Combining nilotinib and PD-L1 blockade reverses CD4+ T-cell dysfunction and prevents relapse in acute B-cell leukemia.

Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have experienced significantly improved outcomes due to the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific T-cell engagers, although a proportion of patients still relapse despite these advances. T-cell exhaustion has been recently suggested to be an important driver of relapse in these patients. Indeed, phenotypic exhaustion of CD4+ T cells is predictive of relapse and poor overall survival in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Thus, therapies that counter T-cell exhaustion, such as immune checkpoint blockade, may improve leukemia immunosurveillance and prevent relapse. Here, we used a murine model of Ph+ B-ALL as well as human bone marrow biopsy samples to assess the fundamental nature of CD4+ T-cell exhaustion and the preclinical therapeutic potential for combining anti-PD-L1 based checkpoint blockade with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. Single-cell RNA-sequence analysis revealed that B-ALL induces a unique subset of CD4+ T cells with both cytotoxic and helper functions. Combination treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib and anti-PD-L1 dramatically improves long-term survival of leukemic mice. Depletion of CD4+ T cells prior to therapy completely abrogates the survival benefit, implicating CD4+ T cells as key drivers of the protective anti-leukemia immune response. Indeed, treatment with anti-PD-L1 leads to clonal expansion of leukemia-specific CD4+ T cells with the aforementioned helper/cytotoxic phenotype as well as reduced expression of exhaustion markers. These findings support efforts to use PD1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade in clinical trials and highlight the importance of CD4+ T-cell dysfunction in limiting the endogenous anti-leukemia response.

Cytotoxic CD4 T cells in the mucosa and in cancer.

CD4 T cells were initially described as helper cells that promote either the cellular immune response (Th1 cells) or the humoral immune response (Th2 cells). Since then, a plethora of functionally distinct helper and regulatory CD4 T cell subsets have been described. CD4 T cells with cytotoxic function were first described in the setting of viral infections and autoimmunity, and more recently in cancer and gut dysbiosis. Regulatory CD4 T cell subsets such as Tregs and T-regulatory type 1 (Tr1) cells have also been shown to have cytotoxic potential. Indeed, Tr1 cells have been shown to be important for maintenance of stem cell niches in the bone marrow and the gut. This review will provide an overview of cytotoxic CD4 T cell development, and discuss the role of inflammatory and Tr1-like cytotoxic CD4 T cells in maintenance of intestinal stem cells and in anti-cancer immune responses.

Single-cell characterization of step-wise acquisition of carboplatin resistance in ovarian cancer.

The molecular underpinnings of acquired resistance to carboplatin are poorly understood and often inconsistent between in vitro modeling studies. After sequential treatment cycles, multiple isogenic clones reached similar levels of resistance, but significant transcriptional heterogeneity. Gene-expression based virtual synchronization of 26,772 single cells from 2 treatment steps and 4 resistant clones was used to evaluate the activity of Hallmark gene sets in proliferative (P) and quiescent (Q) phases. Two behaviors were associated with resistance: (1) broad repression in the P phase observed in all clones in early resistant steps and (2) prevalent induction in Q phase observed in the late treatment step of one clone. Furthermore, the induction of IFNα response in P phase or Wnt-signaling in Q phase were observed in distinct resistant clones. These observations suggest a model of resistance hysteresis, where functional alterations of the P and Q phase states affect the dynamics of the successive transitions between drug exposure and recovery, and prompts for a precise monitoring of single-cell states to develop more effective schedules for, or combination of, chemotherapy treatments.