A high-volume ERCP service led by surgeons is associated with good outcomes and meets national key performance indicators: results from a British district general hospital.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common, but technically challenging procedure used in the management of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) disease. It is traditionally performed by medical gastroenterologists. In 2014, the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) proposed key performance indicators to evaluate and set standards of ERCP practice. This study aimed to compare our ERCP outcomes against these targets, in a centre where ERCP is exclusively performed by surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all ERCPs undertaken over a 38 months in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom (UK), by three Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons. Study outcomes were based upon, and compared against, BSG key performance indicators, including number of ERCPs per annum, proportion of successful cannulations of bile duct and stone clearance, ERCP-specific complications and mortality. RESULTS: The unit's caseload over this period was 1324, equating to approximately 418 per annum (BSG minimum 200 per unit). Management of bile duct stones was the commonest indication for ERCP. Overall, 95% (1253/1324) of bile ducts were cannulated and 92% (645/698) for those undergoing their first ERCP. Bile duct clearance was achieved in 80% of patients (BSG recommend > 75%) and the successful stenting of extra-hepatic strictures in 94% (BSG recommend > 80%). The overall complication rate was 4.3% (BSG standard < 6%). Procedure-specific mortality was 0.3% (4/1324) where death was either caused by pancreatitis or sepsis. CONCLUSION: A high-volume ERCP service led and performed exclusively by surgeons meets all BSG performance indicators, with good procedural and patient outcomes. Formal training pathways should be developed to encourage more surgical centres to provide an ERCP service and deal with what are common surgical pathologies.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With Sphincterotomy in Elderly Patients With Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is common in elderly patients and carries worse outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for prevention of recurrent GSP. In frail populations, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy (ERCP-s) is an alternative. Management guidelines of GSP in the elderly are lacking. This study aimed to investigate and compare management strategies for GSP in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparison of outcome of patients aged ≥65 years with first presentation of GSP treated either with (1) LC only, (2) ERCP-s, (3) ERCP-S followed by LC, or (4) no intervention. RESULTS: 216 patients were included. Median age was 76 years (interquartile range 70-83). Most (80%, n = 172) had mild pancreatitis, whilst 12% (n = 26) had severe disease. 24% (n = 55) were treated with ERCP-s; 40% (n = 87) underwent LC alone; 11% (n = 23) had ERCP-s followed by LC; and 25% (n = 55) received no intervention. Patients without intervention were older (P < .001) and frailer (P < .001). The LC-only group had lower post-procedure re-admission rates of 6% (n = 5) compared to 27% (n = 14) for ERCP-s, 33% (n = 7) for ERCP-S + LC, and 31% (n = 17) for the no intervention group (P = .0001). Biliary cause mortality was highest in the no intervention group (n = 11, 20%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the gold standard for elderly patients with GSP.

Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a viable alternative to open resection for the management of esophagogastric cancer. However, the technique may relate to a higher incidence of ischemia-related gastric conduit complications. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning (LIC) by ligating the left gastric vessels 2 weeks before MIE may have a protective role, possibly through an improvement of conduit perfusion. This project was designed to evaluate whether LIC influenced ultimate conduit perfusion. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare MIE with LIC (L) against MIE without (N). The project began in May 2009 and was offered to consecutive patients with the objective of recruiting 22 in each arm. Sample size calculations were based on data from previous clinical series. The main outcome measure was perfusion recorded by validated laser Doppler fluximetry, at the fundus (F) and greater curve (G); performed at routine staging laparoscopy and every stage of an MIE. A perfusion coefficient measured as ratio at stage of MIE over baseline was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were recruited before an interim analysis of the trial data. At staging laparoscopy perfusion at F was higher than at G (p = 0.016). In the L cohort, an apparent rise in perfusion at G is observed post intervention (p = 0.176). At MIE, baseline perfusion is comparable for both arms; however, a significant drop is observed at both locations once the stomach is mobilized and exteriorized (p = 0.001). Once delivered at the neck, perfusion coefficient is approximately 38% of baseline levels. However, there was no discernible difference between the L (38.3 ± 12) and N (37.7 ± 16.8) cohorts (p = 0.798). CONCLUSIONS: LIC does not translate into an improved perfusion of the gastric conduit tip. The benefits reported from published clinical series suggest that the resistance of the conduit to ischemia occurs through alternative possibly microcellular mechanisms.

Video. Surgical optimisation of the gastric conduit for minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Total minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) is a valid alternative to open surgery for the management of oesophagogastric cancer and may lead to a more rapid restoration of health-related quality of life post surgery. However, a high incidence of gastric conduit failure (GCF) has also been observed which could be detrimental to any potential benefits of this approach. Technical modifications have been introduced in an attempt to reduce conduit morbidity, and the aim of this study was to evaluate their efficacy. METHODS: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy has been the procedure of choice in our unit since April 2004. Data on patient and surgical variables are entered onto a prospective database. Laparoscopic ischaemic conditioning (LIC) by ligation of the left gastric vessels 2 weeks prior to MIO was introduced in April 2006. Extracorporeal formation of the gastric conduit through a minilaparotomy was offered to patients since January 2008. Where present, GCF was characterised as one of three types: I, simple anastomotic leak; II, conduit tip necrosis; and III, whole conduit necrosis. RESULTS: As of January 2010, 131 patients had undergone an MIO and GCF was observed in 21 patients (16.0%). Sixty-seven patients had LIC and 9 of them (13.4%) developed GCF (I, 10.4%; II, 0%; III, 3.0%) compared to 12 (18.8%) of 64 patients who did not have LIC (I, 6.3%; II, 7.8%; III, 4.7%). A total of 43 patients had an extracorporeally fashioned conduit and 6 (14.0%) developed GCF (I, 11.6%; II, 0%; III, 2.3%), whilst 88 had an intracorporeal conduit with 15 (17.0%) developing GCF (I, 6.8%; II, 5.7%; III, 4.5%). GCF can be reduced with the incorporation of LIC and an extracorporeally fashioned conduit, with possible elimination of type II conduit tip necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical modification of a three-stage minimally invasive oesophagectomy technique, with the further incorporation of laparoscopic ischaemic conditioning and extracorporeal conduit formation, reduces gastric conduit morbidity, allowing the potential benefits of this approach to be realised.

Idiopathic ascites following laparoscopic appendicectomy: a case report.

Appendicitis is a common condition and is frequently treated with a laparoscopic appendicectomy. We present a rare case of delayed, idiopathic ascites following laparoscopic appendicectomy for histologically confirmed appendicitis. While the complications of this condition and this procedure are well documented, this case demonstrates very rare sequelae following a laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Ischemic conditioning shows a time-dependant influence on the fate of the gastric conduit after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) is now established as a valid alternative to open surgery for the management of esophagogastric cancers. However, a high incidence of ischemia-related gastric conduit failure (ICF) is observed, which is detrimental to any potential benefits of this approach. METHODS: Since April 2004, MIO has been the procedure of choice for esophagogastric resection in the authors' unit. Data relating to the surgical technique were collected, with a focus on ischemic conditioning by laparoscopic ligation of the left gastric artery (LIC) 2 weeks or 5 days before resection. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients underwent a planned MIO. Four in-patient deaths (4.1%) occurred, none of which were conduit related, and overall, 20 patients experienced ICF (20.6%). In four patients, ICF was recognized and dealt with at the initial surgery. The remaining 16 patients experienced this complication postoperatively, with 9 (9.3%) of them requiring further surgery. Of the 97 patients, 55 did not undergo ischemic conditioning, and conduit failure was observed in 11 (20%). Thirty-five patients had LIC at 2 weeks, and 2 (5.7%) experienced ICF. All seven patients (100%) who had LIC at 5 days experienced ICF. Timing of ischemic conditioning (p < 0.0001) had a definite impact on the conduit failure rate, and the benefit of ischemic conditioning at 2 weeks compared with no conditioning neared significance (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic failure of the gastric conduit significantly impairs recovery after MIO. Ischemic conditioning 2 weeks before surgery may reduce this complication and allow the benefits of this approach to be realized.

Classification and early recognition of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, with significant morbidity resulting from gastric conduit failure. Early recognition and management of these complications is essential. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of routine investigations after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) and to propose a classification system for gastric conduit failure. METHODS: For esophagogastric resection, MIO is the procedure of choice in the authors' unit. Standard postoperative care similar to that for open esophagectomy is undertaken on a specialist ward. Routine investigations include daily assessment of C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count (WCC), and a contrast swallow on postoperative day (POD) 5. The authors performed a retrospective analysis to assess the utility of these tests. RESULTS: Of a prospective cohort of 50 patients from April 2004 to July 2006, 26 (52%) had an uneventful recovery (U), 24 (48%) experienced complications (C) of varying nature and severity, and 1 died (2%). All the patients demonstrated a transient abnormal rise in CRP until POD 3. In group U, the levels then fell, but in group C, they remained elevated (POD 5: U = 96, C = 180; p < 0.01). This discrepancy trend was further exaggerated in the nine patients with gastric conduit failure (POD 5: GC = 254; p < 0.01), whereas contrast swallow failed to identify this complication in six patients. Simple anastomotic leaks (type 1, n = 4) were managed conservatively. Patients with conduit tip necrosis (type 2, n = 3) and complete conduit ischemia (type 2, n = 2) were managed by repeat thoracotomy and either refashioning of the conduit or take-down and cervical esophagostomy. None of the patients with conduit failure died. CONCLUSION: Postoperative CRP monitoring is a highly effective, simple method for the early recognition of gastric conduit failure. This new system of classification provides a successful guide to conservative management or revisional surgery.

Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

BACKGROUND: A minimally invasive approach to esophagogastric cancer resection offers an attractive alternative to traditional open surgery; however, concerns regarding feasibility, safety, cost, and outcomes have restricted widespread acceptance of these procedures. This study outlines our comparative experiences of both open and minimally invasive esophagectomy over a 4-year period. METHODS: Surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between 30 consecutive patients who underwent open (Ivor Lewis) transthoracic esophagectomy (TTO) between January 2002 and December 2003 and 50 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) from January 2004 to July 2006. RESULTS: Inpatient mortality and overall surgical morbidity were identical for each cohort (TTO versus MIO: mortality 3% versus 2%; morbidity 50% versus 48%). Pulmonary-related complications were higher in the open series (23% versus 8%; p = 0.05). The incidence of gastric-conduit-related complications was similar between the two cohorts (13% versus 18%; p = 0.52). Survival at 1 and 2 years was 86% and 58% in the TTO group and 94% and 74% in the MIO group. No significant difference in calculated cost was observed (7,017 pounds sterling versus 7,885 pounds sterling). CONCLUSIONS: Transition from open to minimally invasive techniques of esophagogastric resection for cancer is possible without compromising patient safety or incurring excessive financial expenses, and the minimally invasive procedure results in similar or potentially better outcomes.

Eye-Tracking Technology in Surgical Training.

The aim of this review was to amalgamate literature on the use of eye tracking methodology as an adjunct to surgical training. The PRISMA Guidelines were used to undertake this systematic review. Our review studies has shown that recording a surgeon's eye movements; time to first fixation and gaze pattern through the use of eye tracking technology would be beneficial for surgical training.

A unique complication of self-expandable metal stent placement in malignant duodenal obstruction.

Intestinal obstruction is a common complication in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. In the last two decades, endoscopic placement of duodenal stents has become a mainstay of palliative treatment in patients with unresectable obstructive duodenal pathology. Self-expandable metal stents have been reported to have excellent success rates, besides dramatically improve the patient's quality of life by reinstating the oral feeding ability. Re-intervention rates remain high, commonly as a consequence of tumour ingrowth resulting stent occlusion. We describe a unique case of duodenal stent obstruction secondary to impacted gallstones. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case described in the literature and should alert clinicians to this unusual complication.

Laparoscopic ischaemic conditioning of the stomach may reduce gastric-conduit morbidity following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Oesophagectomy, whether open or minimal access, is associated with a significant incidence of gastric-conduit-related complications. Previous animal and human studies suggest that ischaemic conditioning of the stomach prior to oesophagectomy improves perfusion of the gastric conduit. We have adopted laparoscopic ligation of the left gastric artery 2 weeks prior to minimally invasive oesophagectomy, having identified a relative high incidence of gastric-tube complications through a cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. METHODS: This study included 77 consecutive patients who underwent a Total MIO (thoracoscopic oesophageal mobilisation, laparoscopic gastric tube formation, cervical anastomosis). The ligation group comprised 22 consecutive patients, excluding those with middle-third squamous tumours or early-stage adenocarcinoma, who underwent ligation 2 weeks prior to MIO at staging laparoscopy. The control group comprised 55 patients who did not undergo ischaemic conditioning in this way. We have defined conduit-related complications as: leak managed conservatively (L); tip necrosis requiring resection and re-anastomosis (TN) and conduit necrosis needing resection and oesophagostomy (CN). The values are reported as medians. The effect of ligation of the left gastric artery was followed with a CUSUM analysis. RESULTS: Ligation was performed 15.5 days pre-operatively (median). There were no complications and the length of hospital stay was 1 day. Although gastric mobilisation at MIO was technically more difficult after ligation, there was no significant difference in operating time (ligation, 407 min; control, 425 min) or blood loss (ligation and control, 500 ml). There was less gastric-conduit morbidity in the ligation group (two of 22, 10%; one L, one CN) compared with the control group (11 of 55, 20%; four L, five TN, two CN), but these differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.211 and p=0.176 Fisher's exact test). The CUSUM analysis showed that during ligation of the left gastric artery, conservatively treated gastric-conduit-related morbidity (leak, resection and re-anastomosis or conduit necrosis) remained within safe limits (10%). Conduit-related-morbidity increased after stopping ligation. CONCLUSION: In this non-randomised clinical setting, our results suggest that ischaemic conditioning of the stomach prior to MIO is safe. There is a trend to reduced morbidity related to gastric-conduit ischaemia, which was demonstrated by a CUSUM analysis. A randomised trial is needed before ligation of the left gastric artery can be routinely recommended.

Influence of expert clinical adviser characteristics on opinions about interventional procedures.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine potential associations between the professional background and experience of expert clinicians and their opinions about the clinical utility of interventional procedures. METHODS: A retrospective survey of expert clinician characteristics and their opinions was conducted. Information was collected on expert clinical adviser self-declared "operator," "researcher," and conflict of interest status. Associations were sought between expert clinical adviser characteristics and their opinions on whether procedures were "established," "efficacious," and "safe." The setting was the Interventional Procedures Programme of the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). A total of 598 expert clinician questionnaires relating to 182 different interventional procedures were analyzed. RESULTS: Expert clinical advisers with operative experience of procedures were significantly more likely to consider them as established (odds ratio [OR] 3.93; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 2.43 to 6.36; p < .001), efficacious (OR 1.76; 95 percent CI, 1.00 to 3.08; p = .049), and safe (OR 2.28; 95 percent CI, 1.43 to 3.65; p = .001). Once adjusted for other characteristics, there was no association between either researcher or conflict of interest status and opinions about the clinical utility of procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Expert clinical advisers are an important source of information for decision makers producing guidance about the use of procedures, especially when published evidence is sparse or of poor quality. This study suggests that those who are operators, but not those who are researchers or declare a conflict of interest, are more likely to have a favorable opinion of a procedure's clinical utility. Use of expert clinical advisers with a variety of experience and backgrounds seems a reasonable approach to obtaining authoritative opinions about interventional procedures, to supplement and help interpret evidence from published data.