), and White (72.7%), with frequent comorbidities. Mortality occurred in 2.2%, vascular complications occurred in 10.3%, and major bleeding occurred in 3.3%. The predictors of mortality were acute kidney injury (odds ratio [OR], 5.25; 95% CI, 5.24-5.26; P < .001), major bleeding (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.80-2.83; P < .001), pericardiocentesis (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 2.11-2.18; P < .001), and chronic liver disease (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.39-1.40; P < .001). The predictors of increased length of stay or hospitalization costs included coronary artery disease, atrial arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension, chronic liver disease, and procedural complications. Conclusions: TTVR showed increased adoption with elevated but acceptable mortality and complications considering this high-risk population. The results of randomized trials are awaited.

Obesity, Systemic Hypertension, and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Tale of Three Diseases.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially ischemic heart disease and stroke, is the major cause of death worldwide, accounting for more than one-third of all deaths annually. Hypertension is the most prevalent and modifiable risk factor of CVD-related deaths. The same is true for obesity, which is currently being recognized as a major global epidemic. The prevalence of obesity in the United States has increased dramatically, from 13.4% in 1960 to 36.5% in 2014, with as much as 70.7% of the American adult population being overweight or obese (CDC). Epidemiological studies have shown that obesity predisposes to hypertension and CVD - with the relationship between markers of obesity and blood pressure being almost linear across different populations. In this review, we discuss systemic and pulmonary hypertension in the context of obesity.

Assessing the need for transfer to the intensive care unit for Coronavirus-19 disease: Epidemiology and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Although many patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) require direct admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), some are sent after admission. Clinicians require an understanding of this phenomenon and various risk stratification approaches for recognizing these subjects. METHODS: We examined all Covid-19 patients sent initially to a ward who subsequently required care in the ICU. We examined the timing transfer and attempted to develop a risk score based on baseline variables to predict progressive disease. We evaluated the utility of the CURB-65 score at identifying the need for ICU transfer. RESULTS: The cohort included 245 subjects (mean age 59.0 ± 14.2 years, 61.2% male) and 20% were eventually sent to the ICU. The median time to transfer was 2.5 days. Approximately 1/3rd of patients were not moved until day 4 or later and the main reason for transfer (79.2%) was worsening respiratory failure. A baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of ≤0.8 103/ml and a serum ferritin ≥1000 ng/ml were independently associated with ICU transfer. Co-morbid illnesses did not correlate with eventual ICU care. Neither a risk score based on a low ALC and/or high ferritin nor the CURB-65 score performed well at predicting need for transfer. CONCLUSION: Covid-19 patients admitted to general wards face a significant risk for deterioration necessitating ICU admission and respiratory failure can occur late in this disease. Neither baseline clinical factors nor the CURB-65 score perform well as screening tests to categorize these subjects as likely to progress to ICU care.